JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 2612

Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri

"The Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) has been in operation since almost a decade. It has contributed a huge number of peer reviewed articles, across a spectrum of medical disciplines, to the medical literature.
Its wide based indexing and open access publications attracts many authors as well as readers
For authors, the manuscripts can be uploaded online through an easily navigable portal, on other hand, reviewers appreciate the systematic handling of all manuscripts. The way JCDR has emerged as an effective medium for publishing wide array of observations in Indian context, I wish the editorial team success in their endeavour"



Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri
Faculty, Pediatric Medicine
Super Speciality Paediatric Hospital and Post Graduate Teaching Institute, Noida
On Sep 2018




Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dematolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : July | Volume : 18 | Issue : 7 | Page : WD01 - WD03 Full Version

An Unusual Presentation of Co-existence of Leprosy, Anetoderma and Abdominal Tuberculosis: A Case Report

Published: July 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/69245.19577

Shreya Nirajkumar Gupta, Meenakshi Chandak, Adarshlata Singh, Bhushan Madke, Sugat Jawade

1. Junior Resident, Department of Dermatology, Datta Meghe Instiute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of Dermatology, Datta Meghe Instiute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor, Department of Dermatology, Datta Meghe Instiute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 4. Professor, Department of Dermatology, Datta Meghe Instiute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 5. Professor, Department of Dermatology, Datta Meghe Instiute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Shreya Nirajkumar Gupta,
Datta Meghe Instiute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi, Wardha-442107, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: sngsng2096@gmail.com

Abstract

Leprosy and Tuberculosis (TB), both significant mycobacterial infections, often affect populations with lowered specific immunity. TB is a widespread and life-threatening mycobacterial infection. Co-infection of these diseases is uncommon in routine clinical practice, adding complexity to diagnosis and treatment planning. However, instances of co-existence suggest a potential cross-immunity theory. Leprosy, known for its varied presentations, can manifest as an asymptomatic secondary presentation of anetoderma, characterised by elastinolysis-induced loose sac-like appearances. This case report presents a middle-aged man in his late 30s undergoing Anti-Tubercular Treatment (AKT) for abdominal tuberculosis, who presented with signs of Erythema Nodosum Leprosum (ENL) and small asymptomatic atrophied macules on his trunk and back in the Dermatology department. Through comprehensive history, clinical examination, slit skin smear, and biopsy, authors elucidated a rare case of co-infection of leprosy and atypical cutaneous manifestations as anetoderma, concomitant with abdominal tuberculosis.

Keywords

Atrophied macules, Cutaneous manifestations, Reinfection, Relapse, Tuberculoid leprosy

Case Report
A 37-year-old male visited the Dermatology Outpatient Department (OPD) with complaints of fever, tingling, and asymptomatic red lesions over both limbs, back, and trunk for 15 days (Table/Fig 1). In the past, the patient confirmed being a diagnosed case of Borderline Tuberculoid leprosy almost three years back and had completed a one-year treatment of Multibacillary Multidrug Treatment (MBMDT). Since then, he had not experienced any symptoms of Hansen’s disease.

The current macular lesions, which appeared on new sites, were not involved when he was previously diagnosed with Hansen’s disease. He was also a chronic alcoholic and had been diagnosed with abdominal tuberculosis, confirmed on Ultrasonography (USG) guided ascitic fluid cytology, showing raised Adenosine Deaminase (ADA) levels (86.77 IU/mL, cut-off titre: >40 IU/mL) (1),(2). He had been on Anti-Tubercular Drugs (AKT) for two months. A provisional diagnosis of lepra reaction was made, and he was prescribed oral steroids (prednisolone 20 mg daily) along with antacids (pantoprazole). The erythematous lesions resolved on follow-up after a week, but he still complained of tingling over limbs and sporadic fever episodes over the last two days. Upon general examination, new hypopigmented macules and papule lesions were observed over new sites (Table/Fig 2), along with old atrophied lesions on his back (Table/Fig 3). Gyanecomastia was also noted (Table/Fig 4). The clinical diagnosis was revised to Hansen’s disease with relapse, along with abdominal tuberculosis and anetoderma. Further investigations were advised for confirmation of anetoderma and relapse. Sensory tests for leprosy examination, including pinprick tests, cold-hot differentiation tests, and motor examinations like card, book, and pen tests, were not positive. There were no signs of nerve thickening or neuritis presentation upon palpation. Slit skin smear and biopsy from the hypopigmented macular and atrophied lesions were advised for histopathological examinations. The slit skin smear revealed +2 and +1 (as per Ridley’s logarithmic scale for Bacteriological index) (3) bacterial load from the earlobe and eyebrow, respectively. Histopathological findings from the atrophied lesion indicated fragmented elastic fibers with areas lacking elastic tissue, suggestive of anetoderma using Mason Trichrome stain (Table/Fig 5), and from the hypopigmented macular lesion, haematoxylin and eosin staining was consistent with Lepromatous leprosy (Table/Fig 6).

The patient was started on MBMDT drugs, including Clofazimine 300 mg, Ofloxacin 400 mg, and Dapsone 300 mg on the first day, followed by Clofazimine 50 mg and Dapsone 100 mg for 28 days, along with ongoing AKT treatment and 20 mg of prednisolone.

The ongoing AKT for the past two months, targeting abdominal tuberculosis, consisted of the HRZE regimen (Isoniazid 75 mg, Rifampicin 150 mg, Pyrazinamide 400 mg, and Ethambutol 275 mg), with 4 tablets a day prescribed based on the weight range.

Based on the history, cutaneous examination, and guidelines provided by the National Leprosy Eradication Program (NLEP), which states that “Recurrence of disease at any time after completion of full treatment of MBMDT, irrespective of their clinical status (4),(5), is a case of relapse,” this case was diagnosed as a relapse of Hansen’s disease and anetoderma co-existing with abdominal TB. However, whole gene sequencing is considered the gold standard for distinguishing reinfection from relapse of leprosy (6). Due to the unavailability of molecular testing at the present institution, further subtype differentiation couldn’t be obtained.
Discussion
Leprosy represents one of the oldest mycobacterial infections, impacting large populations. It manifests as an immune-mediated condition, presenting with diverse neurocutaneous involvement. Another disease caused by the mycobacteria genus is TB, which is the most prevalent infection, posing a threat to nearly 10 million lives (7),(8).

TB spreads through inhalation, causing both pulmonary and extrapulmonary manifestations. Research indicates potential cross-infections between Leprosy and TB, especially among populations of low socio-economic status or with limited access to healthcare services (9). While encountering both TB and Leprosy in the same endemic setting is rare, evidence of their co-existence is documented in the literature. Leprosy, known as a great imitator, can mimic various diseases and also serves as a secondary cause for a specific loose skin condition termed anetoderma (9),(10).

Anetoderma (relaxed skin in Greek) is an atrophic idiopathic condition mainly presenting as a loose wrinkled outpouching of skin. The reason for this is connective tissue weakening in the dermis and mid-dermal elastic tissue degeneration. It is classified into primary type, which is idiopathic, while secondary anetoderma is associated with an underlying pathology (11). Primary anetoderma exhibits macules on normal skin, while secondary anetoderma involves an inflammatory and infiltrative dermatosis. Secondary anetoderma is further categorised based on the presence or absence of inflammation. a) Schweninger-Buzzi anetoderma lacks preceding inflammation, whereas b) Jadassohn-Pellizzari anetoderma shows atrophic lesions after inflammation, appearing as small round to oval lesions of 0.5 to 1 cm, typically seen in individuals aged 20 to 40 years (12). Secondary anetoderma linked with dermatoses includes lupus erythematosus, acne vulgaris, tuberculosis, leprosy, and varicella. Though the exact cause remains unclear, evidence suggests elastin tissue breakdown. Diagnosis relies on clinical assessment, confirmed by histopathology, with no established treatment available.

The co-existence with active leprosy cases or misdiagnosis as leprosy necessitates histopathological confirmation (12). The coexistence of leprosy and TB can influence the clinical presentation of both, posing challenges in treatment regimens (13). Mangum L et al., discussed co-infections, noting TB as a common finding in borderline and lepromatous leprosy cases. Impaired cell-mediated immunity in multibacillary leprosy patients may predispose them to TB co-infection (14). A study proposed a cross-immunity link between TB and leprosy, emphasising the role of innate immunity in the broad-spectrum presentation of leprosy. Elevated proinflammatory cytokine responses like Interferon (IFN) gamma and Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF) alpha are crucial in leprosy, also detected in TB cases. Different mycobacterial strains can trigger an inflammatory response on Interleukin mediators, establishing a potential link between them (15). Individuals with immune TB might display some immunity to leprosy (13). Stefani MMA et al., stated the use of Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) distinguishes between relapse and reinfection in recurrent leprosy cases (6). They stated that relapse and reinfection cannot be differentiated clinically, and molecular genotyping of a predefined set of loci has limited resolution due to exceptional Mycobacterium leprae genome conservation and low sequence diversity between strains from the same geographical area. The clear evidence for reinfection is an unrelated strain of bacilli in the first and second diagnosis whereas the true relapses are due to minor strain difference (14). (Table/Fig 7) gives an overview of a comparison between the findings of the present case and cases reported in the past literature (16),(17). As per the NLEP, Disability Prevention, and Medical Rehabilitation Guidelines for Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Care issued by the Central Leprosy Division (2023) (5), the criteria for relapse is that the time since completion of treatment is usually more than three years and for a reaction, it is less than three years. The presented case had lesions over new places after approximately three years of initial MDMDT completion. Thus, on comparative analysis between the published reports by various authors and findings of the presented case, it is a relapse case of lepromatous leprosy with atrophied lesions of anetoderma co-existing with abdominal tuberculosis.
Conclusion
The significance of reporting this case is due to the rare co-existence of two mycobacterial diseases coupled with cutaneous degeneration of elastin fibers as a relapse of lepromatous leprosy, abdominal tuberculosis, along with anetoderma. This reporting will help treating physicians in diagnosing and planning the treatment for the same.
Acknowledgement
Dr. Sunil Kumar, Dr. Kishor Hiwale, Dr. Samarth Shukla, Dr. Preeti Mishra for their expert opinion on this case.
Reference
1.
Rao SD, Adusumalli S, Mazurek JA. Pulmonary hypertension in heart failure patients. Card Fail Rev. 2020r;6:e05.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
2.
Koff A, Azar MM. Diagnosing peritoneal tuberculosis. BMJ Case Rep. 2020;13(2):e233131.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
3.
Naik SM, More SA, Joshi SR. Correlation of histomorphological findings with bacteriological index in leprosy patients. Iranian J Pathol. 2022;17(1):48.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
4.
Kaimal S, Thappa DM. Relapse in leprosy. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2009;75(2):126-35.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
5.
National Leprosy Eradication Program. Disability Prevention & Medical Rehabilitation. Guidelines for Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Level Care. Nirman Bhavan: New Delhi Government of India: 2012.
6.
Stefani MMA, Avanzi C, Bührer-Sékula S, Benjak A, Loiseau C, Singh P, et al. Whole genome sequencing distinguishes between relapse and reinfection in recurrent leprosy cases. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(6):e0005598.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
7.
Shetty S, Umakanth S, Manandhar B, Nepali PB. Coinfection of leprosy and tuberculosis. BMJ Case Rep. 2018;2018:bcr2017222352.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
8.
Keragala BSDP, Herath HMMTB, Janapriya GHDC, Vanitha S, Balendran T, Janani T, et al. Coexistence of mycobacterial infections-Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium leprae-in Sri Lanka: A case series. J Med Case Reports. 2020;14(1):101.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
9.
Garg G, Gogia A, Kakar A. Leprosy: A great mimicking disease. Indian J Lepr. 2016;88(2):123-27.
10.
Parajuli N, Shrestha S, Lama L, Shrestha R, Tiwari S, Karki A. Multibacillary leprosy presenting as anetoderma in a young teenager. Case Rep Dermatol Med. 2020;2020:01-03.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
11.
Paller AS, Mancini AJ. Collagen Vascular Disorders. In: Hurwitz Clinical Pediatric Dermatology [Internet]. Elsevier; 2011. p. 497-527. Available from: https:// linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9781437704129000228.   [CrossRef]
12.
Razmi TM, Narang T, Chatterjee D, Dogra S, Saikia UN. Lepromatous leprosy masquerading as anetoderma in a boy. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2020;86(2):176-77.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed][Internet]. International textbook of leprosy 1
13.
st ed. American Leprosy Missions; 2016. [Cited 2023 Dec 20]. Available from: https://internationaltextbookofleprosy.org/.
14.
Mangum L, Kilpatrick D, Stryjewska B, Sampath R. Tuberculosis and leprosy coinfection: A perspective on diagnosis and treatment. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018;5(7):ofy133.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
15.
Crespo F, White J, Roberts C. Revisiting the tuberculosis and leprosy cross-immunity hypothesis: Expanding the dialogue between immunology and paleopathology. Int J Paleopathol. 2019;26:37-47.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
16.
Shen J, Yan L, Sun P. Clinical features of relapse after multidrug therapy for leprosy in China. Lepr Rev. 2015;86(2):165-69.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
17.
Chagas DF, Diniz LM, Lucas EA, Moraes MO de. Relapse in leprosy and drug resistance assessment in a tertiary hospital of the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2021;54:e0375-2020, S0037-86822021000100626.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
DOI and Others
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/69245.19577

Date of Submission: Dec 23, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Mar 09, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Apr 12, 2024
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 23, 2023
• Manual Googling: Mar 19, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Apr 10, 2024 (5%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 5
JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com