Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 28540

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : November | Volume : 18 | Issue : 11 | Page : ZC01 - ZC06 Full Version

Effect of Chlorhexidine and Benincasa Hispida Pretreatment on Microshear Bond Strength of Universal Adhesive System on Dentin: A Pilot Study


Published: November 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/73389.20224
Girija S Sajjan, Manda Sri Swathi, P Arun Bhupathi, Madhu Varma Kanumuri, Rajulapati Kalyan Satish, Rama Krishna Alla, Tippireddy Srija, CH Uma Shalini

1. Head, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India. 2. Postgraduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India. 4. Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India. 5. Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India. 6. Professor, Department of Dental Materials, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India. 7. Postgraduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India. 8. Postgraduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, In

Correspondence Address :
Girija S Sajjan,
Head, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Vishnupur, Bhimavaram-534202, Andhra Pradesh, India.
E-mail: girijasajjan@vdc.edu.in

Abstract

Introduction: Achieving strong bond strength of adhesive systems to deep dentin is challenging. Various methods to improve bond strength to deep dentin have been investigated. Chlorhexidine (CHX) enhances the longevity of the bond between adhesives and dentin by inhibiting the collagenolytic activity of Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs). Benincasa hispida is a natural plant-based functional food containing minerals and vitamins that help prevent osteoporosis and improve bone health.

Aim: To evaluate the Microshear Bond Strength (MSBS) of a 10-methacryloyloxydecyl-dihydrogen Phosphate-based (10-MDP) universal adhesive system to coronal dentin with different dentin surface pretreatments, specifically CHX and Benincasa hispida.

Materials and Methods: An in-vitro pilot study was conducted at the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India, from May 2023 to November 2023. Dentin discs (42) were prepared from human mandibular first molars. A standard etch-and-rinse protocol was performed on the discs. The specimens were assigned to different dentin pretreatments: Group-I (no pretreatment), Group-II (CHX) and Group-III (Benincasa hispida). CHX and Benincasa hispida were applied using micro applicator tips. A dentin bonding agent containing 10-MDP (DBA) was applied, photopolymerised and a composite restoration was fabricated. The MSBS to dentin was evaluated using a universal testing machine. The failure patterns were analysed using a stereomicroscope at 10x magnification. One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) HSD tests were used for statistical analysis, with a significance level set at α=0.05.

Results: The mean MSBS values were 24.2732±5.41329 MPa for Group-III, 14.3848±4.23492 MPa for Group-II and 6.9724±3.15837 MPa for Group-I. Pretreatment of dentin with B. hispida resulted in significantly higher MSBS values compared to the other two groups (p<0.001*).

Conclusion: Pretreatment with B. hispida significantly improved MSBS. Thus, B. hispida pretreatment may be beneficial in increasing dentin bond strength.

Keywords

Dentin bonding, Dentine pretreatment, Hybrid layer, Matrix metalloproteinase

In today’s day and age, composite restorations have become a go-to option for everyday restorations due to their minimally invasive tooth preparation requirements, superior mechanical qualities and stunning aesthetics. Currently, dentin adhesive procedures encounter a challenge known as the “bonding era” problem. This problem is related to the long-term endurance of the hybrid layer, as research has demonstrated that the hybrid layer deteriorates over time (1). A meta-analysis on the clinical success of posterior composite resin restorations reported a survival rate of 85-90% at the end of 10 years. The reasons for failures include fractures, loss of retention, loss of marginal integrity and unacceptable colour (2). A suggested reason for these failures could be the degradation of the collagen matrix and hybrid layer over time (3),(4). Hence, the long-term structural durability of the hybrid layer plays a pivotal role and has been the focus of research in adhesion. The morphology, chemical composition and mechanical properties determine the structural durability of the hybrid layer (5).

Some strategies for increasing the durability of the hybrid layer include improving the mechanical properties and preventing hydrolysis of the hybrid layer (6). A functional monomer, 10-methacryloyloxydecyl-dihydrogen Phosphate (10-MDP), is reported to increase bond strength by forming an insoluble MDP-calcium (MDP-Ca) salt (7). These MDP-Ca salts are placed on the dentin collagen scaffold to prevent bond deterioration. MDP creates a stable collagen-phosphate complex by hydrogen bonding with the collagen in dentin. In addition, both free MDP and the MDP-Ca salt inhibit MMPs and exogenous proteases (8). However, some researchers have reported that 2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate (HEMA) in 10-MDP-containing bonding agents suppresses nanolayers between 10-MDP and mineralised tissue, compromising the mechanical properties of the hybrid layer (9).

Another method to improve the hybrid layer aims to prevent hydrolysis. The pro MMPs trapped during dentin formation get activated under conditions of lowered pH, such as in carious processes or during acid etching. These MMPs degrade collagen fibres and polymerised hydrophilic resin. Hence, the application of CHX, an MMP and cathepsin inhibitor, has significantly increased bond strength (10).

The CHX is a broad-spectrum MMP inhibitor and cationic antimicrobial agent. The calcium and zinc ions found in MMPs undergo cation chelation, which underlies the inhibitory action. CHX can attach to collagen fibrils of demineralised dentin through electrostatic forces after filling the binding sites of MMP enzymes (11). An in-vitro study that employed micro-Raman spectroscopy to assess the presence of CHX in the resin/dentin interface after five years of water storage provided clear evidence for this. The study focused on cases where CHX was used as an aqueous dentin pretreatment or included in the etchant (12). However, CHX pretreatment with bonding agents containing 10-MDP demonstrated partial inhibition of collagenolytic activity. Giacomini MC et al., mentioned the need for further exploration of the negative impact of CHX when used with bonding agents containing 10-MDP in their research (13).

In a natural vegetarian diet, many fruits and vegetables are rich sources of minerals like calcium and phosphate. Vegetables from the gourd family are abundant in fibres, vitamins, essential minerals and antioxidants. Benincasa hispida, commonly known as ash gourd, is well-known for its nutritional and medicinal properties. The edible portion of B. hispida contains vitamin C, thiamine, riboflavin and vitamin E. Minerals such as sodium, potassium, calcium and phosphorus are also present in this vegetable. In traditional Indian medicine, the fresh juice of B. hispida is recommended as a source of good nutrition (14),(15). Ash gourd has been reported to improve bone health (16),(17). Since teeth and bones share hydroxyapatite in common, the dental application of B. hispida was considered. Therefore, in the present study, the authors explored the novel application of a B. hispida solution as a pretreatment for a dentin bonding agent. Moreover, as a natural product, it contains minerals in their purest form, eliminating any artificial components.

Currently, there is no research available on the effect of dentin pretreatment with B. hispida on adhesive bond quality. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the effects of different dentin surface pretreatments, such as CHX and Benincasa hispida, on the MSBS of coronal dentin using a universal testing machine with a 10 MDP-based universal adhesive system. Since the optimum concentration of B. hispida as a pretreatment for dentin bonding agents has not been established, the present study was conducted as a pilot study.

Material and Methods

The present in-vitro pilot study was conducted at the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India, from May 2023 to November 2023. The Institutional Ethical Committee (IRB No: IECVDC/23/PG01/CE/IVT/5) approved the research protocol. The present research was executed in accordance with the Checklist for Reporting In-vitro Studies (CRIS) guidelines (equator.org). A convenience sample of 42 participants was selected.

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: Forty-two human mandibular first molar teeth, freshly extracted due to poor periodontal health or for complete denture treatment, were selected for the present study. Teeth with carious and non carious lesions, crown or root fractures occurring during extraction and developmental anomalies were excluded.

Study Procedure

After ultrasonic scaling, the teeth were stored in a 0.5% thymol solution at 37°C. All the occlusal enamel was ground off using a diamond disc under water coolant and evaluated for the absence of enamel under a stereomicroscope (Olympus, Model SZX2-ILLT, Olympus Corporation, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan) at magnifications of x12.5 and x20. A dentin slice approximately 1.0 mm thick was cut perpendicular to the long axis of each tooth from the upper middle coronal region using a low-speed diamond disk (Marathon M4 Micromotor) under water coolant (Table/Fig 1) (18). The occlusal surfaces of the slices were ground with up to 600-grit silicon carbide paper to expose a flat dentin surface. The dentin slices were divided into three main groups (fourteen each): Group-I - no pretreatment, Group-II - CHX pretreatment and Group-III - B. hispida pretreatment, according to the surface pretreatments performed, using a randomisation technique (www.randomizer.org) (19).

A putty impression of an 18-gauge needle with an outer diameter of 1.27 mm was made (20). This was used as a matrix to prepare composite restorations with dimensions of 1.2 mm in diameter and 1 mm in height (Table/Fig 2) (21). Surgical micropore adhesive tape was applied to the dentin disc, exposing only the bonding surface (Table/Fig 2) (22).

Preparation of B. Hispida juice: In June, the vegetable was purchased from the local market in Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India. It was washed thoroughly and peeled to obtain only the internal portion from which the juice was intended to be extracted. The equipment (grater) used to grate the pulp was dried in sunlight for a whole day to sterilise it. The juice was extracted from the grated pulp of the vegetable by squeezing it in a sterile cloth into a sterile container. It was used immediately for the surface pretreatment.

The dentin slices in all three groups were etched with 37% phosphoric acid (3M Scotchbond Multipurpose Etchant) for 15 seconds, followed by rinsing for 15 seconds. The excess moisture was removed with absorbent paper.

The dentin slices in Group-I did not receive any surface pretreatment, while Group-II and III underwent a passive application of 2% CHX solution (HexaChlor, Safe Endo Dental India Pvt. Ltd.,) and a passive application of freshly prepared B. hispida juice, respectively, for 30 seconds (Table/Fig 3). The excess solution was removed using absorbent paper.

All dentin slices were then treated with an active application of a layer of Dentin Bonding Agent containing 10-MDP (DBA) (Adper Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE) (23) for 20 seconds, followed by solvent evaporation for five seconds using a 3-way syringe. The Dentin Bonding Agent was light-cured with LED equipment (Woodpecker Ltd., intensity 1000 mW/cm²) for 20 seconds. Composite resin (3M ESPE Filtek Z250 XT Nano Hybrid Universal Restorative) was placed onto the dentin discs using a putty impression as a matrix and photopolymerised with LED equipment (Woodpecker Ltd., intensity 1000 mW/cm2) for 20 seconds (Table/Fig 4).

The samples were then embedded in resin blocks and stored in distilled water. Subsequently, the samples were subjected to a MSBS test using a Universal Testing Machine (AE-UTM-LC2 Advanced Equipment, Thane, India). A flat, sharp chisel with dimensions of 6 mm in length and 3 mm in width was placed as close as possible to the resin-dentin interface (Table/Fig 4). The resin-dentin interfaces of the specimens and the chisel were aligned as straight as possible to ensure shear orientation. A shear force was applied to the specimen at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until failure occurred. The loads at failure were recorded using the formula (18),(21).

Debonding force (N)/Bonding area (mm2): The failed samples were examined to assess the failure patterns under a stereomicroscope at 20x magnification. This examination aimed to determine whether the debonding occurred at the resin-dentin interface, within the adhesive, or within the dentin. The failures were classified as follows: a) adhesive failure between dentin and resin; b) cohesive failure in the resin; c) cohesive failure in the dentin; and d) mixed failure (24).

Statistical Analysis

A one-way ANOVA test (for group-wise comparison) and a Tukey’s HSD test (for pair-wise comparison) were used to analyse the data. The Chi-square test was employed to determine the association between the three groups in the failure mode analysis. The results were considered statistically significant when p ≤0.05.

Results

The group-wise comparison of mean and standard deviation of MSBS values is shown in (Table/Fig 5). As illustrated, the pretreatment of dentin bonding agents with B. hispida resulted in the highest mean MSBS value, followed by the CHX and no pretreatment (control) groups. One-way ANOVA indicated statistically significant differences in bond strength values among the groups (p<0.001).

Consequently, the Tukey’s HSD test was applied for pair-wise comparisons. The results demonstrated statistically significant differences in the mean bond strength values between the Control and CHX groups, the Control and B. hispida groups, as well as the CHX and B. hispida groups (p <0.001) (Table/Fig 6).

Among the three groups, adhesive failures were more prevalent in Group-I, with 8 cases (57.1%), while the least adhesive failures were observed in Group-III, with only 1 case (7.1%). Cohesive failures were more common in Group-III, totaling 7 cases (50.0%) and were least frequent in Group-I, with three cases (7.1%). Mixed-type failures were more frequent in Group-III, with 6 cases (42.9%) and least frequent in Group-II, with 1 case (21.4%). There was a significant difference in failure modes among the three groups, with a p-value of 0.029 (Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8).

Discussion

The results of the present study demonstrated a statistically significant difference in MSBS values among the three groups. Pretreatment with B. hispida resulted in significantly higher MSBS compared to both the pretreatment with CHX and the no pretreatment group.

Three methods for improving dentin bond strength are reported in the literature and were tested in the present study. The first method involved using a functional monomer, such as 10-MDP (Adper Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE), which enhances chemical and micro-mechanical adhesion by binding with hydroxyapatite in dentin and enamel, forming MDP-Ca salts in the specimens of Group-I. The second method involved the pretreatment of etched dentin with MMP inhibitors, such as CHX, in the specimens of Group-II. The third method consisted of pre-treating etched dentin with B. hispida juice to promote the mineralisation of the hybrid layer, as seen in the specimens of Group-III.

In the present study, Group-I samples were treated with a bonding agent containing 10-MDP, following a conventional protocol without dentin pretreatment. The mean bond strength achieved was 6.9724 MPa, with a standard deviation of 3.158. A similar study achieved a MSBS of 15.60 MPa using self-etch adhesive systems containing HEMA and 10-MDP monomers, but it was conducted with bovine dentin (25). Another study involving 10-MDP bonding agents (Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil Tri-S Bond) in self-etch mode reported MSBS bond strength values of 36.9 MPa and 28.5 MPa achieved immediately and after 24 hours, respectively. However, that study also used bovine teeth, which may account for the variation in bond strength (26). Both studies used dentin from incisors as a bonding substrate, whereas in the present study, dentin from molars was utilised with the etch-and-rinse technique. The formation of water-insoluble MDP-Ca salts enhances bond adhesion, durability and strength, with “nano-layering” of MDP-Ca salts proposed as the mechanism. However, the lengthy carboxyl chain of 10-MDP leads to poor monomer polymerisation and a low elastic modulus at the interface. The presence of HEMA suppresses the formation of nanolayers between 10-MDP and mineralised tissue, resulting in lower mechanical integrity during hybridisation (25).

Analysis of the fracture pattern yielded a majority of adhesive fractures (57.1%), followed by fewer mixed fractures (21.4%) and cohesive composite fractures (21.4%) in Group-I. This finding supports the lowest MSBS bond strength achieved in the present experiment.

Many topical treatments on dentin have been researched, aimed at altering the physical and chemical properties to enhance resin-dentin bonding. Such treatments transform a previously hydrophilic, crystalline and relatively impermeable acid-labile surface into a more hydrophobic, organic, highly permeable and acid-resistant surface. Inhibition of collagenolytic activity using CHX is an important strategy to increase resistance to enzymatic degradation (27).

In Group-II, the mean MSBS achieved was 14.38 MPa, which was significantly higher than that of Group-I, with a p-value of less than 0.001. Analysis of the fracture pattern showed fewer adhesive fractures (50.0%), mixed fractures (7.1%) and cohesive composite fractures (42.9%) in Group-II compared to Group-I. This supports the higher MSBS values achieved in Group-II compared to Group-I in the experiment.

The association between CHX and adhesive systems in the bonding procedure could be a promising strategy to increase the durability of restorations due to the anti-gelatinolytic activity of CHX applied prior to the adhesive systems. According to previous literature, acid-etched dentin treated with CHX prevents MMP activity and decreases collagen solubility (13). Consequently, the MSBS values of the CHX group were significantly better than those of the control Group-In the present study (28). Similar findings have been reported in several studies conducted by Carrilho MR et al., Zhang YB et al., Leitune VC et al., and Dionysopoulos D (Table/Fig 9) (29),(30),(31),(32).

The CHX has been reported to ultimately diffuse out of the polymerised resin network, as it cannot co-polymerise with methacrylate resin monomers. Furthermore, its electrostatic bonding characteristics compromise the long-term anti-MMP effectiveness of CHX, as water acts as a desorption medium (13).

According to Gao X et al., topical mineralisation with calcium/phosphorus (Ca/P) ion release after bonding procedures might not improve adhesive bond strength. The spatiotemporal mismatch of mineralising agents and the hybrid layer prevents mineral deposition in the collagen fibril network. Therefore, dentin collagen mineralisation during hybridisation could be a promising technique for intrafibrillar mineralisation (33). With all of this in mind, the use of B. hispida was considered, as it has the potential to be a source of minerals in their purest and most natural form.

The mean MSBS of Group-III (24.27 MPa) is significantly higher than that of Group-I and II, with a p-value <0.001*. This increase in bond strength may be attributed to B. hispida being a rich source of minerals, including sodium, potassium, calcium, iron and phosphorus, as well as antioxidants and polysaccharides found in fruit extract. It also contains vitamins such as vitamins C and E, riboflavin and niacin (15).

Analysis of the fracture pattern revealed lower adhesive fractures (7.1%), mixed fractures (42.9%) and cohesive composite fractures (50.0%) in Group-III compared to Group-II. This supports the higher MSBS values achieved in Group-III compared to Group-II in the experiment.

In the literature, the use of B. hispida is reported to improve bone health (16),(17). An animal study indicated the beneficial role of B. hispida in collagen health and bone mineralisation (16),(17). Supplementation with Benincasa Hispida Extract (BHE) in Ovariectomy-Induced Osteoporosis (OVX) mice resulted in the prevention of Bone Mineral Density (BMD) reduction, as well as an increase in mineralisation and collagen health. This condition is often caused by low calcium intake, inactivity and decreased oestrogen output. The bioactive compound 2-furocid present in BHE can be added to food materials to enhance bone health (16),(17). Bones and teeth share common chemistry, including calcium hydroxyapatite crystals.

The presence of 2-furocid acid and minerals such as calcium and phosphorus may have contributed to increased mineralisation of the hybrid layer. The polysaccharides found in the fruit extract exhibit significant antioxidant effects. Additionally, the fruit extract contains vitamins E and C, which further enhance its beneficial effects. The combination of these minerals and antioxidant properties may have led to increased MSBS values (14),(15),(16),(17).

Limitation(s)

The optimum concentration of B. hispida must be established. It is necessary to analyse the bioactive compounds of B. hispida and to study the molecular mechanisms of action on human dentin. Future studies will focus on evaluating the release of minerals from B. hispida onto the surface of dentin, the mineralisation of the hybrid layer and the long-term durability of the hybrid layer formed by the application of B. hispida.

Conclusion

The MDP-containing bonding agents with B. hispida pretreatment showed significantly higher MSBS than Group-I and II. MDP-containing bonding agents with CHX pretreatment exhibited significantly higher MSBS compared to Group-I. Minimum adhesive failures were observed in Group-III compared to Group-I and II. Pretreatment with B. hispida may be beneficial for increasing dentin bond strength.

References

1.
Moon PC, Weaver J, Brooks CN. Review of matrix metalloproteinases’ effect on the hybrid dentin bond layer stability and chlorhexidine clinical use to prevent bond failure. Open Dent J. 2010;4:147-52. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Heintze SD, Loguercio AD, Hanzen TA, Reis A, Rousson V. Clinical efficacy of resin-based direct posterior restorations and glass-ionomer restorations – An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcome parameters. Dent Mater. 2022;38(5):e109-e135. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjäderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):1-16. Doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.016. Epub 2010 Nov 27. PMID: 21112620; PMCID: PMC3857593. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater. 2008;24(1):90-101. Doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.02.009. Epub 2007 Apr 17. PMID: 17442386. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Carvalho RM, Manso AP, Geraldeli S, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):72-86. Doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.011. PMID: 22192252; PMCID: PMC3863938. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Tjäderhane L, Nascimento FD, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Tersariol IL, Geraldeli S, et al. Strategies to prevent hydrolytic degradation of the hybrid layer- A review. Dent Mater. 2013;29(10):999-1011. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T, et al. Self-assembled Nano-layering at the Adhesive Interface. J Dent Res. 2012;91(4):376-81. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Jin X, Han F, Wang Q, Yuan X, Zhou Q, Xie H, et al. The roles of 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate and its calcium salt in preserving the adhesive–dentin hybrid layer. Dent Mater. 2022;38(7):1194-205. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Zhou J, Wurihan Y, Shibata R, Tanaka Z, Zhang K, Zheng Q, et al. Quantitative/qualitative analysis of adhesive-dentin interface in the presence of 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019;92:71-78. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Saffarpour A, Valizadeh S, Amini A, Kharazifard M, Rohaninasab M. Effect of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors on microtensile bond strength of dental composite restorations to dentin in use of an etch-and-rinse adhesive system. Clinical & Exp Dental Res. 2020;6(6):686-92. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Yaghmoor RB, Jamal H, Abed H, Allan E, Ashley P, Young A. Incorporation of MMP inhibitors into dental adhesive systems and bond strength of coronal composite restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in-vitro studies. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2022;58:298-315. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Loguercio AD, Hass V, Gutierrez MF, Luque-Martinez IV, Szezs A, Stanislawczuk R, et al. Five-year effects of chlorhexidine on the in-vitro durability of resin/dentin interfaces. J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(1):35-42.
13.
Giacomini MC, Scaffa PMC, Gonçalves RS, Zabeu GS, Vidal CdMP, Carrilho MRdO, et al. Profile of a 10-MDP-based universal adhesive system associated with chlorhexidine: Dentin bond strength and in situ zymography performance. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;110:103925. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Mohammad NA, Anwar F, Mehmood T, Hamid AA, Muhammad K, Saari N. Phenolic compounds, tocochromanols profile and antioxidant properties of winter melon [Benincasa hispida (Thunb.) Cogn.] seed oils. Food Measure. 2019;13:940-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-018-0008-x. [crossref]
15.
Islam MT, Quispe C, El-Kersh DM, Shill MC, Bhardwaj K, Bhardwaj P, et al. A literature-based update on Benincasa hispida (Thunb.) Cogn.: traditional uses, nutraceutical, and phytopharmacological profiles. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021;2021:6349041. Doi: 10.1155/2021/6349041. PMID: 34925698; PMCID: PMC8683187. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Choi Y-E, Yang J-M, Cho J-H. Benincasa hispida extract promotes proliferation, differentiation, and mineralization of MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts and inhibits the differentiation of raw 246.7 Osteoclast Precursors Appl Sci. 2022;12:8849. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178849. [crossref]
17.
Choi S, Han X, Men X, Lee S, Oh G, Choi Y, et al. Benincasa hispida extract prevents ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis in female ICR mice. Appl Sci. 2023;13(2):832. [crossref]
18.
Althomali YM, Ebrahim MI. Microshear bond strength of Nano-Bond adhesive containing nanosized aluminum trioxide particles. J Orthod Sci. 2017;6(2):71-75. Doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_158_16. PMID: 28546960; PMCID: PMC5433107. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
https://www.randomizer.org/#randomize
20.
https://www.hamiltoncompany.com/laboratory-products/needles-knowledge/needle-gauge-chart.
21.
Valizadeh S, Moradi A, Mirazei M, Amiri H, Kharazifard MJ. Microshear bond strength of different adhesive systems to dentin. Front Dent. 2019;16(4):265-71. Doi: 10.18502/fid.v16i4.2085. Epub 2019 Aug 30. PMID: 32342055; PMCID: PMC7181353.
22.
Shimaoka AM, de Andrade AP, Cardoso MV, de Carvalho RC. The importance of adhesive area delimitation in a μSBS bond strength experimental design. J Adhes Dent. 2011;13(4):307-14.
23.
3m-single-bond-universal-adhesive-technical-product-profile.pdf
24.
Koyuturk AE, Tokay U, Sari ME, Ozmen B, Cortcu M, Acar H, et al. Influence of the bulk fill restorative technique on microleakage and microtensile of class II restorations. Pediatr Dent J. 2014;24(3):148-52. [crossref]
25.
Pimentel de Oliveira R, de Paula BL, Ribeiro ME, Alves E, Costi HT, Silva C. Evaluation of the bond strength of self-etching adhesive systems containing HEMA and 10-MDP monomers: bond strength of adhesives containing HEMA and 10-MDP. Int J Dent. 2022;2022:5756649. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Harnirattisai C, Roengrungreang P, Rangsisiripaiboon U, Senawongse P. Shear and micro-shear bond strengths of four self-etching adhesives measured immediately and 24 hours after application. Dent Mater. 2012;31(5):779-87. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Frassetto A, Breschi L, Turco G, Marchesi G, Di Lenarda R, Tay FR, et al. Mechanisms of degradation of the hybrid layer in adhesive dentistry and therapeutic agents to improve bond durability- A literature review. Dent Mater. 2016;32(2):e41-e53. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Lima BC de O, Zeni TC, Mendonça MJ, Roque JVO, Ueda JK, Menolli RA, et al. Chlorhexidine added to different adhesive systems- Assessment of antibacterial activity and bond strength. Research, Society and development. [Internet]. 2022Feb.18 [cited 2024Jun.7];11(3):e19011325785.Available from: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25785. [crossref]
29.
Carrilho MR, Carvalho RM, de Goes MF, di Hipólito V, Geraldeli S, Tay FR, et al. Chlorhexidine preserves dentin bond in-vitro. J Dent Res. 2007;86(1):90-94. Doi: 10.1177/154405910708600115. PMID: 17189470; PMCID: PMC2248723. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Zhang YB, Li Y, Yao K, Liang GB. Effect of concentration of chlorhexidine on bonding durability of dentine and resin. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2010;45(2):94-97. Chinese. PMID: 20368003.
31.
Leitune VC, Portella FF, Bohn PV, Collares FM, Samuel SM. Influence of chlorhexidine application on longitudinal adhesive bond strength in deciduous teeth. Braz Oral Res. 2011;25(5):388-92. Doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242011000500003. PMID: 22031050.[crossref][PubMed]
32.
Dionysopoulos D. Effect of digluconate chlorhexidine on bond strength between dental adhesive systems and dentin: A systematic review. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19(1):11-16. Doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.173185. PMID: 26957786; PMCID: PMC4760005. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Gao X, Wang Z, Yang H, Huang C. Rapid intrafibrillar mineralization strategy enhances adhesive–dentin interface. J Dent Res. 2024;103(1):42-50.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/73389.20224

Date of Submission: Jun 08, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Jul 23, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Sep 16, 2024
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 10, 2024
• Manual Googling: Jul 22, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Sep 14, 2024 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com