Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 64133

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2011 | Month : February | Volume : 5 | Issue : 1 | Page : 31 - 34 Full Version

Bilateral Chondroepitrochlearis Muscle: Incidence, Phylogenetic And Clinical Significance


Published: February 1, 2011 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2011/.1146
S ARUNA*, R HANNAH SUGIRTHABAI RAJILA**, VAITHIANATHAN G***

*M.S., Professor and Head of the department, Department of Anatomy, Chettinad Hospital & Research Institute, IT Highway, Kelambakkam, Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu – 603103, India; **M.S., Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Chettinad Hospital & Research Institute, IT Highway, Kelambakkam, Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu; ***M.Sc, Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Chettinad Hospital & Research Institute, IT Highway, Kelambakkam, Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu – 603103, India.

Correspondence Address :
R HANNAH SUGIRTHABAI RAJILA
M.S., Assistant Professor,
Department of Anatomy, Chettinad Hospital & Research Institute, IT Highway, Kelambakkam,
Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu – 603103, India. Email- ashrajsanada@gmail.com
Phone- 9791178269

Abstract

To study the incidence and the phylogenetic and the clinical implications of a rare variant muscle slip arising from the pectoralis major muscle in the Indian population.. In this article, we have described a muscle slip which is present bilaterally, which originates from the lower ribs along with the lower fibres of the pectoralis major muscle. This muscle slip arches across the axilla and then inserts to the medial epicondlye of the humerus. The phylogenetic relationship of the muscle to the abdomino humeralis or to the xiphihumeralis in quadrapeds and to the patagii muscle in birds is discussed. The clinical significance of this muscle is also discussed, as the chondro epitrochlearis muscle forms an important differential diagnosis for ulnar nerve entrapment. It is also an important but a rare cause of the restriction of movements at the shoulder joint.

Keywords

Pectoralis major, chondroepitrochlearis, ulnar nerve, phylogeny.

INTRODUCTION
The muscle mass of the pectoral region exhibits a variety of variations in the form of anomalous slips. The pectoralis major muscle is a thick triangular muscle that usually arises from the medial half of the clavicle, the sternum, and the first six costal cartilages. These three heads, the clavicular, the sternocostal and the abdominal, combine to form a tendon that inserts into the lateral lip of the bicipital groove of the humerus, after undergoing a twist. The pectoralis major muscle is innervated by the medial and the lateral pectoral nerves. The most common variations of the pectoralis major muscle include the absence of the abdominal slip, the decussation of the fibres across the midline and the absence of the sternocostal head (1), (2). Mosconi and Ka-Math (3) have described a case in which the sternocostal head of the pectoralis major muscle was absent on the left and the entire pectoralis major muscle was absent on the right. Several cases of an additional musculature in the axillary region have also been reported. These include the following: a sternalis muscle which runs parallel to the sternum (4),(5) and a pectoralis quartus muscle which arises from the rectus sheath (6) runs parallel to the pectoralis major muscle and inserts into the tendon of the pectoralis major (1)
The chondroepitrochlearis (thoracoepicondylaris) muscle arising from the lateral edge of the pectoralis major muscle and inserting into the medial epicondyle of the humerus, has been reported by Chiba (7) as a unilateral variation and by G. Flaherty (8) as a bilateral variation, but its incidence has yet to be reported. The co -existence of both the chondroepitrochlerais and the muscular arch muscle has been reported by Nakajima et al. (11) In the present study, the authors have tried to learn the incidence and the phylogenetic and the clinical significance of this anomalous muscle slip in the Indian population.

Material and Methods

A total of forty cadavers which were embalmed with a 40% formalin solution were taken up in the Department of Anatomy, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, Chennai, to study the chondroepitrochlearis muscle in detail. Out of the forty cadavers, thirty were males and ten were females. The study period was four years. Hence, a total of eighty upper limbs were studied in detail. The well preserved cadavers were taken and an uppermost incision was made directly over the clavicle. Another incision was made in the midline from the suprasternal notch to the xiphisternum. From the xiphisternum to the base of the axilla, another curved incision was made till the middle of the forearm, making an encircling cut around the nipple and areola, leaving them in place for future reference, reflecting the flaps of skin and the superficial fascia downwards and laterally. A midline incision was made in the arm reflecting the flaps on both sides till the middle of the forearm. The fascia from the anterior parts of the pectoralis majorwere removed and the attachments of the same were defined.
The clavicular head of the pectoralis major below the clavicle was cut across and was reflected towards its insertion. The branches of the lateral pectoral nerve and the thoracoacromial artery pierced the clavipectoral fascia to enter it. The remainder of the pectoralis major was cut across about 5cm from the sternum. A branch of the medial pectoral nerve pierced the pectoralis minor to enter the pectoralis major. In the level of the lowermost origin of the pectoralis major, the small muscle slip, namely the chondroepitrochlearis, was looked for. The slip, as described before, as originating from the lower costal fibres and arching over the base of the axilla was searched for, in the eighty study specimens. The course and its tendinous change, along with its insertion into the medial epicondyle, was studied in detail by measuring the length of the muscle and the tendon in centimetres. Its dimensions, attachments and nerve supply and the extent and its relations with the neurovascular bundle of the arm were studied.

Results

Out of the eighty upper limbs which were dissected and studied, we came across the chondroepitrochlearis muscle slip in two upper limbs, with an incidence of 2.5% in the total study population. The muscle slip was present in a male cadaver bilaterally, as against the more common unilateral variation. The unilateral chondroepitrochlearis has been reported more often than the bilateral variant. The findings by different authors regarding the chondroepitrochlearis, has been enumerated in (Table/Fig 1). In our study, the incidence of the unilateral variant was zero and the incidence of the bilateral variant was 2% of the total study population.

(Table/Fig 1)

Similarly, the incidence of the chondroepitrochlearis in the male cadavers was two out of the sixty upper limbs, as against 0 in twenty female upper limbs. Hence, the incidence in males is derived as 3.3%, as compared to the absence of such a variation in the female study population, as shown in (Table/Fig 2).

(Table/Fig 2)

A Z calculate was used to compare the means from different normally distributed sets of data. The actual score indicates how many standard deviations above or below the mean an observation is. The Z calculated value for male and female incidence was 0.6818 ± 0.05. This value was less than 1.96, which gave us no reason to reject the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is a hypothesis about a population parameter. The purpose of the hypothesis testing was to test the viability of the null hypothesis in the light of experimental data. Depending on the data, the null hypothesis either would or would not be rejected as a viable possibility. Hence, the 0 incidence in the females in our present study doesn’t rule out the occurrence of this variant in females, provided the sample size is bigger than the one which was used for this present study.

Discussion

The pectoralis major is a thick, fan-shaped muscle. Its origin is from the anterior surface of the sternal half of the clavicle, to half of the breadth of the anterior surface of the sternum, to the first to the seventh costal cartilages, to the sternal end of the sixth rib and to the aponeurosis of the external oblique. It gets inserted as a bilaminar tendon into the lateral lip of the intertuberous sulcus of the humerus. The anterior lamina is composed of the clavicular and the manubrial fibres. The posterior lamina has the costal fibres which insert without twisting and the sternal and the aponeurotic fibres which undergo a twisted insertion.

Bergman et .al. (1988) in their book on anatomical variations, were the first to refer to this variant as costoepitrochlearis, chondroepitrochlearis, or chondrohumeralis’. The chondrepitrochlearis is an extremely rare anomaly which arises as a small muscle slip of 1cm diameter from the lowermost muscle costal fibres of the pectoralis major ((Table/Fig 3), (Table/Fig 4)).

(Table/Fig 3)

(Table/Fig 4)

This muscle slip which is presentbilaterally, is a finding which has been reported earlier by only by two authors till date. This slip arched over the base of the axilla and travelled on the medial most part of the anterior compartment of the arm. It was seen embedded within the brachial fascia, with the brachial artery related on its lateral side. The muscle slip turned tendinous at about 15cm from its origin ((Table/Fig 5), (Table/Fig 6)). It continued its course as a tendon for 21cm medially to get inserted into the medial epicondyle of the humerus. The ulnar nerve is closely applied to the posteromedial aspect of the tendon in the middle of the arm before it pierces the medial intermuscular septum ((Table/Fig 7), (Table/Fig 8)). The pectoralis major muscle never underwent the normal twisting before its insertion. ((Table/Fig 3), (Table/Fig 4)). The medial pectoral nerve and the lateral thoracic artery supplied the muscle slip. This pattern of innervation confirms to its embryological origin from the ventral muscle mass.

(Table/Fig 5)

(Table/Fig 6)

(Table/Fig 7)

(Table/Fig 8)

Embryologically, the pectoral musculature is derived from the ventral limb bud masses which arise from the myoblasts that migrate out of the last five cervical and the first thoracic myotomes into the developing limb buds during the fifth week of the intrauterine life (9). The pectoral muscles assume their final forms through a combination of migration, fusion and apoptosis of the muscle cell precursors10. The failure of apoptosis to occur at the right time in the myoblasts, can result in the persistence of a muscle slip in the form of the chondroepitrochlearis.
Phylogenetically, the chondroepitrochlearis is regarded as an atavistic anomaly which is a trait which reappears after having disappeared generations before. It is an equivalent of the abdominoor xiphihumeralis of the quadrapeds, a muscle which is now considered as a part of the pectoralis minor (Howell, 1937). Also, it is regarded to be homologous to the extensor plicae alaris in birds, thus tightening the skin extending from the humerus to the carpal joint. (Perrin 1871). The extensor plicae alaris is now termed as the tensores patagii longus and the brevis in birds (Fischer, 1946). But, the patagii muscles are derived from the dorsal muscle mass and are innervated by the posterior division of the brachial plexus. An anomalous chondroepitrochlearis muscle, having two heads, one ventral and one dorsal, was reported by Nakajima et .al in 1999 (11)The pectoral nerve first innervated the ventral head and then, the greater part of the dorsal head. The intercostobrachial nerve (Th2) innervated a small part of the dorsal head. Hence, judging from the muscular origin, the insertion and the innervation, the ventral head was considered to be the chondroepitrochlearis muscle, whereas the dorsal head was an aberrant type of the muscular arch of the axilla. According to the above observation, the relationship of the chondroepitrochlearis to the patagii muscles is of no relevance.
The absence of the normal twisting pattern denotes that the chondroepitrochlearis is an atavistic anomaly. In quadrupeds, the pectoralis minor muscle has an insertion in the upper end of the shaft of the humerus. In humans, while the insertion of the pectoralis minor shifted to the coracoid process, the lower fibres of the pectoralis major moved up in the lateral lip of the intertubercular sulcus. The absence of the twisted insertion of the pectoralis major is the result of the presence of the chondroepitrochlearis muscle slip. This muscle slip which is formed from the lower fibres of the pectoralis major gets inserted into the normal insertion site at the lower end of the humerus, as it is the case in the quadrupeds. Hence, the lower fibres are compelled to insert without the twist, in the lower end of the lateral lip of the intertubercular sulcus.

In the present case, the muscle slip is seen to be closely related to the ulnar nerve along the medial intermuscular septum [Table/Fig 5, 6]. Every possibility of the compression of the ulnar nerve, either before or immediately after it pierces the medial intermuscular septum, exists. Spinner RJ et .al (12) have reported the first ever known neurological complication due to the crossing of the chondroepitrochlearis muscle over the neurovascular bundle of the arm. Di Gennaro GL et al(13) have reported a case of an 11-year-old boy who was affected bilaterally, who underwent surgical treatment to lengthen the chondroepitrochlearis muscle. There was a significant cosmetic and functional improvement. Samuel et.al (14) reported an added problem of the limitation of the abduction of the humerus because of the presence of the chomdroepitrochlearis muscle.

Ulnar nerve entrapment is the second most frequent entrapment neuropathy in the upper extremity. Pressure or injury to the ulnar nerve along its anatomic course may cause denervation and the loss of the intrinsic muscle function in the hand .Because of the anatomical arrangement of the structures, the area around the elbow is the most common area for the entrapment. In the above elbow causes, the arcade of Struthers (a musculofascial band, about 8 cm proximal to the medial epicondyle), the medial intermuscular septum (which the nerve pierces to reach the olecranon groove), and the medial head of the triceps muscle (which can be hypertrophied or can chronically snap over the medial epicondyle, thus causing a neuritis) are the common reasons (15). The chondroepitrochlearis muscle also comes under the above elbow cause of the ulnar nerve entrapment syndrome. Depending on the level and the severity of the ulnar nerve compression, the signs and symptoms may vary from mild transient paraesthaesias in the ring and small fingers to the clawing of these digits and severe intrinsic muscle atrophy (16),(17).

Landry (1958) (18) concluded that chondroepitrochlearis is an atavistic anomaly which demonstrates the distal extent of the insertion in ancestral forms. The chondroepitrochlearis muscle has been found at autopsy in infants with chromosomal defects, namely, trisomy 13 with a D}D translocation (Aziz, 1980) (19) and trisomy 18 (Bersu and Ramirez-Castro, 1977) (20). Barash et al. (1970) (21) postulated that the genetic code for such atavistic muscles is normally repressed during embryogenesis and that trisomy 18 causes the derepression of these genetic loci.

Conclusion

This article delineates a bilateral example of the rare supernumerary muscle, the chondroepitrochlearis. It is usually associated with an axillary arch muscle, which was not observed in the present study. The normally twisted insertion of the pectoralis major was also not present. This anomaly has attracted clinical attention because of its potential to cause cosmetic defects, to restrict the abduction of the arm, and to cause ulnar nerve entrapment. Thus, it may be of particular interest to plastic surgeons, orthopaedic surgeons, and neurologists.

References

1.
BONASTRE V, RODRIGUEZ-NIEDENFUHR M, CHOI D, SANUDO JR Coexistence of a pectoralis quartus muscle and an unusual axillary arch: case report and review. 2002, 15: 366–370.
2.
STANDRING S, ELLIS H, HEALY C, JOHNSON D, WILLIAMS A Editors Grays anatomy. 39th ed. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, 2002 p.834.
3.
MOSCONI T, KAMATH S. Bilateral asymmetric deficiency of the pectoralis major muscleClin Anat,. 2003 16: 346–349.
4.
LOUKAS M, BOWERS M, HULLETT J Sternalis muscle: a mystery still. Folia Morphol, 2004 a. 63: 147–149.
5.
O’NEILL MN, FOLAN-CURRAN J Case report: bilateral sternalis muscles with a bilateral pectoralis major anomaly. J Anat, 1998 193: 289–292.
6.
BONASTRE V, RODRIGUEZ-NIEDENFUHR M, CHOI D, SANUDO JR Coexistence of a pectoralis quartus muscle and an unusual axillary arch: case report and review. 2002 Clin Anat, 15: 366–370.
7.
CHIBA S, SUZUKI T, KASAI T. A rare anomaly of the pectoralis major--the chondroepitrochlearis Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 1983 ;60(2-3):175-85
8.
G. FLAHERTY,M. N. O'NEILL, AND J. FOLAN-CURRAN. Case report: bilateral occurrence of a chondroepitrochlearis muscle J Anat. 1999; 194 (Pt 2): 313–315. BOOK
9.
SWEENEY LJ Basic concepts in embryology. McGraw-Hill, 1998 pp. 136–138. PERIODICALS
10.
CARLSON BM Human embryology and developmental biology. Mosby, 2004 pp. 224–225.
11.
NAKAJIMA K, CHIBA S, KOBAYASHI K, WAKATUKI E, KUMAKI K, HOSHINO T KAIBOGAKU ZASSHI A rare muscular anomaly in the upper arm--the chondroepitrochlearis muscle with an aberrant type of the muscular arch of axilla. Journal of anatomy. 1999 Apr; 74(2):209-13.
12.
SPINNER RJ, CARMICHAEL SW, SPINNER M. Infraclavicular ulnar nerve entrapment due to a chondroepitrochlearis muscle. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1991 Aug;16(3):315-7
13.
DI GENNARO GL, SONCINI G, ANDRISANO A, VALDISERRI L. The chondroepitrochlearis muscle: case report. Chir Organi Mov. 1998 Oct-Dec;83(4):419-23
14.
SAMUEL, VIJAYA PAUL• VOLLALA, VENKATA RAMAN, Unusual pectoralis major muscle: The chondroepitrochlearis, Anatomical science international / Japanese Association of Anatomists 2008 Volume 83 Issue 4, Pages 277 - 279
15.
OSNER MA. Compressive ulnar neuropathies at the elbow: I. Etiology and diagnosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998; 6(5):282-8.
16.
ZIMMERMAN NB, KAYE MB, WILGIS EF, ZIMMERMAN RM, DUBIN NH. Are standardized patient self-reporting instruments applicable to the evaluation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(3):463-8.
17.
DUNSELMAN HH, VISSER LH. The clinical, electrophysiologic and prognostic heterogeneity of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 79(12):1364-7
18.
LANDRY SO The phylogentic significance of the chondroepitrochlearis muscle and its accompanying pectoral abnormalities. Journal of Anatomy 1958; 92:57-64
19.
AZIZ MA Anatomical defects in a case of trisomy 13 with a D}D translocation. Teratology 1980; 22:217- 227
20.
BERSU ET, RAMIREZ-CASTRO JL Anatomical analysis of the developmental defect of aneuploidy in man ± the 18-trisomy syndrome: I. Anomalies of the head and neck. American Journal of Medical Genetics 1977; 1: 173-193
21.
BARASH BA, FREEDMAN L, OPITZ JM Anatomical studies in the 18-trisomy syndrome. Birth Defects, Original Article Series, 1970;V1(4): 3-15.
22.
LEVENT SARIKCIOGLU , FATOS BELGIN YILDIRIM , SHOJI CHIBA Unilateral occurrence of a chondroepitrochlearis muscle Clinical Anatomy 2004; 17(3): 272-5
23.
P JAIJESH, Unilateral appearance of Chondroepitrochlearis muscle – A case report. Indian J Plast Surg July- December 2005 Vol 38 Issue 2

DOI and Others

JCDR/2011/1146

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com