Year :
2023
| Month :
June
| Volume :
17
| Issue :
6
| Page :
ZC60 - ZC66
Full Version
The Prevalence of Malocclusion among Six-and Nine-year-old School-going Children of Visakhapatnam: A Cross-sectional Study
Published: June 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60457.18120
Usha Kiran Vudata, Narsimha Rao V Vanga, Srinivas Kumar Chandrabhatla
1. Assistant Professor, Department of Dental Surgery, Rangaraya Medical College, Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh, India.
2. Professor and Head, Department of Paediatric Dentistry, GITAM Dental College, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
3. Professor, Department of Paediatric Dentistry, GITAM Dental College, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Usha Kiran Vudata,
Department of Paediatric Dentistry, GITAM Dental College, Visakhapatnam-530045, Andhra Pradesh, India.
E-mail: ushadrkiran@gmail.com
Abstract
Introduction: Malocclusion profoundly impacts a child’s emotional well-being and affects an individual’s quality of life. Early identification improves the chances of organising preventive and interceptive treatment to limit the intensity of developmental aberrations. The data for malocclusion among children of Visakhapatnam is lacking.
Aim: To study and evaluate the prevalence of malocclusion and ascertain gender dimorphism among six and nine-year-old school-going children of Visakhapatnam
Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional, double-stage sample study was conducted among 616 school-going children of Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India, by a single calibrated examiner using a modified Index for Preventive and Interceptive Orthodontic Needs (IPION). IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 25.0, was used to analyse data and Pearson’s Chi-square test to elicit gender differences in the prevalence of malocclusion traits.
Results: Prevalence among six-year-old children: interproximal caries-38.4%, premature tooth loss-10.1%, supernumerary teeth-0.3%, upper molar rotation-0.3%, lower molar tipping-2%, anterior crossbite-2.7%, posterior crossbite-0.7%, overjet more than 3 mm-5.1%, overbite more than 2/3rd-8.4%, open bite-2%, incompetent lips-13.8%. Prevalence among nine-year-old children: interproximal caries-49.5%, premature tooth loss-8.8%, active frenum-2.8%, supernumerary teeth-0.6%, diastema-3.4%, upper molar rotation-2.2%, lower molar tipping-5%, impended eruption of first permanent molar-1.3%, overjet more than 3 mm-11%, overbite more than 2/3rd-12.5%, open bite-2.2%, anterior crossbite-8.2%, posterior crossbite tendency-3.1%, Class I-75.6%, Class II-18.8%, Class III (functional shift)-0.6%, Class III (no functional shift)-3.76%, incompetent lips-16.3%.
Conclusion: Children from both cohorts demonstrated malocclusion traits. The nine-year-old group had greater prevalence for all components examined except premature tooth loss. No statistically significant gender dimorphism was found in both cohorts.
Keywords
Diastema, Open bite, Overbite, Supernumerary, Tooth loss
Introduction
According to Edward H Angle, in studying a case of malocclusion, give no thought to the methods of treatment or appliances until the case shall have been classified and if, all peculiarities and variations from the normal in type, occlusion, and facial lines have been thoroughly comprehended, then the requirements and proper plan of treatment become apparent (1).
Early orthodontic treatment is conceivably easy to perform, consumes less time, and is pocket friendly. Such interceptive measures may not always lead to a final result but do contribute to a considerable lessening of further orthodontic treatment need in children (2). The clinical guidelines by the American Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (AAPD) also draw attention to the fact that ‘early diagnosis and successful treatment of the developing malocclusion can have both short-term and long-term benefits along with functional harmony and dentofacial aesthetics’ (3).
Globally, malocclusion ranges between 39-98% (4),(5),(6),(7). India has an estimated 20-43% of children (4) demonstrating malocclusion and 31.4% (7) of them are from the southern macro-region. Children aged 4-6 years particularly, had a high prevalence of overjet and overbite (81.6% and 84.5%, respectively) (5), with a majority of them showing deviations like lower anterior crowding, crossbites, open bite, and pseudo-Class III during the early mixed dentition (6).
Establishing credible evaluation methods for malocclusion is a difficult and daunting task (8). Though several indices have been developed to organise malocclusion into relevant groups, none of them ensure an all-inclusive criterion (9). Some of these indices like the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI), Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN), and Index of Complexity Outcome and Need (ICON) include a subjective method (9) to evaluate malocclusion, but studies [10,11] have shown that parents and patients cannot efficiently assess such subjective traits at an early age and may not comprehend their long-term implications. Trained clinicians can diagnose these problems and intercept or prevent most of them.
The IPION is a valid, quick, and easy-to-use tool that permits early detection of malocclusion with minimal subjectivity (12),(13),(14). It is the sole index that records malocclusion traits specifically in children aged six and nine years (12). These cohorts are important in dentofacial development because the age of six years marks the beginning of mixed dentition and the age of nine years heralds the eruption of the canine-premolar group of teeth. So, these age groups benefit the most from early orthodontic interventions (15).
There has been a particularly growing interest and an increasing demand for orthodontic services (15). Though studies [3-5] have reported malocclusion among Indian children using various indices, such data is lacking in this geographic region for children in mixed dentition. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to ascertain malocclusion among six and nine-year-old school children using IPION. The null hypothesis was that school-going children aged six and nine years did not have malocclusion traits and the alternate hypothesis was that these children did demonstrate such characteristics. Hence, the present study aimed to study the prevalence of malocclusion among school-going children of Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India, aged six and nine years and also, to determine gender dimorphism for the examined malocclusion traits for both age groups.
Material and Methods
A cross-sectional double-stage sample study was conducted among six and nine-year-old school-going children of Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India, for 15 months (December 2018 to February 2020). The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee.
Sample size calculation: The sample size was calculated based on the formula (Daniel 1999) n=Z2P(1-P)/d2 {confidence level (Z)=95%, expected prevalence (P)=0.05, and, the margin of (d)=5%} (16). As there was no previously reported data regarding malocclusion among the target population, the probability was set at 50% and the minimum sample size of 384 was arrived at. Using the two-stage stratified random sampling method, 24 schools representing all the constituency areas of Visakhapatnam were selected in the first stage. In stage two, children aged six years (5.9-7 years) and nine years (8.6-9.6 years) (8) were chosen from the selected schools. Permission and informed consent were obtained from the concerned school authorities and parents. Following universal precautions and infection control procedures based on the World Health Organisation (WHO) Oral Survey Basic Methods (17) and abiding by the World Medical Association (WMA) Declaration of Helsinki, a single, calibrated examiner conducted the study.
Inclusion criteria: Children aged six and nine years enrolled in the schools of Visakhapatnam were included in the study.
Exclusion criteria:
• Children of ages other than six and nine years enrolled in the schools of Visakhapatnam.
• From the age groups of six and nine years, children who were not willing to participate in the study, children who were undergoing orthodontic treatment at the time of the study, and children with congenital craniofacial abnormalities, were excluded from the study.
Study Procedure
The IPION screens children in their mixed dentition and determines the need for preventive and interceptive orthodontic treatment need (12),(13),(14),(18). The components examined for both cohorts are listed in (Table/Fig 1). Children were called out based on the roll call of their respective classes and were made to rinse their mouths before the examination. They were examined at their school premises in well-lit classrooms or corridors (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3) using a mouth mirror and an explorer (Type 3 examination) (17).
Originally, Coetzee CE and de Muelenaere KR used a custom-built plastic IPION ruler for measuring the malocclusion traits (13). In the present study, while all components were examined and evaluated based on the IPION criteria, two of them were modified (evaluation of upper molar rotation and lower molar tipping) for ease of clinical application. Following the premature loss of a 61maxillary primary molar, rotation of the upper permanent molar from the same quadrant was ascertained when an imaginary line extending between the distobuccal cusp and mesiolingual cusp of the maxillary first permanent molar crossed distal to the contact point of contralateral primary first and second molars. Disposable wooden spatulas (19) were used to create this imaginary line in the maxillary arch of the child’s oral cavity (Table/Fig 4). Following premature loss of a mandibular primary molar, tipping of the lower first permanent molar of the same quadrant was evaluated. A metal scale was modified to measure an acute angulation of 15o (Table/Fig 5). The metal scales were used as: a) They could be easily/accurately modified from a conventional metal scale to reflect the 15° inclination; b) They could be easily cleaned and sterilised after each survey day; c) Would not break or have wear-and-tear during the long survey period of the current study. This scale was held parallel to the gingival margins of the mandibular teeth in that quadrant and when the long axis of the mandibular first permanent molar was inclined more than 15o mesially, it was recorded as a tipped mandibular first permanent molar (Table/Fig 6). After examination, scores were recorded on a separate datasheet for each child. At the end of each survey day, the final score for each child was calculated and the data was transferred to separate Excel sheets for both cohorts (Microsoft® excel® 2019 MSO, version 2211). The sample selection and distribution has been given in (Table/Fig 7).
Statistical Analysis
Once the survey was completed, data was analysed using IBM SPSS. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2017 version 25.0, for computation of prevalence rate of the recorded malocclusion traits in both age groups. Pearson’s Chi-square test (significant if p<0.05) was used to evaluate gender differences. Additionally, Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare means of the variables. Wilcoxon W-test and z-test were used to compare the group means (significant, if p<0.05). All applicable Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were adhered to (20).
Results
A total of 616 children {297 children from the six-year-old group (male-168 children, female-129 children) and 319 children from the nine-year-old group (male-160 children, female-159 children)-(Table/Fig 7)} were evaluated during this study. Children from both cohorts demonstrated malocclusion and therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected. The study results are tabulated in (Table/Fig 8),(Table/Fig 9). The observations from (Table/Fig 8) reflect that the examined six-year-old children demonstrated a particular prevalence for the primary component (interproximal caries-38.4%, and early tooth loss-10.1%) and the soft tissue components of IPION (lip incompetency-13.9%) along with overjet (5.1%) and overbite (8.5%). Supernumerary teeth (0.3% and crossbites (anterior crossbite-2.7% and posterior crossbite-0.7%) were also noted. The observations from (Table/Fig 9) show that approximately half of the examined nine-year-old children (49.5%) had interproximal caries, 7.2% had an anterior crossbite, 3.1% showed a posterior crossbite and 1.3% of them had impended eruption of first permanent molar. The older group of children also demonstrated an increased prevalence for all the examined components except for early tooth loss. (Table/Fig 10) shows the comparative prevalence of malocclusion traits between the six and nine-year-old. No statistically significant gender dimorphism was seen in both cohorts (p-value >0.05).
Discussion
Early identification of malocclusion improves the chances of organising preventive and interceptive treatments (7). Recording metric parameters during mixed dentition stages aids to differentiate between conditions that self-correct and a few others that may progress into serious functional and physical handicaps (21). Characteristics like overjet, overbite, and crossbites can be rectified with simple methods and reduce the need for further treatment (15).
Interproximal caries and premature loss of primary teeth were evaluated in both cohorts. Proximal caries compromises arch circumference and may jeopardise the space available for succedaneous teeth (3),(11),(22). Chewing efficiency is directly proportional to the number of occlusal contact areas and influences masticatory performance. The ensuing deviations in muscular activity lead to variations in arch growth and verticle jaw dimensions (22). Similarly, early loss of one or more primary teeth results in an estimated three-fold increase in orthodontic treatment need (1).
The current study found that the primary mandibular first molar most frequently demonstrated interproximal caries in both cohorts, similar to the findings by Rapeepattana S et al., and Tungaraza JP et al., [14,18]. The tooth lost early was the primary maxillary first molar in the six-year-old group and the primary mandibular second molar in the nine-year-old group. Karaiskos N et al., (23) reported similar results for the six-year-old group and in the nine-year-old group, the results match the findings of studies from Philadelphia, Thailand, and Tanzania (Table/Fig 11) (12),(14),(15),(18),(23),(24).
Approximately, 1/3rd of the primary dentition with a supernumerary tooth demonstrate one such tooth in their permanent dentition too and in about 2% of the population, maxillary incisors are impacted or ectopically erupted due to a supernumerary tooth (3). Such teeth may also hinder normal eruption of the succedaneous teeth, cause over-retention of deciduous teeth, root deflection, tooth displacement, diastema, aberrant root resorption, or cystic lesions. The findings of the current study (Table/Fig 12) are at par with the global prevalence of 0.3-0.8% in the primary dentition and 0.52% to 2% in the mixed dentition (6),(12),(14),(15),(25),(26),(27),(28).
A diastema of 2 mm is a common finding in children (26%) and shows spontaneous closure. But a diastema of more than 2 mm may not close spontaneously and is seen in about 6% of adolescents and adults (1),(3) with a global prevalence ranging from 12.2-38.18% (12),(14),(25). The current study found it to be 3.4% in the nine-year-old group (girls-0.9%, boys-2.5%). This greater prevalence among boys as compared to girls is in agreement with Babler-Zeltmann S et al., but in contradiction to studies in the Indian population (25),(26),(27). A thick, abnormal labial frenum could be an aetiological factor for midline diastema. The prevalence of an active labial frenum in the nine-year-old children of the current study are similar to the findings by Rauten AM et al., (15).
Literature mentions several methods to assess upper molar rotation like plaster models (29), photocopies of plaster models (29), and panoramic and lateral cephalograms (30). For lower molar tipping, techniques like plaster models (29), and panoramic radiographs (30) have been used. In the present study, a novel modification was used for an easier clinical appraisal (detailed in methodology). The nine-year-old children demonstrated an increased prevalence for both these parameters. This could be due to the time elapsed after premature loss and also the lack of space management interventions. Furthermore, the effects of premature loss of primary second molars could be different at the ages of 6, 7, and 8 years (31). Haider Z reported an upper molar rotation of 7.41% and lower molar tipping of 9.26% in nine-year-old children (12). The higher prevalence reported by Rapeepattana S et al., (upper molar rotation-13.7%, lower molar tipping-23.1%) could be due to the greater incidence of interproximal caries (91.6%) and premature loss of primary second molar (24.5%) in that study population (14).
Impended eruption of first permanent molars was seen in 1.3% of nine-year-old children of the current study. Babler-Zeltmann S et al., reported delayed eruption of the first permanent molar in 1.4% of nine-year-old children (25), while Arathi R et al., reported delayed eruption of all first permanent molars in a nine-year-old female child (32). Crossbites may alter skeletal growth pattern, compromise arch perimeter, damage periodontal tissues, and lead to temporomandibular disorder or pseudo-Class III. As age increases, differential diagnosis becomes difficult and treatment outcomes are less favourable (31). Early detection and management are vital because lesser than 10% of functional crossbites are self-correcting (3). Globally, anterior crossbites range from 2.2-30.7% (13),(15),(18),(24),(25),(33) and posterior crossbites from 4.3-17% in children aged 6-10 years [13,14,34]. The higher prevalence of crossbites observed in older group children was in agreement with studies in this region of India (4),(5) and reiterates the importance of early identification of any developing malocclusion (Table/Fig 13) (5),(6),(8),(14),(15),(18),(24),(25),(33),(34),(35).
An overjet of more than 8 mm increases the prevalence of traumatic dental injuries by about 40% (3). While digit sucking and pacifier use increase the chances of anterior open bite (3),(31), a deep overbite may cause eustachian tube dysfunction (36). Keski-Nisula K et al., attributed an anterior open bite of 4.6% among children aged 4-7.8 years to the significantly greater use of pacifiers (33). Olatokunbo da Costa O et al., found an overjet of 44.6% among six and 12-year-old children and attributed it to the greater incidence of digit sucking among those children (34). The global prevalence of overjet and the relation of anterior teeth in the verticle direction (overbite and open bite) differs based on the demographics of the region (Table/Fig 14) (4),(5),(8),(14),(18),(24),(26),(33),(34),(35),(37). The findings from the current study are comparable to results by Ibrahim MM in age-matched children (24).
An ideal occlusion during childhood results in an ideal occlusion during adulthood. Class I interdigitation is the most desirable occlusion with normal skeletal, soft tissue profile and favorable sagittal relationship. Class II demonstrates a convex profile and Class III shows excessive mandibular growth. Some features which can influence the dental arch status in mid-adolescent stage can be easily recognised during transitional dentition (1). Results from the current study and other studies for anteroposterior molar relation are listed in (Table/Fig 15) (5),(6),(15),(24),(27),(37).
Equilibrium between intraoral and extraoral muscles influences the developing dentition and affects tooth eruption. Incompetent lips predispose the maxillary incisors to traumatic dental injury (31) and alter the jaw posture at rest, leading to variation in lip-tongue equilibrium and altered occlusal forces (11). The findings of the present study for the prevalence of lip incompetency (Table/Fig 16) are in agreement with other studies among 6 to 11-year-old children (14),(18),(34). The higher prevalence (43.6%) found among 6- and 12-year-old Nigerian children (34) could be due to the greater incidence of deleterious oral habits found in them.
The findings of the present study highlight the need to evaluate children in their early stages of growth and follow them till the completion of growth. This enables the application of preventive and interceptive methods to avert or minimise any developing malocclusion identified among the population of this region. This is the first study conducted in India to examine malocclusion characteristics and evaluate treatment needs among children in their mixed dentition using IPION. Of all the studies done worldwide using this index, the present study has examined and reported all the components of IPION that reflect a developing malocclusion in children. Such evaluation aids in patient and parent education. The data from the present study contributes to establishing a baseline for further longitudinal studies, evaluation of causative factors of malocclusion, and planning and implementation of any preventive and interceptive treatment methods necessary.
Limitation(s)
Radiographic evaluation (for detection of supernumerary and unerupted permanent teeth) and appraisal of deleterious oral habits (to ascertain the causes of some of the malocclusion characteristics) were not done in the present study.
Conclusion
Both cohorts demonstrated malocclusion and no gender dimorphism was detected. Nearly half of the nine-year-old children had interproximal caries and about 1.3% had impended eruption of first permanent molars. Mandibular teeth showed greater premature loss compared to the maxillary teeth in both age groups. Crossbites and supernumerary teeth were also detected which mandate action as and when detected. The nine-year-old children showed greater prevalence for all the examined components except premature tooth loss. This emphasises the importance of early detection of any developing malocclusion characteristics. The novel modifications of IPION to evaluate molar rotation and tipping are easier to use clinically. Conclusively, the present study reflects the malocclusion status in the examined cohorts and signifies the need for preventive and interceptive orthodontic treatments among them.
Reference
| 1. | Donald J Ferguson. Growth of the Face and Dental Arches. In: Dean JA, Avery DR, McDonald RE. Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent. 9th ed. Boston: Mosby; 2011:510-613.
[ CrossRef] | 2. | Ambashikar VR, Kangne S, Ambekar A, Marure P, Joshi Y, Khanapure C. Interceptive orthodontics-what? why? when? Maharashtra Institute of Dental Sciences & Research, Latur. MIDSR J Dent Res. 2018;1(2):26-31.
| 3. | American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Management of the developing dentition and occlusion in pediatric dentistry. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry. Chicago, Ill.: American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry; 2021:408-25.
| 4. | Shivakumar KM, Chandu GN, Subba Reddy VV, Shafiulla MD. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment needs among middle and high school children of Davangere city, India by using Dental Aesthetic Index. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2009;27(4):211-18.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 5. | Bhayya DP, Shyagali TR, Dixit UB, Shivaprakash. Study of occlusal characteristics of primary dentition and the prevalence of maloclusion in 4 to 6 years old children in India. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012;9(5):619-23.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 6. | Reddy ER, Manjula M, Sreelakshmi N, Rani ST, Aduri R, Patil BD. Prevalence of Malocclusion among 6 to 10 Year old Nalgonda School Children. J Int Oral Health. 2013;5(6):49-54.
| 7. | Ghafari M, Bahadivand-Chegini S, Nadi T, Doosti-Irani A. The global prevalence of dental healthcare needs and unmet dental needs among adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiol Health. 2019;41:e2019046.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 8. | Hill PA. The prevalence and severity of malocclusion and the need for orthodontic treatment in 9-, 12-, and 15-year-old Glasgow schoolchildren. Br J Orthod. 1992;19(2):87-96.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 9. | Agarwal A, Mathur R. An overview of orthodontic indices. World J Dent. 2012;3(1):77-86.
[ CrossRef] | 10. | Aldrigui JM, Abanto J, Carvalho TS, Mendes FM, Wanderley MT, Bönecker M, et al. Impact of traumatic dental injuries and malocclusions on quality of life of young children. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9:01-07.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 11. | Ackerman JL, Proffit WR. Preventive and interceptive orthodontics: A strong theory proves weak in practice. Angle Orthod. 1980;50(2):75-87.
| 12. | Haider Z. An epidemiologic survey of early orthodontic treatment need in Philadelphia pediatric dental patients using the Index for Preventive and Interceptive Orthodontic Needs (IPION) [dissertation] Philadelphia, PA: Temple University; 2013.
| 13. | Coetzee CE, de Muelenaere KR. Development of an index for preventive and interceptive orthodontic needs (IPION). International Association for Dental Research; XXXI Scientific Session of the South African Division; XI Scientific Session of the East and Southern African Section; 1997. Abstract 83.
| 14. | Rapeepattana S, Suntornlohanakul S, Thearmontree A. Orthodontic treatment needs of children with high caries using Index for Preventive and Interceptive Orthodontic Needs (IPION). Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019;20(4):351-58.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 15. | Rauten AM, Georgescu C, Popescu MR, Maglaviceanu CF, Popescu D, Gheorghe D, et al. Orthodontic treatment needs in mixed dentition-for children of 6 and 9-year-old. Rom J Oral Rehab. 2016;1(8):28-39.
| 16. | Naing L, Winn TB, Rusli BN. Practical issues in calculating the sample size for prevalence studies. Arch Orofac Sci. 2006;1:09-14.
| 17. | Petersen PE, Baez RJ. Oral Health Surveys-Basic Methods. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2013:33-56.
| 18. | Tungaraza JP, Mtaya-Mlangwa M, Mugonzibwa AE. Assessment of early orthodontic treatment need and its relationship with sociodemographic characteristics among Tanzanian children using index for preventive and interceptive orthodontic treatment need. Int J Orthod Rehabil. 2019;10(2):57-64.
[ CrossRef] | 19. | Monte-Santo AS, Viana SVC, Moreira KMS, Imparato JCP, Mendes FM, Bonini GA. Prevalence of early loss of primary molar and its impact in school children’s quality of life. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018;28(6):595-601.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 20. | von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453-57.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 21. | Bishara SE, Bayati P, Jakobsen JR. Longitudinal comparisons of dental arch changes in normal and untreated Class-II, Division 1 subjects and their clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110(5):483-89.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 22. | Luzzi V, Fabbrizi M, Coloni C, Mastrantoni C, Mirra C, BossÙ M, et al. Experience of dental caries and its effects on early dental occlusion: A descriptive study. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2011;2(1-2):13-18.
| 23. | Karaiskos N, Wiltshire WA, Odlum O, Brothwell D, Hassard TH. Preventive and interceptive orthodontic treatment needs of an inner-city group of 6-and 9-year-old Canadian children. J Can Dent Assoc. 2005;71(9):649-49e.
| 24. | Ibrahim MM. Preventive and interceptive orthodontic treatment needs of 6 to 9 years old egyptian children (prevalence cross-sectional study). EC Dental Science. 2018;17:1009-25.
| 25. | Babler-Zeltmann S, Kretschmer I, Göz G. Malocclusion and the need for orthodontic treatment in 9-year-old children. Survey based on the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare Scale. J Orofac Orthop. 1998;59(4):193-201.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 26. | Singh A, Purohit B, Sequeira P, Acharya S, Bhat M. Malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need measured by the dental aesthetic index and its association with dental caries in Indian school children. Community Dent Health. 2011;28(4):313-16.
| 27. | Kumar DA, Varghese RK, Chaturvedi SS, Agrawal C, Fating C, Makkad RS. Prevalence of malocclusion among children and adolescents residing in orphanages of Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India. J Adv Oral Res. 2012;3(3):21-28.
[ CrossRef] | 28. | Siddegowda R, Satish RM. The prevalence of malocclusion and its gender distribution among Indian school children: An epidemiological survey. SRM J Res Dent Sci. 2014;5(4):224-29.
[ CrossRef] | 29. | Chung CH, Goldman AM. Dental tipping and rotation immediately after surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25(4):353-58.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 30. | Lindskog-Stokland B, Hansen K, Tomasi C, Hakeberg M, Wennström JL. Changes in molar position associated with missing opposed and/or adjacent tooth: A 12-year study in women. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39(2):136-43.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 31. | Christensen JR, Fields H, Sheats RD. Treatment planning and management of orthodontic problems. In: Nowak A, Christensen JR, Mabry TR, Townsend JA, Wells MH. Pediatric Dentistry Infancy Through Adolescence 6th ed. Pennsylvania: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2019. Pp 512-70.
[ CrossRef] | 32. | Arathi R, Suprabha BS, Pai SM. Permanent molars: Delayed development and eruption. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006;24 Suppl 1:S15-17.
| 33. | Keski-Nisula K, Lehto R, Lusa V, Keski-Nisula L, Varrela J. Occurrence of malocclusion and need of orthodontic treatment in early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124(6):631-38.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 34. | Olatokunbo daCosta O, Aikins EA, Isiekwe GI, Adediran VE. Malocclusion and early orthodontic treatment requirements in the mixed dentitions of a population of Nigerian children. J Orthod Sci. 2016;5(3):81-89.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 35. | Schopf P. Indication for and frequency of early orthodontic therapy or interceptive measures. J Orofac Orthop. 2003;64(3):186-200.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 36. | McDonnell JP, Needleman HL, Charchut S, Allred EN, Roberson DW, Kenna MA, et al. The relationship between dental overbite and eustachian tube dysfunction. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(2):310-16.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 37. | Mtaya M, Brudvik P, Astrøm AN. Prevalence of malocclusion and its relationship with socio-demographic factors, dental caries, and oral hygiene in 12-to 14-year-old Tanzanian school children. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31(5):467-76. [ CrossRef] [ PubMed] |
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60457.18120
Date of Submission: Sep 28, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Nov 30, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jan 25, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jun 01, 2023
AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes
PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 29, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jan 19, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jan 24, 2023 (2%)
ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin
EMENDATIONS: 7
|