Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 19194

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2024 | Month : November | Volume : 18 | Issue : 11 | Page : OD11 - OD14 Full Version

Intrapleural Fibrinolytic Therapy for Complex Haemothorax in a Patient with Congenital Heart Disease and Eisenmenger Syndrome: A Case Report


Published: November 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/74457.20313
Siri Vineeth Anuraag Ganta, Manosri Mandadi, Vishnu Prabhakar

1. Resident, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, (Deemed to be University), Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 2. Resident, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, (Deemed to be University), Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, (Deemed to be University), Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Manosri Mandadi,
Resident, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pimpri, Pune-411018, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: manosrireddy@gmail.com

Abstract

Haemothorax, characterised by blood in the pleural cavity with a haematocrit greater than 50%, can arise from both traumatic and non traumatic causes. Prompt blood removal is crucial to prevent coagulation and complications like post-traumatic empyema. While tube thoracostomy is the initial management, Intrapleural Fibrinolytic Therapy (IPFT) offers a less invasive alternative when drainage is insufficient. The authors hereby, report the case of a 33-year-old male with congenital heart disease who presented with haemothorax. He exhibited worsening breathlessness, a cough with yellowish sputum and intermittent fever. Examination revealed clubbing, tachycardia, hypotension, tachypnoea and hypoxia. Imaging confirmed a right-sided pleural effusion with septations and severe Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH). Initial management with a pigtail catheter and antibiotics resulted in minimal drainage. The patient then underwent IPFT, leading to significant fluid drainage and radiological improvement. His clinical condition improved with reduced breathlessness and stabilised vital signs. The present case supports the efficacy of fibrinolytic agents like Streptokinase (STK) in managing clotted haemothorax, particularly in patients with complex medical backgrounds such as congenital heart disease. Early IPFT can enhance pleural drainage and reduce the need for invasive surgery, highlighting its value in similar clinical scenarios.

Keywords

Chest tube, Intermittent fever, Pleural effusion, Streptokinase

Case Report

A 33-year-old male office clerk, with a known history of congenital heart disease and a potential recipient for a heart and lung transplant, presented to the Emergency Department with breathlessness since childhood, which had increased over the past eight days (modified Medical Research Council grade III), a cough with yellowish expectoration for 10 days and intermittent, undocumented fever for eight days, which was relieved with medication. A detailed history revealed the use of tablet Bosentan 62.5 mg twice daily and tablet Dabigatran 75 mg twice daily for the past two years.

Physical examination revealed grade 3 clubbing (Table/Fig 1), with a pulse rate of 112 bpm, blood pressure of 110/70 mmHg, respiratory rate of 24 cycles/min and Saturation of peripheral Oxygen (SpO2) of 68% on Fraction of inspired Oxygen (FiO2) 21%. The respiratory examination revealed bilateral vesicular breath sounds with diminished intensity in the right mammary, infrascapular and infra-axillary areas, likely suggestive of pleural effusion. The cardiovascular examination suggested a holosystolic murmur at the left 3rd intercostal space. No abnormal findings were noted in other systems.

Radiological investigations included a chest X-ray showing right middle and lower zone homogeneous opacity obliterating the right cardiophrenic and costophrenic angles, suggestive of right pleural effusion (Table/Fig 2). An ultrasound of the thorax indicated a gross right pleural effusion (>1000 cc) with internal septations. High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) and CT Pulmonary Angiogram (CTPA) confirmed the gross right pleural effusion without evidence of thromboembolism (Table/Fig 3). It showed a large abnormal communication between the left distal ascending aorta and the right wall of the main pulmonary artery (Table/Fig 4).

A 2D echocardiogram revealed a Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) of 60%, a dilated Right Atrium (RA) and Right Ventricle (RV), severe Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) with Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP) of 80 mm Hg and a small Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) with a right-to-left shunt.

Laboratory investigations showed a haemoglobin level of 13.9 g/dL, Packed Cell Volume (PCV) of 41.2%, Total Leucocyte Count (TLC) of 14,600, platelet count of 1.4 lacs, a normocytic and normochromic Peripheral Blood Smear (PBS), blood urea of 27 mg/dL, serum creatinine of 0.95 mg/dL, serum sodium (Na+) of 138 mEq/L, serum potassium (K+) of 3.8 mEq/L and an International Normalised Ratio (INR) of 1.20. Liver Function Tests (LFT) were Within Normal Limits (WNL). The C-reactive Protein (CRP) levels were borderline elevated (1 mg/dL).

Pleural fluid analysis revealed a reddish appearance, TLC of 1800 cells, Differential Leucocyte Count (DLC) of 15% neutrophils and 75% lymphocytes, Adenosine Deaminase (ADA) of 31.6 IU/L, serum Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) of 596 IU/L, Pleural fluid (P/f) LDH of 260 IU/L, serum protein of 7.7 g/dL, P/f protein of 14.5 g/dL, serum glucose of 112 mg/dL, P/f glucose of 48 mg/dL, P/f Red Blood Cell (RBC) of 150-200 and pleural fluid haematocrit of 51.2%. The pleural fluid to serum haematocrit ratio was above 0.5, highly suggestive of haemothorax.

The patient was diagnosed with right loculated pleural effusion-haemothorax and congenital heart disease with Eisenmenger syndrome. Initial management included the insertion of a right-sided 14 F pigtail catheter, intravenous antibiotics, adequate analgesia and oxygen therapy. However, the initial drainage post-pigtail insertion was minimal (100 mL) (Table/Fig 5). Due to the lack of subsequent drainage, even after reconfirming the tube position and patience, the patient was administered IPFT with 2.5 lac IU STK. The first cycle of IPFT resulted in 1150 mL of drainage, with a cumulative drainage of 2250 mL after three days (Table/Fig 6),(Table/Fig 7).

After confirming resolution on serial chest radiography, the intercostal drainage was removed and the patient was followed-up in the outpatient unit. No recurrence of pleural effusion was noted in subsequent chest radiographies (Table/Fig 8).

Discussion

The present case report describes a right-sided loculated haemothorax associated with Eisenmenger syndrome and congenital heart disease. Prolonged usage of anticoagulants, including dabigatran, is believed to be the likely cause of the haemothorax.

Haemothorax, defined as the presence of blood in the pleural cavity with a haematocrit of greater than 50%, can result from both traumatic and non traumatic causes (1). Initial treatment typically involves tube thoracostomy; however, if drainage is insufficient, further interventions are indicated (2). Several options include saline flushes, the insertion of one or more catheters into the loculi under image guidance, standard thoracotomy, Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS), empyema drainage and decortication (3). IPFT is a less invasive and cost-effective alternative for treating clotted haemothorax compared to surgical procedures (4).

Adults receiving fibrinolytic therapy are usually administered 100,000 IU of Urokinase (UK) or 250,000 IU of STK every eight hours (4). The medication is first reconstituted in 50 cc of normal saline before being introduced via the intercostal drain and flushed with 20 cc of normal saline (4). The patient is instructed to alternate positions often and the chest tube is clamped for two hours following the administration of each dose (5). Three doses of UK or STK constitute the therapy cycle (5). The amount of pleural fluid drained and the radiological improvement indicate whether the fibrinolysis cycle was successful (5). Responders who show little to moderate radiological improvement within 48 hours and cumulative drainage of more than 100 mL are considered for another cycle of therapy (5). Individuals who fall short of these standards are labelled as non responders (5).

In the present case, the patient had a significant haemothorax on the right-side that did not drain after the insertion of a pigtail catheter. The clearance of the loculated haemothorax was aided by the IPFT with STK injection, as evidenced by the significant drainage volumes and notable radiological improvement. In line with earlier studies, a 91.7% success rate in dissolving fibrinous septations was achieved by Inci I et al., in their investigation of 24 patients undergoing treatment for haemothorax using fibrinolytic medications such as STK and UK (2). A 5-year observational study by Barthwal MS et al., found that patients with haemothorax had a 91.6% success rate (4).

Kimbrell BJ et al., conducted a prospective investigation on patients who had suffered a traumatic haemothorax, showing a 92% success rate (5). Other recent studies by Kumar S et al., and Caylor M et al., in accordance with earlier studies like Jerjes-Scanchez C et al., found that patients with haemothorax had similar outcomes, with a significant resolution of 70% or more (Table/Fig 9) (4),(5),(6),(7),(8).

The STK and other fibrinolytics work by dissolving various proteins, including fibrin, blood clots and pleural loculations (9). The plasminogen-STK complex is enzymatically activated by STK to produce plasmin, which initiates the fibrinolytic response (9). Furthermore, as demonstrated in the present case, plasmin has the ability to lyse the septa of multiloculated pleural space collections, permitting unhindered pleural fluid flow and final resolution (9).

Since IPFT is a widely accessible, safe and efficient substitute for VATS, it should be incorporated into the management strategy for clotted haemorrhage within the seven to ten-day window (10). An investigation by Bouros D et al., shows that optimal pleural drainage occurs when fibrinolytic therapy is started early, before to the development of pleural adhesions (11).

Conclusion

The IPFT with STK is an effective and less invasive treatment for clotted haemothorax in patients with complex medical backgrounds. Early initiation of fibrinolytic therapy enhances pleural drainage and prevents the complications associated with invasive surgical procedures. The authors noted significant radiological and clinical improvement in the present patient with congenital heart disease and Eisenmenger syndrome following IPFT, highlighting it as a valuable treatment option in similar clinical scenarios, particularly for patients at high-risk for surgery.

References

1.
Zeiler J, Idell S, Norwood S, Cook A. Hemothorax: A review of the literature. Clin Pulm Med [Internet]. 2020;27(1):01-12. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/clinpulm/fulltext/2020/01000/hemothorax__a_review_of_the_literature.1.aspx. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Inci I, Özçelik C, Ülkü R, Tuna A, Eren N. Intrapleural fibrinolytic treatment of traumatic clotted hemothorax. Chest [Internet]. 1998;114(1):160-65. Available from: https://journal.chestnet.org/article/S0012369215476330/fulltext. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Boersma WG, Stigt JA, Smit HJM. Treatment of haemothorax. Respir Med [Internet]. 2010;104(11):1583-87. Available from: https://www.resmedjournal.com/article/S0954611110003513/fulltext. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Barthwal MS, Marwah V, Chopra M, Garg Y, Tyagi R, Kishore K, et al. A five-year study of intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy in loculated pleural collections. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 2016;58:17. [crossref]
5.
Kimbrell BJ, Yamzon J, Petrone P, Asensio JA, Velmahos GC. Intrapleural thrombolysis for the management of undrained traumatic hemothorax: A prospective observational study. J Trauma. 2007;62(5):1175-78. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/jtrauma/fulltext/2007/05000/intrapleural_thrombolysis_for_the_management_of.18.aspx.[crossref][PubMed]
6.
Kumar S, Rathi V, Rattan A, Chaudhary S, Agarwal N. VATS versus intrapleural streptokinase: A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial for optimum treatment of post-traumatic Residual Hemothorax. Injury. 2015;46(9):1749-52. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Caylor M, Hamblin S, Guillamondegui O, Johnson D, Dennis B. 1056: Efficacy of intrapleural TPA for retained hemothorax in trauma patients. Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2014;42:A1614. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/ fulltext/2014/12001/1056__efficacy_of_intrapleural_tpa_for_retained.1023.aspx. [crossref]
8.
Jerjes-Sánchez C, Ramirez-Rivera A, Elizalde JJ, Delgado R, Cicero R, Ibarra- Perez C, et al. Intrapleural fibrinolysis with streptokinase as an adjunctive treatment in hemothorax and empyema: A multicenter trial. Chest. 1996;109(6):1514-19. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Foo CT, Herre J. Intrapleural fibrinolysis in acute non-traumatic retained haemothorax. Respirol Case Rep [Internet]. 2021;9(6):e00760. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/rcr2.760. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Agarwal R, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D. Intrapleural fibrinolysis in clotted haemothorax. Singapore Med J. 2006;47(11):984-86. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/17075670/.
11.
Bouros D, Schiza S, Tzanakis N, Chalkiadakis G, Drositis J, Siafakas N. Intrapleural urokinase versus normal saline in the treatment of complicated parapneumonic effusions and empyema. https://doi.org/101164/ajrccm15919803094 [Internet]. 2012;159(1):37-42. Available from: www.atsjournals.org. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Skeete DA, Rutherford EJ, Schlidt SA, Abrams JE, Parker LA, Rich PB. Intrapleural tissue plasminogen activator for complicated pleural effusions. J Trauma. 2004;57(6):1178-83. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/jtrauma/ fulltext/2004/12000/intrapleural_tissue_plasminogen_activator_for.6.aspx.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/74457.20313

Date of Submission: Jul 24, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Aug 23, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Oct 05, 2024
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 25, 2024
• Manual Googling: Sep 28, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Oct 01, 2024 (05%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com