Year :
2023
| Month :
May
| Volume :
17
| Issue :
5
| Page :
HE01 - HE03
Full Version
Systemic Assessment of Fabricated Injury in Sexual Assault Cases: A Narrative Review
Published: May 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62489.17942
Sachin Kumar Tripathi, Richa Choudhary, Rajiv Ratan Singh, Pradeep Kumar Yadav
1. Research Scholar, Department of Anthropometry, Lucknow University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
2. Professor Junior Grade, Department of Forensic Medicine, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
3. Professor Junior Grade, Department of Emergency Medicine, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
4. Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Correspondence Address :
Pradeep Kumar Yadav,
647/37A/468, Sita Vihar Colony, Jankipuram Extension, Lucknow-226031, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: dctrprdp@gmail.com
Abstract
Sexual assault on females may ruin the entire life of the victim. Victims of such incidents rarely get support from any quarters of society, including their family members. On the other hand, men can be made the victim of such heinous crimes by false accusations by women for various motives. As most of the judgments on sexual assault cases are based on circumstantial history, and oral evidence, it may be very hard to disprove the allegation. According to the figures from National Crime Records Bureau’s (NCRB) crime in India report 2020, less than 8% of all cases under investigation for rape were found to be false. In 2014, the Delhi commission for women submitted a report stating that, 53.2% of rape cases registered between April 2013-July 2014 was false. In India, the threat of false rape cases on one pretext or the other is increasing since the new amendment to the rape law in 2013. This fact is evident from the study of court judgments and media reports. In most false sexual assault cases, the victim took advantage of a fabricated injury to strengthen the case. There are various motives behind fabricating injury to register false sexual assault cases some of which are, to bring a charge of rape, heartbreak, anger, or some other mala fide motive induces a woman to file a false rape case majority, some women just do it to seek the attention of the media and have publicity, to defame others, to gain a large sum of money by a false allegation and to obtain compensation from the Government, In most cases, it is also found that to cover up first sexual intercourse women falsely accuse their partner of sexual assault. Various studies of disguised injuries in assault incidents showed that, the limbs, neck, and chest are the most favoured sites for disguised injuries.
Keywords
Fabricated wounds, Rape examination, Sexual violence, Systemic evaluation
Introduction
A wound or injury is defined as a disruption of the natural continuity of living tissue. Physical damage to the body, such as violence, accidents, and broken bones, is sometimes called an injury. Under Indian Penal Code (IPC) Section 44 “Injury”, the term “injury” means any person concerning body, spirit, reputation, or property. Crafted wounds are created by a person on their body or by another person with their consent (1). Sexual assault is defined as sexual favour between individuals without appropriate legal consent. Sexual assault remains the fastest growing violent crime. Despite major legislative reforms underway, statistics show conviction rates are low and rape rates continue to rise. The many emotional consequences, combined with the inferior status of self-perceived women, lead to a large number of unreported cases (2). Fabricated wounds are those, caused by a person on his own body or by another person with his permission. Fabricated injuries are frequently used to gain an advantage in accusations of sexual assault for a variety of reasons, including blackmailing the alleged offender, monetary gain, and forcing a compromise on some dispute (3). There were 28,046 rape cases registered in India in 2020, according to the NCRB report 2020. In total, 5,015 cases were closed by police, because they were declared false. Courts heard 18,967 cases, 14,340 of which resulted in acquittal and 3,425 in conviction (4). Some notable cases include Miss AB serial false rape cases; Girl from Jabalpur filed six false rape cases against six men and Miss SS vs state of Haryana.
Medico-Legal Issues
The investigational approach in cases of sexual assault includes the First Information Report (FIR), an investigation by an investigating officer, a medical examination by a doctor, the filling of a charge sheet by the Investigation Officer (IO), and finally, the court process. The doctor should carefully examine and treat the patient, noting the date, time, place, who brought the patient, and the results of the examination. Section 39 of the criminal procedure code requires the doctor to report the Medico-Legal Case (MLC) to the police after providing primary life saving medical care (5). The goal is to start the legal process, as soon as, possible so that, the police can gather as much evidence as possible. Detecting genital and extra genital injuries is therefore, important for the same reason. These injuries can heal in a short period and result in decisive loss (6).
Fabricated Injury in False Sexual Assault Cases
When people understand the typical features of fabricated injuries, it will demonstrate the incompatible history of assault with injuries (7). Multiple shallows-penetrating cuts, incised wounds, or fingernail abrasions are present. These lesions have a uniform shape, a linear or slightly cured course, and are arranged in a parallel or crisscrossed pattern. The location is on easily accessible part of the body, usually on the left side (non dominant side), avoiding painful areas. There are no defense wounds on the body. There was no damage to the clothing or inconsistent damage [8,9]. The most commonly used weapons are knives. Other items used includes a razor, glass pieces, scissors, and ice picks. The most common body parts where fabricated injuries were discovered were the top of the head, the forehead, the neck, the outer side of the thighs, and the front of the abdomen and chest. As previously stated, characteristics plays a critical role in detecting fabricated injuries in sexual assault cases. This can help with the initial visual inspection of man-made damage [10,11].
Reported Data
According to NCRB statistics, approximately 74% of rape cases under section 376 of the IPC result in acquittals (12). Research has shown that, 40% of these cases are due to the girl’s family filing a rape lawsuit against the boy after the couple eloped and got married. Additionally, 30% of cases were filed by women who claimed that, sexual intercourse took place after an arranged marriage (13). Some women claim to have been raped together for months but had everything they could to raise the alarm bells, if they didn’t want men to become collateral damage, when they did rape (14). Most false rape cases are settled out of court. According to the NCRB crime in India report 2020, less than 8% of all rape cases under investigation were found to be false. All the supporting data are given in (Table/Fig 1). There is a huge incentive in the form of intimidation to frame an innocent man, who has been falsely abused by a woman. Such women should be punished by court of law. In the case of such heinous crimes, financial settlement or dismissal of the case should be refused. There are no penalties for women who file the wrong cases. This encourages false whistleblowers to lie under oath with impunity. Women have used trumped-up injuries to magnify false sexual assault cases (15).
Punishment for False Rape Allegations
There are no specific crimes for a false accuser can be brought to justice, but there are several categories of his actions. Therefore, to protect victims of false rape cases, Indian criminal law provides various penalties like imprisonment, fine and/or both for crimes against which false accusations are made (16).
Section 182: False information, with intent to cause a public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another person (17).
Section 195: Giving or fabricating false evidence with intent to procure conviction of offense punishable with imprisonment for life or imprisonment (18).
Section 196: Using evidence known to be false (19).
Section 199: False statement made in declaration which is by law receivable as evidence (20).
Section 200: Using as true such declaration knowing it to be false (21).
Section 211: False charge of offense made with intent to injure (22).
Indian law has few penalties for filing false rape cases. (although, you can file perjury) false rape allegations are a threat to society and strong action must be taken against them. The NCRB data speaks for itself.
Discussion
In one study conducted by Kumar K et al., 2021, out of a total of 500 forensic cases examined for mechanical injuries, only 63 (12.6%) cases, with 94 (6.9%) injuries, were declared falsified or self-inflicted injuries. Of these 63 cases with fabricated injuries, the majority of cases 58 (92.1%) were males, and only 5 (7.9%) cases were females. Incised wounds were most common 58 (61.7%) injuries, followed by lacerations 36 (38.2%). Most common body part affected was upper limb 62 cases (65.9%) followed by head and neck region 24 cases (25.5%) (2). Another Study conducted by Khichi ZH et al., the age group of 21-30 years was found to have the highest incidence of fabricated injuries in his study. It could be because this age group is highly vulnerable to emotional ups and downs, which predisposes the population to self harm (23).
Bhullar DS et al., in his study of fabricated wounds, discovered that, males (84.6%), the 21 to 40 year age group (57.7%), and upper limbs (80%) were the most commonly observed findings. Sharp light weapons were used in all but one case, and sharp heavy weapons were used in only one case (24). Kumar K et al., conducted a study in which grievous injuries accounted for 85.26% of injuries and only 12.82% of injuries were classified as simple in nature, with injuries dangerous to life occurring in 1.9% of cases (25). In Bhullar DS, study, the incidence of simple injuries was more than twice that of 2grievous injuries which is in contrast. The probable cause of causing grievous hurt is to obtain legal benefits for grievous harm, which carries severe penalties (26). In one study conducted by White C et al., 51% of the total 224 cases of virgin and non virgin females, had minor non genital injuries. Genital injuries in the non virgin group and virgin group were 32% and 53%, respectively (27). In another study, conducted by Palmer CM et al., non genital injuries (mostly minor) were found in 46% of the women examined, while genital injuries were found in only 22%. In the absence of non genital injury, genital injury was uncommon (3%) (28). Rassin E et al., (2005) distinguished between true and false claims to some extent using a list of 43 criteria for 41 suspected sex crimes. Most of the self inflicted injuries to bring out false accusation were superficial, multiple, incised wounds which are parallel to each other and situated on the accessible body parts and often without clothing damage (29). Some landmark false rape cases have been discussed below:
Case 1
On December 29, 2021, Gurugram police detained a “honey trap” bat and arrested Miss AB 22-year-old Delhi resident with a Bachelor of Arts degree, who confessed to falsely accusing men of sexual assault and extortion. She searched men on dating apps, parties, gyms, clubs, and social media platforms. She then met with them in person, had consensual sex, and then convicted them of the assault until they complied with their terms. She admitted that, she had additional seven such false FIRs of sexual accusation against men on record (30).
Case 2
A Jabalpur girl had filed six rape cases against five different men in the city, in the last six years. She filed a rape case against the first man she accused, married him, and then refilled dowry, domestic violence, and rape charges against him. From July 2021 to July 2022, she filed four more rape cases against four different men (30).
Case 3
In the case of Miss SS vs Haryana, on 23 September 2021, the complainant threatened to file a false rape charge against the defendant unless the defendant extorted Rs.20 lac. When the case was brought to court and the necessary investigations were conducted, the court ruled that, the complainant had threatened and extorted people by running racket and involving them in a bogus rape case. There are many other similar cases of people being blackmailed with fake rape cases in exchange for money.
From the above paragraphs, the authors can conclude that, there are many reasons for filing rape cases (30).
Conclusion
Sexual assault has long been a catchphrase in India, as country reports the highest number of rape cases in the world. Sexual assault without a person’s consent and may be committed through violence or the threat of violence. Rape, long thought to be a result of unbridled sexual desire, is now understood as a pathological claim of power over the victim. Most cases of false rape are resolved out of court. Intimidation is a tremendous incentive to lure an innocent man into a fake rape case. If a man injures a woman, he should be punished, and women should be punished equally for their wrongdoing. Financial settlements or dismissal of cases should be prohibited for such heinous crimes. This encourages false whistleblowers to lie under oath. Women used fabricated injuries to amplify false sexual assault cases. A thorough history, as well as, an early detailed physical examination, will aid in the association of injuries and the formation of a final opinion and report.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to express heartfelt appreciation to all of the co-authors for their invaluable contributions and assistance in making the present article article a reality.
Reference
| 1. | Carone DA, Bush SS. (2013). Introduction: Historical perspectives on mild traumatic brain injury, symptom validity assessment, and malingering. In D. A. Carone & S. S. Bush (Eds.), Mild traumatic brain injury: Symptom validity assessment and malingering (pp. 1-29). Springer Publishing Company.
| 2. | Kumar K, Sharma A, Singh JP, Basra S, Singh JP. Pattern of fabricated injuries in medicolegal assault cases. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2021;11(9):1022-26.
[ CrossRef] | 3. | Naik SK, Atal DK, Murari A, Balwantray JK. Fabrication of sexual assault: A case report. Journal of Clinical Pathology and Forensic Medicine. 2010;1(3):35-37.
| 4. | Aggrawal A. Forensic and Medico-Legal aspects of sexual crimes and unusual sexual practices. CRC Press; 2008.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 5. | White D, Du Mont J. Visualizing sexual assault: An exploration of the use of optical technologies in the medico-legal context. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(1):01-08; discussion 9-11. Doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.054. Epub 2008 Oct 24. PMID: 18952339.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 6. | Lopez HN, Focseneanu MA, Merritt DF. Genital injuries acute evaluation and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;48:28-39.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 7. | Karasu T. Role of Medical experts in criminal justice system. J of Karnataka Medico Legal Society. 2016;12(1):5.
| 8. | Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. “wound”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 16 Dec. 2022. https://www.britannica.com/science/wound. Accessed 6 March 2023.
| 9. | Vidhate GS, Pathak HM, Parchake MB, Patil SS, Tasgaonkar GV, Sukhadeve RB. Fabricated or assault wounds-a scientific approach. International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine. 2016;6:167-70.
| 10. | Dass-Brailsford P. A Practical Approach to Trauma: Empowering Interventions. Sage; 2007.
[ CrossRef] | 11. | George PM, Lyckman AW, LaVan DA, Hegde A, Leung Y, Avasare R, et al. Fabrication and biocompatibility of polypyrrole implants suitable for neural prosthetics. Biomaterials. 2005;26(17):3511-19.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 12. | Gray-Eurom K, Seaberg DC, Wears RL. The prosecution of sexual assault cases: Correlation with forensic evidence. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39(1):39-46.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 13. | 2020, NCRB data. False rape data by NCRB. s.l.: National Crime Records Bureau, 2020.
| 14. | Lodhia S. From “living corpse” to India’s daughter: Exploring the social, political and legal landscape of the 2012 Delhi gang rape. Womens Studies International Forum. 2015;50:89-101.
[ CrossRef] | 15. | Mukherjee C, Rustagi P, Krishnaji N. Crimes against Women in India: Analysis of official statistics. Economic and Political Weekly. 2001;36(43):4070-80. http:// www.jstor.org/stable/4411293.
| 16. | Subba S, Solanki RS, Bhattacharya B. False case and vexatious litigation and its impacts in the socio-legal perspective in India: Problems & solutions. J Arch Egyptol [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Mar. 6];17(7):9348-63. Available from: https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/3887.
| 17. | Deswal V. Burking of crimes by refusal to register fir in cognizable offences. Journal of the Indian Law Institute. 2013;55(3):361-75. http://www.jstor.org/ stable/43953675.
| 18. | Rawat MA, Yadav MA. Rape in connubial relationship: A myth or reality. Think India Journal. 2019;22(14):8137-51.
| 19. | Kassin SM, Meissner CA, Norwick RJ. “I’d know a false confession if I saw one”: A comparative study of college students and police investigators. Law Hum Behav. 2005;29(2):211-27. Doi: 10.1007/s10979-005-2416-9.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 20. | Gaur KD. (2001). Textbook on the Indian Penal Code (2 nd ed.) Universal Law Publication.
| 21. | Jubae SMOF, Nayeem Md B. The public justice and false evidence related offenses under penal code, 1860: A penal discussion. World Bulletin of Management and Law. 2021.
| 22. | Mohanty, Advocate Chikirsha. SECTION 211 IPC- Indian Penal Code-False charge of offence made with intent to injure. s.l.: LAWRATO, 01 Mar, 2023. IPC Section 211-False charge of offence made with intent to injure-Punishment and bail (lawrato.com).
| 23. | Khichi ZH, Humayun M, Prithiani KK, Akbar QM, Kaheri GQ. Changing pattern of fabricated injuries in Larkana region. Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad: JAMC. 2009;21(3):76-78.
| 24. | Bhullar DS. Profile and pattern of fabricated injuries by Mechanical Violence in GGS Medical College, Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine. 2007;29(1):31-34.
| 25. | Kumar K, Kaul M, Mittal DR, Tyagi S, Pawar CK, Kumar A, et al. A study to determine various parameters of an alleged fabricated injury. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2017;16:55-65.
[ CrossRef] | 26. | Bhullar DS. Profile and pattern of fabricated injuries by Mechanical Violence in GGS Medical College, Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine. 2006;28(1):31-34.
| 27. | White C, McLean I. Adolescent complainants of sexual assault; injury patterns in virgin and non virgin groups. Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine. 2006;13(4):172-80.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 28. | Palmer CM, McNulty AM, D’Este C, Donovan B. Genital injuries in women reporting sexual assault. Sex Health. 2004;1(1):55-59. Doi: 10.1071/sh03004. PMID: 16335297.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 29. | Rassin E, van der Sleen J. Characteristics of true versus false allegations of sexual offences. Psychological Reports. 2005;97(2):589-98. https://doi.org/10.2466/ pr0.97.2.589-598.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 30. | Bhat Wahid. Rape cases that proved false in India. s.l.: Groud Report, December 8, 2022. Rape cases that proved false in India (groundreport.in). |
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62489.17942
Date of Submission: Dec 26, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jan 21, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Mar 25, 2023
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2023
AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA
PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 27, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jan 26, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Mar 23, 2023 (18%)
ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin
|