Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 13215

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2024 | Month : November | Volume : 18 | Issue : 11 | Page : UD01 - UD03 Full Version

Low-dose Fractionated Spinal Anaesthesia for Elective Caesarean Section in a Patient with Large Atrial Septal Defect, Severe Pulmonary Hypertension and Preeclampsia: A Case Report


Published: November 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/73407.20290
Lisa Barman, Karishma Dhankhar, Neha Goyal, Anurag Das

1. Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 2. Postgraduate Student (Third Year), Department of Anaesthesia, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 3. Postgraduate Student (Second Year), Department of Anaesthesia, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 4. Postgraduate Student (Second Year), Department of Anaesthesia, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Lisa Barman,
Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak-124001, Haryana, India.
E-mail: barmanlisa8@gmail.com

Abstract

Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) is one of the most common acyanotic heart diseases presented in adults, with a higher prevalence among females. Patients often go unrecognised until middle age, unless complications such as arrhythmias arise. The physiological changes during pregnancy cause significant alterations in maternal haemodynamics. Cardiac valvular diseases, when present in obstetric patients, are among the leading causes of maternal mortality worldwide. These conditions pose a significant and unanticipated anaesthetic challenge, as the shunting of blood from left to right may precipitate hypoxia, hypercarbia, arrhythmias and cardiac failure. The presence of any other co-morbidities further complicates management. Hereby, the authors reported the successful management of a 30-year-old primigravida female at eight months of pregnancy, associated with a large ASD (34 mm), severe pulmonary hypertension, and preeclampsia, who underwent an elective Caesarean section (C-section). She presented at the Obstetric Emergency Department with dyspnoea at rest, which progressively deteriorated from the second month of pregnancy onward. She had no other complaints during her pregnancy. Echocardiography revealed a large Ostium Secundum ASD (OS-ASD) measuring 34 mm, almost leading to a single atrium physiology, with an ejection fraction of 45% and grossly dilated right atrium and right ventricle, as well as, severe Pulmonary Artery Hypertension (PAH). She underwent an elective Caesarean section with minimal haemodynamic alterations under fractionated spinal anaesthesia, with prophylactic adrenaline infusion. The effects were found to be beneficial and safe for the Caesarean section in patients with large ASD and preeclampsia.

Keywords

Cardiac septal defect, Dose fractionation, Obstetric anaesthesia, Pregnancy

Case Report

A 30-year-old primigravida female presented to the Obstetric Emergency Department at eight months of pregnancy, associated with shortness of breath. On general examination, she exhibited dyspnoea at rest {New York Heart Association (NYHA) grade 4} while breathing room air, with an Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) of 87%. She was promptly started on oxygen therapy via a simple facial mask at 6 litres/min in a semi-recumbent position, which raised her SpO2 to 98% and provided some relief to her laboured breathing (respiratory rate: 20 breaths/min).

Auscultation revealed decreased air entry in both lungs, along with moderate crepitations at the bases. Her heart examination showed regular S1 and S2, with a grade 4 pansystolic murmur best heard at the left lower sternal border. Patient appeared pale and had grade 2 clubbing of the fingers on both hands, as well as, bilateral pitting oedema extending to the sacrum, with no cyanosis. Her Blood Pressure (BP) was recorded at 158/104 mmHg, and Heart Rate (HR) was 118 beats/min. The obstetrician diagnosed her with preeclampsia and administered an injection of labetalol 20 mg instantaneously. She was then started on oral labetalol 100 mg twice daily.

The patient had been well prior to her pregnancy and worked as a manual labourer with a Metabolic Equivalent (MET) of >4, without any signs or symptoms until pregnancy. Her respiratory distress began in the second month of pregnancy and gradually worsened as the pregnancy progressed (NYHA 1 to NYHA 4). She had not received any antenatal check-ups until presenting at the Emergency Department.

A foetal ultrasonography scan revealed good foetal movement and ruled out placenta accreta. A cardiology opinion was sought regarding ECG changes, and an echocardiography was performed. The echocardiography revealed a large Ostium Secundum Atrial Septal Defect (OS-ASD) measuring 34 mm, almost leading to a single atrial physiology. The defect was associated with an ejection fraction of 45%, moderate to severe Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) (Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP)=82 mmHg + right atrial pressure), moderate Pulmonary Regurgitation (PR), a dilated right atrium and ventricle, severe PAH at 84 mmHg, an immensely dilated pulmonary artery with a main pulmonary artery diameter of 44 mm, and paradoxical septal motion. She was started on furosemide (20 mg) twice daily. The obstetricians decided to perform an elective Caesarean section scheduled for the following day. Her blood pressure and heart rate were 138/84 mmHg and 104 beats/min preoperatively. A multidisciplinary team of trained anaesthesiologists, obstetricians, paediatricians and nursing staff were informed to be present on a priority basis in the Operating Room (OR). The procedure was explained to the patient and her husband, and consent was obtained regarding the risks to both the mother and foetus. The plan for anaesthesia favoured a subarachnoid block over general anaesthesia, firstly to minimise the exposure of the foetus to the adverse side-effects of general anaesthetics, and secondly to minimise airway handling, as the patient already had preeclampsia and bilateral pitting oedema, indicating anticipated airway difficulty. The anaesthetic goal was to prevent hypoxia, acidosis, hypercapnia and profound hypotension. Aspiration prophylaxis was administered with ranitidine 50 mg and ondansetron 4 mg intravenously. The patient was shifted to the OR, and standard American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) monitors (non invasive BP, ECG and pulse oximeter) were attached. Two wide-bore (18 G) cannulas were secured, and intravenous Ringer’s lactate was started through one cannula. Right radial arterial catheterisation was performed for continuous arterial monitoring in anticipation of haemodynamic alterations.

Baseline Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) analysis revealed pH/pO2/pCO2/HCO3/BE/Lac/Na+/K+/Ca+=7.43/104/28/22/-1.1/0.96/134/3.56/0.8. All emergency cardiac medications and defibrillators were prepared in anticipation of adverse cardiac events, and a difficult airway cart was kept on standby. Under aseptic precautions, a fractionated subarachnoid block was administered using a 23G Quincke spinal needle, with an injection of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine (1.6 mL) and an injection of fentanyl (0.2 mL) at the level of the third lumbar intervertebral space. She was also started on an infusion of adrenaline at a rate of 0.1 mcg/kg/min to prevent sudden hypotension induced by spinal anaesthesia. Supplementary oxygen was supplied via nasal prongs at 4 litres/min intraoperatively. A 1.8 kg small-for-gestational-age baby was delivered, with an Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity and Respiration (APGAR) score of 7/10 at 1 minute and 9/10 at 5 minutes. After initial resuscitation, the baby was transferred to the nursery. Oxytocin (15 IU) was injected intramuscularly following the delivery of the baby. The infusion of adrenaline was gradually tapered off. The rest of the surgery was uneventful, and her haemodynamics remained within 10% of preoperative values throughout the one-hour surgery. The total urine output was 200 mL, and the total blood loss was 300 mL. The ABG at the end of the surgery revealed pH/pO2/pCO2/HCO3/BE/Lac/Na+/K+/Ca+=7.34/159/32/20/-5.2/1.29/138/4/0.8. Adequate analgesia was ensured in the postoperative period to prevent sympathetic stimulation. She was shifted to the Intensive Care Unit after 45 minutes of close monitoring in the Post-

2Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU), with cardiology and cardiac surgery follow-up. The cardiologist started her on tablet (tab) tadalafil 20 mg, tab ambrisentan 5 mg, and tab spironolactone 25 mg twice daily, with proper antibiotic coverage. Cardiac surgery consultation revealed the defect to be inoperable and fatally irreversible. She was transferred to a cardiac centre for better management of her condition after she was stabilised haemodynamically, with BP 132/76 mmHg, HR 98/min, and SpO2 99% on nasal prongs at 2 litres/min oxygen.

Discussion

Cardiac diseases in pregnancy are leading causes of maternal mortality in the peripartum period, with an incidence of 0.3-3.5%. ASD is the most common acyanotic cardiac anomaly, accounting for 10% of Grown-up Congenital Heart Disease (GUCHD), with a higher prevalence among females. Patients often go unrecognised until middle age when complications such as arrhythmia and paradoxical embolism become more prominent (1). There are three types of ASD based on anatomical location: ostium secundum (85%), ostium primum (10%) and sinus venosus (5%), with coronary sinus defects being rare. Smaller defects (<3 mm) can close spontaneously within 18 months, while medium-sized defects (3-8 mm) may take longer to close. In contrast, defects larger than 8 mm typically require surgery (2). Large ASDs cause shunting of blood from left to right. Pregnancy and anaesthetic agents further complicate the steady state between systemic and pulmonary circulation (2).

Here, the authors reported a case of successful management of a primigravida undergoing elective Caesarean section with an enormous ASD of 34 mm, possibly the largest reported to date, further complicated by severe pulmonary hypertension and preeclampsia, under fractionated low-dose spinal anaesthesia. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient before reporting the present case.

The physiological haemodynamic changes in pregnancy include increased stroke volume, cardiac output, heart rate and oxygen consumption (3). These changes are further accentuated by foetal growth and peak during labour and the puerperium. The left-to-right shunting of blood in ASD places a significant load on the right atrium, right ventricle, pulmonary arteries and lungs. Sympathetic hyperstimulation and increased metabolic demand during labour further exacerbate shunting (4). All these factors pose an unanticipated challenge to the anaesthesiologist when choosing suitable anaesthesia for the patient. General anaesthesia carries the risk of abrupt and uncontrolled fluctuations in haemodynamics, with the possibility of reversing the intracardiac shunt. It also increases the chances of air embolism during vascular access, heart block, rhythm disturbances (5-10%), heart failure and infective endocarditis (5).

The authors choice was regional anaesthesia, keeping in mind that it is always preferable to general anaesthesia for both the mother and foetus (6). From the aspect of preeclampsia, regional anaesthesia not only decreases maternal morbidity and mortality but also increases uteroplacental flow and improves neonatal outcomes (7). One added benefit of the authors decision was the avoidance of an anticipated difficult airway. Perioperative changes in Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR) can impact patients with ASD (1). The authors chose to perform low-dose spinal anaesthesia, as it would lead to less hypotension. Procedure was started with an adrenaline infusion to firstly counteract abrupt hypotension caused by spinal anaesthesia; and secondly decrease the risk of acute heart failure. The authors administered the spinal anaesthesia in a fractionated dosage. The initial two-thirds of the drug was given, and the syringe was kept attached, followed by one-third of the drug after 45 seconds to prevent sudden hypotension and ensure better haemodynamic stability. This approach was motivated by findings from Badheka JP et al., which indicated that a fractionated dose in obstetric patients undergoing elective Caesarean sections resulted in better haemodynamic stability compared to a bolus dose of spinal anaesthesia (8). Another study by Derakhshan P et al., found that a fractionated dose administered 45 seconds apart not only caused less frequent haemodynamic changes but was also associated with a longer duration and better blockade compared to the bolus method of spinal anaesthesia (9). According to the literature, oxygen is a potent and selective vasodilator of the pulmonary vasculature with minimal systemic side-effects (10). Comparisons of multiple studies have shown a reduction of 5-15% in mean pulmonary artery pressure with acute oxygen administration [10-14]. Therefore, the authors provided patient with supplemental oxygen at 4 litres per minute via nasal cannula throughout the surgery, which is beneficial in cases of severe PAH. The nasal cannula is the simplest oxygen delivery device, capable of delivering 1-6 litres per minute of oxygen with a variable FiO2 of 24-40% (15). Intraoperatively, special care was taken to maintain haemodynamics as close to preoperative values as possible to prevent the worsening of shunt reversal. Perioperatively, the authors ensured adequate preload, good contractility of the heart, near-normal heart rate and SVR, and adequate analgesia to achieve favourable outcomes.

Conclusion

Cardiac diseases in pregnancy further complicate the already altered physiology of obstetric patients. A good preoperative assessment, adequate intraoperative preparation and effective analgesia, during both the intraoperative and postoperative periods are essential. Additionally, fair anticipation and emergency preparedness are necessary to manage these challenging conditions. From the present case, the authors can conclude that low-dose fractionated spinal anaesthesia can be beneficial for Caesarean sections in patients with massive ASD with significant shunting and severe PAH, particularly in those with uncomplicated preeclampsia receiving prophylactic adrenaline infusion.

References

1.
Madaan V, Gupta R. Anaesthetic management of a case of large ASD with severe pulmonary hypertension—case presentation. Ain Shams J Anaesthesiol. 2022;14(1):32. [crossref]
2.
Baboker P, Demissie H. Anesthetic management of patient with large atrial septal defect for caesarean delivery in resource limited Setting. Clinical Case Reports and Studies. 2023;4(1):01-03. [crossref]
3.
Kumar B, Soni S, Jafra A. Anesthetic management of double atrial septal defect with moderate pulmonary hypertension emergency caesarean section. J Anesth Clin Res. 2019;10(2):1000876. [crossref]
4.
Periambudi AA, Zainal R, Lestari MI. Spinal anesthesia in patient with congestive heart failure due to congenital atrial septal defect, and pulmonary hypertension undergoing cesarean section procedure: A case report. JACR. 2021;1(2):95-102. [crossref]
5.
Howard-Quijano K, Smith M, Schwarzenberger JC. Perioperative care of adults with congenital heart disease for non-cardiac surgery. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2013;3(3):144-50. [crossref]
6.
Iddrisu M, Khan ZH. Anesthesia for cesarean delivery: General or regional anesthesia—A systematic review. Ain-Shams J Anaesthesiol. 2021;13(1). [crossref]
7.
Ankichetty SP, Chin KJ, Chan VW, Sahajanandan R, Tan H, Grewal A, et al. Regional anesthesia in patients with pregnancy induced hypertension. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013;29(4):435-44. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Badheka JP, Oza VP, Vyas A, Baria D, Nehra P, Babu T. Comparison of fractionated dose versus bolus dose injection in spinal anaesthesia for patients undergoing elective caesarean section: A randomised, double-blind study. Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61(1):55-60. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Derakhshan P, Faiz SHR, Rahimzadeh P, Salehi R, Khaef G. A comparison of the effect of fractionated and bolus dose injection on spinal anesthesia for lower limb surgery: A randomized clinical trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2020;10(5):e102228. [crossref]
10.
Green S, Stuart D. Oxygen and pulmonary arterial hypertension: Effects, mechanisms, and therapeutic benefits. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020;28(1):127-36. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Roberts DH , Lepore JJ , Maroo A , Semigran MJ , Ginns LC. Oxygen therapy improves cardiac index and pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Chest. 2001;120(5):1547-55. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Groth A, Saxer S, Bader PR, Lichtblau M, Furian M, Schneider SR, et al. Acute hemodynamic changes by breathing hypoxic and hyperoxic gas mixtures in pulmonary arterial and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Int J Cardiol. 2018;270:262-67. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Green S, Stuart D. Effects of oxygen therapy in a young normoxaemic patient with pulmonary arterial hypertension and congenital heart disease. Pulm Circ. 2019;9(2):01-03. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Green S, Stuart D. Oxygen therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension: We need to rethink and investigate. Respirology. 2020;25(5):470-71. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Hardavella G, Karampinis I, Frille A, Sreter K, Rousalova I. Oxygen devices and delivery systems. Breathe. 2019;15(3):e108-16. [crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/73407.20290

Date of Submission: Jun 08, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Jul 31, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Sep 04, 2024
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 10, 2024
• Manual Googling: Jul 29, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Sep 03, 2024 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com