Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 21596

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2024 | Month : November | Volume : 18 | Issue : 11 | Page : QR01 - QR05 Full Version

Understanding and Managing Thrombocytopenia in Pregnancy: A Case Series


Published: November 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/73806.20284
Akshaya Radhakrishnan, A Parimala, K Jayashree Srinivasan, RV Lakshmipriyaa

1. Postgraduate, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University ,Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University ,Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University ,Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University ,Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Akshaya Radhakrishnan,
1/276 , Sri Krishna Nagar, Natham Road, Thazhambur, Chennai-600130, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: akshaya.obgyn@gmail.com

Abstract

Thrombocytopenia, defined as a platelet count of less than 1.5 L/mm3, is a common haematological disorder encountered during pregnancy. It can arise from a variety of causes, including immune-mediated destruction, gestational thrombocytopenia, and underlying medical conditions such as preeclampsia or Haemolysis, Elevated Liver Enzyme Levels and Low Platelet (HELLP) syndrome, with gestational thrombocytopenia being the most common. Hereby, the authors present a case series including six patients with thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. The clinical characteristics, diagnostic work-up, management strategies, and maternal and foetal outcomes in patients with varying aetiologies of thrombocytopenia were described in present series. Understanding the aetiology and management of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy is crucial for optimising maternal and foetal outcomes, and this series contributes valuable clinical insights into this important area of obstetric haematology. It underscores the need for a multidisciplinary approach in managing complex obstetric cases involving thrombocytopenia and other co-morbidities. Effective collaboration among obstetricians, haematologists, physicians, and specialists is essential for addressing the challenges of thrombocytopenia during pregnancy and achieving the best outcomes for both mother and baby.

Keywords

Gestational immune thrombocytopenia, Haemolysis, Management strategies, Platelets count disorder, Pregnancy induced thrombocytopenia

Thrombocytopenia, characterised by a decreased platelet count below the normal range, poses unique challenges in pregnancy, a physiological state marked by various haemostatic alterations. Although an increase in coagulation factors and blood volume is typically associated with pregnancy, thrombocytopenia introduces potential complications that demand careful clinical consideration. This condition can arise from various aetiologies, including gestational thrombocytopenia, Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP), preeclampsia, and other underlying medical conditions. Thrombocytopenia in pregnancy not only affects maternal health but also raises concerns about foetal well-being and potential impacts on delivery outcomes. Understanding the complexities of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy is essential for healthcare providers to effectively navigate its diagnosis, treatment, and subsequent care [1,2]. Hereby, authors present six cases of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy and their management strategies.

Case Report

Case 1

A 29-year-old primigravida at 35 weeks and five days was admitted for safe confinement due to immune thrombocytopenia. She was diagnosed with a low platelet count (0.85 L/per mm3) at 19 weeks of pregnancy. She was a known case of hypothyroidism and was on tablet thyroxine, 37.5 mcg once daily. A peripheral smear (Table/Fig 1) revealed microcytic hypochromic anaemia with thrombocytopenia. A haematologist’s opinion was obtained. The patient was advised to monitor her platelet count monthly and to seek further review if, the count dropped below 50,000.

At 25 weeks of gestation, her platelet count was 0.9 L/mm3, which decreased to 0.73 L/mm3 at 30 weeks, followed by 0.61 L/mm3 at 34 weeks. The patient was diagnosed with probable immune thrombocytopenia based on the pattern of decreasing platelet counts. Weekly platelet monitoring was conducted, and the haematologist advised starting tab Prednisolone at 1 mg/kg/day in divided doses if, the platelet count dropped below 0.5 L/mm3. The patient had a history of bleeding gums and petechial lesions on her skin and was admitted for steroid coverage. Steroid coverage was provided with intravenous Dexamethasone.

At 35 weeks, her platelet count was 0.9 L/mm3. Three days later, her platelet count dropped to 0.58 L/mm3. Considering the possibility of immune thrombocytopenia, the patient was started on Inj. Methylprednisolone 1 gm in 500 mL normal saline intravenously once daily for three days (pulse steroid), followed by oral steroids (Tab Prednisolone at 1 mg/kg) as advised by the haematologist. Her platelet count began to improve. Three units of platelets were transfused, and the patient was taken up for emergency Lower Segment Caesarean Section (LSCS) under general anaesthesia due to foetal distress at 36 weeks. She delivered a healthy baby boy with a birth weight of 1.73 kg.

From the second postoperative day, tab Wysolone at 1 mg/kg/day was restarted and continued for five days. Her postoperative platelet count improved to 1.13 L/mm3 after three weeks of delivery. The steroids were tapered. Her symptoms improved, and she was subsequently discharged. The improvement in platelet count after steroid therapy and the baseline platelet count of 0.1 L/mm3 made the diagnosis of immune thrombocytopenia evident. The patient was reviewed after two weeks, with a platelet count of 1.12 L/mm3, and she was symptomatically better and advised to continue steroid therapy.

Case 2

A 23-year-old primigravida at 37 weeks with monochorionic-diamniotic twins presented in early labour with reports indicating deranged liver function tests and a low platelet count with gestational age of 36 weeks and 5 days and had experienced one episode of elevated blood pressure of 140/90 mmHg at 36 weeks. She exhibited bilateral grade 1 pitting pedal oedema. Her Haemoglobin (Hb) was 11.7 g/dL, D-dimer was 413, and platelets were 1.3 L/mm3 with a normal coagulation profile and normal spot Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). She was diagnosed with partial HELLP syndrome. The patient was taken for an emergency caesarean section due to the monochorionic diamniotic twins in labour and delivered two live and healthy babies. Given the deranged liver function, she was started on Ursodeoxycholic acid 600 mg twice daily for five days. Her postoperative period was uneventful. Postdelivery, her platelet levels improved to 2 L/mm3. A medical gastroenterologist advised the continuation of Ursodeoxycholic acid. She was discharged with antibiotics and vitamin supplements after symptomatic recovery. Upon review two weeks later, she had normal platelet counts and liver function tests.

Case 3

A 26-year-old gravida 3, para 0 patient was admitted at 40 weeks of gestation for safe confinement. She had a history of anaemia, which was corrected with four units of iron sucrose at 32 weeks of gestation. She had two previous abortions: one at two months of gestation five years ago and another at three months of gestation one year ago. For both of these, Dilation and Curettage (D&C) was not performed. She was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at 17 weeks of gestation and was started on tablet thyroxine 12.5 mcg once daily. She also has a history of appendectomy performed in 2022.

Her physical examination was normal, and on abdominal examination, her uterus was corresponding to the dates. Her platelet counts were 1.35 L/mm3 at 37 weeks and 1.26 L/mm3 at 39 weeks. She underwent an emergency LSCS due to cephalopelvic disproportion at 40 weeks. She delivered a healthy baby weighing 3.4 kg. Postdelivery, her platelet count improved to 2.07 L/mm3 on postoperative day 3, and she was discharged with a diagnosis of gestational thrombocytopenia.

Case 4

A 34-year-old primigravida, with a gestational age of 36 weeks and five days, was admitted due to moderate anaemia. The patient reported no complaints of abdominal pain, leaking, bleeding, or spotting per vagina. She denied experiencing fever, vomiting, burning micturition, or any white discharge or trauma. The patient had a history of hypothyroidism, diagnosed in the 5th month of pregnancy, for which she was initially started on tablet Thyroxine 12.5 mcg once daily, later increased to 50 mcg once daily in the 7th month. She had no other co-morbidities. The patient had a history of blood transfusion five years ago due to severe anaemia (Hb 3 g/dL).

On examination, the patient showed no signs of pallor but presented with pedal oedema. Her vital signs were stable, and systemic examinations were within normal limits. The uterus corresponded to 36 weeks of gestation, the foetal presentation was breech, and the foetal heart rate was normal.

Complete Blood Count (CBC) results indicated a gradual decline in haemoglobin levels and platelet counts:

• At 27 weeks: Hb 9.7 g/dL, Platelet count 1.13 L/mm3
• At 36+5 weeks: Hb 9.4 g/dL, Platelet count 1.13 L/mm3
• At 36+6 weeks: Hb 8.7 g/dL, Platelet count 0.81 L/mm3

The peripheral blood smear (Table/Fig 2) revealed normocytic normochromic anaemia, along with varying degrees of thrombocytopenia and leukopenia. The Dengue IgG test was positive. Other investigations, including urine routine, serological tests, serum calcium, d-dimer, and fibrinogen assay, were normal. A general physician’s opinion was sought regarding the anaemia and low platelet count, and the patient was transfused with one unit of Packed Red Blood Cells (PRBC). Serum B12 and folate levels were found to be normal. Iron sucrose was administered on three occasions, two days apart. An emergency LSCS was performed due to a breech presentation in labour. Intraoperatively, one unit of PRBC was transfused. Postoperatively, CBC and coagulation profile monitoring were conducted. The patient improved clinically, and a rising trend in platelet count was noted, leading to a diagnosis of gestational thrombocytopenia. The platelet count increased progressively from Postoperative Day (POD) 1 to POD 10, indicating a positive trend in platelet levels, as represented in (Table/Fig 3).

The patient was discharged and advised to follow-up with CBC and coagulation profiles. She was reviewed after two weeks, and the CBC showed normal platelet levels.

Case 5

A pregnant woman in her mid-20s, Gravida 2 (second pregnancy), Para 1 (one previous delivery or abortion) (G2A1), was admitted with a gestational age of 26 weeks and two days, presenting a two-day history of fever and body aches. She had no history of abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, headache, loose stools, or any bleeding manifestations. The patient had a history of thyroiditis, mild anaemia, and a previous admission for abdominal pain at 23 weeks, where she was diagnosed with mild right hydroureteronephrosis.

On examination, the patient was conscious and febrile, with a temperature of 100°F. She was found to be pale. Vital signs were stable, and the uterus was palpable at 26 to 28 weeks. Baseline investigations showed a haemoglobin level of 9.5 gm% and a low platelet count of 1.26 L/mm3. Fever evaluation was conducted, and the dengue Nonstructural protein 1 (NSI) antigen test returned positive. A physician’s opinion was obtained, and the patient was diagnosed with dengue fever and extended dengue syndrome. Conservative management was initiated with daily blood count monitoring.

The patient was eventually transferred to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) due to hypotension and decreasing platelet counts. She received adequate hydration with intravenous fluids. The patient symptomatically improved, and platelet counts increased to 2.76 L/mm3 after six days. The patient was discharged with a diagnosis of resolved dengue fever with thrombocytopenia. She was advised to continue her thyroid medication and attend regular antenatal check-ups. Close monitoring of foetal well-being was recommended. A follow-up with repeat platelet counts was advised, and they were found to be normal. The patient was educated about warning signs and symptoms to monitor.

Case 6

The patient, a 30-year-old G2A1 woman at 32 weeks and six days of gestation, conceived through ovulation induction. She presented with complaints of vomiting, headache, and blurred vision. During the second trimester, she was diagnosed with gestational hypertension, hypothyroidism, and bronchial asthma. The patient received magnesium sulfate and steroid coverage due to severe preeclampsia. Her first trimester was unremarkable; however, in the second trimester, she was diagnosed with gestational hypertension at 26 weeks, initially managed with Labetalol 100 mg three times daily. At 29 weeks of gestation, the antihypertensives were switched to Labetalol 200 mg three times a day and Nicardipine 10 mg twice daily. The patient was admitted at 31 weeks due to elevated blood pressure and received magnesium sulfate and steroid coverage.

The patient had a five-year history of hypothyroidism, managed with Thyroxine 25 mcg once daily. She was also a known case of bronchial asthma treated with Salmeterol and Fluticasone inhalers. On examination, the patient was afebrile, without pallor, and had bilateral pedal oedema. Cardiovascular and respiratory examinations were normal. Her blood pressure was 130/90 mmHg, pulse rate was 82/minute, and abdominal examination indicated a uterus corresponding to 32 weeks with a good foetal heart rate. The cervix was soft, posterior, uneffaced, and closed.

The patient was admitted with severe preeclampsia and imminent signs of eclampsia. Her haemoglobin was 6.7 gm, and her platelet count was 0.5 L/mm3. Laboratory investigations revealed deranged liver function tests, features of haemolysis, and neutrophilic leukocytosis. Urine protein was 3+, and spot PCR was 1.365. Emergency LSCS was performed on 18/10/23 due to impending eclampsia with an unfavorable cervix and HELLP syndrome. A preterm baby with a birth weight of 1.3 kg was delivered. Intraoperatively, the patient received blood products, and following the emergency LSCS, she was transferred to the ICU.

Postoperatively, she was managed with magnesium sulfate for neuroprotection and antihypertensives. The patient was transfused with four units of Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP), four units of platelets, two units of cryoprecipitate, and one unit of PRBC. An ophthalmologic evaluation revealed a normal bilateral fundus examination. A general medicine consultation was sought, and she was started on Labetalol 100 mg three times daily and Nicardipine 10 mg three times daily. The patient’s blood pressure was diligently monitored, and she remained normotensive throughout the postoperative period, contributing to her overall stable condition. Platelet counts improved to 0.63 L/mm3 after LSCS on the first postoperative day.

Both the patient and the baby stabilised, and she was discharged with a platelet count of 1.58 L/mm3. The patient was advised to continue antihypertensives and to return for a CBC review one week following discharge. Upon review after a week, her CBC showed a platelet count of 1.67 L/mm3 and normal liver function tests.

Discussion

Thrombocytopenia in pregnancy refers to a condition characterised by a decreased platelet count, presenting unique challenges and considerations in the management of expectant mothers. Because platelets are essential for blood coagulation and preventing excessive bleeding, having an adequate number of them during pregnancy, labour, and the postpartum period is essential (3). Thrombocytopenia in pregnancy can have various causes, ranging from benign and self-limiting conditions to more serious underlying disorders. One common cause is gestational thrombocytopenia, which typically occurs in the second or third trimester (4). This benign condition is thought to result from increased plasma volume during pregnancy, leading to a relative decrease in platelet concentration. Gestational thrombocytopenia is generally mild and resolves spontaneously without adverse effects on the mother or baby (4).

Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder that can lead to thrombocytopenia during pregnancy. In this condition, the human body produces antibodies that attack platelets, resulting in a decreased platelet count. Careful management is required to prevent complications during pregnancy and delivery (5).

Preeclampsia, a hypertensive disorder specific to pregnancy, is another significant cause of thrombocytopenia. In preeclampsia, there is widespread endothelial dysfunction and reduced blood flow to various organs, which affects platelet function and count. Severe preeclampsia may lead to HELLP syndrome, a potentially life-threatening condition for both the mother and the baby. Underlying medical conditions, including Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APLAS) and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), can also contribute to thrombocytopenia during pregnancy. These autoimmune disorders can cause immune-mediated destruction of platelets or interfere with normal blood clotting mechanisms (6). Determining the specific cause of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy is crucial for appropriate management and ensuring the best possible outcomes for both the mother and the developing foetus.

Diagnosing thrombocytopenia in pregnancy involves a comprehensive assessment that considers various potential causes. Routine prenatal blood tests, including a CBC, reveal the platelet count. A platelet count below the normal range of 150,000 to 450,000 platelets per microliter may indicate thrombocytopenia. Additional tests, such as peripheral blood smears and blood clotting profiles, help identify specific causes like ITP or preeclampsia (7). A thorough medical history, including any prior history of thrombocytopenia or autoimmune disorders, aids in determining the most accurate diagnosis and tailoring an appropriate management plan for the pregnant individual. Regular monitoring during pregnancy ensures timely intervention if needed.

The fundamental cause and extent of thrombocytopenia during pregnancy are the main determinants of the course of therapy. In cases where the low platelet count is mild and not associated with bleeding complications, close monitoring may be the sole approach. However, more severe cases or those linked to specific disorders may necessitate intervention. For ITP, corticosteroids such as prednisone are commonly prescribed to suppress the immune response and increase platelet production. Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) may also be administered to boost platelet levels. In cases where thrombocytopenia is linked to preeclampsia, managing the underlying condition is crucial. The diagnosis and management of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy requires close attention to personal and family history, pregestational platelet counts, time of onset, severity and accompanying clinical and laboratory findings (8). This may involve hospitalisation, close blood pressure monitoring, and delivery of the baby if, the pregnancy is at an advanced stage. Platelet transfusions are considered in severe cases or if, there is a risk of bleeding during childbirth. However, the decision to administer platelet transfusions is carefully weighed against potential risks and is typically reserved for critical situations due to associated complications.

Gestational thrombocytopenia is the most common cause of low platelet counts during pregnancy and poses no risk to the mother or baby. ITP is diagnosed by ruling out other causes and is often present before pregnancy. Most cases of ITP during pregnancy do not require treatment. Preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome can also cause low platelet counts, sometimes necessitating early delivery (9). Careful observation is necessary for pregnant individuals with normal platelet counts who have experienced Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopenia (NAT) in a previous pregnancy or in the offspring of family members. Testing for antiplatelet antibodies in the mother’s and baby’s blood can determine the presence of antibodies in maternal plasma, their reactivity with the baby’s platelets, and the immunological sensitivity of the parental and embryonic platelets (with appropriate typing). Antigenic typing of the father’s platelets helps assess the risk of NAT in the current pregnancy. If, severe immune-mediated thrombocytopenia is suspected in the foetus due to autoantibodies or alloantibodies, foetal platelet counts should be measured, ideally by puncturing the umbilical cord. If the number of foetal platelets is less than 50,000/μL or cannot be measured but is likely to be low, caesarean delivery should be strongly considered (10). It has been demonstrated 30 that prenatal administration of IVIG reduces the risk of intracranial hemorrhage and improves outcomes in fetuses and newborns (10).

Thrombotic microangiopathy, including Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP) and Complement-mediated (CM) Haemolytic Uraemic Syndrome (HUS), is rare during pregnancy and can be difficult to distinguish from other conditions like preeclampsia (11). Close monitoring and multidisciplinary care can improve outcomes. Treatment decisions for ITP and HUS during pregnancy are challenging due to limited research on new therapies, such as thrombopoietin-receptor agonists or eculizumab, requiring a careful balance of potential benefits against risks to both the mother and baby.

A diagnostic strategy for women with thrombocytopenia during pregnancy emphasises the minor variations in physical assessment, clinical course, appearance, and laboratory results that can help narrow the range of possibilities (11). Preeclampsia, immune system suppression, and other prevalent causes of neutropenia during pregnancy were highlighted in four clinical scenarios, along with their pathogenesis and management (12). The case presented involved a patient with ITP, in which the diagnosis was made early in the pregnancy. First-line therapy for this condition included high-dose steroid hormones, injectable immune globulin, and other splenectomy-sparing methods such as lymphoma treatment. Control of the condition was achieved in the third trimester following splenectomy (13). Although it was not beneficial in this instance, the authors suggested that rituximab should be considered prior to surgery when a woman is pregnant.

It is recommended to use these indices for the benefit of both the foetus and the mother, as anaemia and thrombocytopenia frequently coexist during pregnancy (14). There is a direct correlation between Platelet Distribution Width (PDW) and severe thrombocytopenia, while an indirect correlation exists between PDW and mild thrombocytopenia (15). Factors such as maternal fever and anaemia, foetal development issues, inappropriate alcohol consumption, blood-related procedures, and platelet transfusions are directly associated with thrombocytopenia during pregnancy.

The text discusses two postpartum ITP patients who received effective therapy in a tertiary hospital using Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists (TPO-RA) (16). The management of ITP during pregnancy relies on clinical expertise, and most of the TPO-RA usage in this context comes from case studies. If alternative treatments fail for severe ITP, the medication may be administered starting at 34 weeks. In certain pregnancies, the mother’s response to medication may vary, and in specific instances, it may be appropriate to induce labour.

The management of thrombocytopenia during pregnancy and outlines a decision-making process that considers factors such as the patient’s medical history, platelet count, and clinical examination to guide diagnostic and treatment strategies has been depicted in (Table/Fig 4).

Physicians, haematologists, and other healthcare professionals must adopt an integrated approach to address neutropenia during pregnancy to ensure the safety of both the mother and the unborn child (8). Regular follow-up assessments and individualised treatment plans are crucial for achieving the best outcomes for pregnant individuals with thrombocytopenia. Similar cases are well-documented worldwide as well (9).

Conclusion

The present case series highlights the importance of multidisciplinary management for complex obstetric patients with thrombocytopenia and multiple other co-morbidities. A collaborative effort among obstetricians, haematologists, physicians, and other specialists is essential to navigate the complexities of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy and to ensure optimal outcomes for both the mother and the baby, as evidenced by our patients.

References

1.
Ruszala M, Poniedzialek-Czajkowska E, Mierzynski R, Wankowicz A, Zamojska A, et al. Thrombocytopenia in pregnant women. Ginekologia Polska. 2021;92(8):587-90. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Efobi CC, Okoye HC, Korubo KI, Ezebialu IU, John OC. Evaluation of obstetricians’ opinion of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy: A cross-sectional study. West Afr J Med. 2022;39(7):657-62. PMID: 35921687.
3.
Zhou F, Xu T, Deng C, Yu H, Wang X. Severe thrombocytopenia in pregnancy: A case series from west China. Clin Exp Med. 2019;19(4):495-503. Doi: 10.1007/s10238-019-00575-6. Epub 2019 Aug 28. PMID: 31463831. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Committee on Practice Bulletins Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin no. 207: Thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(3):e181-93. [crossref]
5.
Eslick R, McLintock C. Managing ITP and thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Platelets. 2020;31(3):300-06. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Subtil SFC, Mendes JMB, Areia ALFA, Moura JPAS. Update on thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2020;42(12):834-40. Doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721350. Epub 2020 Dec 21. PMID: 33348401; PMCID: PMC10309201. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Halici-Ozturk F, Ozturk M, Yakistiran B, Caglar AT, Engin-Ustun Y, Ozgu-Erdinc AS. Severe thrombocytopenia in pregnancy: A retrospective study. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2020;31(8):517-21. Doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000955. PMID: 32897892. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Allyson M. Pishko, Lisa D. Levine, Douglas B. Cines. Thrombocytopenia in pregnancy: Diagnosis and approach to management. Blood Reviews. 2020; 40. Doi :https://doi.org/10.1016/j.blre.2019.100638. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
de Wet R, White S, Navadgi S, Chin J, Khor TS. Massive splenomegaly and thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Pathology. 2023;55(4):576-78. Doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2022.09.006. Epub 2022 Nov 23. PMID: 36503637. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Van Der Lugt NM, Kamphuis MM, Paridaans NP, et al. Neonatal outcome in alloimmune thrombocytopenia after maternal treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin. Blood Transfus. 2015;13(1):66-71. Doi:10.2450/2014.0309-13.
11.
Fogerty AE, Kuter DJ. How I treat thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Blood. 2024;143(9):747-56. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Sousa MI, Braga AC, Buchner GC, Braga JS. Rituximab as a treatment for refractory immune thrombocytopenia during pregnancy. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2024;35(5):286-92. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Priyanka B, Kavitha V, Priyadharshni P, Pavithra P. A prospective study of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy in a tertiary care centre, Chennai. Int J Acad Med Pharm. 2024;6(4):60-63.
14.
Marzooq AA, Husain AA, Naseeb AJ. Case of refractory thrombocytopenia in pregnancy associated with may-heglin anomaly after repeated platelet transfusions. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024;14(07):1083-90. [crossref]
15.
Mushahary D, Marwah S, Saran A, Gupta C, Kumari K, Malik S. Feto-maternal outcome in pregnancy with thrombocytopenia and abnormal platelet indices. Cureus. 2024;16(4):e59156. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Sayed G, ElKourashy SA, Alnajjar M, Mallahi NA, Fareed S. Case Report: Thrombopoietin receptor agonists in resistant thrombocytopenia in pregnancy: A case series and review of literature. Frontiers in Hematology. 2023;2:1180156.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/73806.20284

Date of Submission: Jun 11, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Jul 23, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Sep 23, 2024
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 28, 2024
• Manual Googling: Jul 25, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Sep 22, 2024 (5%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com