JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 82628

Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri

"The Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) has been in operation since almost a decade. It has contributed a huge number of peer reviewed articles, across a spectrum of medical disciplines, to the medical literature.
Its wide based indexing and open access publications attracts many authors as well as readers
For authors, the manuscripts can be uploaded online through an easily navigable portal, on other hand, reviewers appreciate the systematic handling of all manuscripts. The way JCDR has emerged as an effective medium for publishing wide array of observations in Indian context, I wish the editorial team success in their endeavour"



Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri
Faculty, Pediatric Medicine
Super Speciality Paediatric Hospital and Post Graduate Teaching Institute, Noida
On Sep 2018




Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dematolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : July | Volume : 18 | Issue : 7 | Page : UD01 - UD03 Full Version

Autonomic Cascade Secondary to Acute Urinary Retention in a Patient undergoing Open Reduction of Forearm Fracture under General Anaesthesia: A Case Report

Published: July 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/70706.19607

Lisa Barman, Chaitali Pandey, S Gowrishankar

1. Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 2. Postgraduate Student, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 3. Postgraduate Student, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Lisa Barman,
Department of Anaesthesiology, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak-24001, Haryana, India.
E-mail: barmanlisa8@gmail.com

Abstract

Acute Urinary Retention (UR) is a common perioperative complication with incidences between 5-70%. Orthopaedic patients tend to have this complication at a comparatively higher incidence rate (8-55%) than any other surgeries. Acute UR is multifactorial and can occur irrespective of any pre-existing urological condition. Acute distension due to UR is sometimes associated with comparatively rare manifestations of cardiovascular morbidity in the form of rhythm disturbances and massive haemodynamic alterations. In this case, a 62-year-old, 50 kg female with no co-morbidities was scheduled for open reduction of a fractured right forearm under General Anaesthesia (GA) in the supine position. Towards the end of the surgery, there was an abrupt change in the patient’s haemodynamics, starting from hypertension with tachycardia to hypotension with tachycardia followed by extreme bradycardia. A quick inspection revealed bladder overdistension due to the blockade of the urinary catheter. After saline flushing and decompression of the bladder, the haemodynamics returned to normal within five minutes. Acute bladder overdistension is a relatively benign complication that may prove fatal if not addressed promptly.

Keywords

Bradycardia, Cardiac arrhythmia, Intraoperative complication, Open fracture reduction, Orthopaedic procedures, Urinary catheterisation

Case Report
A 62-year-old, 50 kg female with a BMI of 24 kg/m2 and no co-morbidities was scheduled for open reduction and plate fixation of a right-sided both bone forearm fracture following a slip and fall incident. Her preoperative clinical assessment revealed no concerning findings. The patient’s investigation reports are presented in (Table/Fig 1).

Her electrocardiogram and chest X-ray were normal as shown in (Table/Fig 2). Initially, regional anaesthesia was planned, but the patient did not provide consent. After consultation with the orthopaedic surgeons and obtaining the patient’s consent, a decision was made to proceed with general anaesthesia for an expected duration of 2.5 hours. The patient was induced with intravenous administration of glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg, fentanyl 100 μg, propofol 100 mg, and atracurium 25 mg, followed by intubation. Mechanical ventilation was initiated in volume control mode, and the patient was catheterised for intraoperative urine output monitoring. Initial urine output after catheter placement was 50 mL. Baseline Blood Pressure (BP) and Heart Rate (HR) were recorded as 150/90 mmHg and 76/min, respectively. The patient remained haemodynamically stable intraoperatively, despite receiving three litres of crystalloid with urine output remaining at 70 mL. Analgesia was provided with intravenous paracetamol 1 gm and diclofenac 75 mg. The patient was maintained in a supine position throughout the surgery.

Towards the end of the procedure, the patient’s BP increased to 182/112 mmHg, accompanied by a heart rate of 112/min. Subsequently, BP abruptly dropped to 80/40 mmHg and did not respond to a rapid infusion of 500 mL crystalloid and intravenous mephentermine. Blood loss during surgery was estimated to be 150 mL, prompting initiation of nor adrenaline infusion at a rate of 2 μg/min to stabilise BP. With consecutive BP readings returning to normal range, nor adrenaline was discontinued. However, a subsequent BP reading after 10 minutes revealed a spike to 180/102 mmHg with the same nor adrenaline infusion rate. Nor adrenaline infusion was promptly stopped, and the following BP measurement taken after two minutes showed 60/40 mmHg with a heart rate of 138/min.

The patient experienced sudden bradycardia with an irregular heart rate of 36/min accompanied by multiple atrial ectopics. Atropine 0.6 mg was administered intravenously. Simultaneously, it was noted that the urobag collection remained at 70 mL after 2.5 hours of surgery. A brief abdominal examination indicated acute overdistention of the bladder. Following a saline flush in the catheter, 800 mL of urine was obtained in the urobag. The patient promptly recovered within seconds, and her haemodynamics returned to preoperative values within the next five minutes. The remainder of the surgery proceeded without any complications. Arterial blood gas analysis was within normal limits. The patient was successfully extubated and monitored for an hour in the Post Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU) without any adverse events before being transferred back to the ward. Cardiology consultation was requested to investigate any potential underlying cardiac conditions contributing to intraoperative haemodynamic instability. Echocardiography revealed a normal study with mild tricuspid regurgitation and a 60% ejection fraction.
Discussion
Acute bladder overdistension is a relatively common complication during and after surgery, with incidences varying widely between 5% and 70%. It is easily avoidable but often goes unnoticed (1). UR is the inability to void in the presence of a full bladder, requiring catheterisation. It can occur after any surgery, affecting patients of both genders and all ages, irrespective of previous history of urological problems (2). Orthopaedic patients have an increased risk of postoperative UR (8-55%) compared to other surgeries (3),(4),(5). Acute distension may lead to undesirable autonomic symptoms such as vomiting, hypotension, hypertension, cardiac dysrhythmias, or even asystole (6). The available literature primarily reviews lower limb surgeries, especially total joint arthroplasty of the knee and hip, creating a gap in knowledge regarding its relationship with upper limb surgeries and potentially skewing the data (7),(8),(9),(10),(11).

The incidence of UR is multifactorial, involving factors such as the type of anaesthesia, age, sex (with males being predominantly affected), associated co-morbidities of the patient, perioperative intravenous fluid administration, postoperative pain, requirement of analgesia, and opioids (12). The adult bladder’s capacity ranges between 400 and 600 mL. The patient experiences the first need to void at 150 mL, followed by an urge to void at 300 mL (12). General anaesthesia affects autonomic regulation of the detrusor, causing smooth muscle relaxation, leading to retention due to atony. The sympathetic “fight and flight” response to surgical pain stimulation also results in detrusor relaxation and bladder neck contraction, contributing to retention (2).

Urinary bladder distension causing autonomic disturbances can precipitate cardiac arrhythmias (13). In a case reported by Eggers GW Jr and Baker JJ, bladder overdistension precipitated multifocal ventricular tachycardia via neurogenic reflex (14). Yamaguchi Y et al., reported the appearance of bigeminy in a conscious 47-year-old diabetic patient secondary to overdistension (15). Gkoufa K et al., reported a rare case where an 85-year-old male patient with multiple co-morbidities, namely hypertension, type-2 diabetes mellitus, benign hypertrophy of the prostate, past history of stroke, suddenly developed complete Atrioventricular (AV) block and incomplete right bundle branch block, not present beforehand, due to acute retention causing vagal stimulation. After catheterisation and complete bladder emptying, the rhythm changes resolved completely over the next 24 hours (16).

The critical aspect of the present case was that, patient was an elderly female, where UR is reported less frequently, let alone causing a range of haemodynamic changes (12),(17),(18),(19). Age is a significant risk factor for acute retention, possibly due to deteriorating neural pathways and detrusor function with advancing age, increasing the chances of retention by 1.4 times for every 10 years (17). Another crucial risk factor for acute UR is perioperative fluid administration. Literature suggests various cut-off values for intraoperative fluid administration, but there is a general consensus that aggressive fluid management can lead to UR (12). Firstly, in present case elderly female patient had been fasting for nearly 10 hours from the point of care and was dehydrated. Therefore, authors opted not to restrict fluid therapy as dehydration in the elderly population is quite common, and undercorrection can lead to increased morbidity (20). Secondly, fluid maintenance was calculated according to the Holliday-Seger formula and administered fluids accordingly, considering hourly insensible losses as well.

Catheter blockage typically presents as suprapubic distension accompanied by lower abdominal discomfort, which was masked by the general anaesthesia in present case. Initially, there was a hypertensive response along with tachycardia. This can be explained by the vesico-vascular sympathetic vasoconstrictor response to overdistension, causing increased sympathetic outflow (21). The subsequent drop in blood pressure and later bradycardia and ectopics can be explained by the vasovagal reflex due to the parasympathetic response to overdistension (22). The pathophysiology is thoroughly discussed in (Table/Fig 3) (21),(22).

The discussion above highlights how a seemingly insignificant issue can trigger a range of cardiovascular morbidities intraoperatively if left unrecognised. Judicious fluid management, adequate analgesia, identification of risk factors with preoperative counselling are a few preventive measures that can be routinely implemented. The next step is to identify bladder overdistension, which can be accomplished either through the clinical method of palpating the bladder or newer modalities like ultrasonography. A bladder volume of 300-600 mL is a criterion for UR and indicates the need for catheterisation (12).
Conclusion
Unrecognised UR leading to acute overdistension can trigger significant cardiovascular morbidity in elderly females undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia. Haemodynamic changes can present as a variety of rhythm disturbances and sudden fluctuations in blood pressure. Risk factors for UR should be identified prior to any surgery to plan for catheterisation and intraoperative fluid management. It is a benign and completely reversible condition that can potentially be fatal if not addressed promptly. It can be easily prevented through continuous monitoring, early detection, and timely catheterisation, ensuring proper function and remaining vigilant if the collected urine amount is less than expected.
Reference
1.
Baldini G, Bagry H, Aprikian A, Carli F. Postoperative urinary retention: Anaesthetic and perioperative considerations. Anaesthesiology. 2009;110(5):1139-57.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
2.
Darrah DM, Griebling TL, Silverstein JH. Postoperative urinary retention. Anesthesiol Clin. 2009;27(3):465-84.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
3.
Sarasin SM, Walton MJ, Singh HP, Clark DI. Can a urinary tract symptom score predict the development of postoperative urinary retention in patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia: A prospective study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006;88(4):394-98.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
4.
Izard JP, Sowery RD, Jaeger MT, Siemens DR. Parameters affecting urologic complications after major joint replacement surgery. Can J Urol. 2006;13(3):3158-63.
5.
Balderi T, Mistraletti G, D’Angelo E, Carli F. Incidence of Postoperative Urinary Retention (POUR) after joint arthroplasty and management using ultrasound-guided bladder catheterisation. Minerva Anestesiol. 2011;77(11):1050-57.
6.
Ishikawa T, Sato J, Nishino T. Acute changes in bladder volume produce minimal cardio-respiratory responses in lightly anaesthetised humans. Can J Anaesth. 2000;47(8):786-91.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
7.
Klein JS, Jamgochian G, Thakar O, Singh A, Huntley S, Nicholson T, et al. Post-operative urinary dysfunction following shoulder surgery: Rates and risk factors. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2022;10(12):1020-25.
8.
David M, Arthur E, Dhuck R, Hemmings E, Dunlop D. High rates of postoperative urinary retention following primary total hip replacement performed under combined general and spinal anaesthesia with intrathecal opiate. J Orthop. 2015;12(Suppl 2):S157-60.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
9.
Hollman F, Wolterbeek N, Veen R. Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention in men undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2015;38(6):e507-11.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
10.
Mayo BC, Louie PK, Bohl DD, Massel DH, Iantorno SE, Ahn J, et al. Effects of intraoperative anaesthetic medications on postoperative urinary retention after single-level lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(18):1441-46.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
11.
Reed LA, Mihas AK, Fortin TA, Donley CJ, Pratheep G, Rajaram Manoharan S, et al. Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention following lumbar spine surgery: A review of current literature and meta-analysis. Global Spine J. 2023;13(6):1658-70.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
12.
Agrawal K, Majhi S, Garg R. Post-operative urinary retention: Review of literature. World J Anaesthesiol. 2019;8(1):01-12.   [CrossRef]
13.
Prakash S, Kale S, Mullick P, Gogia AR. Cardiovascular manifestations of perioperative acute urinary bladder over-distension. Indian J Anaesth. 2014;58(4):502-04.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
14.
Eggers GW Jr, Baker JJ. Ventricular tachycardia due to distention of the urinary bladder. Anesth Analg. 1969;48(6):963-67.   [CrossRef]
15.
Yamaguchi Y, Tsuchiya M, Akiba T, Yasuda M, Kiryu Y, Fuzishiro Y, et al. Action of autonomic nervous reflex arising from visceral organs upon the heart. Acta Neurovegetativa. 1966;28:224-33.   [CrossRef]
16.
Gkoufa K, Zarate-Lagunes M, Perrenoud JJ. A rare case of vagal syncope. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(6):1203-04.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
17.
Sung KH, Lee KM, Chung CY, Kwon SS, Lee SY, Ban YS, et al. What are the risk factors associated with urinary retention after orthopaedic surgery. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:613216.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
18.
Karani R, Mahdy A, Asghar F. Postoperative urinary retention in patients who undergo joint arthroplasty or spine surgery. JBJS Rev. 2020;8(7):e18.00040.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
19.
Being HY, Song SG, Lee JK. Predictors of postoperative urinary retention after semiclosed hemorrhoidectomy. Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(1):53-59.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
20.
Li S, Xiao X, Zhang X. Hydration status in older adults: Current knowledge and future challenges. Nutrients. 2023;15(11):2609.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
21.
Fagius J, Karhuvaara S. Sympathetic activity and blood pressure increases with bladder distension in humans. Hypertension. 1989;14(5):511-17.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
22.
Yamaguchi Y, Tsuchiya M, Akiba T, Yasuda M, Kiryu Y, Hagiwara T, et al. Nervous influences upon the heart due to overdistension of the urinary bladder: The relation of its mechanism to Vago-vagal reflex. Keio J Med. 1964:13:87-99.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
DOI and Others
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/70706.19607

Date of Submission: Mar 14, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Apr 16, 2024
Date of Acceptance: May 16, 2024
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 16, 2024
• Manual Googling: Apr 22, 2024
• iThenticate Software: May 15, 2024 (4%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6
JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com