Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 159784

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : August | Volume : 18 | Issue : 8 | Page : EC19 - EC22 Full Version

Quality of Life among Haemophilic Children in Central Madhya Pradesh, India: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: August 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/69411.19759
Madhuri Tejwani, Pankaj Pal, Gaurav Kumar Prajapati, Vipin Thakur, Shweta Sharma

1. Senior Resident, Department of Neonatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Government Medical College, Seoni, Madhya Pradesh, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Laxmi Narayan Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. 5. Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Shweta Sharma,
Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal-462001, Madhya Pradesh, India.
E-mail: sharmadrshweta77@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Quality of Life (QoL) has recently become a focus of research in haemophilia, as children with haemophilia miss out on opportunities to reach their full potential during school and later in life. This leads to emotional and behavioural problems, family issues, and a decrease in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL). There is very limited data from the state of Madhya Pradesh, India, to assess the QoL in haemophilia patients.

Aim: To study the clinical profile of haemophilic children and assess their QoL.

Materials and Methods: The present hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Paediatrics, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India, from January 2019 to December 2019. A total of 49 children (Institutional incidence), aged from 4-12 years, with factor VIII/IX deficiency who presented in the Paediatric ward of the study Institution for factor transfusion, were included in the study. The study population was divided into two groups with children aged (group ) and children aged 8-12 years (group II). A detailed clinical history was obtained from the accompanying parent/guardian, and QoL was measured using the Haemophilia QoL (Haemo-QoL) questionnaire. Scores achieved in each dimension, as well as, the total score were combined on a scale ranging from 0 to 100. High values indicate high impairment in QoL. The observations of different scales like Standardised and Transformed Scale Scores (TSS) of Haemo-QoL were analysed using the student’s t-test.

Results: In the present study, haemophilia A was more common than haemophilia B. All patients who attended the paediatric ward for factor transfusion were males, with a mean age of 8.37±2.56 years. It was also observed that the proportion of patients who were diagnosed early was significantly higher in the 4-7 years age group compared to the 8-12 years age group of patients (p-value <0.05). The present study revealed that the mean overall scores on the Haemo-QoL for the age groups 4-7 years and 8-12 years were 41.92±17.95 and 51.84±16.36, respectively. The highest impairment was in the physical health, school and sports, and family dimensions of QoL.

Conclusion: The QoL is poor among children in both age groups. The current study also showed that as age advances, the QoL of haemophilia patients becomes poorer.

Keywords

Emotions, Family support, Haemophilia, Physical health

Haemophilia is a rare, chronic, X-linked recessive inherited disorder primarily affecting males (1). Haemophilia is characterised by a deficiency of factor VIII or IX, causing a disturbance in coagulation activity (1). Globally, the prevalence of haemophilia A is around 1 in 5000 male births, and for haemophilia B, it is around 1 in 30,000 male births (2). In a 2015 annual global survey by the World Health Organisation (WHO), it was reported that there were around 17,500 haemophilia patients (83% haemophilia A) identified from India in this survey, which is likely an underestimate (3). In high-income countries, the prevalence of mild, moderate and severe haemophilia is 40%, 15% and 45%, respectively, which is better than the 15%, 22% and 63% prevalence in low-income countries (4).

Quality of Life (QoL) is one of the most important focuses of research in haemophilia. The WHO defined QoL as individuals perceptions of their position in life in terms of the culture and value systems in which they live, and with respect to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns (5). In an international multicentered West European study of children, it was indicated that there were differences in the QoL in various areas of study, and the QoL in patients from other countries was more impaired in the subscales of physical health, feelings, views, school and sports, and treatment. Results of this multicentered West European study indicate that impairment in QoL was different in various age groups (3). Alongside the probable effect of haemophilia on different contexts on QoL, it could be possible that variable age groups might influence the QoL in a different form (4). Moreover, it was shown that with the increase in age of haemophilia patients, the levels of QoL decreased (6).

Children with haemophilia lose opportunities to achieve their potential during school and later in life (7). Individuals with severe haemophilia A (Factor VIII level ≤1%) experience frequent bleedings, often into soft tissues and joints, leading to joint damage. Repeated bleeding can lead to the development of target joints and arthropathy, as well as, pain, permanent deformities, loss of mobility and disability (8). Moreover, joint bleeding results in emotional and behavioural problems, and family issues and impairs HRQoL (9). In young patients with haemophilia, studies indicate lower physical functioning, bodily pain, general health and social functioning QoL compared to the general population (10).

Children with haemophilia and their parents need support in the form of a multidisciplinary team. This is challenging, especially in developing countries, where there is a lack of access to a multidisciplinary team that can provide contextualised, structured psycho-education programs and advice on haemophilia, recognising bleeds, adherence, home management, child care and parental self-care (11). Additionally, there is very limited data from the state of Madhya Pradesh, India to assess the QoL in haemophilia patients. Hence, the present study was conducted to study the clinical profile of haemophilic patients and assess their QoL.

Material and Methods

The present hospital-based cross-sectional study was carried out in the Department of Paediatrics, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India, from January 2019 to December 2019. Approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee (letter no 3567072/MC/IEC/2018 dated 5/11/2018). Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the children before including them in the study.

Inclusion criteria: Children aged between 4 and 12 years with factor VIII/IX deficiency who were attending the Paediatric ward for factor transfusion were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients younger than 4 years or older than 12 years, as well as, those with factor deficiencies other than factor VIII/IX, were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

The study population was divided into two different groups as, group I with children aged 4-7 years and group II with children aged 8-12 years. Clinical history, including parameters such as demographic features, duration of symptoms, symptom profile, family history, age at the time of diagnosis, school absences due to haemophilia in the last year, and number of previous factor transfusions, was gathered from the accompanying parent/guardian.

The case was defined as a physician-diagnosed patient with haemophilia A or B, which was further verified through conditions for factor coverage usage records, records of laboratory diagnosis, factor assay levels, as per their available records and registration records. Mild, moderate and severe haemophilia were defined as those having factor levels of >5-40%, 1-5% and <1% of normal activity, respectively (12).

Haemophilia QoL (Haemo-QoL): The Haemo-QoL questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life among children with haemophilia (13). This questionnaire was developed for children and adolescents with haemophilia by the European Haemophilia Care Centres and has sets of psychometrically tested questionnaires for different age groups of children. There are versions as self-reports for children: version I is for children aged 4-7 years old (21 items), while version II is for children aged 8-12 years old (64 items), with fewer items for younger children in the domains of physical health, feelings, views, family, friends, others, sports and school, and treatment. The questionnaire was expanded with one additional domain (global health). The reliability of this new domain was assessed by subject experts. Group-II has, in addition, the domains of perceived support and dealing with haemophilia. Subjects scored each item on a 5-point scale according to how often they encountered problems during the previous four weeks (1=all the time, 2=often, 3=sometimes, 4=seldom, 5=never).

Because the number of items in each dimension differs in the two versions of the questionnaire for different age groups, raw scores were transformed on a scale of 0 to 100 to enable comparison between the age groups and the levels of disability in different dimensions. Higher scores on the Haemo-QoL reflect higher levels of impairment thus lower levels of quality of life and lower score reflects lower level of impairment and thus better ouality of life. According to the instructions given to the children, the time taken by them to complete the instrument was 20 minutes.

Statistical Analysis

All the data collected in the proforma were entered into the spreadsheets of Microsoft Excel 2007, a version developed by Microsoft Corporation in Washington. The data was then organised and tabulated. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.1 by Graph Stats Technologies Pvt. Ltd. in Bengaluru, India. Non parametric data, such as the number of patients in two key age groups, were compared using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact analysis. The means of different scales, such as standardised and TSSs of Haemo-QoL, were analysed using the Student’s t-test. A p-value of less than 0.05 is considered significant.

Results

A total of 49 children (institutional incidence) were included in the study, with 20 children in the 8-12 years age group. The mean age of the study participants was 8.37±2.56 years.

Out of the 49 cases of haemophilia, 36 (73.47%) cases were diagnosed with haemophilia A and 13 (26.53%) cases were diagnosed with haemophilia B. No statistical difference was observed when comparing the types of haemophilia in both age groups (p-value=0.8403). The Chi-square test showed that the proportions of patients who had an early diagnosis were significantly higher in group I compared to group II of patients (p-value=0.014). The proportion of patients who were absent from school due to the disease in the last 12 months was significantly higher in group II compared to group I (p-value=0.04). Additionally, the proportion of patients who had severe haemophilia was significantly higher in group II compared to group I (p-value=0.038) (Table/Fig 1).

The mean TSS for physical health (p-value=0.0181), view of himself (p-value=0.0001), view of family (p-value=0.019), friends (p-value=0.0001), and others (p-value=0.0001) were significantly higher in group II compared to group I (p-value<0.05). Meanwhile, the mean of domains such as feelings (p-value=0.6961), school and sports (p-value=0.8994), treatment (p-value=0.6683), and global health (p-value=0.3617) were comparable between the two groups (p-value>0.05) (Table/Fig 2).

The domains of physical health (p-value=0.0178), view of self (p-value=0.0001), family (p-value=0.019), friends (p-value=0.0001), and other person (p-value=0.0001) had significantly higher mean Standardised Scale Score (SSS) in the 8-12 years age group compared to the 4-7 years age group (p-value<0.05). On the other hand, domains such as feelings (p-value=0.6947), school and sports (p-value=0.9091), treatment (p-value=0.6747) and global health (p-value=0.3617) had a comparable mean SSS in group I compared to group II (p-value>0.05) (Table/Fig 3).

The mean activity scores of SSS and TSS were comparable between Haemophilia type A and type B (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

Haemophilia is a common heritable bleeding disorder. There is a heavy load of patients with haemophilia, as the prevalence of haemophilia is known to increase with better medical services and improved survival of patients. Although advancements in the management of haemophilia have shortened the life expectancy gap between haemophilic patients and normal individuals, they have led to a significant difference in the Quality of Life (QoL) of haemophilic patients (3).

In the present study, the authors found a greater number of patients with haemophilia A than haemophilia B. Among the 49 cases studied, 36 cases were diagnosed as haemophilia A, accounting for 73.47%, while 13 cases were haemophilia B, accounting for 26.53%. The observations published by the World Federation of Haemophilia (WFH) also state that haemophilia A is more common than haemophilia B, representing 80-85% of the total haemophiliac population. In studies by Mansouritorghabeh H, it was stated that Haemophilia A accounts for about 80% of all haemophiliacs (14).

In the current study, haemophilia A is more common than haemophilia B, which is consistent with other studies (6),(7). A total of 26 out of 49 cases (53.06%) came from “affected families,” meaning those with a history of haemophilia in previous generations. They had siblings or maternal uncles suffering from the disease. A similar percentage was reported by Parthiban R et al., where 52.2% of the patients had a family history of haemophilia (8).

In the present study, the authors found that in the 8-12 years age group, 34.69% of children showed absence from school in the last 12 months due to the disease, while it was 12.24% in the 4-7 years age group. Additionally, in the 8-12 years age group, 10.2%, 14.29% and 34.69% had mild, moderate and severe haemophilia, respectively, while in the 4-7 years age group, the percentages were 14.29%, 6.12% and 20.41% for mild, moderate, and severe haemophilia, suggesting that the severity of the disease increases with age. This finding is consistent with various studies worldwide, indicating that as age advances, there is a limitation of physical activity affecting the Quality of Life (QoL) (15).

The results of this study revealed that the mean overall scores on the Haemo-QoL for age group I and II were 41.92±17.95, and 51.84±16.36, respectively. The highest impairment was observed in the physical health, school and sports, and family dimensions of QoL. It was found that group II had more impaired total Haemo-QoL scores compared to children aged 4-7 years. This finding indicates that age is a significant factor influencing QoL in the present study population, which is consistent with various other studies. Repeated episodes of bleeding can have long-lasting effects on a child’s physical growth and development (16). Thus, children with haemophilia tend to have a lower HRQoL compared to their healthy peers, especially those with severe disease (17).

The mean SSS of all subscales in all attributes was comparable in both type A and type B haemophilic patients. The mean TSS of all subscale scores was 47.91±17.5 in all children with type A haemophilia and 49.23±17.87 in all children with type B haemophilia. This indicates that the QoL is uniformly poor in children affected by both type A and B haemophilia (18).

Limitation(s)

The study resulting from a small sample of the population in the present study may not be applicable to a larger population, so there is a need to study a larger sample for generalisation. The age range was between 4 years and 12 years. Further studies are needed to determine the quality of life for all persons with haemophilia and to compare as many age groups as possible.

Conclusion

The quality of life was poor among children in both age groups. It was also observed that as age increased, the QoL of haemophilia patients worsened. The major factors contributing to poor quality of life included the perceived impact of family, poor physical health, and inability to participate in school/sports activities. Support from family, friends, and others is crucial for maintaining quality of life. To improve haemophilia management and early diagnosis, priorities should be identified, such as training caregivers, establishing day care centers, initiating a registry, raising awareness among affected individuals and their families about the disorder, providing affordable factor concentrates, enhancing social awareness, and developing a comprehensive care and management team.

References

1.
Scott JP, Montgomery RR. Hemorrhagic and thrombotic disorder. In: Kliegman RM, Behrman RE, Jenson BF, editors. Nelson’s Text Book of Paediatrics. 18th ed., Vol. 20. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2010. p. 61-88.
2.
Mannucci PM, Tuddenham EG. The hemophilias- From royal genes to gene therapy. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(23):1773-79. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
World Federation of Hemophilia. Report on the Annual Global Survey 2015. Montreal, Canada: WFH, 2016.
4.
Report of the Annual Global Survey 2016. World Federation of Haemophiilia. 2016; p. 3-73.
5.
Orley J. The WHOQoL Group. The development of the WHO quality of life assessment instruments (the WHOQoL). In: Orley J, Kuyken W, editors. Quality of Life Assessment. International Perspectives. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1994; pp. 41 57. [crossref]
6.
Agarwal MB, Mehta BC, Bhanotra PC. Classical haemophilia a study of 236 cases from 212 unrelated families). J Assoc Physicians India. 1981;29(5):385-89.
7.
Dube B, Chawla SC, Gupta SP, Agarwal SP, Dikshit SK, Khanna MN, et al. Haemophilia and Christmas disease (a clinical and haematological study). J Assoc Physicians India. 1972;20(1):47-54.
8.
Parthiban R, Kaler A, Muralidharan S, Hanagavadi S, Sashikala P, Shariff S. A clinico-pathological study of haemophilia in rural set up of Karnataka. Br J Med Res. 2015;6(10):948-55. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Kar A, Mirkazemi R, Singh P, Potnis-Lele M, Lohade S, Lalwani A, et al. Disability in Indian patients with haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2007;13(4):398-404. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Alpkiliç Baskirt E, Ak G, Zulfikar B. Oral and general health-related quality of life among young patients with haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2009;15(1):193-98. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Phadnis S, Kar A. The impact of a haemophilia education intervention on the knowledge and health related quality of life of parents of Indian children with haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2017;23(1):82-88. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Castaman G, Matino D. Hemophilia A and B: Molecular and clinical similarities and differences. Haematologica. 2019;104(9):1702-709. Doi: 10.3324/ haematol.2019.221093. Epub 2019 Aug 8. PMID: 31399527; PMCID: PMC6717582. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Pollak E, Mühlan H, Von Mackensen S, Bullinger M. The Haemo- QoL Index: Developing a short measure for health-related quality of life assessment in children and adolescents with haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2006;12(4):384-92. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Mansouritorghabeh H. Clinical and laboratory approaches to hemophilia A. Iran J Med Sci. 2015;40(3):194-205.
15.
Ferreira AA, Leite IC, Bustamante Teixeira MT, Corrêa CS, da Cruz DT, Rodrigues DD, et al. Health related quality of life in hemophilia: Results of the hemophilia specific quality of life index (Haem a Qol) at a Brazilian blood center. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2013;35:314 18. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Barr RD, Saleh M, Furlong W, Horsman J, Sek J, Pai M, et al. Health status and health-related quality of life associated with hemophilia. Am J Hematol. 2002;71(3):152-60. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Young NL, Bradley CS, Wakefield CD, Barnard D, Blanchette VS, McCusker PJ. How well does the Canadian Haemophilia Outcomes-Kids’ Life Assessment Tool (CHO-KLAT) measure the quality of life of boys with haemophilia? Paediatr Blood Cancer. 2006;47(3):305-11. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Plug I, Peters M, Mauser-Bunschoten EP, de Goede-Bolder A, Heijnen L, Smit C, et al. Social participation of patients with hemophilia in the Netherlands. Blood. 2008;111(4):1811-15.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/69411.19759

Date of Submission: Jan 04, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Feb 28, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Jun 17, 2024
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 05, 2024
• Manual Googling: Feb 29, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Jun 15, 2024 (13%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 9

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com