Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 92776

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2025 | Month : March | Volume : 19 | Issue : 3 | Page : PD01 - PD05 Full Version

Tubercular Intramuscular Abscess Mimicking Lumbar Hernia: A Rare Case Report


Published: March 1, 2025 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2025/76952.20722
Abhiram Chadive, Rajesh Gattani, Bhagyesh Sapkale

1. Surgery Resident, Department of General Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor, Department of General Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Undergraduate Student, Department of Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Abhiram Chadive,
Surgery Resident, Department of General Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha-442107, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: abhiramsai99@gmail.com

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is a worldwide health concern. Although pulmonary TB is common, extrapulmonary TB, such as infections of the musculoskeletal system, poses diagnostic challenges. The present report details a case of a tubercular intramuscular abscess in the lumbar region, which clinically resembled a lumbar hernia. The present report focuses on a 53-year-old male patient with a progressive, severe mass in the mid-lower back that had lasted for several months. The initial clinical assessment and radiography suggested a lipoma, sebaceous cyst, or lumbar hernia. An ultrasonographic examination revealed that the mass was heterogeneously hypoechoic with internal echoes that did not correlate with lipomas or sebaceous cysts. Further systemic cytological and histopathological analysis revealed tuberculous alterations, including caseation necrosis, epithelioid granulomas and Langhans giant cells. Surgical exploration revealed an abscess within the extrinsic muscular plane, which was drained successfully. Anti-tubercular Therapy (ATT) was initiated after surgery and resulted in marked improvement of the patient’s symptoms. At the one-year follow-up, the lesion had not recurred, nor were there any associated manifestations of systemic disease. The present case emphasises the importance of considering tubercular aetiology in unusual complaints of lumbar swellings, particularly in TB-endemic areas. The diagnostic process, based on imaging and histopathological examination, was instrumental in achieving the correct diagnosis and ruling out mimicking conditions, such as lumbar hernia or fat necrosis. Specifically, the early initiation of ATT, combined with surgical intervention, led to a positive outcome. Reporting such cases is essential to raise awareness and provide clinicians with knowledge about rare extrapulmonary TB.

Keywords

Cytology, Granuloma, Muscles, Necrosis, Spine, Tuberculosis, Ultrasonography

Case Report

A 53-year-old male patient came to the Outpatient Department (OPD) with the complaint of swelling in the mid-lower back (lumbar) region, measuring 2×3 cm. The swelling has been slowly increasing in size over the last few months and is associated with moderate pain. The swelling is localised and occurs intermittently, worsening when touched. It has become progressively larger and uncomfortable for the patient.

The patient reported that he had undergone several sessions of treatment at different private hospitals, which involved conservative management; however, he did not notice any marked improvement. The patient has no history of fever, night sweats, or sudden weight loss at any time in the past. He did not report any other complaints that could be related to the case.

A well-defined swelling discovered during a physical examination was located in the lumbar region of the patient’s body. The swelling was firm and non fluctuant, moderately painful to the touch, without any overlying changes in skin colour or erythema. Considering the anatomic site and clinical characteristics, an initial differential diagnosis of a lipoma or an infected sebaceous cyst was proposed. Clinically, the patient was otherwise stable and did not exhibit features suggestive of a systemic infection. Additional assessment was performed using ultrasound.

On ultrasound, a well-defined, oval, heterogeneously hypoechoic collection with internal echogenic fat lobules was observed. This finding did not correlate with a lipoma (which is typically homogeneously hypoechoic) or a sebaceous cyst (which is usually anechoic with posterior enhancement). The lack of prominent vascularity on Doppler examination diminished any signs of an active infectious process or vascular lesion. When a lumbar hernia was considered as a possibility, the discontinuity with abdominal contents ruled this option out. An X-ray of the lumbosacral spine revealed a hypodense translucent lesion, as seen in (Table/Fig 1).

The size of the collection material was 4×2.3 cm, with a calculated volume of approximately 28 cc. It extended superior and lateral to the superficial muscular fascia; superficial vascularity was not identified on Doppler examination. Based on these findings, the possibility of a lumbar hernia with fat necrosis was considered as a differential diagnosis. However, further diagnostic work-up was necessary for the present case.

While early investigations suggested the potential for a lumbar hernia, the findings during surgery did not support this opinion. No gross evidence of a hernia was observed during the intraoperative procedure. The surgical process began after placing the patient in the prone position, thereby allowing access to the swelling over the mid-lower back region. A 5 cm long incision was made following the intubation of the patient, with adherence to aseptic measures. The incision was made in the middle of the medial aspect, precisely over the swollen mass. This incision site was chosen because it provided direct access to the mass without invading other nearby major structures. The incision was deepened through the skin and subcutaneous tissues and no injury was inflicted on any neighbouring structures, as seen in (Table/Fig 2).

As the dissection advanced deeper into the subcutaneous layer, the initial impression of a hernia sac and/or herniated abdominal contents was not identified, contrary to observations from preoperative imaging studies. As dissection progressed, an abscess cavity was identified within the intramuscular plane, lying between the muscle fibers, as seen in (Table/Fig 3).

The abscess was an encapsulated collection of pus, enclosed in deeply red-coloured inflamed skin tissue. Special attention was paid to the use of a surgical retractor to gain access to the site while the abscess cavity was being opened. Thick, purulent material was drained from the cavity and a sample of the pus was used for the detection of the causative agent in the microbiological and cytological examination. The cytology report on the pus fluid sample was labelled as originating from the right infraclavicular region. A sample of less than 0.5 mL of reddish, blood-tinged, turbid fluid was taken. The cytological examination revealed a haemorrhagic background in which polymorphonuclear cells, lymphocytes and macrophages were present. These cells were arranged in small clusters as well as diffusely distributed to varying extents in the smears, suggestive of inflammation. At this stage, the precise nature of the underlying condition remained unclear, although an infectious process was suspected. The cytological examination and histopathology are shown in (Table/Fig 4).

Histopathological examination was performed on a sample that was removed from the left infrascapular region. The specimen consisted of several variously sized blackish tissue fragments, which measured a total of 7×4×1 cm. Examination under the microscope further confirmed tubercular changes, characterised by caseous necrosis, epithelioid granulomas, Langhans giant cells, chronic inflammatory cells and extensive fibrosis. These findings supported the clinical diagnosis of tubercular inflammation, indicating the possibility of a tuberculous abscess over a hernial or fat necrotic aetiology. The histopathological examination of the left infrascapular region sample confirming tubercular changes is shown in (Table/Fig 5).

In the microbiological examination, the specimen received from the pus intraoperatively was positive for Mycobacterium Tuberculosis (MTB) through Ziehl-Neelsen staining, implying a tubercular origin.

There was no other bacterial growth isolated on aerobic or anaerobic culture. The histopathology of the microbiological examination of the intraoperative pus is seen in (Table/Fig 6).

Once the abscess had been adequately drained, the cavity was washed with saline to minimise the possibility of harbouring infectious material. Nonetheless, there was engorgement of the surrounding soft tissue; otherwise, no signs of active bleeding or other complications were noted. The abscess cavity was then left open to granulate and any remaining infection was allowed to discharge freely. A sterile dressing was placed over the wound and a small drain was sutured to help control postoperative effusion or pus. There were no complications recorded during the surgery and the patient did not complain of any discomfort throughout the process of the tubercular intramuscular abscess operation. After the operation, the patient was observed for any signs of infection, such as fever or complications in the operated region. The patient had a favourable outcome following the initiation of ATT after surgery, based on histopathological evidence of TB.

As the first few weeks went by, he reported relief from localised pain and no soreness in his hands. Subsequent visits demonstrated continued granulation tissue formation and skin healing, as well as the absence of further evidence of infection, including reinfection with MTB, or other TB-related complaints such as fever, weight loss, or night sweats.

Regarding the treatment, the patient continued the ATT regimen he was on, which included first-line anti-TB medications (isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide and ethambutol). To monitor safety and compliance and to prevent the mentioned side-effects, liver function tests and other side-effects were constantly evaluated. Eventually, the abscess cavity was closed and imaging studies conducted afterward did not reveal evidence of residual or recurrent disease. After the surgery, the patient experienced no complications and over the next several days, his condition gradually stabilised. He had no complaints, so he was discharged with wound care instructions and a plan for follow-up visits.

In a one-year follow-up, the symptoms had resolved, there were no new lesions and, more importantly, there was no systemic involvement, suggesting a favourable outcome. The issue of discontinuing ATT was discussed with the patient and he was informed of the consequences of stopping the medication before completing the prescribed dosage; a relapse would be inevitable.

Discussion

Lumbar swelling is an abnormal protrusion that may occur around the lumbar spine, which includes the L1-L5 vertebrae (1). This can be related to infection, haematoma, tumour, disc herniation, cyst, or soft-tissue lesion, which might present with localised pain, tenderness, or limited range of motion (1). An oval, heterogeneously hypoechoic collection with internal echogenicity of fat lobules is an X-ray finding of an oval-shaped mass that is darker (hypoechoic) compared to the surrounding tissue; it has less dense material (2).

A lumbar hernia with fat necrosis is a condition where tissue (which may include fat) protrudes through a weakened area in the lower back (lumbar region), related to the muscular and fascial floor of the abdominal wall (3). A tuberculous abscess is a localised collection of pus due to an infection with MTB, commonly known as TB. These abscesses may occur if TB bacteria extend beyond the lungs and affect other tissues, which is common in extrapulmonary TB, including lymph nodes, bones, muscles, or organs (4).

Pott’s spine, or tubercular spondylitis, is a TB condition that predominately affects the vertebrae of the spine. It can only be suspected clinically and then confirmed by imaging of the spine {Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or Computed Tomography (CT)} and microbiological examination; its treatment traditionally involves anti-TB therapy (5). This condition occurs when MTB extends to the spine, typically affecting the vertebral column near the intervertebral disc, causing destruction of the bone and the surrounding soft tissues. Pott’s spine may lead to severe lower back pain, spinal deformities such as kyphosis or “hunchback,” and in worse cases, may result in neurological problems, including spinal nerve complications like weakness or even complete paralysis due to spinal stenosis (6),(7).

Extrapulmonary TB accounts for approximately 15-20% of all TB patients and musculoskeletal involvement particularly affects the spine (1),(2). Tuberculous abscesses are common in high-burden TB countries, including India, sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. Patients often experience complications such as spinal deformity, neurological dysfunction and unbearable pain (1),(6). In developed countries, the incidence is considerably lower due to better healthcare access and TB control; however, the illness can still manifest, particularly in patients with immunocompromised status, including those with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS), diabetes and other immunosuppressive diseases (5),(6).

Soft-tissue tumours like liposarcomas or myxomas should always be considered because these are painless, gradually growing masses that should be biopsied to determine histological variations (2),(3). Similarly, abscesses may be confused with epidermoid or dermoid cysts, but the differences can be discerned through imaging and histopathological examination (2). Other notable differentials include hydatid cysts, where serological examinations along with imaging studies reveal the classic feature of daughter cysts and vascular lesions like lymphangiomas or hemangiomas, where Doppler and MRI studies play a crucial role (4),(5).

A case involving a 77-year-old male patient, as described by Panigrahi S et al., with a history of diabetes, chronic renal disease on haemodialysis and previous surgery for right lung carcinoma, presented to the outpatient department with acute low back pain and generalised weakness (8). On physical examination, mild tenderness at the L5 vertebra was noted. An MRI of the lumbosacral spine revealed an epidural abscess at the L4-5 level causing spinal compression (8). The patient underwent surgery and a laminectomy with abscess drainage was performed (8). Microscopic examination of the pus revealed budding yeast cells and cultures confirmed the presence of Candida tropicalis (8). The patient was treated with intravenous amphotericin B followed by oral fluconazole (8).

In a case discussed by Singh J et al., a 30-year-old male with a cervical abscess secondary to Pott’s disease, which is a form of extrapulmonary TB affecting the spine, was treated (9). The histopathological findings following surgery confirmed a tubercular aetiology and after surgical decompression and anti-tuberculous treatment, the patient demonstrated marked improvement in his condition (9). The present case highlights the serious nature of spinal abscesses in the context of Pott’s disease, emphasising the risk of neurological impairment if not addressed promptly (9).

In a case described by Özdog? an S et al., a 59-year-old female with a history of significant back pain and recurrent spinal surgeries ultimately presented with spondylodiscitis, evidenced by MRI findings of abscess formation in the lumbar disc (10). The presence of inflammatory markers, alongside the surgical findings of an abscess, indicated an ongoing infection necessitating the use of antibiotics, including vancomycin (10). In a case reported by Hurtado Caballero E et al., a 29-year-old female patient from India presented with a retroperitoneal abscess secondary to tuberculous spondylodiscitis (11). She was initially misdiagnosed with an incarcerated inguinal hernia based on clinical and ultrasound findings (11). Postoperative imaging demonstrated bilateral retroperitoneal abscesses associated with osteolysis of the lumbar spine, suggestive of tuberculous involvement, which necessitated broad-spectrum antibiotics and anti-TB therapy (11).

The case reported by Pandita A et al., describes a 26-year-old Indian female diagnosed with spinal TB after a prolonged diagnostic journey that included symptoms of back pain and radicular symptoms, ultimately leading to the discovery of a Schmorl’s node associated with MTB infection (12). The prolonged time to diagnosis, marked by initial treatments for presumed mechanical back pain and inflammatory arthropathy, exemplifies the challenge of recognising spinal TB, particularly in a patient with recent immigration from an endemic region (12).

A 25-year-old Indian male reported by Meena S et al., presented with abdominal pain, weight loss and subsequent back pain, which were suggestive of Pott’s spine, based on MRI findings that revealed perivertebral collection and radiographic signs in favour of TB (13). Although several conservative measures were applied, the patient had a favourable response to ATT and all imaging studies revealed complete resolution of the abscess (13).

These cases call attention to the necessity of a thorough diagnostic work-up in instances of atypical symptoms and the role of an appropriate surgical approach in managing TB-associated abscesses (13). A comparative table summarising similar cases from the literature is presented in (Table/Fig 7) (8),(9),(10),(11),(12),(13).

Conclusion

The present case emphasises the difficult diagnostic scenario and the increased challenges when generalised lumbar swellings are encountered in clinical practice. In such cases, one should consider an infectious process such as a tuberculous abscess or Pott’s spine, particularly in regions where tuberculosis is endemic. The initial histopathological assessment is essential for diagnosis and effective treatment. The present case highlights the importance of an early start on ATT to avoid adverse effects and enhance prognosis. Improving knowledge and subsequent exploration of the complexity of the clinical spectrum of tuberculosis, particularly in low-resource settings, is crucial for the development of more effective diagnostic strategies and better management of patients.

References

1.
Zhang AS, Xu A, Ansari K, Hardacker K, Anderson G, Alsoof D, et al. Lumbar disc herniation: Diagnosis and management. Am J Med. 2023;136(7):645-51. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Yildiz S, Aralasmak A, Kadioglu H, Toprak H, Yetis H, Gucin Z, et al. Radiologic findings of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis. Med Ultrason. 2015;17(1):39-44. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Goubert D, Oosterwijck JV, Meeus M, Danneels L. Structural changes of lumbar muscles in non-specific low back pain: A systematic review. Pain Physician. 2016;19(7):E985-1000. [crossref]
4.
Khanna K, Sabharwal S. Spinal tuberculosis: A comprehensive review for the modern spine surgeon. Spine J. 2019;19(11):1858-70. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Kumaran SP, Thippeswamy PB, Reddy BN, Neelakantan S, Viswamitra S. An institutional review of tuberculosis spine mimics on MR imaging: Cases of mistaken identity. Neurol India. 2019;67(6):1408-18. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Zhang Y, Yu YS, Tang ZH, Zang GQ. Pott’s kyphosis. QJM Mon J Assoc Physicians. 2015;108(6):507. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Ansari S, Amanullah MF, Ahmad K, Rauniyar RK. Pott’s spine: Diagnostic imaging modalities and technology advancements. North Am J Med Sci. 2013;5(7):404-11. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Panigrahi S, Acharya A, Otta S, Puppala S. Spinal fungal abscess mimicking as Pott’s spine. Int J Mycobacteriol. 2023;12(3):364-66. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Singh J, Gupta P, Singh A, Singh A. Atypical cervical Pott’s spine with multiple level epidural collection: A case series of three patients. J Orthop Case Rep. 2023;13(10):115-20. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Özdoğan S, Yaltirik CK, Düzkalir AH, Demirel N, Kaya M, Atalay B. Spinal tuberculosis mimicking failed back surgery. Am J Case Rep. 2018;19:249-53. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Hurtado Caballero E, Mercader Cidoncha E, Ruiz de la Hermosa A, Amunategui Prats I, Maldonado Valdivieso P, Muñoz-Calero Peregrín A. Absceso retroperitoneal secundario a espondilodiscitis tuberculosa simulando una hernia inguinal incarcerada. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2015;45(4):316-9. Spanish. PMID: 28590102.
12.
Pandita A, Madhuripan N, Hurtado RM, Dhamoon A. Back pain and oedematous Schmorl node: A diagnostic dilemma. BMJ Case Rep. 2017;2017:bcr2017219904. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Meena S, Barwar N, Gupta T, Chowdhury B. Spinal tuberculosis presenting as abdominal pain: Rare presentation of a common disease. Oman Med J [Internet]. 2014 Mar 16 [cited 2025 Jan 3];29(2). Available from: http://www.omjournal.org/fultext_PDF.aspx?DetailsID=513&type=fultext.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2025/76952.20722

Date of Submission: Nov 22, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Jan 03, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Jan 28, 2025
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2025

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 23, 2024
• Manual Googling: Jan 14, 2025
• iThenticate Software: Jan 25, 2025 (4%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com