Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 29407

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : November | Volume : 18 | Issue : 11 | Page : EC26 - EC31 Full Version

Heterogeneity in Clinical Manifestation of Tuberculosis and Comparison between Different Diagnostic Modalities: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: November 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/71153.20351
Upasana Das, Kalyani Prava Gauda, Indrani Mohanty, Atanu Kumar Bal, Sasmita Hotta

1. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, JK MCH, Jajpur, Odisha, India. 2. Professor, Department of Pathology, SCB MCH, Cuttack, Odisha, India. 3. Professor, Department of Microbiology, PRM MCH, Baripada, Odisha, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, PRM MCH, Baripada, Odisha, India. 5. Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, PRM MCH, Baripada, Odisha, India.

Correspondence Address :
Upasana Das,
310, Metro Manorama Complex, Kathagola Street, Mangalabag, Cuttack-753001, Odisha, India.
E-mail: drupasana80@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Infection with tuberculosis is a worldwide health concern. Nearly every organ in the body can be affected by Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis (EPTB). A simple diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis (PTB) can be made using radiography and a positive sputum test. On the other hand, diagnosing EPTB is difficult due to the peculiar presentation of the lesions, which are paucibacillary and exhibit varied sensitivity and specificity in different diagnostic tests across different infected tissues.

Aim: To analyse the varied clinical presentations of tuberculosis infection and to assess several diagnostic techniques for detecting pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis in reference to the Composite Reference Standard (CRS).

Materials and Methods: The present cross-sectional study was carried out in the Department of Pathology and Microbiology, PRM Medical College and Hospital (in the tuberculosis endemic zone of Baripada), North Odisha, India, between April 2018 and November 2022. Clinical presentations included lumps, ulcers, inflammation and lesions resembling neoplasia. All age groups of patients suffering from pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis were included. A total of 400 tuberculosis cases were detected. Fine needle aspiration was performed on the lesions after considering the patient’s age, gender, lesion location and relevant radiological studies. Biopsy samples were handled in a similar manner. To detect mycobacterial nucleic acid, all 400 cytology cases and biopsy samples were processed using the Cartridge-based Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (CBNAAT) and stained with Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) stain for Acid-fast Bacilli (AFB) identification. A CRS was defined as the presence of bacilli in CBNAAT and/or AFB along with morphologic evidence such as caseating granulomas. To assess sensitivity and diagnostic effectiveness, CRS was used in conjunction with procedures from cytology, histopathology, AFB detection and CBNAAT. The p-value for McNemar’s test was less than 0.05, indicating statistical significance across all analyses.

Results: The analysis revealed a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.02, with more females than males over the age of 20 years affected. Pulmonary tuberculosis cases were 39 (9.75%), while extrapulmonary TB cases were 361 (90.25%). The largest percentage of extrapulmonary tuberculosis cases (n=134, 33.5%) involved lymph nodes, with skeletal involvement following closely behind (n=64, 16%). Mycobacterium tuberculosis adversely affected nearly every organ in the body. The most prevalent pattern in histology was necrotising granulomatous inflammation, observed in 85 (69.6%) patients. Similarly, a type II pattern (epithelioid granuloma with caseous necrosis) was seen in 166 (59.7%) cytosmear cases. The sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of four tests were assessed using the CRS; favourable results were obtained for FNAC (72.2%), histological examination (100%), ZN staining (20.5%), and CBNAAT (85.6%). With a diagnostic accuracy of 92.8%, CBNAAT outperformed FNAC and histology, which both achieved 86% accuracy.

Conclusion: The prevalence of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis is extremely high among the people of North Odisha. The present study suggests a combined approach of understanding clinical presentation, conducting pathological investigations, and detecting bacilli to recognise atypical presentations of EPTB at an early stage, given the restricted resources and facilities in peripheral hospitals.

Keywords

Biopsy, Catridge-based nucleic acid amplification test, Extrapulmonary tuberculosis, Granuloma

Tuberculosis, triggered by the bacterium Mycobacterium tuberculosis, is a widely recognised infectious disease that can affect any part of the body (1). The World Health Organisation (WHO) consistently describes it as a major global health problem. Because it is a highly contagious disease, one person with an active TB infection can spread the infection to 5-15 people in close contact each year. According to the WHO, tuberculosis is the 13th leading cause of death worldwide (2). In 2021, an international survey of recent tuberculosis cases found that India was the largest contributor among ten countries. The lungs are the primary organs affected by tuberculosis, which is commonly presented as a pulmonary complaint. Numerous diagnostic procedures with high sensitivity and specificity are available to detect pulmonary tuberculosis. An organ other than the lungs affected by tuberculosis is referred to as EPTB. During the primary infection, Mycobacterium invades other organs besides the lungs, but remains dormant in an immunocompetent individual. As the host immune response decreases, reactivation of the latent infection occurs (3).

The spectrum of clinical presentation of EPTB is similar to that of other diseases, which delays diagnosis and increases morbidity. The etiology may be due to reactivation of a latent TB infection or reinfection in an endemic location (4). EPTB can manifest clinically as fever, Pyrexia of Unknown Origin (PUO), infertility, dysmenorrhea, bacterial infections, anemia, or even as a neoplasm by infecting almost all organs of the body (5). What we diagnose as EPTB is just the tip of the iceberg. Clinicians take great care to correctly diagnose EPTB because the disease has a non specific appearance and is paucibacillary in nature, presenting diagnostic challenges when collecting clinical samples from deeply infected organs (6).

Furthermore, EPTB cases are resistant to therapy because the appropriate drug concentration is not achieved in the affected area. In contrast, cases of pulmonary tuberculosis are easily recognised based on radiological changes in the lungs and the detection of AFB in sputum.

The cytological and histological procedures routinely performed show granulomas but cannot distinguish them from other causes such as fungal infections, sarcoidosis, foreign bodies, and immune granulomas. In order to diagnose a mycobacterial infection, isolation of the bacteria is essential (7). However, the isolation of tuberculosis bacteria depends on many factors, including the stage of the disease, the type of organ affected, and the immune status of the host (8). Nowadays, EPTB, which affects rare sites, can be diagnosed through advanced laboratory diagnostics that are not available in all peripheral regions of a developing country like India (9).

The AFB detection method is the simplest and fastest laboratory method recommended by the WHO and is routinely used to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis. However, the effectiveness of this method is drastically reduced in cases of EPTB because the samples are paucibacillary in nature. Although mycobacterial culture is considered the gold standard, it has some limitations, as it is time-consuming and difficult to establish a culture in peripheral laboratories. Additionally, the isolation of bacteria varies in all EPTB samples (10).

The Gene Xpert Mycobacterium Tuberculosis (MTB)/Rifampicin (RIF) automated molecular assay Ultra (Cepheid), also known as CBNAAT, is a rapid diagnostic method recommended by the WHO to identify the Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid (DNA) of mycobacteria and also rifampicin-resistant variants in all types of Pulmonary Tuberculosis (PTB) and EPTB samples. It has high sensitivity with minimal laboratory risk in handling the samples (11),(12). The limitation of this test is that it requires frequent calibration and is expensive. Given the diagnostic limitations of each test for diagnosing EPTB, a combined approach utilising all tests can be performed in a resource-limited laboratory. A CRS can be used to diagnose extrapulmonary tuberculosis according to the literature, where bacterial isolation by AFB or CBNAAT, along with necrotising granuloma, is considered CRS positive (13).

Since the prevalence and incidence of PTB and EPTB cases are high in Mayurbhanj district, Odisha, India, at 268 cases per lakh per year (14),(15), the aim of the present study was to highlight unexpected atypical presentations of tuberculosis and compare different diagnostic methods. The primary objective of the study was to observe the diversity in the clinical presentation of TB, while the secondary objective was to assess the efficacy of different diagnostic methods in comparison to CRS as the gold standard.

Material and Methods

The present study is a cross-sectional observational study conducted in the Department of Pathology and Microbiology, PRM Medical College and Hospital (in the tuberculosis endemic zone of Baripada), North Odisha, India, from April 2018 to November 2022. The study was carried out after obtaining approval from the Research Ethics Committee (Ref No.-10/Dt 29/05/2019). This medical college, located in the northern part of Odisha, serves as a referral centre for many primary healthcare facilities. Patients with EPTB presented to Outpatient Departments such as Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonary Medicine, Dermatology, and Obstetrics and Gynaecology with complaints of fever, glandular swellings of the head and neck, altered bladder and bowel habits, disturbed menstrual cycles and infertility.

Inclusion criteria: All patients of all age groups suspected of having a tubercular infection, both pulmonary and extrapulmonary, were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients currently undergoing anti-tubercular treatment, those with malignancies, other infections, non co-operative patients, and those with serious co-morbidities were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. A total of 400 cases of both PTB and EPTB were collected for pathological diagnosis and microbiological confirmation. Demographic data, clinical history, PPD skin tests, and relevant laboratory and radiological results were collected from medical records. Clinicians referred suspected cases of tubercular infection for Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) and excised specimens for histopathological examination. Initially, 278 cases of FNAC and 122 cases of biopsy were diagnosed as tubercular infections. For microbiological confirmation, all 400 cases were processed for AFB staining and CBNAAT determination.

Cytology: Patients presenting with various swellings and non healing ulcers with scars were examined in the cytology laboratory. After proper aseptic procedures, the swellings were aspirated using a 22 gauge needle with an aspirator. The aspirated material was divided into three parts. One part was sent in a sterile cartridge container for molecular detection of mycobacteria to an intermediate reference laboratory, following the manufacturer’s instructions. The second part was expelled onto a slide, and a smear of adequate thickness was prepared using a spreader slide. The smears were fixed with methanol. The air-dried and wet-fixed smears were stained with Giemsa and Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stains, respectively. Cytomorphological classification of the smears was performed based on the presence of granuloma and caseous necrosis. Type I had granuloma without necrosis, type II had caseous necrosis with epithelioid granuloma and type III exhibited extensive caseous necrosis without definite granuloma. AFB staining was performed on the third part of the material on an air-dried smear (16).

Histology: The surgically resected biopsy specimens were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for paraffin embedding. The paraffin blocks were placed on an ice-cold plate. Initially, all the blocks were trimmed. Sections of 4 μ in thickness were collected for routine H&E staining and ZN staining. Additionally, CT-guided core biopsy samples of suspected nodular and cavitary lung lesions, as well as miliary lesions in other organs, were also processed.

CBNAAT: Cytological aspirates were sent to the laboratory in a sterile cartridge for nucleic acid amplification. In the paraffin blocks, deparaffinisation was performed using xylene, followed by rinsing in ethanol and buffered saline. The tissue was homogenised by adding proteinase K, and DNA extraction was carried out. According to the manufacturer’s instructions for the Cepheid GeneXpert® MTB/RIF system, GeneXpert reagent was added to the tissue homogenate and allowed to settle for 15 minutes in a cartridge. The cartridge was then placed in the designated chamber of the Cepheid machine, and the barcode was scanned. After automatic filtration and washing, the microorganisms present in the sample were lysed, releasing the DNA. PCR reagent was added to the extracted DNA of the tuberculosis bacteria. Amplification of the TB nucleic acid was performed using hemi-nested PCR, and target sequencing of the TB genome was obtained as a result (17).

AFB stain: Cytological samples and received sputum materials were stained with an acid-fast stain. The ZN-stained slides were examined under oil immersion at 1000x magnification. Biopsies with necrotising granulomas were stained with conventional ZN stain. After adjusting to the water level, slides were stained with hot carbol fuchsin for 45 seconds. Following this, the slides were washed in running tap water, and 25% sulfuric acid was applied to the slides and allowed to stand for 2-4 minutes. The slides were then gently rinsed with tap water, and 0.1% methylene blue was applied for 30 seconds for counterstaining (8).

Composite Reference Standard (CRS): Since the culture facility was unavailable at the present study Institute, CRS was considered positive (gold standard) when bacterial isolation was confirmed either by AFB stain or by CBNAAT, along with the observation of caseating granuloma in the pathological examination (18). The authors have classified all the cases into two categories: CRSa and CRSb for analysing, FNAC and biopsy cases separately. CRSa included TB-positive cases identified by AFB stain and/or CBNAAT, accompanied by necrotising granuloma in FNAC, whereas CRSb comprised TB-positive cases identified by AFB stain and/or CBNAAT, with histomorphology demonstrating well-formed granuloma with caseous necrosis (16). All tests were compared with the reference standard to measure their diagnostic accuracy.

Statistical Analysis

The data analysis was conducted using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 23.0. To assess the diagnostic utility of different tests, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value, along with their 95% confidence intervals, were calculated using GraphPad Prism 5.0 software. For comparison, McNemar’s test was performed, and a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 400 cases of EPTB and, combined PTB and EPTB were studied during the specified period, involving all age groups (1-74 years). The analysis revealed a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.02, indicating that more females than males over the age of 20 years were affected. Pulmonary tuberculosis cases numbered 39 (9.75%), while extrapulmonary TB cases totaled 361 (90.25%). Both cytological aspirations (n=278) and biopsy specimens (n=122) were received. In the 0-20 years age group, males were more affected, whereas above the age of 20 years, a female preponderance was observed, with female patients (n=202) outnumbering male patients (n=198) (Table/Fig 1).

Clinically, the initial impression was EPTB in 172 (47.64%) cases. The remaining cases were misdiagnosed as other bacterial infections, 78 (21.6%), chronic inflammatory lesions, 93 (25.76%), and neoplastic lesions, 18 (4.98%) (Table/Fig 2). The initial clinical diagnosis included inflammatory lesions in organs such as joints, breast, eyelid and axillary lymph nodes. Diagnosis of tuberculosis was confirmed through FNAC and biopsy, followed by a CBNAAT test.

The most affected sites were lymph nodes, 134 (33.5%), followed by bones, 64 (16%). The cervical group of lymph nodes was the most commonly affected, 73 (18.25%), followed by the axillary group, 48 (12%) (Table/Fig 3). In (Table/Fig 4), a female presented with a discharging sinus involving the upper cervical group of lymph nodes (Table/Fig 4)a. Cytosmears demonstrated granuloma (Table/Fig 4)b and the AFB stain revealed rod-shaped, curved bacilli (Table/Fig 4)c.

Pulmonary involvement was 39 (9.75%) cases. Among bone lesions, EPTB involving the knee joint was the most common, 27 (6.75%), followed by the hip joint, 11 (2.75%). In terms of EPTB infection in reproductive organs, the order of prevalence was as follows: testis (n=11, 2.75%), endometrium, ovary and fallopian tube {each, 9 (2.25%)}, and cervix (1.75%). A clinically diagnosed tubo-ovarian mass was received, where the uterus, cervix and bilateral appendages were identified. The right ovary was cystically dilated, and its contents resembled dirty, caseous material (Table/Fig 5)a. The microscopic photograph in (Table/Fig 5)b demonstrated granuloma with classical Langhans-type giant cells.

Tuberculosis affecting the testis in a 40-year-old male presented with scrotal swelling. An orchidectomy specimen was received, and the cut section showed multiple whitish necrotic areas (Table/Fig 6)a. Caseous necrosis with granuloma was evident upon histopathological examination (Table/Fig 6)b.

Small intestinal tuberculosis presented as obstruction and ulcers in (3.25%) cases, followed by omental tuberculosis in 13 cases. (Table/Fig 7)a demonstrates a part of the small intestine measuring 32 cm × 2.5 cm. There was a constricted section 4 cm away from one end, and the cut section revealed a whitish nodule measuring 1×1 cm (Table/Fig 7)b. The attached omentum measured 5×4 cm. Omental fatty tissue showed granulomatous foci containing multinucleated giant cells and clusters of epithelioid cells (Table/Fig 8).

Tubercular infection involving the chest wall with sinus formation was diagnosed in a one-year-old male child. In (Table/Fig 9)a, a 50-year-old female exhibited swelling and an ulcer on the lateral aspect of the right elbow joint for four months. Clinically, TB osteomyelitis was suspected. A minute tissue sample was received, and microscopy demonstrated dead bone (Table/Fig 9)b, necrosis, along with tubercular granuloma (Table/Fig 9)c. The CBNAAT of the tissue confirmed the disease as tubercular in origin. Periorbital structures were also affected by EPTB, accounting for 0.5% of cases. Miliary tuberculosis was observed in three cases.

A total of 278 cytology samples were diagnosed as tubercular granuloma, out of which the maximum number of cases (59.7%) showed a type II pattern with caseating necrosis and granuloma. Type III, characterised by extensive necrosis, was seen in 27.3% of cases (Table/Fig 10). Out of 122 biopsy cases, typical necrotising granuloma was identified in 69.6% of cases, while only granuloma was observed in 19.6% of cases. Suppurative infection was also noted in 4.09% of cases. In all cytology and biopsy samples, the CBNAAT test returned positive in 63.75% of cases, and AFB stains were positive in 15.25%.

Out of a total of 400 samples, CRS was positive in 298 cases. In the 278 positive cytology cases, CRSa positivity was seen in 230 cases. Similarly, in biopsy samples, 68 cases were CRSb positive (Table/Fig 11).

The CBNAAT test demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy (92.8%) among all four tests, whereas the highest sensitivity was observed in the histopathological method, followed by CBNAAT (85.6%). The FNAC method showed a sensitivity of 72.2%, while the AFB staining method yielded disappointing results (20.5%) (Table/Fig 12).

Discussion

Though the pathology, pathogenesis, natural history and course of the disease are well established, it remains a major global health issue. Clinically, 47.64% of cases suspected of TB infection were correctly diagnosed. General symptoms like fever, malaise and weight loss were initially misdiagnosed as chronic inflammatory conditions or bacterial infections. Gastrointestinal tuberculosis presented as adhesions, obstructions and weight loss. Yoon HJ et al., reported TB infection in their study as the initial clinical impression in 67.8% of cases (6). In the present study, the clinical presentation of EPTB affected the lymph nodes in the maximum number of cases (33.5%), followed by the osteoarticular system (16%), gastrointestinal tract, soft tissue, reproductive organs, breast and CNS. Similar to the current study, Sunnetcioglu A et al., reported lymph nodes (39.4%) as the most common EPTB site, followed by the pleura, peritoneum and bone (7.4%) (19). In another study by Njau AN et al., lymph node involvement was 38%, followed by the female genital system (19%) and abdominal tissue (13.9%) (20). Guler SA et al., also highlighted the lymph node as the most common site of EPTB (12%), followed by the pleura (10.8%) (3).

Earlier studies on EPTB have shown an increased predilection for women in the age group of 20 years and above (3),(19),(20). Male preponderance was observed below 20 years. In contrast, pulmonary TB cases were observed more frequently in males, which may be explained by smoking habits. Females were mostly affected by EPTB, possibly due to low living standards, unawareness of the initial symptoms, and inaccessibility to healthcare facilities in this northern Odisha population.

Necrotising granuloma observed in Type II (59.7%) cytomorphological patterns and histological examinations of necrotising granuloma (69.6%) were considered as confirmed TB. Secondary infections of these granulomas containing neutrophils were observed in 4% of cases. A low immune host response usually results in suppurative inflammation (21). Similar observations were reported by Ahmed HGE et al., with 68% of necrotising granulomas (22). Almobarak AO et al., documented that 88.3% of smears demonstrated caseating granulomas along with suppurative inflammation (23).

The diagnostic utility of four tests- FNAC, biopsy, CBNAAT and AFB stain was analysed in comparison to the gold standard, CRS. Although the culture test is always considered the gold standard for diagnosing TB infection, its sensitivity is low in the case of EPTB specimens. This can be explained by the absence of viable bacilli (24),(25). The invention of newer molecular detection techniques, such as GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra, allows for the detection of DNA from dead bacteria and from paucibacillary tissue, with high sensitivity even in culture-negative samples. The AFB detection method had the lowest diagnostic accuracy (20.5%). A similar observation was documented by Polepole P et al., who reported a sensitivity of 94% (17).

The CBNAAT method detects only the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, while AFB stains highlight TB bacilli, as well as, non TB bacilli, which can create a false positive impression in TB-endemic regions. Additionally, the ZN stain exhibited the lowest sensitivity in tissue biopsies in other studies, as well (26). The sensitivity of the Xpert MTB/RIF CBNAAT method was found to be lower (85.6%) compared to histologically confirmed cases. The presence of caseating granuloma in histopathology may be observed even after the degeneration of bacilli, as cellular changes have already occurred. However, CBNAAT detects these cases as negative, as it only identifies viable DNA material of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Polepole P et al., found the sensitivity of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay to be 30% and the PCR assay to be 42%. The yield of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in fresh biopsy specimens is higher than that in paraffin-embedded tissues (17).

The efficiency of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay in EPTB was highest in lymph node samples, while moderate positivity was observed in tubercular meningitis (27). A study by Uddin MKM et al., concluded that the Xpert MTB/RIF assay had a diagnostic accuracy of 83.7% when compared to CRS (28). Similar results for the Xpert MTB method were reported, ranging from 87.3-95% in other studies (27),(28),(29). The sensitivity of Xpert/MTB varies according to the type of specimen. Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) release assays and Adenosine Deaminase (ADA) assays are some useful additional tests in CBNAAT-negative samples (16).

Limitation(s)

The present study was conducted based on laboratory detection methods, which may not truly reflect the prevalence of the disease and the disease status in the population. The immune status of all the patients was not available in the records. Additionally, the extraction of DNA material from formalin-fixed old tissues was variable, as it depends on the time of fixation of the sample and the strength of formalin used. Histopathology alone cannot differentiate between tubercular and non tubercular granulomas; confirmation by an additional method of bacilli isolation is necessary.

Conclusion

Considering tuberculosis as a major public health problem, the diagnosis is of utmost importance. Since no single test is perfect for accurately diagnosing EPTB, a combination of tests is necessary to increase sensitivity and specificity. Clinical insight, along with a couple of diagnostic methods, will definitely raise the number of EPTB cases identified in endemic regions with resource-limited laboratories.

References

1.
Fitzgerald DW, Sterling TR, Haas DW. Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In: Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. Elsevier; 2015. p. 2787-2818.e5. [crossref]
2.
Bagcchi S. WHO’s global tuberculosis report 2022. The Lancet Microbe [Internet]. 2023;4(1):e20. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Guler SA, Bozkus F, Inci MF, Kokoglu OF, Ucmak H, Ozden S, et al. Evaluation of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis in immunocompetent adults: A retrospective case series analysis. Med Princ Pract [Internet]. 2015;24(1):75-79. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Mohammed H, Assefa N, Mengistie B. Prevalence of extrapulmonary tuberculosis among people living with HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa: A systemic review and meta-analysis. HIV AIDS (Auckl) [Internet]. 2018;10:225-37. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Metaferia Y, Seid A, Fenta GM, Gebretsadik D. Assessment of extrapulmonary tuberculosis using Gene Xpert MTB/RIF assay and fluorescent microscopy and its risk factors at Dessie Referral Hospital, northeast Ethiopia. Biomed Res Int [Internet]. 2018;2018:8207098. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Yoon HJ, Song YG, Park WI, Choi JP, Chang KH, Kim JM. Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Yonsei Med J [Internet]. 2004;45(3):453-61. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Purohit MR, Sviland L, Wiker H, Mustafa T. Rapid and specific diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis by immunostaining of tissues and aspirates with anti-MPT64. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol [Internet]. 2017;25(4):282-88. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Bayot ML, Mirza TM, Sharma S. Acid Fast Bacteria. [Updated 2023 Aug 7]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024.
9.
Kim YJ, Kang JY, Kim SI, Chang MS, Kim YR, Park YJ. Predictors for false-negative QuantiFERON-TB Gold assay results in patients with extrapulmonary tuberculosis. BMC Infect Dis [Internet]. 2018;18(1):457. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Zürcher K, Ballif M, Kiertiburanakul S, Chenal H, Yotebieng M, Grinsztejn B, et al. Diagnosis and clinical outcomes of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in antiretroviral therapy programmes in low- and middle-income countries: A multicohort study. J Int AIDS Soc [Internet]. 2019;22(9):e25392. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Nur TE, Akther S, Kamal M, Shomik MS, Mondal D, Raza AKMM. Diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis using fine needle aspiration cytology: A comparison between cytomorphology and GeneXpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistant to rifampicin (MTB/RIF) test. Clin Infect Immun [Internet]. 2019;4(1):06-11. [crossref]
12.
Chakravorty S, Simmons AM, Rowneki M, Parmar H, Cao Y, Ryan J, et al. The new Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra: Improving detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and resistance to rifampin in an assay suitable for point-of-care testing. MBio [Internet]. 2017;8(4):e00812-17. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Uddin MKM, Ather MF, Akter S, Nasrin R, Rahman T, Kabir SN, et al. Diagnostic yield of Xpert MTB/RIF assay using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis among the sputum-scarce suspected pulmonary TB patients. Diagnostics (Basel) [Internet]. 2022;12(7):1676. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
TB India Report 2018. RNTCP. Annual Report Status. Central TB Division, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health with Family Welfare, Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi. pdf: 1-176. https://www.tbcindia.gov.in. TB India 2018.
15.
National Health Profile, 2018. Central Bureau of Health Intelligence. Directorate General Health Services. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. WHO Collaborating Centre on Family of International Classifications (ICD- 10, ICF & ICHI) 13th Issue. pdf. 1-336.
16.
Gouda K, Das U, Dhangadamajhi G. Utility of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) in the diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis compared to GeneXpert in a tertiary health care center in Northern Odisha, India. Indian J Tuberc [Internet]. 2021;68(4):437-44. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Polepole P, Kabwe M, Kasonde M, Tembo J, Shibemba A, O’Grady J, et al. Performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay in the diagnosis of tuberculosis in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Int J Mycobacteriol [Internet]. 2017;6(1):87. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Nasrin R, Uddin MKM, Kabir SN, Rahman T, Biswas S, Hossain A, et al. Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for the rapid diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in a clinical setting of high tuberculosis prevalence country and interpretation of “trace” results. Tuberculosis [Internet]. 2024;145:102478. [Cited 2024 Feb 22]. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Sunnetcioglu A, Sunnetcioglu M, Binici I, Baran AI, Karahocagil MK, Saydan MR. Comparative analysis of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis of 411 cases. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob [Internet]. 2015;14(1):34. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Njau AN, Gakinya SM, Sayed S, Moloo Z. Xpert® MTB/RIF assay on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues in the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Afr J Lab Med [Internet]. 2019;8(1):748. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
de Noronha AL, Bafica A, Nogueira L, Barral A, Barral-Netto M. Lung granulomas from Mycobacterium tuberculosis/HIV-1 co-infected patients display decreased in situ TNF production. Pathol Res Pract. 2008;204:155-61. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Ahmed HGE, Nassar AS, Ginawi I. Screening for tuberculosis and its histological pattern in patients with enlarged lymph node. Patholog Res Int [Internet]. 2011;2011:417635. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Almobarak AO, Elhoweris MH, Ahmed A, Haroon, Adam E, Wmy Elmadhoun, et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology for suspected tuberculous lymphadenitis: a feasible solution for a diagnostic dilemma in Sudan. Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2014;9(4):221-24.
24.
Norbis L, Alagna R, Tortoli E, Codecasa LR, Migliori GB, Cirillo DM. Challenges and perspectives in the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther [Internet]. 2014;12(5):633-47. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Singh UB, Pandey P, Mehta G, Bhatnagar AK, Mohan A, Goyal V, et al. Genotypic, Phenotypic and clinical validation of GeneXpert in extra-pulmonary and pulmonary tuberculosis in India. PLoS One [Internet]. 2016;11(2):e0149258. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Mehta PK, Raj A, Singh N, Khuller GK. Diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis by PCR. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol [Internet]. 2012;66(1):20-36. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Denkinger CM, Schumacher SG, Boehme CC, Dendukuri N, Pai M, Steingart KR. Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Eur Respir J. 2014;44(2):435-46. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Uddin MKM, Ather MF, Kabir S, Rahman A, Choudhury S, Nasrin R, et al. Diagnostic performance of different laboratory methods for the detection of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Microorganisms [Internet]. 2023;11(4):1066. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Vadwai V, Boehme C, Nabeta P, Shetty A, Alland D, Rodrigues C. Xpert MTB/ RIF: a new pillar in diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis? J Clin Microbiol [Internet]. 2011;49(7):2540-45. [crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/71153.20351

Date of Submission: Apr 07, 2024
Date of Peer Review: May 30, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Sep 20, 2024
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 08, 2024
• Manual Googling: Jun 04, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Sep 19, 2024 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com