Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 28829

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2024 | Month : November | Volume : 18 | Issue : 11 | Page : OD04 - OD06 Full Version

Stress-induced Late Onset Adult Idiopathic Epilepsy after Snakebite: A Rare Case Report


Published: November 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/73088.20251
Vignessh Raveekumaran, Elakkian Raj, Sethuraj Selvaraj

1. Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, SBVU (Deemed to be University), Pondicherry, India. 2. Final Year Postgraduate, Department of General Medicine, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, SBVU (Deemed to be University), Pondicherry, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, SBVU (Deemed to be University), Pondicherry, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Vignessh Raveekumaran,
Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, SBVU (Deemed to be University), Pondicherry-607402, India.
E-mail: vignesshravee@gmail.com

Abstract

Viper snake bites are associated with haemorrhagic qualities and bleeding disorders, including intracerebral haemorrhage. However, idiopathic epilepsy resulting from viper venom is considered a rare condition. Here is a case of a 30-year-old female who developed idiopathic epilepsy following a snake bite within two hours of the incident. Based on her clinical symptoms and laboratory investigations, the patient was immediately treated with Anti-Snake Venom (ASV) and supportive care. She then experienced an idiopathic seizure upon admission, and her Electroencephalography (EEG) showed generalised epileptiform activity. Subsequently, she was treated with anticonvulsant agents. After being discharged, the patient was readmitted one month later for the same condition, experiencing multiple seizure episodes, each lasting about 40 to 50 seconds. Her MRI of the brain was normal. She was then treated with two anticonvulsant agents and discharged with regular follow-up. This case highlights the importance of maintaining a high suspicion for seizures in patients presenting after envenomation. Early diagnosis and aggressive management may help prevent further neuromuscular damage to the patient.

Keywords

Anti-snake venom, Electroencephalography, Envenomation, Russell viper

Case Report

A 30-year-old staff nurse presented to the Emergency Medical Service (EMS) with an alleged history of a snake bite on the anterior aspect of her neck two hours prior to arrival. She reported shooting pain associated with mild swelling. She also complained of a headache and giddiness. Pain at the bite site developed, for which she was given Tab. Paracetamol (500 mg). Based on her description, the snake was identified as a Russell viper. The bite site exhibited swelling and fang marks, but there was no active bleeding. Upon arrival, she showed no signs of envenomation. She had a past medical history of a vallecular cyst and underwent tracheostomy surgery 13 years ago. She had no history of any pre-existing comorbidities or significant family history. Therefore, she was kept under observation for further signs and symptoms.

During her observation period, the patient was haemodynamically stable, with a Blood Pressure (BP) of 100/60 mmHg and a Pulse Rate (PR) of 69 beats per minute. On examination, the patient’s pupils were dilated to about 4 mm, with normal extraocular movements. Within one hour of arrival, the patient suddenly developed breathlessness, chest tightness, and palpitations. Her BP rose to 160/100 mmHg, and her PR increased to 152 beats per minute. The monitor showed Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT) waves, so carotid massage was administered, and the patient reverted back to normal. Later, the patient again experienced similar episodes within 30 minutes and became unresponsive. Although her eyes were open and she exhibited eye blinking, she was unable to respond to commands and showed generalised flaccidity, brisk reflexes, and a mute bilateral plantar response. Her vitals were monitored and remained similar to the earlier readings. Then, within five to 10 minutes, the patient recovered spontaneously.

According to the standard treatment guidelines for the management of snake bites in India (1), a 20-minute Whole Blood Clotting Test (WBCT) was conducted on admission, which indicated that blood clotted in less than 20 minutes, ruling out an incoagulable state. Consequently, ASV was administered immediately, consisting of eight vials, each containing 10 mL. Routine blood and urine investigations were performed on admission (Table/Fig 1) and yielded normal results. Her renal and liver profiles were normal, except for elevated Aspartate Transaminase (AST) levels (Table/Fig 1). Prothrombin Time (PT) was 15.4 seconds, and activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) was found to be low at 24.5 seconds (Table/Fig 2). Additionally, Electrocardiography (ECG) and Echocardiography (ECHO) showed no abnormalities (Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4).

The patient was then shifted to the Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) for further observation. After four hours, she reported experiencing nausea and anxiety and had a panic attack, during which she briefly lost consciousness and exhibited confusion, teeth clenching, and irregular movements that lasted for about 30 to 40 seconds. A psychiatric consultation was sought for a transient anxiety state, and the patient was counselled and reassured. Despite this, the patient continued to experience two to three similar episodes daily. Consequently, a Computed Tomography (CT) scan and MRI of the brain were performed to identify potential demyelination secondary to envenomation, but the results were normal (Table/Fig 4). A neurologist’s opinion was obtained due to the recurrent episodes, and an EEG was advised.

Within 24 hours, the patient underwent an EEG (Table/Fig 5), which revealed generalised epileptiform activity (bursts of sharp waves from both cerebral hemispheres). She was diagnosed with idiopathic epilepsy and was started on intravenous Levetiracetam 500 mg twice daily (an antiseizure medication). Levetiracetam was continued until her epileptic spells were under control. Although, she was advised to undergo an MRI, she was unable to do so due to financial constraints. Her prognosis improved, and she was discharged after three days with oral antiseizure medications and a follow-up plan.

After one month of being seizure-free, she was readmitted due to experiencing multiple episodes of seizures, each lasting about 40 to 50 seconds. Upon admission, a contrast MRI of the brain was repeated, which revealed normal neuroparenchyma. These findings led to a diagnosis of stress-induced late-onset adult idiopathic epilepsy. Following the neurologist’s opinion, she was administered inj. Lacosamide 50 mg BD (an antiseizure agent), but there was no improvement in the frequency or duration of the seizures. Subsequently, another antiseizure medication, tab. Lamotrigine (50 mg), was added, resulting in a significant response with no further epileptic spells. The patient had a good prognosis. After 10 days, she was discharged, and her injections were converted to oral medication with a titrated dosage of tab. Lacosamide 50 mg BD and tab. Lamotrigine 100 mg BD. She was advised to have regular follow-ups on an outpatient basis, and an EEG was performed to monitor the findings. The medication was tapered slowly after no changes were observed in the EEG.

Discussion

Snake bites are medical emergencies influenced by the bite site, snake type, and venom (1),(2). Russell’s viper, Daboia russelii, is a highly venomous terrestrial snake of the family Viperidae, commonly found in southern India (3),(4). Its venom contains various proteins and procoagulant enzymes that activate the coagulation cascade, leading to the consumption of clotting factors by activating factors V, IX, X, and XIII, and subsequently forming intravascular fibrin thrombi (2),(4),(5). Due to its haemotoxic properties, it causes bleeding and coagulation disorders, which alter PT and aPTT (1),(3). The patient in this case also had a low aPTT. Snake envenomation is a serious issue that requires immediate treatment and can present with potentially fatal outcomes (1),(6),(7). Unfortunately, it remains neglected in many tropical and subtropical countries (8). Many published reports indicate that India has the highest mortality rate (81,000-138,000 people per year) due to snake bites (6),(7). However, many unreported cases occur due to non-medical treatment-seeking behaviour (7).

Common manifestations include local bleeding, swelling, necrosis, pain at the bite site, and signs of systemic bleeding, such as gingival bleeding, epistaxis, ecchymosis, haematemesis, haemoptysis, subconjunctival haemorrhage, haematochezia, and bleeding from pre-existing conditions (1). In this patient, symptoms of envenomation began at the affected extremity with pain, followed by swelling and mild bleeding; however, the characteristic features of haemotoxicity were not presented.

Epilepsy in Russell’s viper is considerably rare. A study conducted by Huang YK et al., showed that D. russelii, which belongs to the Viperidae family, presents with both haemotoxic and neurotoxic venoms that can cause neural disorders (9). These disorders include ptosis, seizures, hypotonia, and other neurological issues. However, in the present case, generalised epileptiform activity occurred four hours after the snakebite, despite a normal brain MRI with no evidence of Intracranial Haemorrhage (ICH) and a normal EEG. This led to the assumption of idiopathic epilepsy, particularly as the patient had no prior history of seizures.

Abnormal electrical activity in the brain can be caused by various factors, including electrical shock, head injury, tumours, infections, strokes, and venomous bites with neurotoxic potential, as well as withdrawal from alcohol and other causes (10). Individuals experiencing seizures often have warning symptoms before an attack, such as flashing lights, anxiety, fear, vertigo, and nausea, which can lead to intractable epilepsy (11),(12). In this case, the presence of haemotoxic venom, without ICH, resulted in a rare presentation. However, there are no case reports supporting the idea that viper venom can cause idiopathic epilepsy, making this case particularly unusual. In (Table/Fig 6), a few cases that exhibited neurological findings after snakebite are summarised (2),(4),(5),(8),(13).

Conclusion

The case report highlights the importance of early detection and treatment of stress-induced late-onset adult epilepsy following a snakebite. It also emphasises the need for a high index of suspicion and early detection to reduce morbidity and mortality, especially in individuals with no prior history of epileptic episodes.

References

1.
Management of Snake Bite [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from: https://qps.nhsrcindia.org/sites/default/files/2021-05/Management%20of%20 Snake%20Bite.pdf.
2.
Banerjee S, Pipliwal PS, Joshi S, Goyal P, Sharma M, Sharma A. Cerebellar ataxia: a rare manifestation of snake envenomation. J Indian Med Assoc. 2019;117(6):28-29.
3.
Laxme RRS, Khochare S, Attarde S, Suranse V, Iyer A, Casewell NR, et al. Biogeographic venom variation in Russell’s viper (Daboia russelii) and the preclinical inefficacy of antivenom therapy in snakebite hotspots. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15(3):e0009247. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009247. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Puri S, Paul G, Paul BS. Snake bite and stroke: Our experience of two cases. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014;18(4):257-58. Doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.130585. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Lahiri D, Sawale VM, Dubey S, Roy BK, Das SK. Status epilepticus and bilateral middle cerebral artery infarction: A rare presentation after viper bite. Ann Afr Med. 2019;18(2):111-14. Doi: 10.4103%2Faam.aam_21_18. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
WHO/SEARO Guidelines for the clinical management of snake bites in the Southeast Asian region. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1999;30 Suppl 1:1-85.
7.
Snakebite envenoming India [Internet]. [cited 2023 Sep 24]. Available from: https://www.who.int/india/health-topics/snakebite.
8.
Yousaf M, Khan QA, Anthony MR, Badshah A, Abdi P, Farkouh C, et al. Snakebite induced cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: a case report. Clin Med Insights Case Rep. 2023;16:11795476231165750. Doi: 10.1177/11795476231165750. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Huang YK, Chen YC, Liu CC, Cheng HC, Tu AT, Chang KC. Cerebral complications of snakebite envenoming: case studies. Toxins (Basel). 2022;14(7):436. Doi: 10.3390/toxins14070436. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Chauhan V, Thakur S. The North–South divide in snake bite envenomation in India. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2016;9(4):151-54. Doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.193350. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Youmans and Winn Neurological Surgery: 8th edition. H. Richard Winn. [Internet]. Elsevier Asia Bookstore. [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Available from: https://www.asia. elsevierhealth.com/youmans-and-winn-neurological-surgery-9780323661928.html.
12.
Cutting S, Lauchheimer A, Barr W, Devinsky O. Adult-onset idiopathic generalized epilepsy: clinical and behavioural features. Epilepsia. 2001;42(11);1395-98. Doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.14901.x. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Seo YH, Park MR, Yoo SH. Development of complex regional pain syndrome after a snake bite: a case report. Korean J Pain. 2014;27:68-71. Doi: 10.3344/ kjp.2014.27.1.68. [crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/73088.20251

Date of Submission: May 25, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Jul 01, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Sep 18, 2024
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 27, 2024
• Manual Googling: Jul 20, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Sep 17, 2024 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com