Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 60110

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2025 | Month : March | Volume : 19 | Issue : 3 | Page : YC06 - YC09 Full Version

Translation and Response Validation of Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire for the Child’s Primary Caregiver (Kannada Version): A Cross-sectional Study


Published: March 1, 2025 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2025/77141.20707
KB Komal, Navami Mahaveer, Anvita Shiggavi, Prashanth Mukkannavar, Aditi Prayag

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatric Physiotherapy, KLE College of Physiotherapy, Hubballi, Karnataka, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Community Based Rehabilitation, KLE College of Physiotherapy, Hubballi, Karnataka, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatric Physiotherapy, Bethel College of Physiotherapy, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. 4. Principal and Professor, Department of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, KLE College of Physiotherapy, Hubballi, Karnataka, India. 5. Assistant Professor, Department of Community Based Rehabilitation, KLE College of Physiotherapy, Hubballi, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. KB Komal,
Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatric Physiotherapy, KLE College of Physiotherapy, Hubballi-590010, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: drkomalkb24@kledeemeduniversity.edu.in

Abstract

Introduction: Cerebral Palsy (CP) is a collection of long-term conditions that impact posture and movement, frequently accompanied by cognitive, sensory, behavioural and communication abnormalities. Children with CP experience a variety of effects on their Quality of Life (QOL), including social, emotional and physical aspects. The CP-specific questionnaire, known as the CP QOL-Child, has not yet been translated or validated in the Kannada language, limiting its applicability in regions where Kannada is the primary language.

Aim: To translate and validate the CP QOL-Child Primary Caregiver questionnaire into Kannada.

Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional cultural study conducted at Department of Paediatric Physiotherapy, KLE College of Physiotherapy, Hubballi, Karnataka, India, over the course of one month (September 14, 2024, to October 14, 2024). It included 50 children with CP (ages 4-12) and their primary caregivers. The Child Primary Caregivers were given a Kannada-translated questionnaire and the data were collected. The internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels and CP QOL were evaluated and compared. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was used to evaluate the internal consistency of CP QOL scores; a value of >0.7 was considered indicative of internal consistency and response validity.

Results: The mean age observed was 8.1±2.3 years, with 36 (72%) of the children being diagnosed with spastic quadriplegia. Cronbach’s alpha scores for the items in each quality-of-life area demonstrated very good reliability, ranging from 0.687 to 0.882. Overall, the QOL was found to be 41.8±4.2. QOL significantly decreased as GMFCS levels increased, particularly at levels IV (42.8±1.5) and V (36.8±1.4). Pain and the impact of disability showed no significant differences across the GMFCS levels.

Conclusion: The present study concludes that the Kannada-translated CP QOL-Child Primary Caregiver questionnaire (for ages 4-12) is a reliable tool for assessing parent-reported CP QOL in Kannada-speaking primary caregivers.

Keywords

Cognitive, Communication abnormalities, Disability, Pain

The term “Cerebral Palsy” (CP) refers to a collection of long-term mobility and posture disorders that limit one’s activities and are caused by permanent abnormalities in the developing foetal or infant brain (1). As a syndrome, CP is characterised by a broad spectrum of symptoms, which can include motor disorders, sensory, cognitive, communication, perceptual and behavioural abnormalities; seizure disorders might also be present. The variability in symptoms and their severity among individuals makes CP a complex syndrome rather than a singular disorder (2). The prevalence of CP varies between 1.5 and 4 per 1,000 live births globally (1),(3). In India, there are 2.95 cases of CP for every 1,000 children surveyed (4). This high prevalence is partly due to the country’s substantial birth rate and limited access to adequate healthcare services. In countries with middle and lower incomes, such as India, quadriplegia is the most prevalent type (5).

The World Health Organisation (WHO) defines QoL as “an individual’s perception of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and about their goals, expectations, standards and concerns” (6). The impact of CP on QoL is profound and encompasses multiple domains, including physical, psychological, social and functional well-being (6). These deficits often result in limitations in daily activities, social isolation and potential mental health challenges. Additionally, these challenges may reduce participation in community and recreational activities, further affecting QoL (6),(7). Assessing QoL can yield meaningful indicators of intervention outcomes, helping to evaluate the effects of clinical treatments on QoL and health services. It also enhances the understanding of disease burden and assists in identifying priority areas for health resource allocation, the development of public health infrastructure and policy recommendations (8).

A thorough framework for comprehending and characterising the effects of CP on individuals is offered by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), which also takes into account how personal and environmental factors affect function and disability (9). Environmental elements encompass the social, physical and mental surroundings, such as access to healthcare services, educational support, adaptive equipment and social attitudes toward disability (10).

For children with CP, particularly those between 4 and 12 years of age, several specific challenges arise as they grow and develop. Assessing the QoL in these children involves using standardised questionnaires and assessment tools that cover various dimensions of health and well-being. Commonly used QoL assessment tools include the CP QOL-Child, Paediatric Quality-of-Life inventory 4.0 (PedsQL), KIDSCREEN and Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ), of which the CP QOL-Child is a CP-specific assessment tool that consists of two versions: one for the child self-report and one for the primary caregivers. Its purpose is to evaluate well-being rather than illness (11). Parent-substituted reporting is especially helpful when children are unable to self-report, as it offers a thorough understanding of the child’s everyday activities and overall QoL (12).

It recognises the significance of gathering the opinions of primary caregivers of children with CP. Primary caregivers are considered to be those who spend at least 18 hours per day with the child.

The translation and validation of the CP QOL Child-Primary Caregiver questionnaire have been confirmed in multiple countries and various languages; however, it has neither been translated into Kannada nor has its efficacy been evaluated. This gap highlights the need for a culturally appropriate adaptation of the CP QOL-Child to ensure that caregivers in Kannada-speaking communities can effectively communicate and assess their child’s QOL.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional cultural study was conducted at the Department of Paediatric Physiotherapy, KLE College of Physiotherapy, Hubballi, Karnataka, India after obtaining ethics approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee, reference number JGMMMCIEC/60/2024, from September 14, 2024, to October 14, 2024. A convenience sampling method was used to select the samples and the sample size was calculated based on the prevalence of CP in India (1),(3).

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: The study included children aged 4-12 years diagnosed with CP of either gender and their primary caregivers. The KLE Hubli Cooperative Hospital, along with other medical facilities, special schools and rehabilitation centres in and around Hubballi-Dharwad, Karnataka, India were the sources of the qualifying participants. The study excluded primary caregivers who did not understand Kannada and lacked an effective communication framework.

Study Procedure

Formal authorisation was obtained from the primary author to translate and validate the original English version of the CP QOL-Child Primary Caregiver (4-12 years) form into Kannada. The translation adhered to the guidelines outlined in the CP QOL Translation Manual (13), which consists of six steps. Two different translators translated the original English text into Kannada and out of the two translations, we chose the Kannada text for each English sentence that most accurately captured the original meaning.

Three participants were asked to fill out the draft form of the questionnaire as part of an initial assessment; any problematic items were addressed through revisions. Two separate translators performed a back-translation into English as a quality control procedure and any notable differences between the original and the back-translation were examined and corrected. According to all of the study’s authors, the translated Kannada questionnaire was clear and simple for participants to understand at every stage of the translation process. The final translated questionnaire was approved by the original author and made available on the official CP QOL website at the following link: [CPQOL-Child-Kannada-Primary-Caregiver-4-12-Years.pdf](https://www.ausacpdm.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CPQOL-Child-Kannada-Primary-Caregiver-4-12-Years.pdf). The steps of translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the questionnaire are illustrated in (Table/Fig 1).

A single therapist, who was trained to administer the translated questionnaire, conducted interviews through both face-to-face and telephonic methods to maintain homogeneity in the data. Demographic data included the child’s age, gender, latest GMFCS levels (14) and type of CP (15).

The primary caregiver CP QOL questionnaire comprises 66 items in nine categories: family and friends, communication, health, participation, access to services, special equipment, pain and bother, final questions about your child and your health. For the purpose of analysing psychometric properties, it was divided into seven more general domains: Participation and Physical Health (11 items), Emotional well-being and self-esteem (6 items), social well-being and acceptance (12 items), functioning (12 items), pain and impact of disability (8 items), family health (4 items) and access to services (12 items). With the exception of one question in domain 6 about pain and the impact of impairment, which is assessed on a 5-point scale (from 1 to 5), most of the items are rated on a 9-point scale (from 1 to 9). According to the CP QOL-Child Manual, scores for each domain were averaged and then converted to a scale from 0 to 100 (16).

Statistical Analysis

Frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation were used to summarise the gathered data. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was utilised to evaluate the internal consistency of CP-QOL scores, with a value greater than 0.7 deemed indicative of internal consistency and response validity. GMFCS levels were used to compare CP-QOL using the Kruskal-Wallis “H” test. Multiple comparisons of CP-QOL based on GMFCS levels were conducted using the Shirley-Williams post-hoc test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 29.0 software (SPSS Inc.; Chicago, IL) was used to analyse the data.

Results

Data were collected from 50 primary caregivers using a translated Kannada questionnaire. The mean age of the children was reported as 8.1±2.3 years. The demographic data of the children with CP and their primary caregivers are presented in (Table/Fig 2).

Family health had moderate reliability (0.687), while pain and the impact of disability had very good reliability (0.882) (Table/Fig 3). A statistically significant difference was found between GMFCS levels and the six domains of CP QOL, except for pain and the impact of disability. The QOL was significantly lower at levels IV and V, particularly in domains such as social well-being and acceptance, functioning, participation and physical health, emotional well-being and self-esteem, access to services and family health (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

The CP is a progressive disorder in which the QoL is lower in affected children compared to typically developing children. To effectively measure QoL in this population, it is crucial to address several methodological challenges, particularly communication difficulties and cognitive impairments, which may hinder their ability to self-report. Therefore, offering assessment tools that can be completed by parents or caregivers is advantageous. When self-reporting is not feasible, QoL assessments can be conducted by primary caregivers, who often possess a deep understanding of their children’s experiences and can provide accurate insights. Thus, the study translated and validated the CP QOL-Child (Primary Caregiver) for children aged 4-12 years in Kannada.

Regarding the rating scale’s internal consistency, the original CP QOL instrument for primary carers had Cronbach’s α coefficients ranging from 0.74 to 0.927. Cronbach’s α values in Hindi were greater than 0.9 (17) and they ranged from 0.72 to 0.89 for Japanese (18). With a low value of 0.687 in family health, the Cronbach’s α (range: 0.687-0.882) of the Kannada CP QOL-Child Primary Carer (ages 4-12) has demonstrated moderate to very good reliability. Similar findings were obtained in an analysis of internal consistency for the domains “pain and impact of disability” and “family health” by Waters E et al., and Vadivelan K and Sekar P (19),(20).

In the age group of 4–12 years, a greater prevalence of quadriplegic CP was found (72%), with GMFCS level IV accounting for 56%. A study by Bhati P et al., found the highest incidence of quadriplegic CP in New Delhi (21). In contrast, another study conducted in Gujarat found a predominance of diplegic CP (22).

In the current study, the QOL was significantly lower in GMFCS levels IV and V. A similar study conducted in Tamil Nadu stated that with higher levels of GMFCS, QOL was lower, especially at levels IV and V (20). Nurani Gharaborghe S et al., reported that an increase in GMFCS in children with CP has a considerable effect on their QOL (23). Mutoh T et al., showed similar results, indicating that the domains of pain and impact disability had no effect on GMFCS levels (18).

The overall QOL, when assessed using the Kannada CP QOL-Child Primary Caregiver, was found to be 41.8±4.2. A score of 37.67±4.57 was found in Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu (20). The study carried out in the Child Development Clinic of a tertiary care hospital in North India found an overall QOL of 38.29±5.2 (24). To generalise the results regarding the influence of GMFCS level and gender on QOL, a larger sample size should be obtained for future studies.

Limitation(s)

Samples from different geographical areas of Karnataka would further strengthen the findings of the study. The current study did not address the education level of the primary caregivers, which might have influenced the QOL.

Conclusion

The study concluded that the Kannada CP QOL - Child Primary Caregivers (ages 4 to 12 years) is a valid and reliable measure that can be used to assess QoL in the Kannada-speaking community. The QOL decreased as GMFCS levels increased, particularly at levels IV and V. There was no significant difference in pain and the impact of disability across the GMFCS levels.

References

1.
Kerr Graham H, Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Dan B, Lin JP, Damiano DL, et al. Cerebral palsy. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:15082. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Brooks JC, Strauss DJ, Shavelle RM, Tran LM, Rosenbloom L, Wu YW. Recent trends in cerebral palsy survival. Part I: Period and cohort effects. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56(11):1059-64. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Korzeniewski SJ, Slaughter J, Lenski M, Haak P, Paneth N. The complex aetiology of cerebral palsy. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14(9):528-43. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Chauhan A, Singh M, Jaiswal N, Agarwal A, Sahu JK, Singh M. Prevalence of cerebral palsy in Indian children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J Pediatr. 2019;86(12):1124-30. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Jahan I, Muhit M, Hardianto D, Laryea F, Amponsah SK, Chhetri AB, et al. Epidemiology of malnutrition among children with cerebral palsy in low- and middle-income countries: Findings from the Global LMIC CP Register. Nutrients. 2021;13(11):3676. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46(12):1569-85. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(10):1403-09. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C, Jordan K, Leslie HH, Roder-DeWan S, et al. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: Time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e1196-252. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
dos Santos AN, Pavão SL, de Campos AC, Rocha NACF. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(12):1053-58. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Huisman ERCM, Morales E, van Hoof J, Kort HSM. Healing environment: A review of the impact of physical environmental factors on users. Building and Environment. 2012;58:70-80. [crossref]
11.
Gilson KM, Davis E, Reddihough D, Graham K, Waters E. Quality of life in children with cerebral palsy: Implications for practice. J Child Neurol. 2014;29(8):1134-40. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Rapp M, Eisemann N, Arnaud C, Ehlinger V, Fauconnier J, Marcelli M, et al. Predictors of parent-reported quality of life of adolescents with cerebral palsy: A longitudinal study. Res Dev Disabil. 2017;62:259-70. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Waters E, Davis E. Translation Manual. Version 2. 2018 Nov 23 [cited 2025 Jan 16]; Available from: https://mcri.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Translation_Manual_Version_2/7284443/1.
14.
Paulson A, Vargus-Adams J. Overview of four functional classification systems commonly used in cerebral palsy. Children (Basel). 2017;4(4):30. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Vitrikas K, Dalton H, Breish D. Cerebral palsy: An overview. Am Fam Physician. 2020;101(4):213-20.
16.
AusACPDM [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jan 16]. The Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire. Available from: https://www.ausacpdm.org.au/research/cpqol/.
17.
Das S, Aggarwal A, Roy S, Kumar P. Quality of life in Indian children with cerebral palsy using cerebral palsy-quality of life questionnaire. J Pediatr Neurosci. 2017;12(3):251-54.[crossref][PubMed]
18.
Mutoh T, Mutoh T, Kurosaki H, Shimomura H, Taki Y. Development and exploration of a Japanese version of the cerebral palsy quality of life for children questionnaire for primary caregivers: A pilot study. J Phys Ther Sci. 2019;31(9):724-28. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Waters E, Davis E, Mackinnon A, Boyd R, Graham HK, Kai Lo S, et al. Psychometric properties of the quality of life questionnaire for children with CP. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49(1):49-55. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Vadivelan K, Sekar P. Assessment of proxy quality of life in children with cerebral palsy: A cross-sectional study. Pediatr Pol. 2021;95(4):212-15. [crossref]
21.
Bhati P, Sharma S, Jain R, Rath B, Beri S, Gupta VK, et al. Cerebral palsy in north indian children: Clinico-etiological profile and comorbidities. J Pediatr Neurosci. 2019;14(1):30-35. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Ramanandi VH, Shukla YU. Socio-demographic and clinical profile of pediatric patients with cerebral palsy in Gujarat, India. Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy. 2022;27(1):19. [crossref]
23.
Nurani Gharaborghe S, Sarhady M, Hosseini SM sadegh, Mortazavi SS. Quality of Life and Gross Motor Function in Children with Cerebral Palsy (Aged 4-12). Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2015;13(3):59-63.
24.
Jain R, Arun P, Ramanjot null. Translation and adaptation of cerebral palsy quality of life primary caregiver- teen questionnaire in north Indian population: CP-QOL-Teen (Hindi). Indian J Pediatr. 2024;91(10):1090.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2025/77141.20707

Date of Submission: Dec 04, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Jan 15, 2025
Date of Acceptance: Jan 31, 2025
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2025

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 05, 2024
• Manual Googling: Jan 27, 2025
• iThenticate Software: Jan 29, 2025 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com