Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 29576

AbstractConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2024 | Month : November | Volume : 18 | Issue : 11 | Page : QE01 - QE07 Full Version

Exploring Biomarkers in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Comprehensive Review


Published: November 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/73856.20243
Dhivya Senthil Kumar, Sathya Selvarajan, KS Rajeswari

1. Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Biochemistry, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Consultant Biochemist and Quality Manager, Department of Laboratory Medicine, MGM Healthcare Private Limited, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sathya Selvarajan,
Department of Laboratory Medicine, MGM Healthcare Private Limited, No: 72, Nelson Manickam Road, Aminjikarai, Chennai-600029, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: drsathyasunil@gmail.com

Abstract

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is a common complication during pregnancy, typically diagnosed in the second or third trimester. Factors such as advanced maternal age, obesity and a sedentary lifestyle contribute to its prevalence. The pathophysiology involves insulin resistance, β-cell dysfunction, gluconeogenesis, adipose tissue dysfunction, gut microbiota dysbiosis and oxidative stress. GDM is associated with maternal and neonatal complications, both short-term and long-term. Managing GDM requires interventions such as medication, dietary adjustments and regular physical activity. However, early detection in low-risk populations remains challenging. The Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) is the gold standard for diagnosis but is limited by its inconvenience and reliance on multiple blood samples. The present review focuses on novel biomarkers for early and accurate GDM diagnosis. It discusses emerging biomarkers such as vitamin D, vitamin B9, vitamin B12, preptin, angiopoietin-like protein 8, adiponectin, chemerin, omentin-1, leptin, Interleukin-6 (IL-6), homocysteine, C-peptide, irisin, adropin, nesfatin-1, Afamin, fetuin A, amylin, galectin, osteocalcin, resistin, visfatin and Fatty Acid-binding Protein 4 (FABP4). The review explores the pathophysiology of these biomarkers in GDM and presents preliminary study findings.

Keywords

Pregnancy, Gestational diabetes, Prediction, Biomarkers

The GDM is a common medical condition that occurs during pregnancy and is characterised by any degree of glucose intolerance first detected during pregnancy, but not clearly overt diabetes. It is usually diagnosed in the second or third trimester (1),(2). The global prevalence of GDM is 16%, with varying rates across countries. India has the highest prevalence at 29.3% (3). Factors contributing to the development of GDM, similar to those for diabetes, include insulin resistance, β-cell dysfunction, gluconeogenesis, adipose tissue dysfunction, gut microbiota dysbiosis and oxidative stress (4).

Pathophysiology of GDM

Several factors, including genetic, environmental and nutritional influences, along with insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction, may contribute to the development of GDM (5). β-cell dysfunction can occur when β-cells fail to accurately sense blood glucose levels or produce enough insulin (6). Pregnancy-induced insulin hyperplasia, which is caused by maternal obesity and placental hormones, can lead to insulin resistance. Pancreatic β-cells compensate for this by increasing insulin production; however, some women develop GDM due to an insufficient pancreatic response (7).

Insulin resistance is a condition in which cells fail to respond effectively to insulin because of impaired insulin signalling, resulting in inadequate translocation of Glucose Transporter-4 (GLUT4). GLUT4 is crucial for transporting glucose into cells for energy production. In GDM, insulin-stimulated glucose absorption is reduced by 54% compared to normal pregnancies. Insulin signalling is hindered by decreased tyrosine phosphorylation or increased serine/threonine phosphorylation of the insulin receptor. GDM is associated with altered expression or phosphorylation of downstream insulin signalling pathways, including GLUT4, Phosphoinositide-3-Kinase (PI3K) and Insulin Receptor Substrate (IRS)-1. Placental hormones play a crucial role in inducing insulin resistance [6,8]. (Table/Fig 1) illustrates the pathophysiology of normal and GDM pregnancies.

Current Diagnostic Modality

The OGTT is a standard diagnostic method for GDM in pregnant women, performed between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation. The International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria serve as the foundation for GDM diagnosis (9). However, the lack of early screening methods, especially for low-risk populations, poses a challenge, as substantial foetal adiposity may have already developed by the time of diagnosis, contributing to maternal and neonatal complications, as shown in (Table/Fig 2) (5). There is no universally accepted reference test for GDM diagnosis due to the varying diagnostic criteria used by different countries, as presented in (Table/Fig 3) (10),(11),(12). The OGTT is considered the gold standard, but its reliability, speed and convenience raise concerns. The 75 g OGTT recommended by the IADPSG is significant but cumbersome due to its sampling requirements (13),(14). There is a pressing need for novel, accurate and timely diagnostic approaches for GDM. The present review emphasises the importance of exploring novel biomarkers from existing literature to enhance diagnostic methods.

The biomarkers observed during the first and second trimesters of pregnancy, identified from the literature and their roles in GDM, are presented. Among these biomarkers, some are novel discoveries, while others may have been previously known but studied in contexts other than GDM.

Vitamin D

Vitamin D, a fat-soluble secosteroid also known as calciferol, is synthesised in the liver and kidneys through hydroxylation after exposure to sunlight (15). It affects calcium channels and tissues such as the gut, vascular smooth muscle, pancreatic β-cells and monocytes. Vitamin D deficiency is linked to decreased levels of collagen type I, osteoblast activity, parathyroid hormone secretion, muscle function and insulin secretion (16). Cholecalciferol increases Ca2+ influx, impacting insulin production in β-cells and leading to insulin exocytosis. Vitamin D deficiency is also associated with impaired glucose tolerance, primary hyperparathyroidism and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) (17).

Soheilykhah S et al., suggest that vitamin D deficiency may elevate the risk of GDM due to its effects on insulin production, activity and sensitivity, potentially influencing β-cell function and secretion (18). Amrein K et al., recommend that pregnant women with vitamin D levels below 40 ng/mL should be supplemented with 400-600 IU of vitamin D daily to prevent adverse outcomes (19). A strong relationship has been observed between low vitamin D levels and the risk of GDM, with individuals with vitamin D deficiency having a 26% greater chance of developing GDM (20),(21),(22). A randomised controlled trial found that calcium-based vitamin D supplementation reduced caesarean sections, maternal hospitalisations, macrosomia, hyperbilirubinemia and neonatal hospitalisations in women with GDM (23). Zhang Q et al., found that administering 50,000 IU of vitamin D every two weeks decreased insulin resistance without affecting inflammation or triglyceride levels (24).

Previous research emphasises that prenatal vitamin D intake is crucial and routine screening can help assess the risk of GDM in individuals. In contrast to GDM, more research has been conducted on vitamin D, yet its exact mechanism behind GDM is not fully understood.

Vitamin B9

Vitamin B9, commonly known as folate, is a group of water-soluble vitamins essential for cell division and one-carbon metabolism. It is used in food fortification and supplements, with 5-methyltetrahydrofolate being the primary type found in plasma. Elevated folate levels can affect β-cell function and promote insulin differentiation in pig pancreatic stem cells. However, excessive doses can decrease cell growth and survival (25),(26).

Chen X et al., revealed that pregnancies complicated by GDM have higher levels of folate and vitamin B12 and supplementation with folic acid increases the risk of GDM (27). Studies have found a robust correlation between early pregnancy levels of vitamin B12 and folate (28),(29). Research on vitamin B9, including animal studies supporting its role in β-cell function, is limited (27),(28), indicating a need for further human studies on its role in the pathophysiology of GDM.

Vitamin B12

Vitamin B12, also known as cobalamin, is crucial for physiological processes like cell division, DNA synthesis and amino acid metabolism, particularly during pregnancy (30). It plays a vital role in the remethylation of homocysteine to methionine and the mitochondrial conversion of methylmalonyl-CoA to succinyl-CoA for energy production (31). A deficiency in B12 can lead to functional folate deficiency and impaired DNA synthesis, potentially contributing to insulin resistance. Women with GDM have reduced mitochondrial activity, which is linked to increased methylation of the D-loop region of the mitochondrial genome (32). Vitamin B12 deficiency can negatively affect DNA and cell metabolism, leading to reduced enzyme activity and impacting liver coenzyme A and glucose breakdown. Monitoring vitamin B12 levels is essential, especially in individuals with T2DM, as diminished levels can impair the maintenance of enzyme systems (33).

Wang L et al., revealed a connection between GDM and lower serum concentrations of vitamin B12 (34). Low levels during the second or third trimester increase the risk, especially among Asians, while adequate vitamin B12 status reduces the risk of GDM. However, higher maternal blood levels in early pregnancy may elevate this risk (35). Kanwal A et al., unveiled significant variations in vitamin B12 levels, with low glutathione peroxidase and high homocysteine levels associated with GDM (36).

Preptin

Preptin, an E-peptide derived from proinsulin-like growth factor II, is co-secreted with insulin in islet β-cell granules in response to glucose, enhancing glucose-mediated insulin production. Individuals with metabolic disorders such as GDM, Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS), T2DM and impaired glucose tolerance often have elevated preptin levels. A study by Cheng KC et al., indicated that preptin influences insulin secretion by activating the protein kinase C/phospholipase C (PKC/PLC) pathway and affecting signal transduction through the Insulin-like Growth Factor 2 Receptor (IGF2R) (37). Additionally, a 2019 study suggested that high preptin levels in insulin-resistant patients may indicate a link between preptin and glucose-lipid metabolism, potentially contributing to insulin resistance (38).

Research by Kirac UI et al., found that individuals with elevated serum preptin levels have a higher risk of developing GDM (39). However, another study found that maternal serum preptin levels were comparable to those of non GDM control subjects, while cord blood preptin levels were lower (40). Preptin appears to be a novel hormone. Despite limited research, studies suggest that preptin is related to insulin resistance and is synthesised in response to glucose. Further research is warranted to elucidate its role in the pathogenesis of GDM.

Angiopoietin Like Protein 8

Angiopoietin-like 8 (ANGPTL8) is a 22-kDa peptide primarily synthesised in the liver and adipose tissues of humans. It plays a crucial role in lipid and glucose metabolism by enhancing insulin sensitivity, promoting glycogen production and improving glucose tolerance (41). Additionally, ANGPTL8 regulates lipid metabolism by inhibiting the action of lipoprotein lipase, thereby increasing triglyceride levels and reducing serum-free fatty acid levels. It is also known by several alternative names, such as betatrophin, Refeeding Induced Fat and Liver (RIFL) protein and lipasin (42).

Furthermore, ANGPTL8 decreases fasting blood glucose levels and enhances glucose tolerance. Overexpression of ANGPTL8 inhibits gluconeogenesis, suggesting a role in suppressing hepatic gluconeogenesis (43). Seyhanli Z et al., found a significant correlation between ANGPTL8 levels and insulin resistance, suggesting ANGPTL8’s potential as a biomarker for GDM (44).

Adiponectin

Adiponectin, an anti-inflammatory adipokine, plays a crucial role in lipid and glucose metabolism, inflammation, cell apoptosis and angiogenesis. In women with GDM, lower maternal levels of adiponectin are associated with higher birth weights, potentially contributing to insulin resistance and foetal overgrowth (45). Studies in rodents have demonstrated that full-length adiponectin inhibits foetal growth, while its absence results in enlargement (46). Adiponectin interacts with receptors AdipoR1 and AdipoR2, activating signalling pathways like AMP-activated Protein Kinase (AMPK) and Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor (PPAR) α. This interaction facilitates GLUT4 translocation, leading to cellular responses, including glucose suppression, lipogenesis, inflammation modulation, glucose uptake, fatty acid oxidation and enhanced insulin sensitivity (47).

Additionally, adiponectin suppresses the production of amino acids and nutrient transporters like GLUT-1 in human villous cytotrophoblasts. Studies have shown that decreased adiponectin levels in the placentas of women with GDM, coupled with increased maternal Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF-1), activate insulin/IGF-1 signalling pathways, potentially impacting foetal development (46). Early in pregnancy, women diagnosed with GDM exhibit lower levels of adiponectin, which are correlated with visceral adiposity and glucose control (48).

Chemerin

Chemerin, classified as a novel adipokine, plays a crucial role in regulating glucose and fat metabolism. It originates from the retinoic acid receptor responder 2 gene and initially exists as a 163-amino acid inactive preproprotein (45). Chemerin functions by modulating proinflammatory cytokines and contributing to adipocyte differentiation. Impairment of chemerin receptors can lead to diminished glucose tolerance, obesity and reduced levels of proinflammatory cytokines in adipose tissue (49).

Wang X et al., have highlighted that chemerin levels are positively correlated with inflammatory markers like TNF-alpha and IL-6. Women with GDM have higher plasma chemerin levels compared to normal pregnant women (50). Studies have shown that mutations affecting rs4721 (Beta-2 adrenergic-receptor gene) and rs17173608 (Fat-mass and obesity-associated gene) polymorphisms in the Chinese population are associated with decreased plasma chemerin levels, a low Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) score and protection against the development of GDM (51). A case-control study found higher chemerin messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNA) and protein expression in the placenta, adipose tissue and umbilical cord blood in women with GDM compared to the normal group (52).

Omentin-1

Omentin-1, an adipokine, is crucial for controlling microbiota across various organs and possesses anti-inflammatory properties. Impaired production of omentin-1 is linked to coronary artery disease, insulin resistance and diabetes. It enhances insulin sensitivity and facilitates glucose absorption, ensuring adequate levels for maintaining insulin sensitivity and metabolic balance (49).

Interventions targeting weight loss in individuals with T2DM and obesity have been shown to elevate omentin-1 levels (53).

Franz M et al., found that omentin-1 levels decrease during pregnancy, with women of higher Body Mass Index (BMI) showing lower levels. Offspring of diabetic women also have lower omentin-1 levels. The study suggests that altered insulin sensitivity during pregnancy could lead to decreased levels in the third trimester (54). Overall, omentin-1 appears to be more closely associated with BMI and obesity than directly with insulin and glucose homeostasis.

Leptin

Leptin, an adipokine, is closely associated with insulin resistance and obesity. It regulates food intake and correlates with adipocyte mass. During pregnancy, leptin levels peak around the 28th week of gestation and women diagnosed with GDM show increased levels of circulating leptin and higher leptin messenger RNA expression (55). Leptin regulates glucose homeostasis and increases during pregnancy due to changes in maternal fat stores and glucose metabolism. It directly impacts whole-body insulin sensitivity by regulating gluconeogenesis in skeletal muscle and the liver. Studies suggest that leptin acutely inhibits insulin secretion (56). Xiao WQ et al., highlighted that women with GDM have higher concentrations of leptin compared to those without GDM and circulating leptin levels are notably elevated in women with GDM compared to normal pregnant women (57).

Interleukin-6 (IL-6)

The IL-6 an inflammatory cytokine, is released by various cell types and plays a crucial role in regulating inflammation, insulin resistance, the immune system, obesity and type 2 diabetes. It may contribute to GDM by promoting adipose tissue expansion, inflammation, or release from the placenta (45).

Women with GDM typically have elevated levels of IL-6 compared to those of normal pregnant women. During pregnancy, IL-6 secretion by the placenta may increase in response to hyperleptinemia. Research suggests that IL-6 could serve as a valuable biomarker for early glucose intolerance screening. GDM can induce insulin resistance due to heightened IL-6 levels and leptin stimulates monocytes via Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase/Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase (MAPK/ERK) signalling pathways, enhancing IL-6 production (58). Amirian A et al., found a significant association between IL-6 levels and GDM, suggesting that assessing serum IL-6 levels could serve as a new diagnostic biomarker for GDM (59).

Homocysteine

Homocysteine, a sulfur-containing amino acid produced from the hydrolysis of S-adenosylhomocysteine, plays a crucial role in one-carbon metabolism within the methionine cycle and is linked to various pathological conditions, including diabetic vascular disease, insulin resistance, thrombotic events and premature arterial atherosclerotic disease (60). Homocysteine levels are typically lower during normal pregnancies; however, hyperhomocysteinemia can lead to pregnancy complications such as recurrent miscarriages, hypertension, preterm delivery, GDM, placental abruption and foetal growth restriction (61).

Zhang X et al., suggest that elevated homocysteine levels decrease the insulin receptor alpha and beta subunits, thereby affecting insulin sensitivity. Treatment with homocysteine reduces the protein levels of these subunits, contributing to insulin resistance and diabetes. The cysteine-homocysteinylation mechanism of the pro-insulin receptor is proposed as the underlying mechanism. Inhibiting cysteine-homocysteine interactions in the endoplasmic reticulum may improve insulin sensitivity and help prevent insulin resistance (62). Studies have found higher homocysteine levels in women with GDM (63),(64). Additionally, vitamin B12 insufficiency is linked to increased homocysteine levels and lower glutathione peroxidase levels (36).

C-Peptide

The short polypeptide known as the connecting peptide (C-peptide), which consists of 31 amino acids, is responsible for linking the A and B chains of proinsulin. It has a half-life of 20-30 minutes, making it more stable than insulin (65). C-peptide’s physiological functions include acting as a structural bridge, stimulating Sodium–potassium Adenosine triphosphatase (Na+-K+-ATPase), modifying endothelial nitric oxide synthase and inducible nitric oxide synthase, influencing intracellular signalling, gene transcription, glucose metabolism, thrombotic events and lipid metabolism (66). Beyond its structural roles, it also exhibits biological activity by attaching to G-protein-dependent receptors on cell membranes, modulating gene transcription and nuclear processes and demonstrating insulin-mimetic properties that regulate hyperglycaemia and glucose metabolism in diabetes (65).

Yang X et al., found a correlation between GDM and early pregnancy serum C-peptide levels, suggesting that C-peptide could be a reliable biomarker for predicting GDM risk in early pregnancy (67). While the functional properties of C-peptide are not fully understood, its role as an indicator of GDM in early pregnancy warrants further investigation.

Irisin

Irisin, a neurokine, myokine and adipokine produced by the fibronectin type III domain containing-5 gene, regulates energy consumption and glucose metabolism by converting white adipose tissue into brown adipose tissue (68). It acts as an anti-diabetic hormone by decreasing insulin resistance, increasing insulin sensitivity, reducing body weight, improving glucose tolerance, enhancing lipolysis, promoting the browning of white adipocytes, increasing GLUT4 expression and stimulating β-cell regeneration. Irisin secretion is upregulated by exercise and downregulated by hyperglycaemia and high fatty acid concentrations (69). Irisin is implicated in metabolic disorders such as obesity, lipid metabolism disorders, cardiovascular disease, polycystic ovarian syndrome, T2DM and non alcoholic fatty liver disease (70). Studies show that irisin levels are significantly lower in women with GDM compared to normal pregnant women, possibly due to insulin resistance or high oestrogen levels [40,49]. Further research is needed to fully understand irisin’s role in GDM during early pregnancy.

Adropin

Adropin, a regulatory protein present in the pancreas, liver, brain, kidneys and umbilical vein, is involved in preventing insulin resistance and obesity, as well as maintaining glucose and lipid homeostasis. Elevated levels of adropin have been observed in patients with T2DM, suggesting a potential role in the pathophysiology of GDM (71). A meta-analysis revealed increased maternal serum adropin levels in patients with GDM compared to a control group. These elevated levels were particularly notable during the first and last trimesters of pregnancy (72). A recent study found that patients with first-degree obesity in the third trimester had higher levels of adropin compared to those with third-degree obesity, suggesting that a lower Body Mass Index (BMI) may lead to endogenous adropin production, which protects against insulin resistance and hyperglycaemia (73).

Nesfatin-1

Nesfatin-1, an 82-amino acid peptide derived from nucleobindin-2, is secreted by peripheral organs and tissues and regulates hunger, satiety and body weight. It is primarily expressed in the hypothalamus and influences blood glucose levels in patients with diabetes (74). Nesfatin-1 plays a crucial role in carbohydrate metabolism by enhancing glucose-induced insulin release, stimulating pre-proinsulin mRNA expression and inhibiting glucagon secretion. It is localised in pancreatic β-islets in mice and rats and has an antihyperglycemic effect when administered to hyperglycemic animals (71). A study found that low maternal serum Nesfatin-1 levels were associated with a higher risk of developing GDM, with a 6.1 times higher likelihood of developing GDM in women with GDM compared to healthy pregnant women (75).

Afamin

Afamin, a liver-expressed albumin protein, is associated with the development of T2DM. It also contributes to oxidative stress and insulin resistance, which increase during pregnancy and are strongly linked to GDM (76). Tramontana A et al., highlighted that women with GDM have higher median afamin concentrations, which serve as a robust predictor for GDM (77). Similarly, Li Q et al., revealed that elevated afamin levels show higher sensitivity and specificity for GDM diagnosis and are positively correlated with HOMA-IR values and insulin levels. These findings suggest a potential role for afamin in pregnancy-related metabolic disorders (78).

Fetuin-A

Fetuin A, a member of the cystatin fetuin family and also known as a glycoprotein, is a naturally occurring inhibitor of the insulin receptor tyrosine kinase. It is released by adipose tissue and the liver. Fetuin A is linked to atherogenic lipid profiles, T2DM, insulin resistance, fat accumulation and metabolic syndrome (79). Plasma concentrations of fetuin A are significantly increased in women with GDM compared to those with Normal Glucose Tolerance (NGT) controls, with levels rising from the first to the second trimester (80). Jin C et al., found that women with GDM had higher plasma fetuin A concentrations, which are associated with changes in insulin resistance, fasting insulin levels and β-cell activity (81). This suggests that fetuin A could serve as a biomarker for predicting the risk of GDM. The highest concentrations were linked to an increased risk of developing GDM.

Amylin

Amylin, a hormone released by pancreatic β-cells, plays a significant role in suppressing glucagon release, regulating glucose metabolism and controlling stomach emptying. It is predominantly found in the islets of Langerhans in over 90% of patients with T2DM and constitutes the primary component of amyloid. The development of T2DM is attributed to amylin fibrils inducing β-cell cytotoxicity, which leads to intracellular ion imbalances, membrane damage and β-cell death (71). However, more studies are needed to validate the potential relationship between amylin and the development of GDM due to insufficient data.

Galectin

Galectins are a diverse family of lectins with broad specificity, involved in cell-matrix adhesion, cell-cell interactions and transmembrane signalling. They play roles in angiogenesis, maternal immune responses and placentation during pregnancy. A total 10 of the 16 classes of galectins are found in humans, predominantly in placental tissue. Galectin-1 and -3 are decreased in the placentas of patients with GDM, while the role of galectin-2 remains uncertain (49). Pelech A et al., found that the immunomodulatory protein galectin-9 binds to GLUT-2, an essential component of pancreatic β-cells and regulates glucose homeostasis (82). Research by Buschmann C et al., indicates that, compared to the healthy control group, placentas affected by GDM exhibit overexpression of galectin-12 in the nucleus of the syncytiotrophoblast and the extravillous trophoblast (83). Furthermore, investigations are needed to elucidate the specific role of galectin-12 in the placenta and its association with GDM.

Osteocalcin

Osteocalcin, a non collagenous protein found in bone, plays a role in regulating fat and glucose metabolism. It indirectly lowers blood glucose levels by promoting the utilisation of glucose by the liver, adipocytes and muscle tissues, or by increasing insulin release from pancreatic β-cells (84). A meta-analysis revealed increased levels of osteocalcin in women with GDM compared to normal pregnant women (85). Osteocalcin exists in three main forms: undercarboxylated Osteocalcin (ucOC), total Osteocalcin (tOC) and carboxylated osteocalcin (cOC). While pregnant individuals with and without GDM showed no significant changes in serum tOC concentrations, women with GDM exhibited significantly elevated serum levels of ucOC (86).

Resistin

Resistin, a proinflammatory adipokine produced in various cells, has been shown to inhibit insulin’s effects in mice. It is associated with metabolic syndrome, inflammation, diabetes and obesity, contributing to the pathophysiology of GDM by reducing insulin sensitivity, elevating plasma glucose concentrations and inhibiting glucose absorption (49). Bawah AT et al., conducted a study during the first trimester of pregnancy and found that women with GDM had a significant increase in serum resistin levels compared to non GDM women (87). Additionally, a meta-analysis further supports the link between maternal serum resistin levels and the risk of GDM (88).

Visfatin

Visfatin, primarily produced by visceral adipose tissue in both mice and humans, is also known as a pre-B cell colony-enhancing factor and nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase. It plays a significant role in energy homeostasis and the development of GDM and is expressed in various tissues (89). Prior studies have revealed that patients with GDM exhibit higher levels of visfatin, particularly during the first trimester of pregnancy (90). Furthermore, a similar survey by Bawah AT et al., supports these findings (87). These results suggest that elevated visfatin levels during gestation could serve as a novel biomarker for the early detection of GDM.

Fatty Acid-binding Protein 4

Fatty Acid-Binding Protein 4 (FABP4) is a lipid-binding protein found in adipose tissue and mature adipocytes. It enhances fatty acid transport and regulates lipid metabolism. FABP4 is associated with obesity, insulin resistance and T2DM, with higher levels observed in GDM (91). A study by Ron I et al., found FABP4 expression in the white adipose tissues of pregnant women with GDM and those who were normoglycemic, with increased secretion from visceral white adipose tissues in GDM patients (92). Neutralising FABP4 reduced glucagon-stimulated hepatic glucose production (85),(92).

The biomarkers observed during the first and second trimesters of pregnancy, identified from the literature and their roles in GDM are presented in (Table/Fig 4) (17),(26),(32),(38),(43),(47),(49),(51),(53),(56),(58),(62),(67),(69),(71),(73),(76),(79),(82),(84),(89),(92). The present review provides an overview of GDM, focusing on its pathophysiology, complications, diagnosis and prediction. It emphasises the importance of early diagnosis and highlights the significance of existing biomarkers in the prediction and diagnosis of GDM. The present review will aid researchers in the initial stages of their literature review by outlining existing biomarkers for diagnosing and predicting GDM.

Conclusion

Among the biomarkers evaluated, preptin, homocysteine, C-peptide and vitamin D appear to be promising indicators for predicting the risk of GDM and for identifying high-risk individuals due to their strong association with the pathophysiology of GDM. Vitamin D has been studied extensively, but its exact mechanism remains unclear. Preptin and homocysteine are linked to insulin secretion and signalling pathways. However, the number of studies on these biomarkers is limited, necessitating larger sample size studies, meta-analyses and clinical trials. These biomarkers show potential for predicting GDM risk and identifying high-risk individuals, but further research is needed to explore additional adipokines and biomarkers.

The review underscores the importance of early pregnancy stages, particularly between 8 and 15 weeks, to improve the accuracy and timeliness of GDM detection. It suggests that microRNAs, which are being studied for various diseases, could help uncover the pathogenesis and mechanisms of GDM. However, the review primarily focuses on inflammation and protein biomarkers, neglecting genetic markers and their diverse physiological functions, which represents a limitation.

References

1.
Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, Buchanan TA, Catalano PA, Damm P, et al. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(3):676-82. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Dalfra MG, Burlina S, Del Vescovo GG, Lapolla A. Genetics and epigenetics: New insight on gestational diabetes mellitus. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:602477. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Internet Source: International Diabetes Federation. 2024 Jan 1 [cited 2024 Apr 28]. Available from: https://diabetesatlas.org/data/en/indicators/14/.
4.
Lu W, Hu C. Molecular biomarkers for gestational diabetes mellitus and postpartum diabetes. Chin Med J (Engl). 2022;135(16):1940-51. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
McIntyre HD, Catalano P, Zhang C, Desoye G, Mathiesen ER, Damm P. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Dis Primer. 2019;5(1):47. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Plows J, Stanley J, Baker P, Reynolds C, Vickers M. The pathophysiology of gestational diabetes mellitus. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(11):3342. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Choudhury AA, Devi Rajeswari V. Gestational diabetes mellitus- A metabolic and reproductive disorder. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;143:112183. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Alesi S, Ghelani D, Rassie K, Mousa A. Metabolomic biomarkers in gestational diabetes mellitus: A review of the evidence. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(11):5512. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Lachmann EH, Fox RA, Dennison RA, Usher-Smith JA, Meek CL, Aiken CE. Barriers to completing oral glucose tolerance testing in women at risk of gestational diabetes. Diabet Med. 2020;37(9):1482-89. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Internet Source: Updated ACOG Guidance on Gestational Diabetes. The ObG Project. 2023 [cited 2024 Aug 10]. Available from: https://www.obgproject.com/2023/01/02/acog-releases-updated-guidancegestational-diabetes/.
11.
Rani PR, Begum J. Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus, where do we stand. J Clin Diagn Res: JCDR. 2016;10(4):QE01- QE04. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Nayak PK, Mitra S, Sahoo JP, Daniel M, Mathew A, Padma A. Feto-maternal outcomes in women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus according to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2013;7(4):206-09. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
McIntyre HD, Kapur A, Divakar H, Hod M. Gestational diabetes mellitus-innovative approach to prediction, diagnosis, management, and prevention of future NCD-mother and offspring. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:614533. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Shen L, Zhao D, Chen Y, Zhang K, Chen X, Lin J, et al. Comparative proteomics analysis of serum proteins in gestational diabetes during early and middle stages of pregnancy. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2019;13(5):e1800060. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Keller A, Varela Vazquez C, Dangol R, Damm P, Heitmann BL, Händel MN. The role of vitamin d in the development of diabetes post gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic literature review. Nutrients. 2020;12(6):1733. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Lips P. Vitamin D physiology. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2006;92(1):04-08.[crossref][PubMed]
17.
Vondra K, Hampl R. Vitamin D and new insights into pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig. 2021;42(2):203-08. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Soheilykhah S, Mojibian M, Rashidi M, Rahimi-Saghand S, Jafari F. Maternal Vitamin D status in gestational diabetes mellitus. Nutr Clin Pract. 2010;25(5):524-27. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Amrein K, Scherkl M, Hoffmann M, Neuwersch Sommeregger S, Köstenberger M, Tmava Berisha A, et al. Vitamin D deficiency 2.0: An update on the current status worldwide. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020;74(11):1498-513. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Wang L, Zhang C, Song Y, Zhang Z. Serum vitamin D deficiency and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis. Arch Med Sci. 2020;16(4):742-51. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Milajerdi A, Abbasi F, Mousavi SM, Esmaillzadeh A. Maternal vitamin D status and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(5):2576-86. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Cheng Y, Chen J, Li T, Pei J, Fan Y, He M, et al. Maternal vitamin D status in early pregnancy and its association with gestational diabetes mellitus in Shanghai: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):819. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Karamali M, Asemi Z, Ahmadi-Dastjerdi M, Esmaillzadeh A. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation affects pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Public Health Nutr. 2016;19(1):156-63. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Zhang Q, Cheng Y, He M, Li T, Ma Z, Cheng H. Effect of various doses of vitamin D supplementation on pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus: A randomized controlled trial. Exp Ther Med. 2016;12(3):1889-95. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Naderi N, House JD. Recent developments in folate nutrition. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research. 2018;83:195-213. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Williamson JM, Arthurs AL, Smith MD, Roberts CT, Jankovic-Karasoulos T. High folate, perturbed one-carbon metabolism and gestational diabetes mellitus. Nutrients. 2022;14(19):3930. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Chen X, Zhang Y, Chen H, Jiang Y, Wang Y, Wang D, et al. Association of maternal folate and Vitamin b12 in early pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(1):217-23. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Liu XH, Cao ZJ, Chen LW, Zhang DL, Qu XX, Li YH, et al. The association between serum folate and gestational diabetes mellitus: A large retrospective cohort study in Chinese population. Public Health Nutr. 2023;26(5):1014-21. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Yang Y, Cai Z, Zhang J. Association between maternal folate status and gestational diabetes mellitus. Food Sci Nutr. 2021;9(4):2042-52. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Chen X, Du Y, Xia S, Li Z, Liu J. Vitamin B 12 and gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr. 2023;129(8):1324-31. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Dib MJ, Gumban-Marasigan M, Yoxall R, Andrew T, Harrington DJ, Sobczyn´ ska-Malefora A, et al. Evaluating the diagnostic value of a combined indicator of Vitamin B12 Status (cB12) throughout pregnancy. Front Nutr. 2022;8:789357. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Maher A, Sobczyńska-Malefora A. The relationship between folate, Vitamin B12 and gestational diabetes mellitus with proposed mechanisms and foetal implications. J Fam Reprod Health. 2021;15(3):141-49. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Butola LK, Kute PK, Anjankar A, Dhok A, Gusain N, Vagga A. Vitamin B12- do you know everything? J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2020;9(42):3139-46. [crossref]
34.
Wang L, Hou Y, Meng D, Yang L, Meng X, Liu F. Vitamin B12 and folate levels during pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Nutr. 2021;8:670289. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Wang N, Zhou T, Ma X, Lin Y, Ding Y. The association between Maternal B Vitamins in early pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study. Nutrients. 2022;14(23):5016. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Kanwal A, Khalid A, Shahid A, Pasha HH, Rana M, Saeed MS. Vitamin B12, homocysteine and glutathione peroxidase levels in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Gomal J Med Sci. 2023;21(1):16-20. [crossref]
37.
Cheng KC, Li YX, Asakawa A, Ushikai M, Kato I, Sato Y, et al. Characterization of preptin-induced insulin secretion in pancreatic β-cells. J Endocrinol. 2012;215(1):43-49. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Yoldemir SA, Altun O. The relationship between insulin resistance and serum preptin level. Ank Med J. 2019;19(4):708-15. [crossref]
39.
Kirac UI, Demir E, Ozkan H, Sahtiyanci B, Uzun H, Ekinci I, et al. Maternal serum preptin levels in the pathogenesis and diagnosis of Gestational diabetes mellitus. J Med Biochem. 2023;42(2):311-17. [crossref][PubMed]
40.
Ersahin S, Yurci A. Cord blood and maternal serum preptin and irisin concentrations are regulated independently in GDM. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021;25:1954-58.
41.
Yuan J, Zhang D, Wang Y, Zhu Z, Lin Q, Li M, et al. Angiopoietin-like 8 in gestational diabetes mellitus: Reduced levels in third trimester maternal serum and placenta, increased levels in cord blood serum. Perez-Lopez FR, editor. Int J Endocrinol. 2022;2022:1113811. [crossref][PubMed]
42.
Guo C, Zhao Z, Deng X, Chen Z, Tu Z, Yuan G. Regulation of angiopoietin-like protein 8 expression under different nutritional and metabolic status. Endocr J. 2019;66(12):1039-46. [crossref][PubMed]
43.
Zhao Z, Deng X, Jia J, Zhao L, Wang C, Cai Z, et al. Angiopoietin-like protein 8 (betatrophin) inhibits hepatic gluconeogenesis through PI3K/Akt signalling pathway in diabetic mice. Metabolism. 2022;126:154921. [crossref][PubMed]
44.
Seyhanli Z, Seyhanli A, Aksun S, Pamuk BO. Evaluation of serum Angiopoietin-like protein 2 (ANGPTL-2), Angiopoietin-like protein 8 (ANGPTL-8), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus and normoglycaemic regnant women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(25):5647-52. [crossref][PubMed]
45.
Bogdanet D, Reddin C, Murphy D, Doheny HC, Halperin JA, Dunne F, et al. Emerging protein biomarkers for the diagnosis or prediction of gestational diabetes-a scoping review. J Clin Med. 2021;10(7):1533. [crossref][PubMed]
46.
Balachandiran M, Bobby Z, Dorairajan G, Gladwin V, Vinayagam V, Packirisamy RM. Decreased maternal serum adiponectin and increased insulin-like growth factor-1 levels along with increased placental glucose transporter-1 expression in gestational diabetes mellitus: Possible role in fetal overgrowth. Placenta. 2021;104:71-80. [crossref][PubMed]
47.
Pheiffer C, Dias S, Jack B, Malaza N, Adam S. Adiponectin as a Potential biomarker for pregnancy disorders. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(3):1326. [crossref][PubMed]
48.
Karasek D, Krystynik O, Kucerova V, Macakova D, Cibickova L, Schovanek J, et al. Adiponectin, A-FABP and FGF-19 levels in women with early diagnosed gestational diabetes. J Clin Med. 2022;11(9):2417. [crossref][PubMed]
49.
Ruszala M, Niebrzydowska M, Pilszyk A, Kimber-Trojnar Z? , Trojnar M, Leszczyn´ ska-Gorzelak B. Novel biomolecules in the pathogenesis of gestational diabetes mellitus. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(21):11578. [crossref][PubMed]
50.
Wang X, Liu J, Wang D, Zhu H, Kang L, Jiang J. Expression and correlation of Chemerin and FABP4 in peripheral blood of gestational diabetes mellitus patients. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2020;19(1):710-16. [crossref]
52.
Wang D, Wang H, Li M, Zhao R. Chemerin levels and its genetic variants are associated with Gestational diabetes mellitus: A hospital-based study in a Chinese cohort. Gene. 2022;807:145888. [crossref][PubMed]
52.
Ma Z, Chu L, Zhang Y, Lu F, Zhu Y, Wu F, et al. Is chemerin associated with gestational diabetes mellitus? a case-control study. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2023;16:2271-81. [crossref][PubMed]
53.
Cui S, Zhu X, Li S, Zhang C. Study on the predictive value of serum hypersensitive C-reactive protein, homocysteine, fibrinogen, and omentin-1 levels with gestational diabetes mellitus. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2023;39(1):2183046. [crossref][PubMed]
54.
Franz M, Polterauer M, Springer S, Kuessel L, Haslinger P, Worda C, et al. Maternal and neonatal omentin-1 levels in gestational diabetes. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;297(4):885-89. [crossref][PubMed]
55.
Rodrigo N, Glastras SJ. Pathophysiology underpinning gestational diabetes mellitus and the role of biomarkers for its prediction. EMJ Diabetes. 2020.
56.
Soheilykhah S, Mojibian M, Rahimi-Saghand S, Rashidi M, Hadinedoushan H. Maternal serum leptin concentration in gestational diabetes. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;50(2):149-53. [crossref][PubMed]
57.
Xiao WQ, He JR, Shen SY, Lu JH, Kuang YS, Wei XL, et al. Maternal circulating leptin profile during pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020;161:108041. [crossref][PubMed]
58.
Srivastava N, Singh K, Singh N, Mahdi AA. Association between serum interleukin-6, leptin and insulin in gestational diabetes mellitus-a cross- sectional study. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2023;22(1):639-48. [crossref][PubMed]
59.
Amirian A, Mahani MB, Abdi F. Role of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in predicting gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020;63(4):407-16. [crossref][PubMed]
60.
Zheng Y, Deng HY, Qiao ZY, Gong FX. Homocysteine level and gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2021;37(11):987-94. [crossref][PubMed]
61.
Dai C, Fei Y, Li J, Shi Y, Yang X. A novel review of homocysteine and pregnancy complications. BioMed Res Int. 2021;2021:6652231. [crossref][PubMed]
62.
Zhang X, Qu YY, Liu L, Qiao YN, Geng HR, Lin Y, et al. Homocysteine inhibits pro-insulin receptor cleavage and causes insulin resistance via protein cysteine-homocysteinylation. Cell Rep. 2021;37(2):109821. [crossref][PubMed]
63.
Deng M, Zhou J, Tang Z, Xiang J, Yi J, Peng Y, et al. The correlation between plasma total homocysteine level and gestational diabetes mellitus in a Chinese Han population. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):18679. [crossref][PubMed]
64.
Mahmood K, Al-Rasol EA. The effect of Vit B12 deficiency, homocystein, and lipid metabolism in association with increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Med J Babylon. 2022;19(3):409. [crossref]
65.
Yaribeygi H, Maleki M, Sathyapalan T, Sahebkar A. The effect of C-peptide on diabetic nephropathy: A review of molecular mechanisms. Life Sci. 2019;237:116950.[crossref][PubMed]
66.
Wahren J, Ekberg K, Johansson J, Henriksson M, Pramanik A, Johansson BL, et al. Role of C-peptide in human physiology. Am J Physiol-Endocrinol Metab. 2000;278(5):E759-68. [crossref][PubMed]
67.
Yang X, Ye Y, Wang Y, Wu P, Lu Q, Liu Y, et al. Association between early-pregnancy serum C-peptide and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A nested case-control study among Chinese women. Nutr Metab. 2022;19(1):56. [crossref][PubMed]
68.
AL-Ghazali MJ, Ali HA, AL-Rufaie MM. Serum irisin levels as a potential marker for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus. Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parm. 2020;91(1):56-63.
69.
Sahoo D, Pattanaik SR, Kumar PR, Gandhi R. Role of serum iris in during early pregnancy to predict the development of gestational diabetes mellitus at 24-28 weeks of pregnancy in high-risk patients. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2022; 26(1):61-67. [crossref][PubMed]
70.
Cui L, Qiao T, Xu F, Li Z, Chen T, Su H, et al. Circulating irisin levels of prenatal and postnatal patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cytokine. 2020;126:154924. [crossref][PubMed]
71.
Ruszala M, Pilszyk A, Niebrzydowska M, Kimber-Trojnar Z? , Trojnar M, Leszczyn´ ska-Gorzelak B. Novel biomolecules in the pathogenesis of gestational diabetes mellitus 2.0. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(8):4364. [crossref][PubMed]
72.
Vivek K, Reddy EP, Thangappazham B, Raj H, Pérez-López FR, Varikasuvu SR. Maternal adropin levels in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2022;38(2):105-09. [crossref][PubMed]
73.
Adamczak L, Gutaj P, Wender-Ozegowska E. Adropin in pregnancy complicated by hyperglycemia and obesity-a preliminary study. Ginekol Pol. 2023;94(3):229-32. [crossref][PubMed]
74.
Mierzynski R, Poniedzialek-Czajkowska E, Dluski D, Leszczyn´ ska-Gorzelak B. The role of new adipokines in gestational diabetes mellitus pathogenesis. Ginekol Pol. 2018;89(4):222-27. [crossref][PubMed]
75.
Wahid UA, Islam MM, Ferdoues T, Saha S, Rizwan A. Association of maternal serum nesfatin-1 level with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) in a tertiary care hospital. M Abdur Rahim Medical College Journal, 2023;16(2):215-22.
76.
Atakul N, Atamer Y, Selek S¸ , Kiliç BS, Unal F. Novel metabolic marker Afamin: A predictive factor for Large-for-Gestational-Age (LGA) fetus estimation in pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus? J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021;50(10):102201. [crossref][PubMed]
77.
Tramontana A, Pablik E, Stangl G, Hartmann B, Dieplinger H, Hafner E. Combination of first trimester serum afamin levels and three-dimensional placental bed vascularization as a possible screening method to detect women at-risk for adverse pregnancy complications like pre-eclampsia and gestational diabetes mellitus in low-risk pregnancies. Placenta. 2018;62:9-15. [crossref][PubMed]
78.
Li Q, Li C, Jin J, Shen Y, Wang M. Clinical significance of Neuregulin 4, Afamin, and SERPINB1 in gestational diabetes mellitus and their relationship with insulin resistance. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022;2022(9):01-08. [crossref][PubMed]
79.
Simjak P, Cinkajzlova A, Anderlova K, Klouckova J, Kratochvílová H, Lacinova Z, et al. Changes in plasma concentrations and mRNA expression of Hepatokines Fetuin A, Fetuin B and FGF21 in physiological pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus. Physiol Res. 2018;67(3):S531-42. [crossref][PubMed]
80.
Kansu-Celik H, Ozgu-Erdinc AS, Kisa B, Findik RB, Yilmaz C, Tasci Y. Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in the first trimester: Comparison of maternal fetuin-A, N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and fasting glucose levels. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2019;63(2):121-27. [crossref][PubMed]
81.
Jin C, Lin L, Han N, Zhao Z, Liu Z, Luo S, et al. Effects of dynamic change in fetuin-A levels from the first to the second trimester on insulin resistance and gestational diabetes mellitus: A nested case-control study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020;8(1):e000802. [crossref][PubMed]
82.
Pelech A, Ruszala M, Niebrzydowska-Tatus M, Bien K, Kimber-Trojnar Z, Czuba M, et al. Do serum Galectin-9 levels in women with gestational diabetes and healthy ones differ before or after delivery? A pilot study. Biomolecules. 2023;13(4):697. [crossref][PubMed]
83.
Buschmann C, Unverdorben L, Knabl J, Hutter S, Meister S, Beyer S, et al. Placental expression of inflammatory Galectin-12 is associated with gestational diabetes. J Reprod Immunol. 2024;163:104240. [crossref][PubMed]
84.
Song L, Huang Y, Long J, Li Y, Pan Z, Fang F, et al. the role of osteocalcin in placental function in gestational diabetes mellitus. Reproductive Biology. 2021;21(4):100566. [crossref][PubMed]
85.
Sun J, Zhang D, Xu J, Chen C, Deng D, Pan F, et al. Circulating FABP4, nesfatin-1, and osteocalcin concentrations in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis. Lipids Health Dis. 2020;19(1):199. [crossref][PubMed]
86.
Martinez-Portilla RJ, Villafan-Bernal JR, Lip-Sosa DL, Meler E, Clotet J, Serna- Vela FJ, et al. Osteocalcin serum levels in gestational diabetes mellitus and their intrinsic and extrinsic determinants: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Diabetes Res. 2018;2018:4986735. [crossref][PubMed]
87.
Bawah AT, Seini MM, Abaka-Yawason A, Alidu H, Nanga S. Leptin, resistin and visfatin as useful predictors of gestational diabetes mellitus. Lipids Health Dis. 2019;18(1):221. [crossref][PubMed]
88.
Hu SM, Chen MS, Tan HZ. Maternal serum level of resistin is associated with risk for gestational diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases. 2019;7(5):585-99. [crossref][PubMed]
89.
Radzicka S, Pietryga M, Iciek R, Bra? zert J. The role of visfatin in pathogenesis of gestational diabetes (GDM). Ginekol Pol. 2018;89(9):518-21. [crossref][PubMed]
90.
Ruidar SB, Mushtaq M, Raza SA, Mukhtar F, Rehman T, Ning W. Visfatin as a Biomarker for Early Detection of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2022;16(7):1000-02. [crossref]
91.
Vorobjova T, Tagoma A, Talja I, Janson H, Kirss A, Uibo R. FABP4 and I-FABP levels in pregnant women are associated with body mass index but not gestational diabetes. J Diabetes Res. 2022;2022:1089434. [crossref][PubMed]
92.
Ron I, Mdah R, Zemet R, Ulman RY, Rathaus M, Brandt B, et al. Adipose tissue-derived FABP4 mediates glucagon-stimulated hepatic glucose production in gestational diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023;25(11):3192-201. [crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

Doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/73856.20243

Date of Submission: Jun 26, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Jul 25, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Aug 22, 2024
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 09, 2024
• Manual Googling: Aug 16, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Aug 20, 2024 (17%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com