Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 62606

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2025 | Month : March | Volume : 19 | Issue : 3 | Page : QC01 - QC05 Full Version

Comparison of Placental Vitamin D Receptor Target Gene Expression in Idiopathic Foetal Growth Restriction Pregnancy and Gestational Age-matched Healthy Controls: A Case-control Study


Published: March 1, 2025 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2025/74719.20731
Priya Sharma, Richa Aggarwal, BD Banerjee, Priyanka Gogoi, Richa Sharma

1. Postgraduate Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, New Delhi, India. 2. Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, New Delhi, India. 3. Professor, Department of Biochemistry, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, New Delhi, India. 4. Professor, Department of Pathology, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, New Delhi, India. 5. Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Correspondence Address :
Richa Aggarwal,
KL-99, Kavi Nagar, Ghaziabad-201002, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: richa.agg77@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Foetal Growth Restriction (FGR) is a common pregnancy complication that affects up to 10% of pregnancies and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in the perinatal period and infancy. Despite extensive investigations, a definite etiology cannot be found in up to 70% of cases of FGR, which are termed idiopathic. One of the causative factors responsible for idiopathic FGR could be altered placental expression of Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) genes.

Aim: To estimate placental VDR target gene expression in pregnancies affected by idiopathic FGR and to compare it with gestational age-matched healthy pregnant women.

Materials and Methods: A case-control study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, New Delhi, India, from November 2019 to October 2021. All pregnant women ≥28 weeks gestation with FGR were evaluated to determine the etiology. Those with a negative work-up were defined as having idiopathic FGR (cases, n=30). Gestational age-matched healthy pregnant women were enrolled as controls (n=30). A maternal blood sample for Vitamin D levels was taken before delivery. After delivery, a small portion of the placenta was collected for Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) extraction to study the relative gene expression of VDR and the downstream target gene in the VDR pathway, Transforming Growth Factor Beta 3 (TGFβ3). Statistical tests used in the study included the Independent t-test and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for quantitative variables and the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for qualitative variables. The Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to correlate maternal Vitamin D level (ng/mL) with VDR messenger RNA (mRNA) expression fold change and TGFβ3 mRNA expression fold change. Univariate logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. The software used for statistical analysis was Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 21.0.

Results: Both groups were comparable in demographic characteristics such as age, socio-economic status, parity and Body Mass Index (BMI). The mean value of maternal Vitamin D levels in idiopathic FGR was 15.73±7.65, compared to 20.01±5.27 in controls. The majority of the patients in our study had Vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL), with 70% of cases and 60% of controls. The mean VDR mRNA ?ct value in cases was higher compared to controls (5.09±0.86 vs. 4.53±1.03, p-value=0.027), implying reduced VDR mRNA gene expression in cases. The mean TGFβ3 mRNA ?ct value was 8.11±1.81 in cases and 6.73±1.64 in controls (p-value=0.003), suggesting reduced TGFβ3 mRNA gene expression in cases. Maternal Vitamin D levels were not found to have any correlation with VDR mRNA and TGFβ3 mRNA expression (correlation coefficients 0.008 and 0.194, respectively).

Conclusion: Women with idiopathic FGR had reduced placental VDR and TGFβ3 mRNA expression. However, no correlation was found with maternal Vitamin D levels, suggesting defects in the placental VDR pathway as an etiological factor in FGR.

Keywords

Placenta, Transforming growth factor beta 3, Gene expression, Vitamin D deficiency

The FGR is defined as the inability of a foetus to maintain expected growth, with an estimated foetal weight or actual birth weight below the 10th percentile for gestational age, along with evidence of placental dysfunction in the form of oligohydramnios or abnormal Doppler studies. FGR is a common pregnancy complication that affects up to 10% of pregnancies and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in the perinatal period and infancy (1). Furthermore, FGR has potential lifelong consequences for an infant, including impaired neuropsychological development, reduced intelligence quotient and a greater risk of chronic adulthood diseases like hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and diabetes (2). It is important to establish the etiology of FGR because of the high incidence of recurrence; however, despite extensive investigations, a definite etiology cannot be found in up to 70% of cases of FGR, which are termed idiopathic (3).

Foetoplacental growth requires tight regulation of cell cycle gene expression. Vitamin D is a secosteroid hormone with pleiotropic effects that extend far beyond calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism. These effects include cellular proliferation, differentiation and immune response modulation (4). Vitamin D exerts its physiological effects by binding to its nuclear receptor, VDR. VDR can mediate both transcriptional and non transcriptional effects. In the transcriptional pathway, 1,25(OH)2D-bound VDR heterodimerises with a partner receptor, Retinoid X Receptor (RXR). This VDR-RXR complex binds to the vitamin D Response Element (VDRE) and further regulates the transcription of vitamin D target genes. The non transcriptional pathway involves the calcitriol-VDR complex binding with caveolae, stimulating numerous signaling cascades such as protein kinase C and mitogen-activated protein kinase, which play important roles in cellular proliferation, differentiation, invasion and apoptosis, thereby highlighting the modulatory effects of vitamin D (2). Altered VDR expression is associated with several health concerns, but the role of VDR and vitamin D signaling in pregnancy is poorly understood (2).

Vitamin D plays an important role in maintaining the health of both the mother and foetus during pregnancy. A deficiency of vitamin D has been linked to several complications associated with placental insufficiency, including FGR (5). Sufficient vitamin D intake during pregnancy has been shown to reduce these complications and has beneficial effects on foetal birth weight (6). Therefore, optimal maternal 25-hydroxy levels are believed to be beneficial to the health of both the mother and foetus. However, no consensus has been reached regarding the biological actions of vitamin D in perinatal outcomes (7). The placenta expresses the VDR, which is involved in vitamin D signaling, suggesting that vitamin D functions in a tissue-specific manner at the foetal-maternal interface. Reduced placental expression of VDR may be a contributing factor to the pathology of idiopathic FGR-affected pregnancies (2).

Nguyen TP et al., reported reduced VDR expression and decreased mRNA and protein expression of TGFβ3 in FGR placentae (3). Reduced TGFβ3 may cause changes in VDR signaling, which may directly or indirectly contribute to placental insufficiency.

Despite low maternal vitamin D levels, not all foetuses are growth-restricted. Similarly, even with normal vitamin D levels, some foetuses may be growth-restricted. Therefore, the authors proposed that alterations in the genes involved in the vitamin D metabolic pathway in the placenta may be the causative factor responsible for idiopathic FGR.

If this hypothesis is correct, methods for detecting placental VDR expression may have clinical utility in treating FGR. Appropriate therapeutic interventions may be explored in the future once we determine the etiology of idiopathic FGR. Further clarification of the biological mechanisms by which placental vitamin D metabolism contributes to FGR will enhance our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying FGR and may also provide novel approaches to intervention. With this hypothesis and background, the present study was conducted with the aim of estimating placental VDR target gene expression in idiopathic FGR and comparing it with gestational age-matched low-risk pregnancies.

Material and Methods

The present case-control study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, New Delhi, India, from November 2019 to October 2021. The present study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC-HR/2019/41/75, dated 16/10/2019). Written informed consent was obtained from all the study participants.

Sample size: During the study period, 250 patients with FGR were recruited. After an elaborate work-up that included a detailed history, examination and blood investigations, no etiology could be found in 83 patients and they were labeled as having Idiopathic FGR. A total of 53 patients refused to participate; hence, 30 patients were recruited as cases.

Inclusion criteria: All pregnant women between 20 years and 34 years of age (spontaneous conception, singleton), ≥28 weeks of gestation with Ultrasound (USG)-diagnosed FGR, defined as Estimated Foetal Weight (EFW) <10th percentile for that gestational age, accompanied by one or more of the following features: abnormal umbilical artery Doppler flow velocimetry defined as Umbilical Artery Pulsatility Index (UA-PI) >95th centile or Cerebroplacental Ratio (CPR) <5th centile, or oligohydramnios defined as Amniotic Fluid Index (AFI) <5, were considered for the study. Severe FGR was defined as EFW <3rd percentile for that gestational age.

Exclusion criteria: Pregnant women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, a history of chronic medical disorders (renal disease, jaundice, epilepsy), multifoetal pregnancy, prolonged Premature Rupture of Membranes (PROM), smoking, alcohol and drug abuse, or placental abruption were excluded. Additionally, if any of the following investigations were abnormal: Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT), Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL), Toxoplasmosis, Rubella, Cytomegalovirus, Herpes simplex virus- Immunoglobulin M (TORCH IgM), liver function tests, kidney function tests, or Antiphospholipid Antibody (APLA) work-up (including lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies), or if a foetal anomaly was detected on Ultrasonography (USG), those patients were also excluded.

Gestational age-matched pregnant women with no obstetrical complications until delivery were enrolled as controls.

Study Procedure

Patients were managed according to the hospital protocol for FGR. A 5 mL maternal blood sample was taken prior to delivery for the measurement of vitamin D (25OH) levels for both cases and controls using radioimmunoassay. After delivery, the placentas of all the participants were grossly examined and a small portion of the maternal side of the placenta was stored in phosphate buffer solution at -80°C for RNA extraction to study the relative gene expression of VDR and TGFβ3 in the VDR pathway. The placenta was stored in 10% formalin and sent for histopathological analysis. Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Scientific TRIzol reagent as per the manufacturer’s instructions). The RNA concentration and purity were estimated using NanoDrop™. RNA quality was assessed by the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyser. The authors selected the target gene (TGFβ3) in the VDR pathway based on a similar study conducted earlier (3) with a similar sample profile. TGFβ3 was further validated by real-time RT-PCR.

Reverse transcription was carried out using the USA Verso cDNA synthesis kit on the isolated RNA sample. Reverse transcription was conducted in a thermal cycler at 42°C for 30 minutes and 92°C for two minutes (to inactivate the reverse transcriptase).

Reverse transcription and real time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assay: Real-time PCR was performed in a mixture containing 10 μL of SsoFast™ EvaGreen® supermix with forward and reverse primers (1 μL each), cDNA (1 μL) and 9 μL of nuclease-free water. The PCR reaction was carried out for VDR and TGFβ3 and the melt curve was analysed at 55°C to 95°C with an increment of 0.5° in the thermocycler. Primers for each gene were synthesised by SahaGene (Biological Research India), with the sequences provided in the table below. Each sample was run in duplicates. The relative gene expression (fold change) levels were determined by the comparative ??Ct method after normalisation to the expression level of Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate Dehydrogenase (GAPDH).

Primer sequence 5'?3'

The placenta of all patients was sent for histopathological examination. At the time of delivery, the birth weight of the baby was recorded. Neonatal outcomes were noted in terms of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission, length of NICU stay (number of days), sepsis, neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Statistical Analysis

Quantitative variables were compared using an independent t-test (for two groups) and ANOVA to assess the association of quantitative variables with vitamin D levels. Qualitative variables were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. The Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between maternal vitamin D levels (ng/mL) and the fold change in VDR mRNA expression, as well as, the fold change in TGFβ3 mRNA expression. Univariate logistic regression was employed to calculate the odds ratio for VDR mRNA ?Ct values and TGFβ3 mRNA ?Ct values. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. The software used for statistical analysis was SPSS software version 21.0.

Results

The overall incidence of idiopathic FGR in the present study was 33.2% (Table/Fig 1). Both groups were comparable concerning demographic characteristics such as age, socio-economic status, parity and BMI (Table/Fig 2).

The mean birth weight in the FGR group was 2.08±0.28 kg, which was significantly lower compared to 2.71±0.15 kg in the controls (p-value <0.001). The majority of patients delivered vaginally. A caesarean section was necessary for seven patients in the FGR group: one patient at 30 weeks 0 days had severe FGR with Absent End-diastolic Flow (AEDF) and a non reassuring Non Stress Test (NST), while another patient at 36 weeks 2 days presented with breech presentation, anhydramnios and absent foetal movements. Additionally, five patients developed foetal distress and underwent Lower Segment Caesarean Section (LSCS). In the control group, the indications for instrumentation were poor maternal bearing efforts and foetal distress in the second stage (Table/Fig 3).

All the pregnancies affected by FGR could be continued to term with regular foetal surveillance, except in seven cases where pregnancies were terminated at 34 weeks due to the development of AEDF in the foetuses. Among the cases, 22 babies experienced neonatal morbidities: nine developed Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS), four had sepsis and hypoglycaemia and jaundice were observed in 13 and 18 cases, respectively; three developed hypothermia and were admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), compared to eight babies in the control group who required NICU admission. One baby in the FGR group died in the NICU due to sepsis leading to multiple organ involvement (Table/Fig 3).

The mean placental weight in the FGR group was 420±23.76 g, which was significantly less than 459.33±38.05 g in the control group (p-value <0.0001) (Table/Fig 4).

The mean maternal vitamin D levels in idiopathic FGR cases were 15.73±7.65 ng/mL compared to 20.01±5.27 ng/mL in controls (p-value=0.014). Approximately 21 (70%) of cases and 18 (60%) of controls had vitamin D deficiency.

When correlating neonatal birth weight with maternal vitamin D levels, the Pearson’s correlation coefficient was found to be 0.456, suggesting a positive correlation between neonatal birth weight and maternal vitamin D levels. This correlation was statistically significant with a p-value of 0.0002 (Table/Fig 5).

The mean VDR mRNA ?ct value in cases was 5.09±0.86, compared to 4.53±1.03 in controls (p-value=0.027) (Table/Fig 6). The higher ?ct value implies reduced VDR mRNA expression; therefore, VDR mRNA expression was lower in cases compared to controls in our study. The odds ratio was 1.915, suggesting that an increase of one unit in the VDR mRNA ?ct value implies a decrease in VDR mRNA expression, which increases the risk of the foetus being affected by FGR by twofold.

The mean TGFβ3 mRNA ?ct value was 8.11±1.81 in cases, compared to 6.73±1.64 in controls (p-value=0.003), implying significantly reduced TGFβ3 mRNA gene expression in placental tissue in cases compared to controls (Table/Fig 6). The odds ratio was 0.642, suggesting that an increase of one unit in the TGFβ3 mRNA ?ct value implies a decrease in TGFβ3 mRNA expression and the risk of the foetus being diagnosed with FGR increases by one fold.

In the comparison of VDR mRNA expression between cases and controls, 73.33% of cases had downregulation of gene expression, whereas 26.67% had upregulation of gene expression. Similar findings for TGFβ3 mRNA expression were observed between cases and controls (Table/Fig 7).

When correlating maternal vitamin D levels with VDR mRNA expression and TGFβ3 mRNA expression using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient, no significant correlation was found, with correlation coefficients of 0.008 and 0.194, respectively (Table/Fig 8).

However, when correlating VDR mRNA expression with TGFβ3 mRNA expression, the Pearson’s correlation coefficient was found to be 0.348, indicating a weak positive correlation. This correlation was not statistically significant, with a p-value of 0.060 (Table/Fig 9).

Discussion

The overall prevalence of idiopathic FGR cases in the present study was 33.2%. The mean maternal vitamin D levels were significantly lower in cases compared to controls. The majority of patients in our study had vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL), with 70% of cases and 60% of controls. The rest of the patients were vitamin D insufficient (20-29 ng/mL).

Goswami R et al., measured serum 25(OH) vitamin D in apparently healthy subjects and showed that significant hypovitaminosis D was present in up to 90 percent of them (8). Further studies from different parts of our country have pointed towards widespread vitamin D deficiency in Asian Indians of all age groups residing in rural and urban areas (9).

There was a positive correlation between neonatal birth weight and maternal vitamin D levels in the current study. Robinson CJ et al., and Fernando M et al., reported a positive correlation between maternal 25(OH)D and neonatal birth weight (5),(10). However, Eggemoen AR et al., conducted a longitudinal, multi-ethnic population-based study and measured maternal 25(OH) vitamin D levels (11). They found that 51% of pregnant women in early pregnancy were vitamin D deficient, but there was no independent relation between maternal vitamin D levels and any of the neonatal anthropometric measures, including birth weight, abdominal circumference and head circumference.

In the present study, all the mothers had low serum vitamin D levels, including the controls, but not all the foetuses were growth-restricted. Therefore, low maternal vitamin D levels alone might not be responsible for growth-restricted foetuses. There may be other mechanisms operational within the placenta itself that lead to FGR. One such proposed mechanism is the placental VDR pathway.

The VDR mRNA expression was decreased in idiopathic FGR compared to controls in the present study. This finding was similar to a study by Nguyen TP et al., who reported a decrease in placental VDR mRNA expression in cases and suggested that decreased placental VDR expression alters the expression of cell-cycle genes in FGR placentae (3).

Nguyen TP et al., studied VDR mRNA and protein expression in placental samples of women with idiopathic FGR and controls using PCR, immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting (7). They found significantly decreased VDR mRNA expression (p-value=0.0005) in women affected by idiopathic FGR and concluded that VDR is an important regulator of trophoblast functions; decreased VDR expression in the placenta may be a cause or a consequence of the pathophysiological defects observed in FGR-affected placentae.

They also demonstrated that when VDR mRNA was reduced following siRNA treatment, an increased syncytium formation was observed compared to cells that were treated with non targeted siRNA control. These observations suggested that VDR inactivation influenced larger syncytium formation. They further demonstrated that reduced VDR also significantly increased apoptosis when measured using TP53 mRNA as a marker of apoptosis.

Therefore, a decrease in placental VDR expression may impair its actions and limit the beneficial effects of maternal vitamin D in the regulation of foetoplacental growth, thus playing a role in the pathophysiology of idiopathic FGR.

Gene TGFβ3 is one of the downstream target genes of VDR. In the present study, TGFβ3 mRNA gene expression was found to be reduced in placental tissue obtained from pregnancies affected by idiopathic FGR compared to controls.

Nguyen TP et al., reported that TGFβ3 mRNA expression was significantly reduced by 46% in cases compared to controls (3). Additionally, the protein expression of TGFβ3 showed a significant reduction of 64% in FGR placentas compared to controls.

Decreased TGFβ3, caused by changes in VDR signaling, may directly or indirectly contribute to placental insufficiency by causing uncontrolled cell proliferation. This, in turn, may lead to impaired ion and nutrient exchange, as well as decreased synthesis of hormones required for foetoplacental growth.

We found no correlation between maternal vitamin D levels and VDR mRNA or TGFβ3 mRNA expression, but we did find a weak positive correlation between VDR mRNA expression and TGFβ3 mRNA expression. This suggests that placental expression of the VDR pathway is independent of maternal vitamin D levels. Therefore, even if vitamin D levels are low, the normal expression of VDR pathway genes, as seen in controls, may mean that foetuses are not affected.

Our study is supported by the findings of Young BE et al., who found that placental VDR expression was not significantly related to maternal 25(OH)D and the negative association approached significance (p-value=0.080), while a positive association was observed with neonatal 1,25(OH)2D (p-value=0.006) (12). They concluded that placental VDR may play a role in transplacental calcium transfer and foetal bone development. All these findings suggest that there is a definite and significant relationship between placental VDR and TGFβ3 mRNA expression, as well as, the likelihood of idiopathic FGR.

Limitation(s)

The limitations of the present study include a small sample size. The authors collected the placental tissue at the time of delivery, which did not allow us to infer the dynamic changes of VDR throughout pregnancy. Additionally, the authors did not study placental vitamin D levels, so they could not analyse the correlation between maternal and placental vitamin D levels.

Conclusion

The association of VDR mRNA expression and TGFβ3 mRNA expression with idiopathic FGR supports the hypothesis that reduced TGFβ3 contributes to the pathogenesis of idiopathic FGR. The present study provides evidence that the placental expression of the VDR pathway is independent of maternal vitamin D levels. Therefore, further intervention strategies that target the placenta might alleviate altered foetal growth by improving placental vitamin D metabolism. The establishment of the pathogenesis of idiopathic FGR may open new avenues for the early prediction of FGR, leading to adverse neonatal outcomes and thereby allowing for timely interventions to prevent such outcomes.

Acknowledgement

The authors are deeply grateful to all participants in the study and to hospital staff for their cooperation.

Authors’ contribution: RA: Conceived and designed the study, developed the data collection instruments, performed the statistical analysis and wrote first version of the manuscript. PS: Participated in data collection, PS, BDB and PG: Participated in data interpretation and analysis. PS: Designed the study and drafted the report. BDB: Carried out the measurement of various biochemical markers used in the study. PG: Carried out the placental histopatholgical examination. RA, RS, PS and PG: Critically reviewed, revised and approved the final manuscript.

References

1.
Swanson AM, David AL. Animal models of fetal growth restriction: Considerations for translational medicine. Placenta. 2015;36(6):623-30. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Murthi P, Yong HE, Ngyuen TP, Ellery S, Singh H, Rahman R, et al. Role of the placental vitamin D receptor in modulating feto-placental growth in fetal growth restriction and preeclampsia-affected pregnancies. Frontiers in Physiology. 2016;7:43. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Nguyen TP, Yong HE, Chollangi T, Brennecke SP, Fisher SJ, Wallace EM, et al. Altered downstream target gene expression of the placental Vitamin D receptor in human idiopathic fetal growth restriction. Cell Cycle. 2018;17(2):182-90. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Bikle DD. Vitamin D regulation of immune function. Vitamins & Hormones. 2011;86:01-21. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Robinson CJ, Alanis MC, Wagner CL, Hollis BW, Johnson DD. Plasma 25- hydroxyvitamin D levels in early-onset severe preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):366.e1-6. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
De-Regil LM, Palacios C, Lombardo LK, Peña-Rosas JP. Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(1):CD008873. [crossref]
7.
Nguyen TP, Yong HE, Chollangi T, Borg AJ, Brennecke SP, Murthi P. Placental vitamin D receptor expression is decreased in human idiopathic fetal growth restriction. J Mol Med (Berl). 2015;93(7):795-805. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Goswami R, Gupta N, Goswami D, Marwaha RK, Tandon N, Kochupillai N. Prevalence and significance of low 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in healthy subjects in Delhi. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72(2):472-75. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Arya V, Bhambri R, Godbole MM, Mithal A. Vitamin D status and its relationship with bone mineral density in healthy Asian Indians. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15(1):56-61. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Fernando M, Coster TG, Ellery SJ, Guingand DD, Lim S, Harrison CL, et al. Relationships between total, free and bioavailable vitamin D and vitamin D binding protein in early pregnancy with neonatal outcomes: A retrospective cohort study. Nutrients. 2020;12(9):2495. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Eggemoen ÅR, Jenum AK, Mdala I, Knutsen KV, Lagerløv P, Sletner L. Vitamin D levels during pregnancy and associations with birth weight and body composition of the newborn: A longitudinal multiethnic population-based study. Br J Nutr. 2017;117(7):985-93. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Young BE, Cooper EM, McIntyre AW, Kent T, Witter F, Harris ZL, et al. Placental vitamin D receptor (VDR) expression is related to neonatal vitamin D status, placental calcium transfer, and fetal bone length in pregnant adolescents. FASEB J. 2014;28(5):2029-37.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2025/74719.20731

Date of Submission: Aug 02, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Oct 15, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Dec 04, 2024
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2025

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 03, 2024
• Manual Googling: Nov 30, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Dec 02, 2024 (18%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com