Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 153552

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2024 | Month : August | Volume : 18 | Issue : 8 | Page : UD01 - UD03 Full Version

An Intricate Case of Pyopneumothorax with Trapped Right Lung Requiring Swift Adaptation and Multidisciplinary Collaboration


Published: August 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/70621.19694
Vipul Sharma, Jayant Bhatia, Preeti Raj

1. Professor, Cardiac Anaesthesia, Department of Anaesthesia, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 2. Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 3. Fellow, Cardiac Anaesthesia, Department of Anaesthesia, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Jayant Bhatia,
Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune-411018, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: jayant.bhatia0314@gmail.com

Abstract

Pulmonary Tuberculosis (PTB) is a significant cause of morbidity, especially in patients with underlying health conditions. The present case highlights the complex management in a patient with intricate medical history, marked by tuberculosis, multiple Intercostal Chest Drain (ICD) procedures, and pyopneumothorax with long-standing diabetes mellitus and a history of smoking, adding to the uniqueness of the case. The authors present a case of a 67-year-old male, admitted for a right Pneumonectomy (PE) due to a complex combination of pyopneumothorax, right trapped lung and post-decortication status. However, due to the fragile nature of the tissue and the existence of vascular adhesions, it was decided to choose “physiological lung exclusion” by separating the affected lung from the tracheobronchial tree by cutting the bronchus and tying off the pulmonary artery, without removing any lung tissue, while keeping the pulmonary veins intact. The present report highlights the challenges faced, the multidisciplinary approach employed, and the successful surgical outcome, underscoring the importance of collaborative management.

Keywords

Decortication, Double lumen tube, Pneumonectomy, Pneumothorax, Pulmonary tuberculosis

Case Report

A 67-year-old male, 158 cm in height and weighing 60 kg, presented with persistent cough and pain at the Intercostal Chest Drain (ICD) site for three months. The pain, described as dull, constant, non radiating, and increased in severity with inspiration, was partially relieved by Tablet Paracetamol 500 mg and Tablet Diclofenac 75 mg as needed. Importantly, there was no history of trauma, breathlessness, fever, loss of appetite, or weight loss at the time of initial presentation. The patient was a known case of Diabetes Mellitus Type-2 since 20 years, on Tablet Metformin 500 mg twice daily, Tab Glimepiride 1 mg once daily, Tab Vildagliptin 50 mg once daily for glycaemic control.

The patient was admitted with symptoms of breathlessness, fever (39.8°C), and cough. Initial investigations and High-resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) of the chest revealed a large hydropneumothorax in the right hemithorax, resulting in complete collapse of the right lung. Subsequent evaluation led to the diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis, and an ICD was inserted. The patient initiated the Isoniazid+Rifampicin+Pyrazinamide+Ethambutol (HRZE) regime for six months, with a pleural fluid negative smear. However, pleural fluid GeneXpert (CBNAAT) testing after six months indicated resistant tuberculosis, suggesting treatment failure. Consequently, the patient was reinitiated on Anti-tubercular Treatment (ATT), and therapeutic thoracocentesis was performed, draining 1300 cc of thick, straw coloured pus. Later the patient also developed an abscess (82×17×9 mm) at the ICD site. Moderate to gross right pleural effusion with pleural thickening and a subcutaneous plane hypodense collection, indicative of empyema with abscess formation was seen in HRCT thorax.

The patient was admitted under respiratory medicine with an initial diagnosis of a trapped right lung associated with a resolving pyopneumothorax and failed post-decortication status {Post-operative Day (POD) 38}. The patient’s treatment regimen comprised i.v. Meropenem 1 g three times daily, i.v. Metronidazole 500 mg three times daily, i.v. Cotrimoxazole 2960/592 mg once daily, and continuation of HRZE therapy.

Upon examination, the patient was in fair general condition and afebrile, with a blood pressure of 120/90 mmHg, a heart rate of 94 bpm, and oxygen saturation of 95% on room air. Cardiovascular examination revealed normal heart sounds without murmurs. Respiratory examination indicated reduced air entry, especially on the right-side, along with coarse crepitations bilaterally in the lower zone and diffuse rhonchi.

Throughout his medical history, the patient underwent multiple ICD insertions (total of three) and ICD repositioning (total of two), along with frequent thoracocentesis procedures. The patient received ATT for two years, discontinuing the treatment two months before the surgery. Bronchoscopy and Broncho Alveolar Lavage (BAL) were performed for decortication. Unfortunately, post-decortication, the right lung did not fully expand because of extensive dense fibrosis due to past history of multiple instrumentations and the patient complained of breathlessness on exertion and pain, necessitating admission for further management.

The patient had a history of cigarette smoking (20 Pack Years) with a severe smoking index of 400. Recent blood sugar monitoring indicated readings within the normal range with Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) of 7.5%. The patient remained in a post-decortication status, and a right ICD was in situ for three months.

Preoperative blood investigations were within normal limits, and Electrocardiogram (ECG) showed normal sinus rhythm. Recent chest X-ray displayed a collapsed right lung alongside left hilar lymphadenopathy, with the right ICD in situ (Table/Fig 1). Ultrasonography (USG) of the thorax demonstrated a mild pleural effusion on the right-side, measuring 100-150 cc, along with a hypoechoic accumulation measuring 3.9×1.7×4.3 cm, approximately 8 cc in volume, in the infrascapular region on the right (Table/Fig 2).

High-resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) of the thorax revealed the presence of the right ICD through the 8th and 9th intercostal spaces and a large pyopneumothorax leading to near-complete collapse of the right lung with ipsilateral tracheal and mediastinal shift [Table/Fig-3,4].

At arrival in the operating room, standard monitoring devices like BP cuff, 5 Lead ECG, temperature and SpO2 probe were connected. A 16G peripheral intravenous cannula was secured on the left hand. An epidural catheter (Portex-Smiths Medical®) was placed using loss of

Throughout his medical history, the patient underwent multiple ICD insertions (total of three) and ICD repositioning (total of two), along with frequent thoracocentesis procedures. The patient received ATT for two years, discontinuing the treatment two months before the surgery. Bronchoscopy and Broncho Alveolar Lavage (BAL) were performed for decortication. Unfortunately, post-decortication, the right lung did not fully expand because of extensive dense fibrosis due to past history of multiple instrumentations and the patient complained of breathlessness on exertion and pain, necessitating admission for further management.

The patient had a history of cigarette smoking (20 Pack Years) with a severe smoking index of 400. Recent blood sugar monitoring indicated readings within the normal range with Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) of 7.5%. The patient remained in a post-decortication status, and a right ICD was in situ for three months.

Preoperative blood investigations were within normal limits, and Electrocardiogram (ECG) showed normal sinus rhythm. Recent chest X-ray displayed a collapsed right lung alongside left hilar lymphadenopathy, with the right ICD in situ (Table/Fig 1). Ultrasonography (USG) of the thorax demonstrated a mild pleural effusion on the right-side, measuring 100-150 cc, along with a hypoechoic accumulation measuring 3.9×1.7×4.3 cm, approximately 8 cc in volume, in the infrascapular region on the right (Table/Fig 2).

High-resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) of the thorax revealed the presence of the right ICD through the 8th and 9th intercostal spaces and a large pyopneumothorax leading to near-complete collapse of the right lung with ipsilateral tracheal and mediastinal shift (Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4).

At arrival in the operating room, standard monitoring devices like BP cuff, 5 Lead ECG, temperature and SpO2 probe were connected. A 16G peripheral intravenous cannula was secured on the left hand. An epidural catheter (Portex-Smiths Medical®) was placed using loss of resistance technique in the T4-T5 interspace in sitting position using 18G Touhy’s epidural needle and after confirming epidural catheter placement by positive Meniscus sign, Inj. Bupivacaine 0.5% 10 cc with 3 mg Morphine was given in intermittent doses for adequate intraoperative and postoperative analgesia and haemodynamic stability. An infusion of 0.25% Bupivacaine (0.1 mL/kg/hour) was started subsequently. A 7-Fr triple-lumen central venous catheter (Centro-Romsons®) was inserted into the right internal jugular vein, and the left radial artery was cannulated and baseline Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) analysis was done.

Prior to the induction, the patient received 100% oxygenation for three minutes. General anaesthesia induction consisted of i.v. Propofol (2 mg/kg), Fentanyl (2 mcg/kg), and Vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg). Orotracheal intubation was performed using a 37F left-sided Robertshaw Double-Lumen Tube (DLT) and fixed at 27 cm mark to facilitate left-sided One-Lung Ventilation (OLV) and to isolate the right lung preventing further lung trauma during ventilation and infection or secretions from entering the left lung. Following the observation of chest rise with ventilation and the presence of End-Tidal CO2 (EtCO2), bilateral and then left-side unilateral breath sounds were auscultated. Tube placement was confirmed, and the patient was positioned in the left lateral decubitus position. Ventilator was adjusted to a Tidal Volume (TV) of 6-8 mL/kg and a Respiratory Rate (RR) adjusted to maintain normal EtCO2. During OLV, TV was decreased to 3-5 mL/kg and RR increased to maintain Minute Ventilation (MV). Peak airway pressure ranged between 18-21 cm H2O during OLV.

Maintenance was with a low-flow mixture of oxygen, isoflurane (MAC of 1.2), and air. Intraoperative, dense adhesions were encountered between the lung and chest wall. The right main stem bronchus was found to be transected, with a 4 cm gap between the two segments. Given the tissue’s friability and the presence of vascular adhesions, a decision was made to opt for physiological lung exclusion. Despite a blood loss of one litre, the patient maintained haemodynamic stability, supported by infusion of Noradrenaline (2 mg in 50 cc) @ 0.05 to 0.1 mcg/kg/min. Intravenous fluid therapy consisted of 1000 mL Gelofusine and 500 mL of Ringer’s Lactate, with the goal of achieving a urine output of 0.5-1 mL/kg/hour and Central Venous Pressure (CVP) monitoring (8-10 mmHg) during the 4-hours of surgery.

Following surgery, the patient was reversed using Neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg and Glycopyrrolate 0.008 mg/kg. The patient was successfully extubated demonstrating no immediate post-extubation complications. The patient was pain-free with stable vital signs (Table/Fig 5) and was subsequently transferred to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with supplemental oxygen @ 6 L/min via O2 face mask. Postoperative analgesia was continued through infusion of 0.25% Bupivacaine @ 0.1 mL/kg/hour.

Discussion

Pulmonary Tuberculosis (PTB) remains prevalent in developing nations such as India. As the disease progresses over time, it leads to extensive damage in lung tissue, resulting in significant fibrosis, calcification, and the development of vascular adhesions between the lung and the chest wall (1). The build-up of dense fibrous tissue within the pleural cavity can become so extensive that it hinders the expansion of the underlying lung, necessitating corrective intervention (2). In cases where all therapeutic measures fall short, Pneumonectomy (PE) often emerges as the last resort for PTB patients with extensively damaged lungs (3),(4).

This method, known as “physiological lung exclusion,” is employed when lung resection presents notable technical hurdles or is considered unfeasible. It involves isolating either the problematic lung lobe or the entire lung from the tracheobronchial tree by dividing the bronchus and ligating the pulmonary artery, without extracting any lung tissue, while preserving the pulmonary veins. Division of the bronchus eliminates its contribution as a source of haemoptysis. Despite isolation, the lung maintains blood supply through vessels within the adhesions between its surface and the chest wall, ensuring viability of lung tissue. Additionally, the pulmonary veins remain intact, facilitating drainage of blood from the affected lung and preventing necrosis of lung parenchyma. Subsequently, the isolated lung or lobe gradually diminishes in size, leading to gradual obliteration of the pleural space as the hemithorax reduces in size. Retaining native tissue within the pleural cavity minimises the risk of pleural complications such as empyema in these high-risk patients prone to infection (1).

Before thoracotomy, OLV must be initiated. Lung-protective ventilator strategies are now standard during OLV and can be achieved using pressure or volume control. Strategies employing low-tidal-volume (<6 mL/kg) ventilation are linked to a reduced risk of postoperative respiratory failure compared to higher volumes (8 mL/kg). Low TVs should be combined with adequate Positive End-expiratory Pressure (PEEP). Low TVs without sufficient PEEP are likely to be detrimental (5).

Licker M et al., provided additional insights into the mechanisms of protective lung strategies, including the adoption of low TV with recruitment manoeuvres, a targeted fluid management approach, and prophylactic administration of inhaled β2 adrenergic agonists (6). Schilling T et al., also highlighted another advantage of reducing TV, demonstrating reduced alveolar release of pro-inflammatory cytokines during the postoperative period of OLV (7).

In our approach, we adjusted the breathing pattern to prevent the buildup of intrinsic PEEP by prolonging expiratory times and maintaining a specific ratio of inhalation to exhalation. To address the challenge of using low TVs in order to maintain low airway pressures thereby reducing probability of ventilator-induced dependent lung injury and incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, the authors regulated the RR to ensure sufficient ventilation.

Additionally, the authors utilised thoracic epidural anaesthesia for pain relief during and after surgery, which is known to have positive effects on cardiovascular parameters and respiratory function [8,9]. Ensuring haemodynamic stability was crucial, requiring meticulous monitoring and adjustment of intravascular volume levels.

Conclusion

The present case report underscores the patient’s extensive medical history, recurrent interventions, multifaceted approach to patient care and critical importance of thorough anaesthesia management. Through in-depth preoperative assessment and a multidisciplinary approach, the authors adeptly addressed the complexities associated with this condition. This experience highlights the value of meticulous patient evaluation, vigilant monitoring, and adaptability in anaesthesia protocols.

References

1.
Dhaliwal RS, Saxena P, Puri D, Sidhu KS. Role of physiological lung exclusion in difficult lung resections for massive hemoptysis and other problems. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;20(1):25-29. Doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(01)00685-6. [crossref]
2.
Sugarbaker DJ. Macroscopic complete resection: The goal of primary surgery in multimodality therapy for pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Oncol. 2006;1(2):175-76. [crossref]
3.
Shiraishi Y, Katsuragi N, Kita H, Tominaga Y, Hiramatsu M. Different morbidity after pneumonectomy: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis versus non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;11(4):429-32. Doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.236372. [crossref]
4.
Xie B, Yang Y, He W, Xie D, Jiang G. Pulmonary resection in the treatment of 43 patients with well-localized, cavitary pulmonary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Shanghai. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013;17(3):455-59. Doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt251. [crossref]
5.
Hackett S, Jones R, Kapila R. Anaesthesia for pneumonectomy. BJA Educ. 2019;19(9):297-304. Doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.04.004. [crossref]
6.
Licker M, Fauconnet P, Villiger Y, Tschopp JM. Acute lung injury and outcomes after thoracic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22(1):61-67. Doi: 10.1097/ ACO.0b013e32831b466c. [crossref]
7.
Schilling T, Kozian A, Huth C, Bühling F, Kretzschmar M, Welte T, et al. The pulmonary immune effects of mechanical ventilation in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(4):957-65. Doi: 10.1213/01.ane. 0000172112.02902.77. [crossref]
8.
Garutti I, Quintana B, Olmedilla L, Cruz A, Barranco M, Garcia de Lucas E. Arterial oxygenation during one-lung ventilation: Combined versus general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1999;88(3):494-99. Doi: 10.1097/00000539-199903000-00005. [crossref]
9.
Wattwil M, Sundberg A, Arvill A, Lennquist C. Circulatory changes during high thoracic epidural anaesthesia - influence of sympathetic block and of systemic effect of the local anaesthetic. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 1985;29(8):849-55. Doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1985.tb02309.x. [crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/70621.19694

Date of Submission: Mar 13, 2024
Date of Peer Review: May 30, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Jun 15, 2024
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 15, 2024
• Manual Googling: Jun 03, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Jun 14, 2024 (5%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com