Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 37725

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : November | Volume : 18 | Issue : 11 | Page : WC01 - WC05 Full Version

Assessment of Electrocardiographic P Wave Dispersion in Individuals with and without Psoriasis: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: November 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/73050.20222
Laya Jayarajan Nair, Sandhya Somasekharan Nair, Suresh Muthezathu Kesavadas, Anuja Elizabeth George

1. Senior Resident, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Trivandrum, Kerala, India. 2. Professor (CAP), Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Trivandrum, Kerala, India. 3. Former Professor, Department of General Medicine, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Trivandrum, Kerala, India. 4. Professor, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Laya Jayarajan Nair,
Makeeriyam, Paliyerikovval, Karivellur P.O. Kannur, Payyanur-670521, Kerala, India.
E-mail: layajnair48@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Psoriasis is a prevalent, long-lasting inflammatory skin condition characterised by various clinical manifestations and arising from the interaction of genetic, environmental, and immunological factors. It has been found to be associated with several medical conditions, such as hypertension, diabetes, Cardiovascular (CV) diseases, and metabolic syndrome.

Aim: To compare the Electrocardiographic P Wave Dispersion (PWD) in individuals with and without psoriasis and to correlate PWD with the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) score.

Materials and Methods: This was a hospital-based cross-sectional study comparing the electrocardiographic PWD in 30 patients with psoriasis to that of 30 age- and gender-matched subjects without psoriasis who attended Government Medical College, Trivandrum, Kerala, India, during a period of one year (February 2021 to January 2022). A structured questionnaire was used to record history and examination findings. A 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) was performed on study participants from both groups in a supine position following 15 minutes of rest. Categorical and quantitative variables were expressed as frequency (percentage) and mean±SD, respectively. The Karl Pearson test was used to find correlations. A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Ten (33.3%) patients belonged to the age group of 41-50 years. The duration of the disease ranged from six months to 21 years. Seventeen (56.7%) patients had a PASI score between 10-20, and 5 (16.7%) patients had a PASI score of less than 10. The maximum value of the P wave and PWD was higher in the case group and was statistically significant (p≤0.001 and p≤0.001, respectively). A statistically significant correlation was found between the severity of psoriasis and PWD (r=0.564, p≤0.001) and between the duration of psoriasis and PWD (r=0.372, p=0.04) in this study.

Conclusion: PWD was found to be higher in psoriasis patients, with a significant correlation between PWD and both the severity and duration of the disease. Therefore, ECG should be considered as a screening test for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) in all psoriasis patients.

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation, Cardiovascular diseases, Psoriasis area severity index score

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder mediated by type 1 T helper cells and Th17 cells, affecting about 2-3% of the population [1,2]. It is associated with several medical conditions, the most common of which are CV diseases, hypertension, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome (3),(4). The association between psoriasis and CV diseases is only partially understood; however, inflammatory processes and oxidative stress are among the most frequently delineated pathogeneses (5).

Among CV diseases, accumulating evidence highlights the role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of AF, a known cause of increased morbidity and mortality (4),(6). The most common cardiac arrhythmia, AF, is linked to a higher risk of stroke, heart failure, coronary artery disease, and CV mortality (7),(8).

Prolongation of PWD is an independent risk factor for the development of AF. PWD has been proposed as an electrocardiographic indicator of inhomogeneous and discontinuous atrial conduction during sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal AF (9).

The P wave in an Electrocardiogram (ECG) represents atrial depolarisation, with a normal duration ranging from 40 to 120 milliseconds (ms). PWD is the difference between the maximum and minimum P wave duration on a single 12-lead ECG, with a normal duration of 29±9 ms (10).

Even though psoriasis patients are more likely to develop CV diseases (11), only a few previous studies have examined the effect of psoriasis on the cardiac conduction system and its correlation with AF (12),(13),(14),(15). The association between psoriasis and AF remains unexplored in the South Indian population. To the best of the author’s knowledge, no such study has been conducted in Kerala.

A better understanding of the association between psoriasis and AF will enable the early identification of susceptible patients through screening processes. Hence, the present study was conducted to compare the electrocardiographic PWD among individuals with and without psoriasis and to correlate PWD with the severity of the disease.

Material and Methods

A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Dermatology and Venereology at Government Medical College, Trivandrum, Kerala, India, from February 2021 to January 2022. The study received clearance from the Institutional Ethics Committee (HEC No. 02/12/2021/MCT). Participants were provided with an information sheet outlining the details and purpose of the study. The study included 30 patients with psoriasis as the case group and 30 age- and gender-matched subjects without psoriasis, who accompanied other patients (non-psoriasis cases) to the Dermatology Department, as the control group.

Inclusion criteria: All consenting clinically diagnosed patients with psoriasis aged 18 years and older, as well as, all consenting individuals without psoriasis in the same age group, were included in the study as cases and controls, respectively.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with known cases of CV disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, thyroid disorders, or those already on CV medications were excluded from the study. Additionally, when recruiting controls, individuals with pre-existing CV disease and first-degree relatives of psoriasis patients were also excluded.

Sample size: Sample size calculation was done by using a formula: N=(Z1-α/2+Z1-β)2(σ12+σ22)/(μ1-μ2)2

Let ‘N’ represent the sample size. In the case group, the Standard Deviation (SD) of PWD (σ1) was 22.9, and the mean value of PWD (μ1) is 67.4. In the control group, the SD of PWD (σ2) was 19.6, and the mean value of PWD (μ2) was 45.0. The value of (Z1-α/2+Z1-β)2 was 10.49, with a β value of 90% (12). By substituting these values, we find that N=20. Therefore, 30 individuals were selected from both the case and control groups for the study.

Study Procedure

A detailed history of demography and comorbidities was collected using a structured questionnaire. A general examination was conducted, during which vital signs, height, and weight were recorded, and Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated. The morphology of lesions, their distribution, nail changes, and joint involvement were documented through a thorough dermatological examination, and the PASI score was calculated (2). A systemic examination was performed to rule out any associated diseases. A 12-lead ECG was conducted on study participants from both groups in a supine position after 15 minutes of rest, using a BPL ECG machine (Cardiart 6108T single channel). ECG recordings were obtained at a paper speed of 50 mm/s and an amplitude of 20 mm/mV. The beginning of the P wave was defined as the point where the first atrial deflection crossed the isoelectric line, and the end of the P wave was defined as the point where the atrial deflection returned to the isoelectric line (10).

The P wave was assessed, and the maximum and minimum durations of the P wave were recorded in all 12 ECG leads. The difference between the maximum and minimum P wave durations was then calculated (PWD in milliseconds).

Statistical Analysis

The data were entered into Microsoft Excel sheets, and statistical analysis was performed using a trial version of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0. Categorical and quantitative variables were expressed as frequency (percentage) and mean±SD, respectively. The Karl Pearson test was used to find the correlation between the presence of psoriasis with both the severity of the condition and the duration of the disease. A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 30 patients with psoriasis who met the inclusion criteria and 30 age- and gender-matched individuals without psoriasis were studied. The age of the patients ranged from 18 to 70 years. Most of the patients (10, 33.3%) were between the ages of 41 and 50, followed by those aged 51 to 60 (8, 26.7%), with a male-to-female ratio of 2.3:1. The mean age of onset was 39.5±11.3 years. Ten patients (33.3%) had their disease onset between the ages of 31 and 40 and between 41 and 50 years (Table/Fig 1). The mean duration of the disease was 5.07±5.2 years, with a range from six months to 21 years (Table/Fig 2). The mean PASI score was 16.6±8.6, with scores ranging from 8 to 36. The frequency distribution of the cases according to PASI score is given in (Table/Fig 3).

A comparison of demographic features is shown in (Table/Fig 4), in which the mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) of patients with psoriasis was 78.3±4.6 mmHg, while in the group without psoriasis it was 75±5.7 mmHg.

The triggering factors for psoriatic patients are presented in (Table/Fig 5). The majority of the patients (22, 73.3%) had a history of infection, and two patients (6.7%) reported no aggravating factors (Table/Fig 5). All patients had plaque lesions. Joint involvement was present in five patients (16.7%), and nail changes were observed in 28 patients (93.3%).

Among the 30 psoriatic patients, PWD was greater than 40 in 22 patients (73.3%), compared to 12 individuals (40%) without psoriasis. The difference in PWD between the groups was found to be statistically significant, with a p-value of less than 0.001 (Table/Fig 6).

The mean P max was significantly higher in psoriatic patients (108.3±14.16 ms) than in non-psoriatic individuals (98.3±13.4 ms), with a p-value ≤0.001 (Table/Fig 7). The mean P-minimum was lower in psoriatic patients (52.3±12.8 ms) compared to non-psoriatic individuals (56.3±13.3 ms) (Table/Fig 8). A statistically significant correlation was observed between the severity of psoriasis and electrocardiographic PWD (r=0.564, p-value≤0.001). A scatter diagram of electrocardiographic PWD and the PASI is shown in (Table/Fig 9).

Additionally, (Table/Fig 10) presents the value of Karl Pearson’s coefficient of correlation between PASI and PWD. A statistically significant correlation was also observed between electrocardiographic PWD and the duration of the disease (r=0.372, p-value=0.04). A scatter diagram of electrocardiographic PWD and the duration of the disease is shown in (Table/Fig 11).

Discussion

The present study included 30 patients with a clinical diagnosis of psoriasis and an equal number of age- and gender-matched individuals without psoriasis. The most common age group was 31-50 years, with a mean age of 44.5±10.8 years for the patients, which was comparable to most other studies on psoriasis (16),(17). This finding was discordant with that observed by Bacaksiz A et al., and Simsek H et al., (33.7±6.7 and 35.8±13 years, respectively) (12),(18). The majority of the patients in this study were men (70%), consistent with most previous studies (12),(16),(17).

The mean age at onset of the disease was 39.5±11.3 years, with a minimum age of onset of 19 years and a maximum of 62 years. This was discordant with the study by Bacaksiz A et al., (20.1±7.7 years) (12). The mean duration of the disease in this study was 5.07±5.2 years, which was discordant with the findings of Bacaksiz A et al., (12.8 years) and Markuszeski L et al., (17 years) (12),(16). In a recent publication by Aryanian Z et al., the mean duration recorded was 10±8 years (14). In the present study, the minimum disease duration was 6 months and the maximum was 21 years. However, in the studies by Bacaksiz A et al., Aryanian Z et al., and Markuszeski L et al., the duration of disease ranged from 3 to 26 years, two months to 40 years, and 1 to 37 years, respectively (12),(14),(16).

In the present study, 28 (93.3%) patients with psoriasis reported a history of infection and/or psychological distress as factors aggravating their condition. Most of them attributed financial constraints and concerns regarding the chronic nature of psoriasis as the cause of their stress. In a study by Park BS et al., the most common precipitating factor noted was mental stress (19). The mean PASI score was 16.6±8.6, ranging from 8 to 36. This result was almost concordant with the study by Markuszeski L et al., which reported a mean PASI of 13.4±8.8 (16). However, it was discordant with the findings of Bacaksiz A et al., where the mean PASI was 3.5±3.7, ranging from 0.4 to 16.8 (12).

The interpretation of the ECG of the participants showed that the mean Heart Rate (HR) was 72.6±6.6 beats per minute in psoriatic patients and 70.9±7.4 beats per minute in participants without psoriasis. This result was consistent with a study from Iran by Aryanian Z et al., (14). However, it was discordant with the findings of Bacaksiz A et al., which reported a mean HR of 80.5±9.9 beats per minute in patients with psoriasis and 83.1±11.5 beats per minute in individuals without psoriasis (12). Additionally, a study from Iran found a median HR of 82 beats per minute in the psoriasis group and 84 in the control group (13). In all these studies, the results were not statistically significant between the groups.

The mean P max was significantly higher in psoriatic patients (108.3±14.16 ms) than in non-psoriatic individuals (98.3±13.4 ms). A higher P max indicates an abnormality in atrial conduction in patients with psoriasis. This finding was similar to that of Bacaksiz A et al., where the mean P max was 112.6±22.7 ms in psoriatic patients and 93.0±12.8 ms in individuals without psoriasis (12). However, a study from Turkey reported a median P max of 100 ms in the case group and 88 ms in the control group, while Aryanian Z et al., reported 78.67±13.89 ms in cases and 80.06±15.57 ms in controls (13),(14). In all these studies, the results were statistically significant.

The mean P-minimum was lower in psoriatic patients (52.3±12.8 ms) compared to non-psoriatic individuals (56.3±13.3 ms). No statistical association was found between the groups. This finding was similar to that of Bacaksiz A et al., where among 61 cases, the P-min was 42.2±12.5 ms in psoriatic patients and 47.4±14.3 ms in controls, with results that were not statistically significant (12). However, in the study by Aryanian Z et al., a statistical difference between groups was noted (38.22±6.86 ms among cases and 50.67±10.94 ms in controls) (14).

PWD was found to be prolonged in psoriatic patients, and this difference was statistically significant with a p-value≤0.001, indicating an increased risk of developing AF in patients with psoriasis compared to individuals without psoriasis. The mean PWD was 56±16.2 ms in psoriatic patients and 42±11.1 ms in non-psoriatic individuals, respectively. Studies by Bacaksiz A et al., Namazi N et al., and Aryanian Z et al., have reported similar findings (12),(13),(14).

A statistically significant correlation was observed between the severity of psoriasis and PWD (p-value≤0.001). As the severity of psoriasis increases, PWD also increases, leading to a higher chance of developing AF later in life. Comparable findings were reported in a case-control study by Bacaksiz A et al., and in a recent observational study by Kumar U et al., (12),(15). In contrast, a study from Iran by Namazi N et al., reported no association between the severity of psoriasis and PWD (13).

In the study, a significant correlation was also observed between the duration of the disease and PWD, with a p-value of 0.04. This indicates that the longer the duration of psoriasis, the greater the PWD, and the higher the chance of developing AF. Therefore, an earlier onset of the disease correlates with a higher PWD and an increased risk of developing AF later in life. However, studies conducted by Namazi N et al., and Simsek H et al., observed no correlation between the duration of psoriasis and the incidence of arrhythmia (13),(18).

Limitation(s)

The major limitation of this study was its cross-sectional design. Data were collected at a single point in time, with no follow-ups; therefore, trends that may recur over time could not be studied.

Conclusion

This study showed that patients with psoriasis vulgaris had higher PWD, indicating an increased risk of AF compared to those without psoriasis. Additionally, the study revealed a significant correlation between PWD and both the severity and duration of the disease. Therefore, ECG, which is a reliable, non-invasive, and feasible method, should be considered as part of the screening process for AF, particularly in patients with severe and long-standing psoriasis. Prospective studies will be needed to confirm the development of AF in patients with psoriasis.

References

1.
Mehta NN, Azfar RS, Shin DB, Neimann AL, Troxel AB, Gelfand JM. Patients with severe psoriasis are at increased risk of cardiovascular mortality: Cohort study using the General Practice Research Database. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(8):1000-06. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Griffiths CEM, Barker J, Bleiker T, Chalmers R, Creamer D. Rook’s Textbook of Dermatology 9th edition: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2016:1133-219. [crossref]
3.
Griffiths CEM, Armstrong AW, Gudjonsson JE, Barker JNWN. Psoriasis. Lancet. 2021;397(10281):1301-15. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Yildiz A, Ucmak D, Oylumlu M, Akkurt MZ, Yuksel M, Akil MA, et al. Assessment of atrial electromechanical delay and P-wave dispersion in patients with psoriasis. Echocardiography. 2014;31(9):1071-76. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Rocha-Pereira P, Santos-Silva A, Rebelo I, Figueiredo A, Quintanilha A, Teixeira F. Dislipidemia and oxidative stress in mild and in severe psoriasis as a risk for cardiovascular disease. Clin Chim Acta. 2001;303(1-2):33-39. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Chiu HY, Chang WL, Huang WF, Wen YW, Tsai YW, Tsai TF. Increased risk of arrhythmia in patients with psoriatic disease: A nationwide population-based matched cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73(3):429-38. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Tsang TSM, Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ. Epidemiological profile of atrial fibrillation: A contemporary perspective. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2005;48(1):01-08. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, Cha SS, Bailey KR, Seward JB, et al. Coronary ischemic events after first atrial fibrillation: Risk and survival. Am J Med. 2007;120(4):357-63. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Dilaveris PE, Gialafos EJ, Sideris SK, Theopistou AM, Andrikopoulos GK, Kyriakidis M, et al. Simple electrocardiographic markers for the prediction of paroxysmal idiopathic atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J. 1998; 135(5):733-38. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Pérez-Riera AR, de Abreu LC, Barbosa-Barros R, Grindler J, Fernandes-Cardoso A, Baranchuk A, et al. P-wave dispersion: An update. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2016;16(4):126-33. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Garshick MS, Ward NL, Krueger JG, Berger JS. Cardiovascular risk in patients with psoriasis: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77(13):1670-80. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Bacaksiz A, Erdogan E, Tasal A, Vatankulu MA, Kul S, Sevgili E, et al. Electrocardiographic P-wave characteristics in patients with psoriasis vulgaris. Ups J Med Sci. 2013;118(1):35-41. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Namazi N, Helali, M, Pishgahi M, Ketabi Y. Assessment of P-wave indices as atrial fibrillation predictors in psoriasis patients. Iran J Dermalol. 2017;20(4):113-17.
14.
Aryanian Z, Jafaripour I, Kohneshin E, Pourkia R, Hedayati Goudarzi MT, Tirgar Tabari S, et al. Echocardiographic and electrocardiographic assessments in patients with psoriasis. Caspian J Intern Med. 2021;12(2):162-66.
15.
Kumar U, Agarwal M, Varma K. Study of P wave dispersion in patients of psoriasis: An observational study. IP Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dermatology. 2023;9(2):66. [crossref]
16.
Markuszeski L, Bissinger A, Janusz I, Narbutt J, Jedrzejowska AS, Zalewska A. Heart rate and arrhythmia in patients with psoriasis vulgaris. Arch Med Res. 2007;38(1):64-69. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Ahlehoff O, Gislason GH, Jorgensen CH, Lindhardsen J, Charlot M, Oleson JB, et al. Psoriasis and risk of atrial fibrillation and ischaemic stroke: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(16):2054-64. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Simsek H, Sahin, Akypol A, Akdag S, Ozkol HU, Gumrukcuoglu A, et al. Increased risk of atrial and ventricular arrhythmia in long-lasting psoriasis patients. Scientific World Journal. 2013;2013:901215. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Park BS, Youn JI. Factors influencing psoriasis: An analysis based upon the extent of involvement and clinical type. J Dermatol. 1998;25:97-102.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/73050.20222

Date of Submission: Jun 12, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Jul 16, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Sep 26, 2024
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 17, 2024
• Manual Googling: Jul 15, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Sep 25, 2024 (15%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com