Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 14554

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : November | Volume : 18 | Issue : 11 | Page : OC29 - OC32 Full Version

Clinical and Radiological Features of Lung Abscesses and their Management: A Retrospective Observational Study


Published: November 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/73123.20353
Dhruminkishan Prajapati, Bina Modi, Sai Aditya Nayudu, Nisarg Patel

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Swaminarayan Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Kalol, Gujarat, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Respiratory Medicine, PDU Medical College, Rajkot, Gujarat, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Respiratory Medicine, PDU Medical College, Rajkot, Gujarat, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Respiratory Medicine, GMERS Medical College, Himmatnagar, Gujarat, India.

Correspondence Address :
Nisarg Patel,
19, Alok-4, Behind Hotel Flora, Sardar Patel Ringroad, Vastral, Ahmedabad-382418, Gujarat, India.
E-mail: nisarg130490@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: A lung abscess is a localised area of destruction of lung parenchyma in which infection by pyogenic organisms results in tissue necrosis and suppuration. It is one of the common diagnosis in patients presenting to the respiratory Outpatient Department (OPD) and accounts for up to 4.0 to 5.5 per 10,000 hospital admissions each year.

Aim: To study the clinical profile, predisposing factors, anatomical location and response to medical treatment in patients with lung abscesses.

Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective observational study conducted on patients who had lung abscesses from the outpatient and inpatient departments of Respiratory Medicine at LG Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India during January 2019 to December 2020. Parameters such as clinical profile, demographic profile, predisposing factors, radiological profile and response to medical treatment were assessed in all patients. All data were collected and analysed statistically using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Software version 21.0.

Results: In the study of 50 patients, 36 (72%) were in the 41-60 years age group, with a mean age of 47.56 years; the male-to-female ratio was 3.2:1. The most common symptom in the study was cough with expectoration, which was present in all the patients. Poor oral hygiene was a predisposing factor in the majority of patients, i.e., 22 (44%). Other factors included low Body Mass Index (BMI), alcohol use, diabetes, seizures and pre-existing lung disease. Mixed organisms were found in the sputum culture reports. Upper zone distribution was the most common radiological finding, observed in 29 (58%) cases. The majority of lung abscesses were located in the upper lobes of both lungs. A total of 48 (96%) cases showed clinical improvement and 42 (84%) cases showed radiological improvement after 28 days of broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Conclusion: The study found that lung abscesses are more common in males in the middle age group, particularly in individuals with addiction and co-morbidities such as diabetes, with upper lobe presentation being the most common. Most patients will improve if broad-spectrum antibiotics are started timely, at optimal doses and for the appropriate duration.

Keywords

Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Poor oral hygiene, Pyogenic organism

A lung abscess is a localised area of destruction of lung parenchyma in which infection by pyogenic organisms results in tissue necrosis and suppuration (1). Lung abscesses may be single or multiple and they frequently contain air-fluid levels. The incidence of lung abscesses also declined in the late 1940s and 1950s, after the practice of performing oral surgery and tonsillectomy in the sitting position was abandoned, as it became clear that this could result in lung abscess formation (2). Lung abscesses account for up to 4.0 to 5.5 per 10,000 hospital admissions each year in the US (3). They occur at any age, but most frequently from the sixth to eighth decades and are predominantly seen in men (4),(5). A changing pattern of the disease has been reported in developed countries, where secondary lung abscesses due to underlying medical conditions, such as malignancy or immunosuppression, are becoming more common (5). When multiple and small (less than 2 cm in diameter), they are sometimes referred to as necrotising or suppurative pneumonia, but they are an expression of the same pathological process and the distinction is arbitrary. It should not be forgotten that in addition to the more usual anaerobic and aerobic organisms, lung abscesses may also be found in tuberculosis and may be caused by non bacterial organisms, including fungi and protozoa. The most common cause of lung abscess is the aspiration of oropharyngeal contents (6).

Dr. David Smith postulated that the aspiration of oral bacteria was the mechanism of infection. He observed that the bacteria found in the walls of the lung abscesses at autopsy resembled the bacteria noted in the gingival crevice (7). In recent times, there have been very limited studies available for the diagnosis and management of lung abscesses (8). Therefore, we aimed to fill this gap and create proper data for better management. The present study aimed to study the clinical profile of lung abscess patients, to examine the predisposing factors responsible for the development of lung abscesses, to determine the anatomical localisation of lung abscesses by chest X-ray and/or Computed Tomography (CT) scan and to evaluate the response to medical treatment.

Material and Methods

It was a retrospective observational study conducted on patients who had lung abscesses from the outpatient and inpatient departments of Respiratory Medicine at LG Hospital, Ahmedabad, during the period from January 2019 to December 2020. Final interpretation and analysis of the data were done in April 2021. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation Medical Education Trust (AMC MET) Institutional Review Board before starting the study.

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: A total of 50 patients who were diagnosed with lung abscesses on an outpatient or inpatient basis, with or without co-morbidities and aged over 15 years, were included in the study. Patients with malignancy and those aged less than 15 years were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

A history regarding symptoms such as cough with expectoration, fever, chest pain, haemoptysis, dyspnoea and weight loss was collected, along with medical histories of Diabetes Mellitus (DM), Hypertension (HTN), Tuberculosis (TB), immunocompromised conditions and any pre-existing lung diseases. Demographic data, including age, sex, weight, height and Body Mass Index (BMI), as well as investigation data like chest X-ray or CT thorax and clinical and radiological outcome details of all patients after receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics, were obtained from medical records. BMI is calculated by dividing an adult’s weight in kilograms by their height in meters squared. A reading of less than 18.5 kg/m2 is considered low BMI (9).

Statistical Analysis

All data were collected and analysed statistically using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Software version 21.0.

Results

The mean age in the study (Table/Fig 1) was 47.56 years. The most common symptom in the study (Table/Fig 2) was cough with expectoration, which was present in all patients. Fever, varying from mild/low-grade (38.1-39°C/100.5-102.2°F) to moderate-grade (39.1-40°C/102.2-104.0°F) and high-grade (40.1-41.1°C/104.1-106.0°F), often associated with rigours was present in 48 (96%) patients.

Predisposing Factors

Poor oral hygiene was the major predisposing factor in the present study (Table/Fig 3). In many patients, multiple predisposing factors were present.

Pathogenic Oraganisms Causing Lung Abscess

Mixed organisms were common, with Mycobacterium tuberculosis being the most prevalent (Table/Fig 4).

Radiological Zonal Distribution

In the majority of cases, upper zone distribution was observed in 29 (56%) instances. Middle and lower zone distributions were seen in 4 (8%) and 14 (28%) cases, respectively. A total of 3 (6%) cases showed involvement of more than one zone.

Radiological Distribution of Lung Abscess

Upper lobe involvement was the most common (Table/Fig 5).

Antimicrobial Drugs

Most of the patients with lung abscess were treated with amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (24%) and cefoperazone + sulbactam (36%), along with clindamycin (56%) or metronidazole (44%). Other patients were treated with piperacillin+tazobactam (20%), meropenem (16%) and amikacin (4%) (Table/Fig 6).

Resolution of Lung Abscess

Responses were considered satisfactory when patients became asymptomatic both clinically and radiologically, either showing complete clearing or a stable residual lesion in the form of a linear or small thin-walled cystic lesion less than 2 cm in diameter (Table/Fig 7).

Discussion

The present study showed that the occurrence of lung abscesses was more common in males over 40 years of age, especially in patients with co-morbidities, addictions, or pre-existing lung conditions. Upper lobe involvement was the most common and most patients responded well to broad-spectrum antibiotics.

The occurrence of lung abscesses was higher (80%) in the age group over 40 years in the present study, which was similar to the study by Mohapatra MM et al., which reported 32.6% (8). Gupta A and Dutt N, Deng A et al., and Shafron RD and Tate CF observed a peak incidence in the age group of 41-50 years (10),(11),(12). Gupta A and Dutt N noted that 75% of their patients were under 50 years of age (10). In the present study, there were 38 male patients and 12 female patients out of 50 cases. The sex ratio was 3.2:1, which is similar to the study by Gupta A and Dutt N (10). Mohapatra MM et al., showed a sex ratio of 6.6:1. Males and older age groups were affected more commonly than females in all studies (8).

Radiologically, the upper lobes of both lungs were most commonly involved. The studies by Mohapatra MM et al., Gupta A and Dutt N, Weiss W and Cherniack NS, and Takayanagi N et al., reported upper lobe involvement of the left lung in 13.05%, 8%, 8.4%, and 19% of cases, respectively (8),(10),(13),(14). Right upper lobe involvement was seen in 36% of cases, similar to the findings of Takayanagi N et al., (14). In the studies by Mohapatra MM et al., and Gupta A and Dutt N, right upper lobe involvement was reported in 50% and 16% of cases, respectively (8),(10). The middle lobe of the right lung was involved in 8% of cases, which aligns with the findings of Gupta A and Dutt N (10). The lower lobe of the right lung was involved in 10% of cases in this study. More than one lobe in the right lung was involved in 6% of cases. Mohapatra MM et al., and Takayanagi N et al., found this in 2.17% and 3.9% of cases, respectively (8),(14). Upper and lower lobe involvement of the left lung was observed in 22% and 18% of cases, respectively, in this study. Thus, dependent segments in a recumbent position, specifically the posterior segment of the upper lobe and the superior segment of the lower lobe, are more commonly involved, likely favoured by gravitational flow. In the present study, the major predisposing factor was poor oral hygiene, found in 44% of cases. In the studies by Mohapatra MM et al., Gupta A and Dutt N and Takayanagi N et al., the rates were 43%, 68% and 61%, respectively, for poor oral hygiene (8),(10),(14). Poor oral hygiene increases the number of anaerobes in the oral cavity. Infected material from the mouth might be aspirated during sleep. Dental caries, periodontal infections, gingivitis and oral sepsis were considered criteria for poor oral hygiene in the present study. Dental decay was found in 11 (18%) cases in the study by Magalhaes L et al., (15). Lung abscess is rare in edentulous persons; when present, it suggests the possibility of an associated bronchogenic carcinoma (16). Alcoholism may have favoured aspiration due to altered sensorium and was present in 26% of cases in this study. Mohapatra MM et al., and Takayanagi N et al., reported alcoholism in 22% and 16.6% of their patients, respectively (8),(14). Another contributing factor in this study was diabetes mellitus (14%). Takayanagi N et al., showed 22.9% of cases, which was higher compared to the present study (14). Mohapatra MM et al., and Gupta A and Dutt N detected diabetes in 8.7% and 4% of their patients, respectively (8),(10). Seizures were found in 4% of cases in the present study. All the above studies show similarities in risk factors, indicating that poor oral hygiene, alcohol use and diabetes mellitus increase the risk of lung abscess.

Pre-existing lung diseases such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), bronchiectasis, obstruction by tumours, carcinoma and congenital anomalies were present in 16% of cases in the present study. COPD and bronchiectasis were the most commonly found conditions. Mohapatra MM et al., Gupta A and Dutt N and Takayanagi N et al., reported these conditions in 4.35%, 8% and 13.7% of cases, respectively (8),(10),(14). In 12% of cases, no known predisposing factor was observed in the present study. Mohapatra MM et al., Gupta A and Dutt N and Takayanagi N et al., did not find any predisposing factors in 15.5%, 28% and 18.5% of their cases, respectively (8),(10),(14). Thus, there is variation in the prevalence of pre-existing lung diseases across different studies.

The most common symptom in the present study was cough with expectoration, observed in all cases. Mohapatra MM et al., Gupta A and Dutt N and Takayanagi N et al., found this symptom in 91%, 100% and 55.6% of cases, respectively [8, 10, 14]. Fever was the second most common symptom, present in 96% of cases in this study. Mohapatra MM et al., Gupta A and Dutt N and Takayanagi N et al., observed fever in 83%, 68% and 81.5% of cases, respectively (8),(10),(14). Weight loss was noted in 46% of cases in the present study, while Mohapatra MM et al., Gupta A and Dutt N and Takayanagi N et al., reported it in 18%, 24% and 8.3% of cases, respectively (8),(10),(14). Chest pain was present in 50% of cases in this study, compared to 21.7%, 42% and 37.1% in the studies by Mohapatra MM et al., Gupta A and Dutt N and Takayanagi N et al., respectively (8),(10),(14). Haemoptysis was present in 8% of cases in this study, which was similar to the findings of Mohapatra MM et al., (8). Dyspnoea was present in 18% of cases. Thus, cough with expectoration and fever were the most common symptoms in this and all other studies, while weight loss was less commonly reported.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis was detected in sputum microscopy using rhodamine and auramine stains in 20% of cases in this study, which was higher than other organisms, reflecting the greater prevalence of tuberculosis in our country. Staphylococcus aureus was found in 10% of cases in this study, which was similar to the study by Chidi CC and Mendelsohn HJ (3). Gupta A and Dutt N and Deng A et al., observed it in 28% and 39.02% of cases, respectively (10),(11). Streptococcus pneumoniae was observed in 6% of cases in this study, which was similar to Gupta A and Dutt N’s findings, but higher (43%) in Deng A et al.,’s study (11). In the present study, Klebsiella pneumoniae was found in 14% of cases. Its presentation may be acute but not severe, often associated with multiple cavities and putrid sputum. Haemophilus influenzae was isolated in only 2% of cases. Escherichia coli was found in 6% of cases in this study. Chidi CC and Mendelsohn HJ, Gupta A and Dutt N and Deng A et al., observed it in 20%, 16% and 26.83% of cases, respectively (3),(10),(11). No pathogen was found in 32% of cases in this study. Gupta A and Dutt N and Deng A et al., also did not find any pathogenic organisms in 16% and 18% of their cases, respectively (10),(11). This could be due to prior antibiotic use by patients before coming to the hospital, which may have resulted in no pathogenic organism being detected in the sputum report. Therefore, the above findings suggest that tuberculosis is a more common cause of lung abscess in India and mixed organisms are commonly found in lung abscess patients rather than a single organism.

A total of 24% of cases were treated with amoxicillin+clavulanic acid in this study. In the study by Moreira JS et al., 74.6% of patients received amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (17). Trials on antibiotic regimens for lung abscesses have reported that β-lactamase inhibitors/β-lactams are the mainstay for the treatment of aspiration pneumonia and lung abscesses (18),(19). In this study, 56% of cases received clindamycin. In the studies by Mohapatra MM et al., and Moreira JS et al., 30.43% and 18.3% of cases received it, respectively (8),(17). A total of 44% of cases were treated with metronidazole in this study. In the study by Mohapatra MM et al., 17.4% of cases were treated with it. Additionally, 36% of cases were treated with cefoperazone+sulbactam in the present study, while 21.7% of cases received it in Mohapatra MM et al.,’s study (8). Furthermore, 20% of cases were treated with piperacillin+tazobactam in the present study and 16% of cases received meropenem. In Mohapatra MM et al.,’s study, 4.34% of cases were treated with it (8). Four percent of cases received amikacin in this study, while 34.7% of cases were treated with it in Mohapatra MM et al.,’s study (8). A total of 10 (20%) cases were placed on antitubercular drugs in this study and showed improvement. Surgical intervention was not required in any case in this study. Therefore, β-lactam antibiotics combined with metronidazole or clindamycin are the most effective treatments for lung abscesses in all studies.

Patients were considered cured when they were asymptomatic and when chest roentgenograms were clear or showed a small stable residual lesion. In the present study, 40 (80%) cases were clinically improved and 30 (60%) patients showed radiological improvement after 14 days. The remaining cases improved both clinically and radiologically after 42 days. Out of 50 cases, 10 (20%) required six months of antitubercular treatment, with radiological resolution observed within 42 days. All cases responded well to treatment. In the study by Gupta A and Dutt N, all cases showed satisfactory improvement with medical treatment over a duration of 2 to 8 weeks, except for one case that had bronchogenic carcinoma (10). In the study by Takayanagi N et al., the duration of antibiotic administration ranged from 28 to 48 days (14). The three patients with nocardiasis and the three with actinomycosis required antibiotic treatment for 76 to 189 days. Cure rates of 85-90% have been reported by Gittens SA and Mihaly JP and Fox JR et al., (16),(20). Therefore, the above studies suggest that most lung abscess patients respond well to four to six weeks of antibiotics.

Limitation(s)

Anaerobic culture was not performed due to practical limitations, as specimens need to be obtained through transtracheal aspiration to prevent false results. Additionally, some patients had already received antibiotics beforehand, which may alter the culture results.

Conclusion

The present study showed that the occurrence of lung abscesses was more common in males over the age of 40, especially in patients with co-morbidities, addictions, or pre-existing lung conditions. Upper lobe involvement was the most common and most patients responded well within 4 to 6 weeks of receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics in the form of beta-lactamase with metronidazole or clindamycin. Mycobacterium tuberculosis was found to be more common in India. Early diagnosis, strict control of co-morbidities, cessation of addictions and optimal medical therapy are the mainstays for treating lung abscess patients.

References

1.
Seaton A, Seaton D, Gordon A. Leitch Ch. 15; Lung Abscess. Crofton and Douglas 5th Edition, Volume 1, 460-475. [crossref]
2.
Schweppe HI, Knowles JH, Kane L. Lung abscess: An analysis of the Massachusetts General Hospital cases from 1943 through 1956. N Engl J Med. 1961;265:1039-43. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Chidi CC, Mendelsohn HJ. Lung abscess: A study of the results of treatment based on 90 consecutive cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1974;68(1):168-72. [crossref]
4.
Bartlett JG, Finegold SM. Anaerobic infections of the lung and pleural space. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1974;110(1):56-77.
5.
Pohlson EC, McNamara JJ, Char C, Kurata L. Lung abscess: A changing pattern of disease. Am J Surg. 1985;150(1):97-101. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Bartlett JG. The role of anaerobic bacteria in lung abscess. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40(7):923-25. https://doi.org/10.1086/428586. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Smith DT. Experimental aspiration abscess. Arch Surg. 1927;14:231-39. [crossref]
8.
Mohapatra MM, Rajaram M, Mallick A. Clinical, radiological and bacteriological profile of lung abscess-an observational hospital based study. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018;6(9):1642-46. Doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.374. PMID: 30337980; PMCID: PMC6182528. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Zierle-Ghosh A, Jan A. Physiology, Body Mass Index. [Updated 2023 Nov 5]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan Available from: https;//www.ncbi.nlm.gov/books/NBK535456/.
10.
Gupta A, Dutt N. A study profile of lung abscess patient coming to tertiary care center Ahmedabad. NJMR. 2015;5(4):300-04.
11.
Deng A, Zhang Z, He M, Zhou T. Acute lung abscess with multiple infections: A refractory case. Asian J Surg. 2023;46(8):3364-65. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Shafron RD, Tate CF. Lung abscess- A five year evaluation. Dis Chest. 1968;53:12. [crossref]
13.
Weiss W, Cherniack NS. Acute nonspecific lung abscess- A controlled study compairing orally and parentrally administered penicillin G. Chest. 1974;66:348. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Takayanagi N, Kagiyama N, Ishiguro T, Tokunaga D, Sugita Y. Etiology and outcome ofcommunity-acquired lung abscess. Respiration. 2010;80(2):98-105. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Magalhaes L, Valadares D, Oliveira JR, Reis E. Lung abscesses: Review of 60 cases. Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia (English Edition). 2009;15(2):165-78. [crossref]
16.
Gittens SA, Mihaly JP. Medical management of acute lung abscess. Am Rev Tuberc. 1954;69:673-81.
17.
Moreira JS, Camargo JJ, Felicetti JC, Goldenfun PR, Moreira AL, Porto Nda S. Lung abscess: Analysis of 252 consecutive cases diagnosed between 1968 and 2004. J Bras Pneumol. 2006;32(2):136-43. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Yazbeck MF, Dahdel M, Kalra A, Browne AS, Pratter MR. Lung abscess: Update on microbiology and management. Am J Ther. 2014;21(3):21721. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/AmericanThoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community acquired pneumonia inadults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(Suppl2):S27-72. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Fox JR, Hughes FA, Sutuff WD, Tenn M. Non-putrid lung abscess. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1954;27:255.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/73123.20353

Date of Submission: May 27, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Aug 16, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Oct 01, 2024
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 28, 2024
• Manual Googling: Aug 19, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Sep 30, 2024 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com