Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 12514

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : November | Volume : 18 | Issue : 11 | Page : WC06 - WC10 Full Version

Prevalence of Sexually Transmitted Infections in Self-reporting Men Who have Sex with Men: A Cross-sectional Study from Chennai, India


Published: November 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/72976.20264
R Sowmiya, BT Priya, Ragini Rajan, V Anandan, Ramya Selvaraj

1. Associate Professor, Department of Dermatology, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Dermatology, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Professor, Department of Dermatology, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Postgraduate Student, Department of Dermatology, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. BT Priya,
A2B, Aishwaryam Apartments, Barakka Road, Secretrait Colony, Kilpauk, Chennai-600010, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: priyachiran@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Men who have Sex with Men (MSM) are at high-risk for acquiring Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs). The high prevalence of STIs, such as syphilis, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), genital herpes, genital warts, gonorrhea, and hepatitis B, necessitates regular screening in the MSM group. Furthermore, the presence of these STIs increases the transmission of HIV. Unfortunately, limited data are available regarding STI prevalence among MSM in India. Understanding the prevalence in this high-risk group aids in rapid diagnosis and effective control of infections, thereby reducing their transmission.

Aim: To analyse the prevalence of STIs in the MSM group in Venereology Outpatient Department (OPD) in a Tertiary care centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Materials and Methods: A record-based cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care centre in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India over a period of one year (January 2023 - December 2023). The study included 110 men who were brought in by voluntary organisations or who walked in directly to the Venereology department and identified themselves as homosexuals. Their socio-demographic data, detailed contact history, chief complaints, relevant investigations, and treatments provided were recorded and analysed. All data were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software.

Results: Out of the 110 men enrolled in this study, most were in the 18 to 29 years age group, and a predominant 58 (52.72%) reported engaging in unprotected sexual practices. Specifically, 67 (60.91%) of the men identified themselves as strictly homosexuals, while 43 (39.1%) identified as bisexuals. Further inquiry about their partners revealed that 24 (21.82%) had contact with known partners, while 86 (78.18%) had contact with unknown partners, primarily through dating apps and social media platforms. Among the 42 patients diagnosed with STIs, syphilis was the most common, affecting 15 (13.63%) individuals. The second most common STI was HIV, seen in 10 (9.09%) of which 4 had co-infection with syphilis. The next most common STIs diagnosed were genital herpes in 7 (6.36%), gonorrhea in 6 (5.45%), genital warts in 3 (2.73%), hepatitis B in 3 (2.73%), and genital scabies in 2 (1.81%).

Conclusion: The prevalence of STIs in this study was found to be 38.18%. This study underscores the importance of understanding the prevalence of STIs, which may aid in targeted interventions to address STI transmission, particularly among young adults and MSM populations. Efforts should focus on promoting safer sexual practices, increasing access to testing and treatment, and providing education and support to both individuals and their partners.

Keywords

Homosexuals, Sexually transmitted disease, Syphilis

Homosexuality can be described as the behaviour of a person whose sexual desire is predominantly directed towards members of the same sex or who primarily engages in sexual activity with persons of the same sex (1). MSM fall under this broader category of homosexuality. The changing societal attitudes towards sexuality and increasing acceptance have led to a noticeable rise in the number of MSM who come out and express their sexual orientation (2). Social media and dating apps play a significant role in facilitating discreet connections among MSM (3).

MSM populations are at a higher risk of transmitting STIs and HIV infections compared to heterosexual individuals, as they often engage in high-risk sexual practices (4),(5),(6). It is crucial to study the prevalence of STIs in this high-risk group. Limited data are currently available regarding STI prevalence among MSM in India, as noted in studies by Setia MS et al., Aggarwal P et al., and Pravitha BP et al., (5),(7),(8). Understanding the prevalence of STIs in this high-risk group is essential for rapid diagnosis and effective control of infections, thereby reducing transmission (7).

The purpose of this study was to analyse the prevalence of STIs among the MSM group, which may help in understanding the factors contributing to the rise of STIs and in developing effective control measures to prevent further transmission. Ultimately, this can lead to a decrease in the overall prevalence of STIs in the community.

Material and Methods

This was a record-based cross-sectional study conducted on men who either walked in directly or were brought in by voluntary organisations and identified themselves as homosexuals at the Venereology OPD of a tertiary care centre in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. This study was conducted in January 2024, and the records from January 2023 to December 2023 were reviewed, covering a 12-month period. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional ethics committee (ECR/131/Inst/TN/2013/RR-22).

Inclusion criteria: Men above 18 years old who have sex with men and attend the Venereology OPD, whether as direct walk-ins or brought in by voluntary organisations for screening or with genital lesions, were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Men under 18-year-old and heterosexuals were excluded from the study.

Sample size: Sample size was calculated based on a similar study by Aggarwal P et al., India (7).

n=z2+pq/L2

Z=1.96 (statistical significant constant for 95% CI)

P=7%, q=100-p=93, L=absolute error=5%

n=1·96×1·96×7×93/5×5

n=2501/25=100.04

Therefore, by using the above formula and 10% non-response rate, the calculated sample size was 110.

Study Procedure

The male patients who sought care at the skin and venereal diseases OPD and reported being involved in sexual relationships with other males were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The following data were collected: demographic information regarding sexual orientation, age, marital status, educational status, present occupation, and details of their contacts. Subsequently, detailed information regarding sexual practices was obtained. This was followed by documenting the clinical history and examination findings.

All patients were screened for syphilis, HIV, and Hepatitis B. Screening for syphilis was conducted using the Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) test, and those who tested reactive for RPR were confirmed with the Treponema pallidum Hemagglutination Assay (TPHA) using a card test. Additional laboratory investigations were performed in accordance with the patients’ symptoms. For patients presenting with genital ulcers and discharge, smears were taken for dark field microscopy, Tzanck smear, Gram stain, and Giemsa stain. All patients were referred to the Integrated Counselling and Testing Centre (ICTC) for voluntary counselling and testing for HIV.

Statistical Analysis

The data were presented as frequencies and percentages. All analyses were conducted using SPSS software 21.0.

Results

In this study, over one year, a total of 110 patients who self-reported to the venereology OPD and identified themselves as MSM were enrolled. The prevalence of STIs in this study was found to be 42 (38.18%). Analysing the socio-demographic data, as depicted in (Table/Fig 1), the most common age group ranged from 18 to 29 years. Out of the 110 patients, 34 (30.91%) were uneducated, while the remaining were educated, which included 32 (29.09%) graduates and 4 (3.64%) postgraduates. Additionally, 23 (20.91%) MSMs were Commercial Sex Workers (CSWs), and 21 (19.09%) MSM patients were married, thereby posing an increased risk of transmission of infection to their female partners.

Among the 110 patients, 74 (67.27%) were brought in by voluntary organisations for screening, while the other 36 (32.73%) patients were direct walk-ins. The most common genital complaint was a genital ulcer, seen in 13 (11.82%) patients, followed by a maculopapular rash on the palms and soles in 7 (6.36%) and urethral discharge in 6 (5.45%) (Table/Fig 2). Four (3.64%) patients who were asymptomatic at the time of presentation were found to have a sexually transmitted disease upon further laboratory investigation.

(Table/Fig 3) illustrates the sexual practices among MSM patients. Sixty-seven (60.91%) men identified as strictly homosexual, while 43 (39.09%) identified as bisexual, although they predominantly preferred male partners. Fifty-seven (51.82%) men were ano-insertive in practice, and 58 (52.72%) reported having unprotected intercourse. Eighty-six (78.18%) men had contact with unknown partners.

(Table/Fig 4) depicts the most common STDs in the MSM group. The most prevalent STD was found to be syphilis, seen in 15 (13.63%) patients, followed by HIV in 10 (9.09%) patients (among whom six had only HIV and four had a co-infection of HIV and syphilis). The next most common infections were genital herpes in 7 (6.36%), gonorrhea in 6 (5.45%), genital warts in 3 (2.73%), hepatitis B in 3 (2.73%), and genital scabies in 2 (1.81%). All others who came for screening were found to be free of STDs.

Discussion

In this study, the prevalence of STIs among MSM was found to be 38.18%. A recent study on the MSM population in Kerala by Pravitha BP et al., (2015-2020) also noted a prevalence of STIs among MSM at 46.30% (8). Studying prevalence is crucial for public health efforts aimed at preventing the transmission of STIs and HIV.

High rates of partner turnover, high-risk sexual practices, and inconsistent condom use contribute to the increased transmission of STIs and HIV among these men. Additional factors, such as stigma associated with this population, discrimination, and barriers to accessing healthcare, further increase the risk (7). MSM are at greater health risk than heterosexual men not only because of promiscuity but also due to the nature of sexual practices among men. Anal intercourse is relatively common among MSM, and the rectum differs significantly from the vagina. The vagina has stratified squamous epithelium with secretions that help with lubrication during sexual intercourse, allowing it to endure friction without damage and resist the immunological actions caused by semen and sperm (9). In contrast, the rectum and anal canal consist of delicate muscles that cannot withstand the friction associated with penile penetration, leading to trauma, damage to the anal sphincter, anal tears, and fecal incontinence (10). All of these factors expose both participants to blood and organisms in feces, resulting in infection, inflammation, and enhanced susceptibility to STIs. The fragility of the anus and rectum, along with the immunosuppressive effect of ejaculate, makes anogenital intercourse a particularly efficient means of HIV transmission (11).

In this study, the most common age group of MSM was 18 to 29 years, which was comparable to the findings of Aggarwal P et al., where the common age group ranged from 20 to 29 years (7), and Setia MS et al., where the common age group ranged from 18.5 to 28.7 years (5). Similarly, in Pravitha BP et al., study a majority of patients were in the age group of 20 to 30 years (47.3%) (8).

In this study, 29.09% of MSM were graduates, and 3.64% were post-graduates. In Aggarwal P et al., 17.31% and 3.85% were graduates and postgraduates, respectively (7). In this study, 15.45% were self-employed, and 27.27% were professionals. Similar findings were noted in Pravitha BP et al., study, where most patients (82.4%) among MSM were semiprofessional workers (8). Unlike the studies conducted by Setia MS et al., Aggarwal P et al., and Pravitha BP et al., this study noted that 20.90% of MSM were CSWs (5),(7),(8).

In this study, 19.09% of MSM patients were married. This findingwas similar to that of Aggarwal P et al., where 34.62% were married (7), and Setia MS et al., which noted that 22% of MSM were married (5). Pravitha BP et al., study found that 41.9% of MSM were married (8). These MSM, who are married to women,often feel obligated to have intercourse with their wives to fulfil societal expectations of having children, thereby increasing the risk of STI transmission to females. In this study, strict MSM accounted for more (60.91%) than bisexual MSM, which was contrary to the findings of Aggarwal P et al., where bisexual individuals comprised a greater percentage (63.46%) than strict homosexuals (7). These bisexual individuals serve as a bridge population for STI transmission (3). Therefore, it is crucial to trace, treat, and follow-up with married and bisexual MSM due to their significant role in the spread of STIs.

Additionally, 67.27% of MSM were brought in by voluntary organisations for screening, while 3.63% of MSM who were initially asymptomatic later received an STI diagnosis. This underscores the importance of screening. Voluntary organisations also play a vital role in tracing MSM individuals, creating awareness among them regarding STI risks, motivating them for regular screenings, and counseling them on the proper use of condoms. Through regular screening, STIs can be diagnosed at an early stage, allowing for appropriate treatment to be initiated and thereby preventing complications.

In previous studies by Setia MS et al., and Brahmam GN et al., genital herpes was found to be the most common STI among MSM (5),(12). In the study, conducted by Aggarwal P et al., genital warts were the most common STI, occurring in 23.08% of cases, followed by HIV in 23.08% and syphilis in 21.15% (7). Viral STIs were found to be more common in these studies. In contrast, the study by Pravitha BP et al., found that syphilis was the most common STI, present in 64.9% of cases, followed by genital warts in 36.5% and HIV in 14.9% (8). Similarly, in this study, syphilis was the most common STI, found in 13.63% of MSM, followed by HIV in 9.09%. This changing trend from viral STIs to bacterial STIs has been observed after the year 2015 and continues to the present (8),(13),(14).

In this study, HIV co-infection with syphilis was found in 3.63% of patients. Similar findings were noted in other Indian studies, such as the study by Pravitha BP et al., (8), where HIV co-infection with syphilis was reported in 8.1% of patients and in the study by Aggarwal P et al., where the HIV-syphilis co-infection was reported in 5.77% of patients (7). This HIV co-infection with syphilis could enhance HIV replication by increasing the activation of the immune system and causing cytokine alterations. This co-infection negatively impacts immune recovery and the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy (15),(16). A comparison of data with similar studies has been presented in (Table/Fig 5) (4),(5),(7),(8),(17),(18),(19),(20),(21),(22).

In this study, it was noted that a significant number of individuals (78.18%) had contact with unknown male partners, making contact tracing very difficult and resulting in the spread of STIs to other MSM. To address this issue, social media platforms can be utilised to create awareness among MSM (23).

Some suggested strategies to decrease the prevalence of STIs in this high-risk group include increasing awareness about the signs and symptoms of STIs before entering dating apps. This knowledge helps individuals recognise early symptoms and seek treatment promptly, thereby reducing the likelihood of transmission to partners. While using dating apps, it is essential to emphasise the importance of using protection (condoms) during sexual activity. Lastly, better coordination between physicians and voluntary organisations for field-level tracing of MSM groups and their contacts will ensure that MSM individuals undergo regular screening, early diagnosis, and treatment, ultimately decreasing the prevalence of STIs.

Limitation(s)

As this is a record-based study, retrieving detailed histories was challenging. More information regarding the contacts could not be obtained. Additionally, no comparison was made between STIs among MSM and STIs among heterosexual men.

Conclusion

The MSM is a high-risk group due to the high prevalence of STIs among them. In this study, the prevalence of STIs was found to be 38.18%, with syphilis being the most common STI, affecting 13.63% of the subjects. As the prevalence of syphilis and HIV among this vulnerable group continues to rise, it is crucial to create awareness about STI risks and encourage regular screening to facilitate early diagnosis and prompt treatment. Since a significant portion of the MSM population is young and educated, combining traditional outreach and educational approaches with digital interventions will be a powerful strategy for maximising healthcare initiatives within the MSM community.

References

1.
Rao TS, Jacob KS. Homosexuality and India. Indian J Psychiatry. 2012;54(1):01-03. Doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.94636. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Biswas M. Socio-economically convenient ‘coming-out’ decision of India’s lesbian, gay, bisexual community. Int J Res Cult Soc. 2018;2(2):324.
3.
Unyapipat C, In-iw S, Manaboriboon B. Influence of online dating apps on sexual risk adolescents and youths in Thailand: An online cross-sectional survey. Siriraj Med J. 2023;75(9):612-21. Doi: 10.33192/smj.v75i9.264171. [crossref]
4.
Garg T, Chander R, Jain A, Barara M. Sexually transmitted diseases among men who have sex with men: A retrospective analysis from Suraksha clinic in tertiary care hospital, India. J Sex Transm Dis. 2012;33:16-19. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Setia MS, Lindan C, Jerajani HR, Kumta S, Ekstrand M, Mathur M, et al. Men who have sex with men and transgenders in Mumbai, India: An emerging risk group for STIs and HIV. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2006;72:425-57. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Saha MK, Mahapatra T, Biswas S, Ghosh P, Mahapatra S, Deb AK, et al. Sociobehavioural correlates of HIV risk among men who have sex with men in Chhattisgarh, India: Analysis of sentinel surveillance data. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2015;68:38-44. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Aggarwal P, Bhattar S, Sahani SK, Bhalla P, Garg VK. Sexually transmitted infections and HIV in self-reporting men who have sex with men: A two-year study from India. J Infect Public Health. 2016;9:564-70. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Pravitha BP, Prathap P, Asokan N, Sudhiraj TS. The profile of sexually transmitted infections of men who have sex with men: A tertiary care centre-based comparative cross-sectional study. Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS. 2023;44(2):128-131. Doi: 10.4103/ijstd.ijstd_14_21. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Jenness SM, Begier EM, Neagius A, Murrill CS, Wendal T, Hagen H, et al. Unprotected anal intercourse and sexually transmitted diseases in high-risk heterosexual women. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(4):745-50. Doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.181883. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Hladik F, McElrath MJ. Setting the stage: Host invasion by HIV. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:447-57. Doi: 10.1038/nri2302. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Haase AT. Targeting early infection to prevent HIV-1 mucosal transmission. Nature. 2010;464:217-23. Doi: 10.1038/nature08757. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Brahmam GN, Kodavalla V, Rajkumar H, Rachakulla HK, Kallam S, Myakala SP, et al. Sexual practices, HIV, and sexually transmitted infections among self-identified men who have sex with men in four high HIV prevalence states of India. AIDS. 2008;22(Suppl 5):S45-57. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Shah BJ, Karia DR, Pawara CL. Syphilis: Is it making a resurgence? Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS. 2015;36(2):178-81. Doi: 10.4103/2589-0557.167170. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Kamat S, Vaghasia A, Dharmender J, Kansara KG, Shah BJ. Syphilis: Is it back with a bang? Indian Dermatol Online J. 2024;15(1):73-77. Doi: 10.4103/idoj.idoj_187_23. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Ren M, Dashwood T, Walmsley S. The intersection of HIV and syphilis: Update on the key considerations in testing and management. Curr HIV AIDS Rep. 2021;18:280-88. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Fan L, Yu A, Zhang D, Wang Z, Ma P. Consequence of HIV/syphilis co-infection on HIV viral load and immune response to antiretroviral therapy. Infect Drug Resist. 2021;14:2851-62. Doi: 10.2147/IDR.S320648. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Go VF, Srikrishnan AK, Sivaram S, Murugavel GK, Galai N, Johnson SC, et al. High HIV prevalence and risk behavior in men who have sex with men in Chennai, India. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35:314-19. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Mwaniki SW, Kaberia PM, Mugo PM, Palanee-Phillips T. Prevalence of five curable sexually transmitted infections and associated risk factors among tertiary student men who have sex with men in Nairobi, Kenya: A respondent-driven sampling survey. Sex Health. 2023;20(2):105-17. Doi: 10.1071/SH22114. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Ye ZH, Chen S, Liu F, Cui ST, Liu ZZ, Jiang YJ, et al. Patterns of sexually transmitted co-infections and associated factors among men who have sex with men: A cross-sectional study in Shenyang, China. Public Health. 2022;10:842644. Doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.842644. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Hart TA, Moore DM, Noor SW, Lachowsky N, Grace D, Cox J, et al. Prevalence of HIV and sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections, and related preventive and risk behaviours, among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver: Results from the Engage Study. Can J Public Health. 2021;112(6):1020-29. Doi: 10.17269/s41997-021-00546-z. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Hakim AJ, Iwamoto C, Badman SG, Willie B, Pekon S, Aeno H, et al. High prevalence of chlamydia and gonorrhea and the need for sexually transmitted infection testing among men who have sex with men and transgender women in Papua New Guinea. Sex Transm Dis. 2021;48(2):109-17. Doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001300.[crossref][PubMed]
22.
Fournet N, Koedijk FDH, van Leeuwen AP, van Rooijen MS, van der Sande MA, van Veen MG. Young male sex workers are at high-risk for sexually transmitted infections: A cross-sectional study from Dutch STI clinics, the Netherlands, 2006–2012. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:63. Doi: 10.1186/ s12879-016-1388-3. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Zou H, Fan S. Characteristics of men who have sex with men who use smartphone geosocial networking applications and implications for HIV interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46(4):885-94. Doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0709-3. Epub 2016.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/72976.20264

Date of Submission: May 19, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Jun 13, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Oct 08, 2024
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 19, 2024
• Manual Googling: Jun 15, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Oct 07, 2024 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com