Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 78787

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2025 | Month : March | Volume : 19 | Issue : 3 | Page : OC13 - OC17 Full Version

Outcome of Mathieu Meatal-based Flip Flap Technique for Distal Hypospadias: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a Single Tertiary Care Centre, Bhubaneswar, India


Published: March 1, 2025 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2025/75919.20714
Harish Chandra Tudu, Nikhil Pothugunta, Varsha Madhavnarayan Totadri, Subrat Kumar Mohanty, Pradeep Kumar Jena, Amaresh Mishra

1. Consultant, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 2. Junior Resident, Department of General Surgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 4. Professor and Head, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 5. Professor, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 6. Professor and Head, Department of General Surgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Subrat Kumar Mohanty,
Professor and Head, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, KIIT Road, Campus 5, Bhubaneswar-751024, Odisha, India.
E-mail: subrat.mohanty@kims.ac.in

Abstract

Introduction: Several surgical procedures are used for the correction of distal hypospadias. Institutional protocols vary regarding the ideal procedure. The goal of modern hypospadias surgery is to achieve a functionally and cosmetically normal penis. Mathieu described a technique that utilises the perimeatal skin proximally to create a flap for the repair of distal hypospadias. It is a time-tested method with minimal complications.

Aim: To highlight the incidence of complications and the surgical outcomes of distal hypospadias using Mathieu’s meatal-based flip flap technique.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Department of Paediatric Surgery at a tertiary care hospital at the Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India on 55 children aged 2-16 years from January 2021 to August 2024. The study population included children with distal penile hypospadias with or without mild skin-level chordee. Patients underwent surgery using the Mathieu meatal-based flip flap technique. The length of the skin flap was determined by the distance from the meatus to the glans tip, after which a ventral meatal-based skin flap was incised. The maximum flap length used was 2 cm. The proximal flap was dissected from the underlying urethra, flipped distally, and anastomosed to the distal urethral plate with running subcuticular sutures of 6-0 Polydiaxanone. The urethra was stented using an infant feeding tube for eight days, and the dressing with the catheter was removed on postoperative day 9. Postoperative complications were analysed using descriptive statistics of frequency and percentage.

Results: The mean age at the time of urethroplasty was 6.6±3.2 years. Out of 55 patients, 1 (1.8%) developed meatal stenosis, 1 (1.88%) developed a urethrocutaneous fistula, 2 (3.6%) experienced meatal regression, and 3 (5.4%) had glans dehiscence. All patients (and their caregivers) were satisfied with the cosmetic and functional outcomes postoperatively during follow-up.

Conclusion: In present study, Mathieu’s meatal-based flip flap urethroplasty resulted in successful outcomes with low complications. Thus, Mathieu’s meatal-based flip flap urethroplasty remains a time-tested and effective method for select cases of distal hypospadias.

Keywords

Meatal stenosis, Perimeatal, Urethrocutaneous

Hypospadias is a congenital anomaly characterised by an abnormally placed urethral meatus on the ventral aspect of the phallus, commonly associated with corporal disproportion (1),(2),(3). The surgical management of hypospadias varies according to institutional protocols and depends on the location of the meatus as well as associated anatomical findings, such as the size of the urethral plate, depth of the glanular groove, glans diameter, and so forth. The primary objective is to achieve a functional and cosmetically acceptable penis (4),(5),(6). Total 60 to 70% of all hypospadias cases are distal lesions, with multiple surgical techniques in use for their repair (7),(8). While the field of hypospadias surgery has undergone significant changes, there is no specific technique considered ideal. Different techniques have been adapted to address the expected complications while ensuring functional and cosmetic requirements are met. Tubularised Incised Plate Urethroplasty (TIPS, or the Snodgrass technique) remains one of the most commonly used methods for the repair of distal hypospadias, closely followed by procedures such as Meatal Advancements Granuloplasty Incorporated (MAGPI) and modified Mathieu’s urethroplasty (1),(2),(4),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9),(10).

Mathieu originally described his single-stage repair for distal hypospadias in 1932 (1),(2),(6),(7),(8). Multiple modifications of this procedure have been developed over the years. The Mathieu technique involves the use of a perimeatal-based flap for the construction of a neourethra with the utilisation of the native urethral plate. It is a versatile method that has stood the test of time for the management of distal hypospadias. With the advent of techniques such as TIPS urethroplasty, the complications feared with Mathieu’s urethroplasty have been mitigated, with only a few surgical centers still following the original technique with precision.

The primary drawback of the original Mathieu’s urethroplasty is the horizontally oriented and rounded neomeatus, referred to as the “fish mouth meatus,” which can give an unsightly cosmetic appearance in some patients (8),(9),(10). Other frequently encountered complications include meatal regression and meatal stenosis, paving the way for modifications of the original technique, such as Multi-camera Augmented Visual Interial SLAM (MAVIS) and Slit-like Adjusted Mathieu (SLAM) techniques (2),(8),(9),(10).

Several studies describe modifications of the traditional Mathieu’s meatal flip-flap urethroplasty and compare these with other methods of distal hypospadias repair concerning complications and outcomes (7),(8),(9),(10). However, there is very limited literature (6),(7),(9),(10) in recent years analysing the outcomes of the traditional method. The rationale for performing the original Mathieu’s meatal-based flip-flap urethroplasty is based on the notion that when performed precisely, while ensuring crucial steps are followed, the outcome can be as successful as with other new methods, with a lesser or equal incidence of postoperative complications.

The identified concerns during the surgical procedure, such as flap length, vascularity, and proper glans wings mobilisation, must be adhered to in order to ensure good functionality. With a standardised protocol, the original method continues to yield good outcomes. In comparison with techniques such as TIPS urethroplasty and modifications of Mathieu’s urethroplasty (such as MAVIS and SLAM) in other studies (1),(2),(6),(7),(8),(10),(11), postoperative outcomes such as meatal stenosis, meatal regression, urethrocutaneous fistula, glans dehiscence, and flap necrosis have a lesser or comparable incidence, provided that the surgical steps are executed with intention.

Therefore, the aim of present study was to identify and highlight the incidence of complications and surgical outcomes in patients who have undergone Mathieu’s repair without any modifications, while underscoring the critical steps of the procedure and demonstrating the advantages of continuing to utilise the original method.

Material and Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of all cases of distal hypospadias that underwent Mathieu’s meatal-based flip-flap repair between January 2021 and August 2024 in the Department of Paediatric Surgery at the Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. The time period for data analysis and interpretation was from January 2023 to November 2024. Ethical Committee clearance (IEC) was obtained for the study (Ref no. KIIT/KIMS/IEC/1843/2024).

Inclusion criteria:

• All children aged 2 to 16 years with distal hypospadias and minimal or no chordee who underwent the Mathieu meatal-based flip-flap method.

Exclusion criteria:

• Patients with proximal or mid-penile hypospadias where management involved staged urethroplasty.
• Patients with severe chordee or chordee that is non correctable by degloving.
• Patients with prior failed urethroplasty for distal hypospadias.
• Patients with a thin and hypoplastic urethra, which is not ideal for planning the Mathieu meatal-based flip-flap method.

Sample size calculation: During the review period, 55 children aged 2 to 16 years underwent the Mathieu meatal-based flip-flap method for the management of distal hypospadias, and all cases satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study.

Study Procedure

The case notes were retrieved from the medical records department, along with photographs of the surgical procedure, with due consent from the patient’s attendant. Informed consent was obtained from the parents of each patient, explaining the surgery and the inclusion in the study, while ensuring that no personal patient details would be revealed. Patient confidentiality was maintained by securing locked data, accessible only to the surgical and investigative team, with prior permission granted by the Medical Superintendent of the hospital for the study. The required information was extracted accordingly, and the data was entered into a proforma. Postoperative complications, including immediate and long-term follow-ups such as meatal stenosis, urethrocutaneous fistula, flap necrosis, meatal regression, and glans dehiscence, were analysed using descriptive statistics of frequency and percentage. A follow-up period ranging from six months (for the most recently operated patient) to two years was maintained postoperatively, during which a subjective assessment of functional and cosmetic outcomes (of the neomeatus) was conducted.

Postoperatively, functional and cosmetic outcomes were assessed subjectively by analysing:

• The ability to stand and micturate.
• Micturition in a single, good stream.
• No abnormal ventral curvature noted on erection of the penis.
• Satisfaction with the appearance of the urethral meatus.

Surgical procedure followed (1),(2),(3),(6),(7),(8): The surgical procedure was standardised by all surgeons in the unit/Department, ensuring uniformity, with equal skill levels maintained among the surgeons for the purpose of the surgery and subsequent study. The first step was the assessment of anatomical characteristics and the measurement of flap length and width. The length of the skin flap was determined by the distance from the native hypospadic meatus to the glans tip, with an equal distance marked from the hypospadic meatus proximally over the ventral skin of the shaft of the penis. The glans width was measured in each patient. Children with mild chordee (skin-level chordee) had to undergo complete penile degloving for correction. After marking the flap and ensuring a minimum width of 1 cm, the ventral meatal-based skin flap was incised. The maximum flap length used was 2 cm. The proximal flap was dissected from the underlying urethra, ensuring well-vascularised subcutaneous tissue with adequate width. The native urethra was catheterised with an 8Fr infant feeding tube. The lateral edges of the flap were marked with sutures, and thereafter, the flap was flipped distally and anastomosed to the native urethral plate distally with running subcuticular and inverting 6-0 Polydiaxanone sutures. Excess prepucial skin (prepucial hood) was split midline dorsally (Byar’s flap) until the coronal sulcus and was ventrally rotated to cover the neourethra. The remaining phallus skin was sutured circumcoronally to the mucosa around the coronal sulcus. The skin was closed in the midline, ensuring good cosmesis along the midline raphe (Table/Fig 1)a-e. A urethral stent cum catheter using an 8 Fr infant feeding tube was kept in place for eight days, after which the dressing and catheter were removed on postoperative day 9.

Statistical Analysis

The descriptive statistical analysis was conducted using MS Excel. The data is presented in the form of frequency and percentage for categorical data, and as mean/average for continuous data.

Results

A total of 55 patients were included in present retrospective analysis. The age distribution of the children ranged from 2 to 16 years. The mean age at the time of urethroplasty was 6.6±3.2 years (Table/Fig 2). The most common location of the native urethral meatus was at the subcoronal site, with 33 out of 55 patients (60%), while other locations included the coronal sulcus and distal penile (15 and 7 patients, respectively). Twenty-two (40%) patients had mild/skin-level chordee (coronal-4; distal-4; subcoronal-14). The maximum flap length harvested was 2 cm, with a minimum width of all flaps maintained at least 1 cm. The mean flap length harvested in the study population was 1.48±0.24 cm (Table/Fig 3). The glans width in all patients was more than 10 mm. The urethroplasty dressing was opened on postoperative day 9, along with the removal of the urethral catheter (infant feeding tube).

Meatal stenosis was identified in 1 out of 55 (1.8%) patients (coronal hypospadias) (Table/Fig 4). A urethrocutaneous fistula was noted in 1 out of 55 (1.8%) patients (distal hypospadias) (Table/Fig 5). This was identified five days post-discharge, which is 14 days postoperatively. The child presented with a good stream of urine from the neomeatus. The child was re-catheterised with a Foley catheter for a period of two weeks for spontaneous healing and was thereafter removed. The child still had a persistent urethrocutaneous fistula and underwent successful repair after six months.

One out of 55 (1.8%) patients developed flap necrosis, wherein the flap length harvested was 2 cm. Two out of 55 (3.6%) patients developed meatal regression, and three out of 55 (5.4%) patients developed glans dehiscence (Table/Fig 5). Two out of three patients who had glans dehiscence had a glans width of 11 mm.

No specific subjective scoring system was available in the literature; rather, the above factors were discussed with parents using videos and direct examination. None of the patients had any functional abnormalities. All patients and attendants were satisfied with the cosmesis of the neomeatus (Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 6),(Table/Fig 7). All patients, except those who developed postoperative complications, were able to achieve a comfortable voiding schedule in a standing position.

Discussion

The present study indicates successful outcomes when using the original Mathieu’s meatal-based flip-flap urethroplasty. As demonstrated, the incidence of complications such as meatal stenosis, urethrocutaneous fistula, meatal regression, flap necrosis, and glans dehiscence was lower or comparable to those reported in the literature (1),(2),(3),(6),(7),(8),(9). Although new and innovative methods have been developed, along with modifications of original procedures to address complications and improve surgical outcomes, there is no single definitive surgical management defined for hypospadias. Institutional protocols and surgeons’ preferences differ based on successful outcomes, and therefore, different methods are followed. In present Institution, the experience with the original Mathieu’s flip-flap urethroplasty has been successful, corroborating the outcomes of this study.

When comparing present findings with other studies highlighting Mathieu’s urethroplasty and its modifications, author can identify the advantages of the traditional method, especially when ensuring that surgical steps are followed critically.

Qayyum A et al., in 2010, conducted a study on the surgical outcomes of Mathieu’s technique in the repair of distal hypospadias. They noted a urethrocutaneous fistula in 14% of their study population (70 patients), meatal stenosis in 7.1%, and total tube disruption in 5.7% (6). In the original Mathieu’s technique, the incidence of urethrocutaneous fistula ranges between 10-30%, and that of meatal stenosis is between 7-30% (1),(2),(3). The present study had comparatively better results, with the incidence of meatal stenosis and urethrocutaneous fistula being far lower than reported in the literature. This could be attributed to present careful selection of patients on whom to perform the Mathieu’s procedure, thereby reducing the incidence of commonly seen complications.

One of the major complications in Mathieu’s technique is meatal regression. The incidence of this complication in present study was only 3.6%, which is lower in comparison to other studies, where the incidence ranged from 6% to 15% (3),(4),(5),(6),(7). This could be attributable to the maturation of the tip of the neourethra to the glans, thereby preventing its regression.

The incidence of glans dehiscence in present study was 5.4% (3/55 patients), which is considerably lower when compared with other studies (3),(4),(5),(7),(8). Two out of three patients with glans dehiscence had a glans width of 11 mm. This could have contributed to the development of glans dehiscence due to a possible tight glansplasty. The author advocates for adequate mobilisation of the glans wings, proper measurement of glans width, and careful patient selection criteria to prevent this complication.

Intraoperative assessment and measurement of flap length are crucial, as longer flaps can impair distal blood supply, thereby contributing to flap necrosis. According to a study by Uygur MC et al., as the length of the flap increases, the possibility of blood supply insufficiency also increases; therefore, longer flaps are associated with a higher incidence of fistula formation (7). Similarly, Ul Haq A et al., identified that the success of the Mathieu meatal-based flip flap technique lies in the careful preservation of the vascularisation of the flap and avoidance of overlapping suture lines to produce a watertight closure (8). In present study patients, the maximum flap length utilised was 2 cm, with a minimum width of 1 cm, so as to ensure a wide and well-vascularised neourethra. The low incidence of flap necrosis (1/55) in present study can possibly be attributed to this crucial step.

Most surgeons advocate the use of a cover or second layer over the tubularised neourethra, utilising either a tunica vaginalis flap or a ventral dartos flap (5),(6),(9),(10). This is done with the aim of reducing the incidence of fistula formation. In the patients of present study, this approach was not followed, as the second layer creates a bulky cover over the neourethra, making glans wings approximation or glanuloplasty difficult and increasing the chance of glans dehiscence. Even without the utilisation of a second layer over the neourethra, the incidence of urethrocutaneous fistula in this study was 1.8%, which is much lower than what is documented in the literature (10-30%) (1),(3),(4),(5),(6).

The incidence of meatal stenosis in present study was 1.8% (1/55 patients). This could be attributed to a narrow urethral plate. Incision of the urethral plate is avoided in present Institute to prevent a higher incidence of meatal stenosis. Despite the development of meatal stenosis, the patient was managed comfortably with dilatation on an outpatient basis using an infant feeding tube. Although Khalil M et al., recommend considering a modification of the original Mathieu technique that includes incision of the urethral plate to reduce meatal stenosis, author do not follow this approach at present center (4). Present surgical outcomes remain favourable, and the meatal stenosis identified was resolved with dilatation in the Outpatient Department (OPD), thereby reinforcing present preference for the original technique.

A review single-centre study conducted by Minevich E et al., of 202 patients who underwent the original Mathieu meatal-based flip-flap method showed that urethrocutaneous fistulas were noted in only 1% of patients, and meatal stenosis with retraction occurred in 0.5% of patients (9). This outcome can be corroborated in present study, even with a smaller patient population, which demonstrated a significantly low incidence of postoperative complications.

Although not all present patients achieved the classical slit-like meatus, all parents were satisfied with the cosmetic and functional outcomes, which were assessed subjectively during follow-up. This has been corroborated in studies by Qayyum A et al., Uygur MC et al., and Salako AA et al., wherein the postoperative cosmetic outcomes were satisfactory according to patient and parent records when the original Mathieu meatal-based flip-flap procedure was used (6),(7),(10).

Multiple modifications of the original Mathieu technique have come into vogue to combat the cosmetic appearance of the fish-mouth neourethral meatus. Techniques such as MAVIS (Mathieu and V incision sutured), described by Boddy SA and Samuel M, and the SLAM, described by Hadidi AT, have been introduced (11),(12). Modified methods have been developed to enhance the outcomes of Mathieu’s urethroplasty, utilising modifications pertaining to critical steps to ensure success, such as Hybrid Mathieu’s urethroplasty, which uses the urethral plate incision to improve outcomes in patients with small glans (13). With the advent of these modifications, there are also multiple studies that highlight the advantages of Mathieu’s urethroplasty in salvage and redo procedures, demonstrating successful outcomes and a lower incidence of postoperative complications (14),(15). For a better comparison of the original Mathieu procedure with its modifications, more prospective or randomised controlled trials would be required to analyse the outcomes.

In summary, over the years, the Mathieu meatal flip-flap procedure has stood the test of time, and when performed with the right technique and surgical expertise, it can yield excellent outcomes. It is essential to reiterate the importance of institutional protocols and the surgeon’s comfort and experience in achieving optimal functional and cosmetic results.

Limitation(s)

Since, the study is retrospective in nature, there was difficulty in conducting a thorough data analysis. The limited sample size restricts the comprehensive analysis of complications and outcomes, thereby limiting comparisons with other studies. There is a need for further prospective randomised controlled trials to compare the outcomes between the original Mathieu meatal-based flip flap method and other modifications to better assess the outcomes.

Conclusion

From present study, it was concluded that the outcome of the original Mathieu meatal-based flip-flap technique for distal hypospadias was favourable in this center. The incidence of postoperative surgical outcomes, such as meatal stenosis, urethrocutaneous fistula, meatal regression, and glans dehiscence, was less than or comparable to the literature. Although not all patients achieved the classical slit-like meatus, the overall functional and cosmetic outcomes were favourable, allowing the child to lead a normal life.

Author can conclude that it is essential to identify patients with favourable anatomical characteristics prior to proceeding with the Mathieu meatal-based flip-flap procedure. Proper measurement of flap length is important to ensure a well-vascularised flap and avoid flap necrosis; otherwise, it is safer to consider other surgical procedures for distal hypospadias. Modifications of the traditional Mathieu procedure can be considered, but in present centre, this would require further evaluation and randomised controlled trials to properly compare the incidence of complications and assess surgical outcomes. Further prospective studies and randomised controlled trials are needed to assess the outcomes when compared with modifications of Mathieu’s urethroplasty.

Acknowledgement

The author takes this opportunity to acknowledge the support of study procedure for aiding in collection of data and ensuring safety of the data. Author acknowledge the entire team of Paediatric Surgery, the Operation Theatre (OT) staff and technicians for the success of the surgeries and their support in present publication endeavours. Author acknowledge present patients and their guardians for their support and contribution.

References

1.
Hadidi A. The slit-like adjusted Mathieu technique for distal hypospadias. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47:617-23. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Moradi M, Moradi A, Ghaderpanah F. Comparison of snodgrass and mathieu surgical techniques in anterior distal shaft hypospadias repair. UNRC/IUA; 2005;2:28-31.
3.
Oztorun K, Bagbanci S, Dadali M, Emir L, Karabulut A. A retrospective analysis of Mathieu and TIP urethroplasty techniques for distal hypospadias repair, a 20 year experience. Arch Esp Urol. 2017;70(7):679-87.
4.
Khalil M, Gharib T, El-shaer W, Sebaey A, Elmohamady B, Elgamal K. Mathieu technique with incision of the urethral plate versus standard tubularised incised-plate urethroplasty in primary repair of distal hypospadias: A prospective randomised study. Arab J Urol. 2017;15(3):242-47. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Mathew P, Gupta P, Shukla AK, Singh AP, Gupta MK, Barolia DK, et al. Modified Mathieu’s urethroplasty v/s. modified onlay island flap urethroplasty based on patient selection criteria for distal hypospadias repair: A prospective cohort study. WIM Journal. 2021;8(1):33-41.
6.
Qayyum A, Kaleem M, Hassan S, Niaz S. Repair of distal penile hypospadias with (Meatal Based Flap) Mathieu technique. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2010;4(4):359-61.
7.
Uygur MC, Erol D, Germiyanoğlu C. Lessons from 197 Mathieu hypospadias repairs performed at a single institution. Pediatr Surg Int. 1998;14(3):192-94. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Ul Haq A, Akhter N, Nilofer, Samiullah, Javeria. Comparative study of Mathieu and Snodgrass repair for anterior hypospadias. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2006;18(2):50-52.
9.
Minevich E, Pecha BR, Wacksman J, Sheldon CA. Mathieu hypospadias repair: Experience in 202 patients. J Urol. 1999;162(6):2141-42. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Salako AA, Olajide AO, Sowande AO, Olajide FO. Retrospective analysis of Mathieu’s urethroplasty for anterior hypospadias repair in circumcised children: A single center experience. Afr J Urol. 2011;17:11-14. [crossref]
11.
Boddy SA, Samuel M. Mathieu and 'V' incision sutured (MAVIS) results in a natural glanular meatus. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35(3):494-96. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Rady, M., Abdalla, M., Abdelrahman, M., Mohamed, A. Outcomes of Snodgrass (TIP) versus Slit Like Adjusted Mathieu (SLAM) in distal penile hypospadias repair in pediatrics. Minia Journal of Medical Research, 2022; 33(2): 103-110. doi: 10.21608/mjmr.2022.249981. [crossref]
13.
Khirallah M, El-dossuky N. Hybrid Mathieu urethroplasty: A simple modification outcomes. Res Rep Urol. 2021;13:473-78. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Hayashi Y, Sasaki S, Kojima Y, Maruyama T, Tozawa K, Mizuno K, et al. Primary and salvage urethroplasty using Mathieu meatal-based flip-flap technique for distal hypospadias. Int J Urol. 2001;8(1):10-16. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Ho Bae S, Nyung Lee J, Tae Kim H, Kwang Chung S. Urethroplasty by use of turnover flaps (Modified Mathieu Procedure) for distal hypospadias repair in adolescents: Comparison with the tubularized incised plate procedure. Korean J Urol. 2014;55(11):750-55.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2025/75919.20714

Date of Submission: Oct 01, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Dec 17, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Jan 16, 2025
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2025

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 03, 2024
• Manual Googling: Jan 03, 2025
• iThenticate Software: Jan 14, 2025 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com