Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 14927

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : November | Volume : 18 | Issue : 11 | Page : EC21 - EC25 Full Version

Histopathological Spectrum of Benign and Borderline Breast Lesions: A Cross-sectional Study from Vindhya Region, Madhya Pradesh, India


Published: November 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/73076.20349
Priyanka Agrawal, Suresh Kumar Sutrakar, Jagannath Jatav, Parul Singh Rajpoot, Shambhavi, Sadhana Yadav, Pushpkunjika Sharma

1. Professor, Department of Pathology, Shyam Shah Medical College, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, Shyam Shah Medical College, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Shyam Shah Medical College, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, India. 4. Junior Resident, Department of Pathology, Shyam Shah Medical College, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, India. 5. Junior Resident, Department of Pathology, Shyam Shah Medical College, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, India. 6. Junior Resident, Department of Pathology, Shyam Shah Medical College, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, India. 7. Junior Resident, Department of Pathology, Shyam Shah Medical College, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Parul Singh Rajpoot,
Junior Resident, Department of Pathology, Shyam Shah Medical College, Rewa-486001, Madhya Pradesh, India.
E-mail: parulsinghrajpoot1093@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Breast pathology encompasses a wide spectrum, ranging from benign conditions to invasive cancers, posing significant diagnostic challenges. Most breast lesions are usually divided into benign and malignant disorders, and their prognosis can often be reasonably predicted. However, certain tumours exhibit borderline characteristics and occupy a grey area between benign and malignant, making it difficult to forecast their course with any degree of accuracy.

Aim: To assess the histopathological spectrum of benign and borderline breast lesions.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study, conducted over a period of five years (January 2019 to December 2023) at Shyam Shah Medical College, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, India analysed 831 cases of breast lesions to determine their clinicopathological features, such as laterality of the breast and gross features. Grossing of the specimens was performed, and details were noted. Tissue pieces were processed, and sections were stained using conventional Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining.

Results: Out of 831 breast lesions, 640 (77.0%) cases were benign, 15 (1.8%) were borderline, and 176 (21.2%) were malignant. Fibroadenoma was the most frequent lesion in females with 419 cases (50.4%), with a mean age of 21.4 years. In males, gynaecomastia was the most common finding in 21 (2.5%), with a mean age of 17 years. The second most common lesion overall was fibrocystic disease 148 (17.8%), with a mean age of 33.5 years. Other benign lesions included inflammatory breast diseases 21 (2.5%), lactational adenoma 2 (0.24%), sclerosing adenosis 7 (0.84%), microglandular adenosis 8 (0.96%), tubular adenoma 7 (0.84%), benign phyllodes 4 (0.48%), and lipoma and hamartoma 3 (0.36% combined). Borderline lesions included atypical ductal hyperplasia 9 (1.08%), ductal carcinoma in-situ 3 (0.36%), and borderline phyllodes tumours 2 (0.12%).

Conclusion: In the study population, the range of benign breast diseases appears consistent with findings from other studies, with fibroadenoma emerging as the predominant benign lesion, followed by fibrocystic changes. While premalignant lesions were less prevalent in present study, a thorough evaluation of all cases of breast lesions is recommended to rule out the potential for breast cancer.

Keywords

Benign breast lesions, Fibroadenoma, Fibrocystic disease, Gynaecomastia

The breasts are paired glands of variable size and density that lie superficial to the pectoralis major muscle (1). A lump or mass in the breast is a source of worry or anxiety, particularly for female patients of all age groups, and it sometimes produces diagnostic difficulties for both clinicians and pathologists (2). In most nations, benign breast conditions account for 10 times more cases of breast problems in women than breast cancer (3). Benign breast diseases are often considered aberrations of normal development and involution (4). Benign pathology is depicted in almost 80% of breast biopsies (5). Up to 30% of women suffer from a benign breast disorder that requires treatment (6). A standard method for evaluating breast lumps is the triple assessment, which consists of clinical examination, radiographic imaging, and pathological assessment via core or excision biopsy (7). In diagnostic breast pathology, distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions is usually straightforward, with well-defined criteria for malignancy. However, some tumours exhibit ambiguous features that fall between benign and malignant, complicating diagnosis and treatment (8). Borderline breast lesions are a diverse set of non cancerous breast lesions that have a higher risk of developing cancer in the future and have the potential to be upstaged to malignancy during surgery (9).

Choosing the best course of action for a borderline lesion for which a definitive diagnosis of benign or malignant cannot be made can be difficult. The same lesion may be treated differently at different centres or even in the same centre when managed by different doctors. This uncertainty could lead to over-treatment or under-treatment. The risk associated with a particular lesion and awareness of the advantages of action should form the basis of management plans (8). The main objective of the study was to determine the overall prevalence of benign and borderline breast lesions in the Vindhya region, where, with limited resources, histopathology plays a crucial role in diagnosis. This way, early and appropriate management strategies can be implemented, subsequently improving patient outcomes.

Material and Methods

The present cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Pathology at Shyam Shah Medical College, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, India from January 2019 to December 2023, comprising a total of 831 cases of breast lesions. Ethical clearance was not required or was waived for this cross-sectional study since it involved pathological specimens. Additionally, no patient data were disclosed.

Inclusion criteria: All lumpectomy and wedge biopsy specimens of breast lesions sent from the Department of Surgery, submitted in properly labeled containers filled with 10% formalin, along with duly filled histopathology requisition forms containing details of the patient’s age, sex, and laterality of the lesion, only benign and borderline lesions (all those lesions that have a higher risk of developing into invasive lesions) were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with incomplete demographic information and specimens sent without 10% formalin in the container, or samples sent in containers filled with normal saline, were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

In each case, data was collected from the requisition forms, including age, sex, duration, laterality of the lesion, signs and symptoms, and significant clinical history. A detailed gross examination of the breast specimens was conducted. Sections of the specimens were taken, followed by processing and embedding in paraffin wax. The sections were cut to a thickness of 5 μm. H&E staining was performed on the sections. The histopathological typing of lesions was conducted, and HPE reports were recorded as benign, borderline, and malignant lesions.

Statistical Analysis

The data collected was entered into Microsoft® Excel® 2019 MSO (Version 2407 Build 16.0.17830.20056) 64-bit, and the descriptive data were expressed as numbers, percentages, and means.

Results

A total of 831 breast lesions were analysed, out of these, 640 (77.0%) cases were benign breast lesions, 15 (1.8%) were borderline lesions, and 176 (21.2%) cases were malignant lesions. There were 631 (96.3%) females and 24 (3.7%) males out of a total of 655 lesions, including benign and borderline breast lesions. The age of the patients ranged from 14 years to 57 years for the benign and borderline breast lesions, with the mean age for benign breast lesions being 27.3 years, while the mean age for borderline lesions was 44.5 years. Involvement of the left-side of the breast was more common, with a frequency of 334 (51%) cases, right breast involvement was seen in 293 (44.7%) cases, and 28 (4.3%) cases involved bilateral breast.

Fibroadenoma was the most common lesion among females, with 419 (50.4%) cases out of all the lesions, constituting 65.5% of all benign lesions (the total benign lesions were 640). Most of the lesions involved the unilateral breast, with a more common involvement of the left breast. The mean age for fibroadenoma was 21.4 years. The mass lesions ranged from 0.5 cm to 5.5 cm, with the cut surface showing slit-like spaces. The microscopy was characterised by varying degrees of overgrowth of both stromal and epithelial components (Table/Fig 1).

Among males, gynaecomastia was the most common breast lesion, constituting 21 (2.5%) cases of total lesions and 3.2% of all benign lesions. There was frequent involvement of the left breast, with the most common presentation occurring in the age group between 15 years to 25 years, and the mean age being 17 years. Grossly, the masses were well-circumscribed with firm consistency, and microscopy revealed the ducts exhibiting epithelial hyperplasia of varying degrees, encased by a significant proliferation of the surrounding stroma.

The second most common breast lesion was fibrocystic disease of the breast, with a total of 148 cases (17.8%) among all benign, borderline, and malignant lesions. The ages ranged from 27 to 50 years, with a mean age of 33.5 years. Grossly, the tumours were firm and fibrosed, with the cut surface showing cysts measuring from 0.2 to 1.5 cm. Microscopy revealed cystic dilatation of the glands, with the presence or absence of eosinophilic secretions inside the dilated glands and the surrounding fibrosed stroma (Table/Fig 2).

Among other benign breast lesions, there were 21 cases (2.5%) of inflammatory breast diseases, which included 10 cases of chronic mastitis, five cases of granulomatous mastitis, three cases of breast abscess, two cases of necrotising mastitis, and one case of acute suppurative mastitis. There were eight cases of microglandular adenosis, seven cases of each tubular adenoma (Table/Fig 3) and sclerosing adenosis (Table/Fig 4), four cases of benign phyllodes tumour (Table/Fig 5), and two cases of lactational adenoma. Additionally, there were two cases (0.3%) of lipoma and one case (0.15%) of hamartoma. The detailed distribution of all the benign lesions is presented in (Table/Fig 6).

Under the borderline category, there were a total of 15 cases, constituting nine cases (1.08%) of atypical ductal hyperplasia, three cases (0.36%) of Ductal Carcinoma In-situ (DCIS) (Table/Fig 7), two cases (0.24%) of borderline phyllodes, and one case (0.12%) with the possibility of infiltrating ductal carcinoma in a wedge biopsy from breast tissue. All the borderline lesions were exclusively identified in females (Table/Fig 8).

Discussion

Breast lesions are the primary reason patients with breast concerns seek surgical consultation. The present study was conducted to assess the histopathological studies of breast lesions. In present study, which covered a duration of five years, benign lesions (77.0%) were more common than borderline and malignant breast lesions. This finding was comparable to the studies by Mrudula A et al., in which benign lesions constituted 78.5% (10).

In the current study, involvement of the left-side of the breast was more commonly observed, with a frequency of 334 (51%) cases compared to the right-side (44.7%) and bilateral involvement (4.3%). This conclusion was consistent with the previous study conducted by Kumbhakar D and Talukdar P which showed a higher incidence of left breast involvement at 50.76% of cases, right breast involvement at 44.31%, and bilateral involvement at 4.93% (11). Present study found that females in the reproductive age group (14-39 years) were more commonly affected than older females, which was supported by the previous study done by Pudale S and Tonape SD (12). Abhijit Maji A reported that the mean age at diagnosis for benign breast lesions was 28.6 years, similar to the findings of the current study, which reported a mean age of 27.3 years (13).

Fibroadenoma was the most common finding in present study, constituting 65.4% of all benign cases. Most of the cases were observed in the age group of 21-30 years, followed by 11-20 years. This was consistent with the findings of Padmom L et al., (14) Fibrocystic disease was the second most common lesion, responsible for 23.1% of all benign lesions in the current study, mostly occurring in the fourth decade. This was supported by the studies conducted by Kapoor B et al., and Anushree CN et al., which accounted for 22.85% and 20% of cases respectively (5),(15).

Lesions of the male breast were observed in 24 cases. Among males, the most common finding was gynaecomastia (3.2%) among benign breast lesions, which was similar to the findings of Pudale S and Tonape SD, as well as Parajuli S et al., regarding all benign breast lesions (12),(16). The incidence was most common in the second decade of life, followed by the third decade.

Padmom L et al., found that the incidence of inflammatory breast diseases was 2.9% among all lesions, which aligns with present study finding of 2.5% for inflammatory lesions among all breast lesions (benign, borderline, and malignant) (14). However, Pai SG reported this incidence to be 9.8%, (17). Other benign breast lesions have also been analysed and compared with findings from other studies, as shown in (Table/Fig 9) (5),(12),(14),(16),(17),(18),(19).

There were a total of nine cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia, which constituted an incidence of 1.08% among all the breast lesions (benign, borderline, and malignant) studied. This was consistent with the findings of Maji A et al., who reported the incidence to be 1.81% (13).

Nikumbh DB et al., in his seven-year study, found the incidence of borderline phyllodes tumours to be 0.21%, which corresponds with present study finding of 0.24% for borderline phyllodes (20). Diagnosing DCIS poses a formidable challenge in clinical practice. The incidence of DCIS, according to Dayanand V et al., and Bhavani C et al., was reported to be 0.46% and 0.64%, respectively, which was consistent with present study finding of 0.36% (21),(22). Nonetheless, Kumbhakar D et al., reported the incidence to be 2.37% (11). Among benign and borderline breast lesions, fibroadenoma is one of the leading causes of palpable breast lesions, followed by fibrocystic disease. Therefore, the authors aim to raise awareness about benign and borderline breast lesions among clinicians.

Limitation(s)

This was a hospital-based, single-centre study; therefore, the data may not be applicable to a larger population. Additionally, long-term follow-up of the patients was not conducted, which impedes the evaluation of the course and outcome of the disease.

Conclusion

Benign breast diseases comprise a diverse range of disorders and constitute a significant source of breast-related issues among females, surpassing malignant and premalignant lesions. These conditions are fairly common in younger females of reproductive age, and it is crucial to differentiate these benign lesions from malignant and borderline conditions through histopathological examination. Borderline lesions were less prevalent in the current study, with the majority of cases being Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia (ADH). A thorough evaluation and a systematic approach to all cases of breast lesions are recommended to rule out the potential for breast cancer. Early diagnosis, treatment, and adequate follow-up are essential for achieving the most favourable outcome for the patient.

References

1.
Alex A, Bhandary E, McGuire KP. Anatomy and physiology of the breast during pregnancy and lactation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1252:03-07. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Daly C, Puckett Y. (2022, October 6). New breast mass. In StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560757/.
3.
Alamri AM, Alsareii SA, Al-Wadei H, Al-Qahtani AM, Sultan SaA, Alshamrani SA, et al. Epidemiological pattern of breast diseases among females in the south-western region, Saudi Arabia. Int J Clin Med. 2020;11(05):257-69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4236/ijcm.2020.115027. [crossref]
4.
Chakrabarti N, Singh S. A clinicopathological study of benign breast diseases in females. Medical Journal of Dr D Y Patil Vidyapeeth. 2022;15(3):346. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_171_20. [crossref]
5.
Kapoor B, Kapoor M, Vaid P, Kapoor B, Kapoor S. Epidemiology of benign breast diseases in women. Panacea Journal of Medical Sciences. 2020;10(3):222-26. Doi: 10.18231/j.pjms.2020.047. [crossref]
6.
Kanumuri S, Chalamalasetty JD, Reddy AS, Punyapu S, Damam R, Sri NVSL. A study of benign breast disease management based on clinical, radiological and pathological assessment. Science Rise: Medical Science. 2022;2(47):11-16. Doi: 10.15587/2519-4798.2022.254037. [crossref]
7.
Karim MO, Khan KA, Khan AJ, Javed A, Fazid S, Aslam MI. Triple assessment of breast lump: Should we perform core biopsy for every patient? Cureus. 2020;12(3):e7479. Doi: 10.7759/cureus.7479. PMID: 32351857; PMCID: PMC7188022. [crossref]
8.
Rakha EA, Badve S, Eusebi V, Reis-Filho JS, Fox SB, Dabbs DJ, et al. Breast lesions of uncertain malignant nature and limited metastatic potential: Proposals to improve their recognition and clinical management. Histopathology. 2016;68(1):45-56. Doi: 10.1111/his.12861. PMID: 26348644; PMCID: PMC4987288. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Lamb LR, Bahl M. Evidence-based pragmatic approach to the management of borderline or high-risk breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022;218(1):186-87. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.21.26340. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Mrudula A, Ali MI, Samalla S, Chary RN. Spectrum of histopathological patterns of breast lesions in a tertiary care hospital. Asian J Med Sci. 2023;14(2):151-56. Doi: 10.3126/ajms.v14i2.48750. [crossref]
11.
Kumbhakar D, Talukdar P. Histopathological patterns of breast lesions-A Hospital-Based study. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare. 2021;8(10):567-74. Doi: 10.18410/jebmh/2021/111. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Pudale S, Tonape SD. A histopathological study of nonmalignant breast lesions. Int J Res Med Sci. 2015;3(10):2672-76. [crossref]
13.
Maji A, Anantharaman D, Bhoopal S, Ramanujam R. Benign breast diseases: Experience at a teaching hospital in rural India. Int J Res Med Sci. 2013;1(2):73. Doi: 10.5455/2320-6012.ijrms20130507. [crossref]
14.
Padmom L, Sapru K, Beena D. Histopathological spectrum of breast lesions-a study done in a tertiary care hospital. J Evolution of Medical and Dental Sci. 2020;9(17):1412-15. Doi: 10.14260/jemds/2020/308. [crossref]
15.
Anushree CN, Priyadarshini MR, Manjunatha YA. Histopathological spectrum of neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions of breast in a tertiary care centre in Bangalore. Indian J Pathol Oncol. 2019;6(2):203-06. [crossref]
16.
Parajuli S, Koirala U, Khatri R, Acharya L, Suwal A. Histomorphological spetrum of breast lesions. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2011;9(1):48-51. PMID: 22929713.
17.
Pai SG. The spectrum of benign breast diseases among females: A 6-year histopathological study. Indian J Pathol Oncol. 2019;6(4):561-67. Doi: 10.18231/j.ijpo.2019.110. [crossref]
18.
Hemrajani D, Minda N, Harsh A, Jain A, Solanki R, Mathur K. Histomorphological spectrum of benign breast diseases in a tertiary care centre. Saudi J Pathol Microbiol. 2018;3(1):22-29.
19.
Patil V, Khandelwal A, Ghorpade KG. Histopathological spectrum of benign breast lesions. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2017;5(4):09-14. Doi: 10.24896/jrmds.2017543.
20.
Nikumbh DB, Kanthikar SN, Suryawanshi KH, Jagtap SV, Dravid NV, Gondane SR. Histopathological spectrum of unusual breast lesions: A seven year retrospective review. Indian J Pathol Oncol. 2016;3(3):456. Doi: 10.5958/2394- 6792.2016.00086. [crossref]
21.
Dayanand V, Shashidhar HB, Sandhya M, Ashwini NS, Bharathi M. Spectrum of breast neoplasms in females: A 10 years histopathological review in a tertiary care hospital. Int J Sci Stud. 2015;3(2):79-84.
22.
Bhavani C, Neeraja M, Sravani P. A study of histopathological spectrum of breast lesions in a tertiary care hospital. Int J Clin Diag Pathol. 2019;2(2):356-60. Doi: 10.33545/pathol.2019.v2.i2f.128.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/73076.20349

Date of Submission: May 31, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Aug 08, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Oct 01, 2024
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? No
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 04, 2024
• Manual Googling: Aug 12, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Sep 28, 2024 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com