Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 163176

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : August | Volume : 18 | Issue : 8 | Page : VC01 - VC05 Full Version

Knowledge, Attitude and Practices Regarding Marijuana usage among Medical Students: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study


Published: August 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/73095.19710
Bhushan Mhetre, Preetika Baghel, Mihir Kshirsagar, Hrishikesh Solunke, Aayushi Goel, Sanaa Gore Datar

1. Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of Psychiatry, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 3. Junior Resident, Department of Psychiatry, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 5. Intern Doctor, Department of Psychiatry, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 6. Intern Doctor, Department of Psychiatry, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Hrishikesh Solunke,
Flat 301, Ashish Apartments, Damle Lane, Law College Road, Erandwane, Pune-411004, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: hrishisolunke@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The increment in marijuana use across the world is concerning and needs to be addressed. There has been a cultural change regarding the perception and use of marijuana medicinally and recreationally, even among medical students. This needs to be studied to understand the outlook towards marijuana among young adults, including future doctors, to help improve their awareness of the risks and pitfalls of marijuana usage.

Aim: To evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding marijuana usage among medical students.

Materials and Methods: This cross sectional study recruited 159 medical undergraduate students from the tertiary healthcare institute, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India via an online, anonymised, semistructured, self-designed questionnaire that was circulated over social media. The duration of the study was from October 2023 to February 2024. The study population was grouped into first-year and final-year MBBS students to identify differences, if any, in knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding marijuana usage among students between the start and end of their MBBS training. The responses to questions were compared to establish any statistical significance.

Results: Out of the total 159 participants, 106 (66.67%) were first-year MBBS students, and 53 (33.33%) were final-year MBBS students. Most students from both groups reported that marijuana was illegal in India. Both groups responded affirmatively to questions regarding their awareness of the effects of marijuana and whether it could be used as a medical therapeutic drug. The majority of students, 81 (76.42%) and 32 (60.38%), respectively in both groups, agreed with the statement that marijuana impairs concentration and movement. A total of 88 (83.02%) and 41 (77.36%) participants, respectively, were largely in favour of legalising marijuana, with a greater proportion of respondents from both groups opining that marijuana should be legalised, be it for medical therapeutic use or as a recreational drug.

Conclusion: Study results showed that the majority of students from both groups responded positively to the question about the legalisation of marijuana in India. Some interesting differences were found between the two groups with respect to marijuana use and the perceptions about its positive or negative effects. It is essential to educate medical students, as future physicians, on the adverse effects and implications of marijuana use.

Keywords

Awareness, Legalisation, Medical cannabinoids

The increase in marijuana use worldwide is concerning and needs to be addressed. Over the past decade, there has been a cultural shift in the perception and use of marijuana, both medicinally and recreationally (1). Multiple studies have reported psychiatric implications of marijuana use, such as intoxication, dependence, and an increased likelihood of developing psychosis in healthy individuals (2),(3),(4),(5). Despite this, recreational marijuana use is on the rise, especially among college students, due to perceived benefits of relaxation, stress relief, and improved ability to work responsibly (1). In recent years, medical cannabinoids have been linked to managing conditions such as neuropathic pain, hypertension, poststroke neuroprotection, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, and cancer, among others (6). Previous studies suggest that medical students worldwide have poor knowledge of medical marijuana use (7),(8).

Due to the various adverse effects and benefits, the legal status of marijuana varies widely across countries and regions (9). In India, marijuana (hemp) is classified as a ‘narcotic drug’ under Section 2 (xiv) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPSA), 1985 (10). Recreational marijuana use and its various forms, such as ganja, charas, hashish, and any mixture of these preparations, are legally prohibited in India (10). However, bhang (a preparation exclusively made from marijuana leaves) is excluded from this definition in the NDPSA (10). There is an argument about the need to legalise marijuana use in India, as the country could benefit from the medical uses of marijuana, generate revenue for the government, and potentially lower unemployment and crime rates (11). However, the legalisation of marijuana use might further complicate the management of psychiatric disorders associated with its use (10). Early marijuana use is likely to cause long-term neurocognitive deficits, supported by neuroimaging studies showing reduced hippocampal volume and density (12). Marijuana impairs memory in the short-term, with more significant effects seen with chronic use, which may also be accompanied by poorer effort, slower processing, and impacted attention (12). Research conducted overseas has found that college students, including medical students, tend to underestimate the risks associated with marijuana use (12),(13).

According to prior studies conducted among college students in India, marijuana use has been found to range between 6.8-36% (1),(14),(15). Awareness of marijuana use in terms of usage, effects, and legal status is still lacking among Indian college students (1),(16).

With this background, it becomes important to understand the perspective of medical students on marijuana use, which can be beneficial in filling the information-related gaps in their understanding and also in training them as future clinicians.

There are few studies in India comparing medical students’ awareness of marijuana at entry and exit levels (16). This study was conducted due to the scarcity of data regarding marijuana use among medical students in Maharashtra, India. A highlight is that, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, it is the first study of its kind in the state. Another highlight is that the study is semistructured, and participants were asked to elaborate on certain questions in their own words to gain a deeper insight into their perspectives on marijuana use. The aim was to study the knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding marijuana usage among medical students. The primary objective was to study the awareness among medical students regarding the physiological effects and legal status of marijuana. Additional objectives included comparing the awareness of marijuana usage in medical students at the entry level (first year) and at the exit level (final year).

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study recruited medical undergraduate students from a tertiary healthcare institute, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India via an anonymised online survey that was circulated over social media. It was a time-bound study conducted between October 2023 and February 2024. The online survey was distributed to a total of 250 students from the first and final year of MBBS, out of which 159 responses were received (106 first-year and 53 final-year students). The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC number: SKNMC/Ethics/APP/2023/891).

Inclusion criteria: Responses from first and final-year MBBS students were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Incomplete or inapplicable responses were excluded from the study. However, all responses received were complete and appropriate and were therefore considered for the study.

The study population consisted of first-year and final-year MBBS students during the academic year 2023-2024, of either sex and aged 18 years or older, who voluntarily agreed to participate. The questionnaire was self-designed and semistructured, specifically created with the intention of obtaining more descriptive responses from the participants. The questions were partly based on data collected during clinical psychiatry interviews when assessing substance use patterns, particularly related to marijuana. The scale was not in a 5-point Likert format, as the present study aimed to focus more on the descriptive perspective of the participants, and the discussion was intended to center on the differences in perspective rather than objective scores [Annexure 1].

Along with demographic characteristics, data were collected to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding marijuana use among medical students.

The questionnaire consisted of 10 questions broadly divided into three parts. The first part comprised seven questions assessing the participants’ knowledge regarding marijuana use, with questions on the legal status of marijuana, awareness of the effects of marijuana, and whether it can be used as a therapeutic drug. The participants’ knowledge about the effects of marijuana was gauged through four questions with a three-point Likert scale for each (“Disagree,” “Uncertain,” and “Agree”). The responses to these Likert scale questions were compared in the analysis to gauge any statistical significance.

The second part comprised two questions about attitudes towards marijuana use, including participants’ opinions on the legalisation of marijuana. The second question asked for the participants’ opinion on the gender with a higher prevalence of marijuana use and to elaborate on possible reasons for this.

The third part had one question asking participants if they had consumed or thought of consuming marijuana. The responses to this question were also compared to establish any statistical significance. Participants were asked to further elaborate on the reasons behind their yes/no response. The online survey was anonymously conducted, and the students’ identities were not revealed at any point.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics was used to represent the data. The Chi-squared test was used for comparison between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using International Business Machines (IBM) Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL), with a p-value <0.05 defined as significant.

Results

A total of 159 students participated in the study. All the students were in the age groups of 18 to 34 years. Out of 159, 106 (66.67%) were first-year MBBS students, and 53 (33.33%) were final-year MBBS students. Out of the 106 first-year students, 57 (53.77%) were males, and 49 (46.23%) were females. Among the 53 final-year students, 30 (56.60%) were males, and 23 (43.40%) were females (Table/Fig 1).

Knowledge regarding marijuana: There were seven questions in the questionnaire assessing the knowledge of MBBS students regarding marijuana. In response to the question about the legality of marijuana in India, the majority of students reported that it was illegal. Sixteen students from the first year reported that they didn’t know about the legal status, while only one student from the final year did (Table/Fig 2). The majority of the students from both groups responded affirmatively to questions regarding their awareness of the effects of marijuana and whether it could be used as a medical therapeutic drug (Table/Fig 2).

The students were asked four 3-point Likert scale questions to gauge and compare their knowledge about the effects of marijuana (Table/Fig 3). The majority of the students in both groups agreed with the statement that marijuana impairs concentration and movement. Interestingly, a greater and statistically significant percentage of first-year students agreed with the statement (p-value=0.039). The majority of the responses to the next statement about marijuana helping a person to unwind and relax were affirmative, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The responses to the statement “Marijuana makes people feel more creative and perceive things differently” had a higher number of respondents from both groups agreeing with the statement. However, a statistically significant number of final-year respondents were in agreement (p-value=0.001) compared to first-year students. As for the fourth statement about marijuana having bad effects and leading to volatile emotions, a higher, statistically significant majority of the first-year students agreed with the statement (p-value=0.001) compared to final-year respondents.

Attitude regarding marijuana: The participants were mostly in favour of legalising marijuana, with a greater proportion of respondents from both groups opining that marijuana should be legalised, whether for medical therapeutic use or as a recreational drug. The students were also asked about which gender they thought had a higher prevalence of marijuana use. Most of the students opined that marijuana use is higher in males (Table/Fig 4).

The participants were asked to elaborate on their opinions about gender-specific marijuana use. The most common reasons expressed were “access/availability is higher in males” and “males are more likely to enjoy drugs/experimenting.” Some students also opined that “males experience more stress,” and a few mentioned that “males face more peer pressure.”

Practice regarding marijuana: The study also asked a question about individual marijuana use and the reasons behind it. Four students from the first-year group had consumed or thought of consuming marijuana, while the number among the final-year group was 23. This difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p-value <0.01) (Table/Fig 5).

The most common reason given for consumption/thought of consumption was “for recreational purposes.” Some students also mentioned that they had consumed due to “peer pressure.” The most common reason expressed for not consuming/not having thought of consuming was “bad health effects.” Some students also expressed “marijuana is addictive” as the reason for not consuming it, while some also mentioned “marijuana is illegal” as a reason.

Discussion

There is a paucity of studies comparing the knowledge of first and final-year medical students regarding marijuana use, with only one study in India so far (16), to the best of the authors’ knowledge. The present study attempts to shed light on medical students’ perspectives about marijuana at the entry and exit levels of undergraduate study and to compare salient points about knowledge and practices. The term “medical marijuana” refers to a wide variety of preparations; however, the most widely used in clinical practice are cannabinoid-based medicines (17). Cannabinoids are constituents of marijuana, of which Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Cannabidiol (CBD) are the most studied so far (18). Most respondents from both groups in the present study were aware that marijuana can be used as a medical therapeutic drug. Marijuana has been purported to cause some degree of euphoria, relaxation, and changes in perception, like distortion of time and intensification of ordinary experiences such as hunger, eating, and listening to music (19), and is also known to impair attention and working memory during intoxication, thereby impairing concentration abilities as well (12).

A study about marijuana use and risk perception in medical students of Mexico found that the students underestimated the risks associated with marijuana use (20). A study conducted in India that had only 2nd-year medical students as subjects reported that the students’ knowledge regarding addiction-causing drugs was inadequate (21). A comparative study similar to the present study, done in southern India, reported that both the first and final-year medical students had poor awareness and inadequate knowledge about the various adverse effects of marijuana usage (16). In that study, only about 32% of both first and final-year students agreed about marijuana causing cognitive impairments, and only 13% from both groups agreed with the statement about cannabis making people feel more creative and altering perceptual abilities. The study also did not find any statistically significant difference between the two groups that were assessed (16). The results of the present study, interestingly, contrast with these findings. In the present study, 76.42% of first-year students and 60.38% of final-year students agreed that marijuana impairs concentration and movement. A 42.45% of first-year students and 71.69% of final-year students agreed with the statement about marijuana increasing creativity and altering perception.

The present study findings indicate that most of the first and final year medical students who participated in the study had adequate knowledge about the adverse effects of marijuana. Interestingly, in the current study, a higher, statistically significant number of first-year students agreed with statements about the adverse effects of marijuana, such as impairments in concentration, movement, leading to overall negative effects, and emotional instability. On the other hand, a higher percentage of final-year students were found to agree on some potential benefits, such as the calming effects of marijuana and its ability to make a person feel more creative after use. As reported in the results section, a significantly higher proportion of final-year students had consumed or thought of consuming marijuana. This interesting finding suggests that though there is no lack of knowledge regarding the adverse effects of marijuana, even at the level of first-year MBBS, there seems to be a difference in outlook, with final-year students looking more at its potential benefits than its negative effects. Drug use normalisation describes the process whereby drug use becomes less stigmatised and more accepted as normative behaviour, in an attempt to create a descriptive framework for understanding these kinds of drug use changes in society (22). Drug use among peers and self-experimentation can reduce the stigma around psychoactive substances and make their use more acceptable (23). This phenomenon could help explain the inclination of final-year students in the present study towards the benefits of marijuana more than adverse effects compared to first-year students.

The respondents from both groups in the present study had a positive outlook towards the legalisation of marijuana. The majority, totaling 83.02% of first-year students and 77.36% of final-year students, were in favour of marijuana legalisation, whether for therapeutic purposes or recreational use. These findings are similar to a previous study conducted in the United States of America, which found that 64% of the medical students who participated in it supported marijuana legalisation (24).

Previous research among physicians suggests that being less religious and politically liberal is associated with greater support for legalising marijuana (25). Additionally, support for legalisation has been associated with “non moralism” and “permissiveness” (26). Further research is needed to establish these reasons among the Indian medical student population. A majority of students in the current study expressed that marijuana use is greater in males than in females. This finding was consistent with the results of other studies and surveys (23),(24),(25). Surveys in Europe indicate a lifetime cannabis use level of 9.1% for males compared to 4.4% for females (27), figures that are very similar to those in the United States, where cannabis use rates are 9.3% for males and 4.9% for females (28). A large sample online survey with 2459 participants reported that 73.4% of men used cannabis recreationally, compared to 65.5% of women (29). It has been found that males tend to use different methods for administering this drug and are more likely to use high-potency marijuana products compared to females. However, the gender gap in terms of marijuana use seems to be decreasing (30). Additionally, the phenomenon of telescoping, i.e., a quicker transition from marijuana use to developing marijuana use disorders, is more commonly seen in females than in males (31), making it important to further study trends and effects of marijuana use in females. In this study, the majority of first-year students had either not consumed or not considered consuming marijuana. The reasons for this were attributed to the adverse effects of marijuana, its addictive properties, and awareness of its illicit status. It will be interesting to reassess the same study group during their final year to determine any changes in attitude and practices towards marijuana use in relation to increased exposure and the normalisation of drug use.

Limitation(s)

This study has a few limitations. Data were collected via a self-report internet survey, which can cause overreporting or underreporting and could lead to recall biases. The sample size was small, and there was a difference in the number of respondents in the two study groups, leading to a lack of generalisability. Another limitation was that gender differences in marijuana use and concomitant use of other psychoactive substances were not assessed.

Conclusion

Study results showed that there was no lack of knowledge regarding marijuana use and its effects among the respondents; however, they brought up findings that certainly give some food for thought regarding the outlook towards marijuana use among medical students. Some interesting differences were found between the two groups with respect to marijuana use and perceptions about its positive or negative effects, as well as how the positive or negative effects of marijuana are reported when comparing responses of first-year students to final-year students. It is essential to educate medical students, as future physicians, on the adverse effects and impact of marijuana usage. If the trend of drug use normalisation continues to increase, it could have potentially negative implications on the healthcare providers of the future. Therefore, the authors opine that teaching regarding marijuana and substance use in general, with a greater focus on detrimental effects, needs to be emphasised and updated in undergraduate medical curricula. Further studies, especially of a longitudinal nature and with greater sample sizes, would lead to a better reflection of the trends in the young population regarding their knowledge, attitudes, and practices of marijuana and other substance use.

References

1.
Kannan K, Nattala P, Mahadevan J, Meena KS. Knowledge, attitude, and expectancies related to cannabis use: A cross-sectional community study among college students from Bangalore, Karnataka. Indian J Psychol Med. 2024;46(3):221-27. [crossref]
2.
Urits I, Gress K, Charipova K, Li N, Berger AA, Cornett EM, et al. Cannabis use and its association with psychological disorders. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2020;50(2):56-67.
3.
Shah D, Chand P, Bandawar M, Benegal V, Murthy P. Cannabis induced psychosis and subsequent psychiatric disorders. Asian J Psychiatr. 2017;30:180-84. [crossref]
4.
Nestoros JN, Vakonaki E, Tzatzarakis MN, Alegakis A, Skondras MD, Tsatsakis AM. Long lasting effects of chronic heavy cannabis abuse. Am J Addict. 2017;26(4):335-42. [crossref]
5.
Lowe DJE, Sasiadek JD, Coles AS, George TP. Cannabis and mental illness: A review. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019;269(1):107-20. [crossref]
6.
Sullivan E, Austriaco N. A virtue analysis of recreational marijuana use. Linacre Q. 2016;83(2):158-73. [crossref]
7.
Denneler T, Mahling M, Hermann S, Stengel A, Zipfel S, Herrmann-Werner A, et al. Medical students’ attitudes and perceived competence regarding medical cannabis and its suggestibility. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):149. [crossref]
8.
Benavides A, Gregorio N, Gupta P, Kogan M. Medical students are unprepared to counsel patients about medical cannabis and want to learn more. Complement Ther Med. 2020;48:102237. [crossref]
9.
Farrelly KN, Wardell JD, Marsden E, Scarfe ML, Najdzionek P, Turna J, et al. The impact of recreational cannabis legalization on cannabis use and associated outcomes: A systematic review. Subst Abuse. 2023;17:11782218231172054. [crossref]
10.
Chithra NK, Bojappen N, Vajawat B, Pai NM, Gowda GS, Moirangthem S, et al. Legalization of recreational cannabis: Is India ready for it? Indian J Soc Psychiatry. 2023;39(4):325-31. [crossref]
11.
Bhasin B. Legalization of cannabis in India. Asian Law Public Policy Rev. 2018;3(12):53-65. Available from: https://https://thelawbrigade.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Bhavya-Bhasin-1.pdf.
12.
Urits I, Charipova K, Gress K, Li N, Berger AA, Cornett EM, et al. Adverse effects of recreational and medical cannabis. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2021;51(1):94-109.
13.
Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the future: National survey results on drug use, 1975-2009. National Institute on Drug Abuse, US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health; 2010. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED514367.pdf.
14.
Gupta S, Sarpal SS, Kumar D, Kaur T, Arora S. Prevalence, pattern and familial effects of substance use among the male college students- A North Indian study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(8):1632-36. [crossref]
15.
Regmi S, Pandey A, Chaudhary P, Acharya A. Study on marijuana abuse among male Nepalese college students in Bangalore. J Sci Res Rep. 2019;25(4):01-07. [crossref]
16.
Gururaj GP, Chandrakumar RS. Medical students and marijuana, attitudes and beliefs: A comparative study. Indian J Soc Psychiatry. 2020;36(4):317-20. Doi: 10.4103/ijsp.ijsp_36_20. [crossref]
17.
Abuhasira R, Shbiro L, Landschaft Y. Medical use of cannabis and cannabinoids containing products- Regulations in Europe and North America. Eur J Intern Med. 2018;49:02-06. [crossref]
18.
Ebbert JO, Scharf EL, Hurt RT. Medical cannabis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018;93(12):1842-47. Doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.09.005. PMID: 30522595. [crossref]
19.
Manzanares J, Julian MD, Carrascosa A. Role of the cannabinoid system in pain control and therapeutic implications for the management of acute and chronic pain episodes. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2006;4(3):239-57. [crossref]
20.
Castillo-Guzmán S, Palacios-Ríos D, Nava-Obregón TA, Arredondo-Mendoza JC, Alcalá-Alvarado OV, Alonso-Bracho SA, et al. Risk perception of medicinal marijuana in medical students from northeast Mexico. F1000Research. 2017;6:1802. Available from: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12638.1. [crossref]
21.
Parmar P. Knowledge and awareness regarding substance addiction among medical students of Valsad, Gujarat. Forensic Sci Add Res. 2018;4(1):305-07. [crossref]
22.
Measham F, Newcombe R, Parker H. The normalization of recreational drug use amongst young people in North-West England. Br J Sociol. 1994;45(2):287-312.[crossref]
23.
Sznitman SR, Taubman DS. Drug use normalization: A systematic and critical mixed-methods review. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016;77(5):700-09. [crossref]
24.
Chan MH, Knoepke CE, Cole ML, McKinnon J, Matlock DD. Colorado medical students’ attitudes and beliefs about marijuana. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(4):458-63. [crossref]
25.
Charuvastra A, Friedmann PD, Stein MD. Physician attitudes regarding the prescription of medical marijuana. J Addict Dis. 2005;24(3):87-93. [crossref]
26.
Linn LS, Yager J, Leake B. Physicians’ attitudes toward the legalization of marijuana use. West J Med. 1989;150(6):714-17.
27.
Secades-Villa R, Fernández-Artamendi S. Chapter 14 - Gender Differences in Cannabis Use Disorders. Preedy VR (Ed.). Handbook of Cannabis and Related Pathologies. Academic Press; 2017:131-37. [crossref]
28.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Results from the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings, NSDUH Series H-48, HHS Publication No. (SMA) 14-4863. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2014.
29.
Cuttler C, Mischley LK, Sexton M. Sex differences in cannabis use and effects: A cross-sectional survey of cannabis users. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2016;1(1):166-75. Doi: 10.1089/can.2016.0010. [crossref]
30.
Hemsing N, Greaves L. Gender norms, roles and relations and cannabis-use patterns: A scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(3):947. [crossref]
31.
Calakos KC, Bhatt S, Foster DW, Cosgrove KP. Mechanisms underlying sex differences in cannabis use. Curr Addict Rep. 2017;4(4):439-53. [crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/73095.19710

Date of Submission: May 27, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Jun 10, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Jul 17, 2024
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 27, 2024
• Manual Googling: Jun 12, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Jul 16, 2024 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com